As the dpm clock table is needed during DC HW initialization.
And that (DC HW initialization) comes before smu_late_init()
where current APU dpm clock table setup is performed. So, NULL
pointer dereference will be triggered. By moving APU dpm clock
table setup to smu_hw_init(), this can be avoided.

Fixes: 02cf91c1 ("drm/amd/powerplay: postpone operations not required for hw setup to late_init")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reported-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

It needs to use adev->pg_flags other than adev->cg_glags in
gfx_v10_cntl_power_gating
Signed-off-by: Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Remove the virtual_display warning in drm_crtc_vblank_off when
dev->num_crtcs is null.
Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily.Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Fixes: c7651b73 ("drm/amdgpu: Fix handling of KFD initialization failures")
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Make use of the new struct_size() helper instead of the offsetof() idiom.
Also, use kmalloc() instead of kcalloc().

v2: squash in kzalloc fix
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Make use of the new struct_size() helper instead of the offsetof() idiom.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_table, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7db0bc.7Xivn4K83f7XW0ug%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61df.jWrFfnjxGbjSkPOp%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a
one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the
size for the allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61e2.qiTVTyG2pVoG8bb0%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have been multiplied it by
sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it
should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.iT%2FQTjN+659XUDo5%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
ptable->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d36.6PStUZp2HRxAz7IM%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3c.TyfOhg%2FA6JycL6ZN%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_array, instead of a one-element array, and use the
struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433f.ZyMD+YUIVAwiHGVe%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Use a flexible-array member in struct vi_dpm_table instead of a
one-element array.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Enable Green_Sardine VCN support and VCN firmware loading

v2: use apu flags
Signed-off-by: Thong Thai <thong.thai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This patch enable green_sardine_asd.bin loading.

v2: use apu flags
Signed-off-by: Aaron Liu <aaron.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Initialize the SDMA IP for green_sardine.

v2: use apu flags
Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Enable the gfx base HW function of green_sardine.

v2: use apu flags
Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This patch adds common ip support for green_sardine.

v2: use apu flags, squash in CG/PG enablement
v3: rebase
Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This patch adds green_sardine support for gpu_info firmware and ip block setting.

v2: use apu flag
Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Will be used for Green_Sardine which is a new APU.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The default auto setting for kcq should not generate
a warning.

Fixes: a300de40 ("drm/amdgpu: introduce a new parameter to configure how many KCQ we want(v5)")
Reviewed-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We want to use the dev_* functions here rather than the pr_* variants.
Switch to using dev_warn() which mirrors what we do on other asics.

Fixes the following build errors on ARC:

../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/navi10_ppt.c: In function 'navi10_fill_i2c_req':
../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/sienna_cichlid_ppt.c: In function 'sienna_cichlid_fill_i2c_req':
../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Add xgmi perfmons for Arcturus.

v4: Align with patch 2 with struct improvements
v3: Align with patch 2 streamlining perf types versus event config types.
v2: Resend for re-review with alignment for v3 in patch 2.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com>
Tested-by: Chris Freehill <chris.freehill@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Non-outbound data metrics are non useful so mark them as legacy.
Bucket new perf counters into device and not device ip.
Bind events to chip instead of IP.
Report available event counters and not number of hw counter banks.
Move DF public macros to private since not needed outside of IP version.

v5: cleanup by moving per chip configs into structs

v4: After more discussion, replace *_LEGACY references with IP references
to indicate concept of pmu-typed versus event-config-typed event
registration.

v3: attr groups const array is global but attr groups are allocated per
device which doesn't work and causes problems on memory allocation and
de-allocation for pmu unregister. Switch to building const attr groups
per pmu instead to simplify solution.

v2: add comments on sysfs structure and formatting.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Mapping hw counters per event config will cause ABA problems so map per
event instead.

v2: Discontinue starting perf counters if add fails.  Make it clear what's
happening with pmc_start.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[Why]
DAL resume from BACO time is longer if we always flush inst_fb

[How]
Check if backdoor loading to flush inst_fb
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[Why]
When forcing 3D mode in DAL, we set the right address to be the same as the
left address. We need to do the same for the meta addresses.

[How]
Program right meta to be same as left meta.
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[WHY]
Currently construction of clock limits gets skipped for diags.
This logic would be useful to get tested in diags.

[HOW]
Copy existing states to clk_table such that update_bw_bounding_box
logic gets used to fill the table.
Signed-off-by: Sung Lee <sung.lee@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[Why]
On narrow range monitors without LFC, a margin prevents good utilization
of the available range.

[How]
Decrease the margin for exiting fixed mode and fix the frame counter to
reset if a non-consecutive render is found.
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This should be programmed with timing rather than with odm.
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[why]
HDCP 1.4 failed on SL8800 SW w/a test driver use.

[how]
Slow down the HW i2c speed when used by HW i2c.
This request: each acquired_i2c_engine setup the i2c speed needed
and sets the I2c engine for HDCP use at release_engine.

This covers SW using HW i2c engine and HDCP using HW i2c engine.
for dmcu using HW i2c engine, needs add similar logic in dmcu fw.
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Park <Chris.Park@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

[Why]
enable ODM on eDP panel with ABM will result in color difference
on the panel due to only one ABM module to set one pipe.

[How]
Block ABM in case of ODM enabled on eDP.
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Yang <eric.yang2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>