- 14 Sep, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Jan Kara authored
Currently we set the group's trimmed bit in ext4_trim_all_free() based on return value of ext4_try_to_trim_range(). However when we will want to abort trimming because of suspend attempt, we want to return success from ext4_try_to_trim_range() but not set the trimmed bit. Instead implementing awkward propagation of this information, just move setting of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range() when the whole group is trimmed. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913150504.9054-1-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Li Zetao authored
There is a memory leak reported by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xff11000105903b80 (size 64): comm "mount", pid 3382, jiffies 4295032021 (age 27.826s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffffae86ac40>] __kmalloc_node+0x50/0x160 [<ffffffffaf2486d8>] crypto_alloc_tfmmem.isra.0+0x38/0x110 [<ffffffffaf2498e5>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x85/0x2f0 [<ffffffffaf24a92c>] crypto_alloc_tfm_node+0xfc/0x210 [<ffffffffaedde777>] journal_init_common+0x727/0x1ad0 [<ffffffffaede1715>] jbd2_journal_init_inode+0x2b5/0x500 [<ffffffffaed786b5>] ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x255/0x2440 [<ffffffffaed8b423>] ext4_fill_super+0x8823/0xa330 ... The root cause was traced to an error handing path in journal_init_common() when malloc memory failed in register_shrinker(). The checksum driver is used to reference to checksum algorithm via cryptoapi and the user should release the memory when the driver is no longer needed or the journal initialization failed. Fix it by calling crypto_free_shash() on the "err_cleanup" error handing path in journal_init_common(). Fixes: c3071308 ("jbd2: move load_superblock() into journal_init_common()") Signed-off-by:Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911025138.983101-1-lizetao1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 07 Sep, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) authored
jbd2_alloc() allocates a buffer from slab when the block size is smaller than PAGE_SIZE, and slab may be using a compound page. Before commit 8147c4c4, we set b_page to the precise page containing the buffer and this code worked well. Now we set b_page to the head page of the allocation, so we can no longer use offset_in_page(). While we could do a 1:1 replacement with offset_in_folio(), use the more idiomatic bh_offset() and the folio APIs to map the buffer. This isn't enough to support a b_size larger than PAGE_SIZE on HIGHMEM machines, but this is good enough to fix the actual bug we're seeing. Fixes: 8147c4c4 ("jbd2: use a folio in jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer()") Reported-by:
Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
If the buffer pointed to by the buffer_head is part of a compound page, bh_offset() assumes that b_page is the precise page that contains the data. A recent change to jbd2 inadvertently violated that assumption. By using page_size(), we support both b_page being set to the head page (as page_size() will return the size of the entire folio) and the precise page (as it will return PAGE_SIZE for a tail page). Fixes: 8147c4c4 ("jbd2: use a folio in jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer()") Reported-by:
-
- 27 Aug, 2023 17 commits
-
-
Baokun Li authored
Yikebaer reported an issue: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888112ecc1a4 by task syz-executor/8438 CPU: 1 PID: 8438 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.5.0-rc5 #1 Call Trace: [...] kasan_report+0xba/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588 ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894 ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680 ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462 ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline] ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721 [...] Allocated by task 8438: [...] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:693 [inline] __es_alloc_extent fs/ext4/extents_status.c:469 [inline] ext4_es_insert_extent+0x672/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:873 ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680 ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462 ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline] ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721 [...] Freed by task 8438: [...] kmem_cache_free+0xec/0x490 mm/slub.c:3823 ext4_es_try_to_merge_right fs/ext4/extents_status.c:593 [inline] __es_insert_extent+0x9f4/0x1440 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:802 ext4_es_insert_extent+0x2ca/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:882 ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680 ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462 ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline] ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721 [...] ================================================================== The flow of issue triggering is as follows: 1. remove es raw es es removed es1 |-------------------| -> |----|.......|------| 2. insert es es insert es1 merge with es es1 merge with es and free es1 |----|.......|------| -> |------------|------| -> |-------------------| es merges with newes, then merges with es1, frees es1, then determines if es1->es_len is 0 and triggers a UAF. The code flow is as follows: ext4_es_insert_extent es1 = __es_alloc_extent(true); es2 = __es_alloc_extent(true); __es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, NULL, es1) __es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es1) ---> insert es1 to es tree __es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es2) ext4_es_try_to_merge_right ext4_es_free_extent(inode, es1) ---> es1 is freed if (es1 && !es1->es_len) // Trigger UAF by determining if es1 is used. We determine whether es1 or es2 is used immediately after calling __es_remove_extent() or __es_insert_extent() to avoid triggering a UAF if es1 or es2 is freed. Reported-by:Yikebaer Aizezi <yikebaer61@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALcu4raD4h9coiyEBL4Bm0zjDwxC2CyPiTwsP3zFuhot6y9Beg@mail.gmail.com Fixes: 2a69c450 ("ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_extent()") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Eric Biggers authored
Now that neither ext4 nor f2fs allows inodes with the casefold flag to be instantiated when unsupported, it's unnecessary to repeatedly check for support later on during random filesystem operations. Signed-off-by:
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814182903.37267-4-ebiggers@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Eric Biggers authored
Now that ext4 does not allow inodes with the casefold flag to be instantiated when unsupported, it's unnecessary to repeatedly check for support later on during random filesystem operations. Signed-off-by:
-
Eric Biggers authored
It is invalid for the casefold inode flag to be set without the casefold superblock feature flag also being set. e2fsck already considers this case to be invalid and handles it by offering to clear the casefold flag on the inode. __ext4_iget() also already considered this to be invalid, sort of, but it only got so far as logging an error message; it didn't actually reject the inode. Make it reject the inode so that other code doesn't have to handle this case. This matches what f2fs does. Note: we could check 's_encoding != NULL' instead of ext4_has_feature_casefold(). This would make the check robust against the casefold feature being enabled by userspace writing to the page cache of the mounted block device. However, it's unsolvable in general for filesystems to be robust against concurrent writes to the page cache of the mounted block device. Though this very particular scenario involving the casefold feature is solvable, we should not pretend that we can support this model, so let's just check the casefold feature. tune2fs already forbids enabling casefold on a mounted filesystem. Signed-off-by:
-
Ruan Jinjie authored
Use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head instead of open-coding it. Signed-off-by:
Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812071839.3481909-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liu Song authored
In the delalloc append write scenario, if inode's i_size is extended due to buffer write, there are delalloc writes pending in the range up to i_size, and no need to touch i_disksize since writeback will push i_disksize up to i_size eventually. Offers significant performance improvement in high-frequency append write scenarios. I conducted tests in my 32-core environment by launching 32 concurrent threads to append write to the same file. Each write operation had a length of 1024 bytes and was repeated 100000 times. Without using this patch, the test was completed in 7705 ms. However, with this patch, the test was completed in 5066 ms, resulting in a performance improvement of 34%. Moreover, in test scenarios of Kafka version 2.6.2, using packet size of 2K, with this patch resulted in a 10% performance improvement. Signed-off-by:
Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by:
-
Theodore Ts'o authored
The most common use that s_error_work will get scheduled is now the periodic update of the superblock. So rename it to s_sb_upd_work. Also rename the function flush_stashed_error_work() to update_super_work(). Signed-off-by: -
Vitaliy Kuznetsov authored
This patch introduces a mechanism to periodically check and update the superblock within the ext4 file system. The main purpose of this patch is to keep the disk superblock up to date. The update will be performed if more than one hour has passed since the last update, and if more than 16MB of data have been written to disk. This check and update is performed within the ext4_journal_commit_callback function, ensuring that the superblock is written while the disk is active, rather than based on a timer that may trigger during disk idle periods. Discussion https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg85865.htmlSigned-off-by:
Vitaliy Kuznetsov <vk.en.mail@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810143852.40228-1-vk.en.mail@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
The commit referenced below opened up concurrent unaligned dio under shared locking for pure overwrites. In doing so, it enabled use of the IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY flag and added a warning on unexpected -EAGAIN returns as an extra precaution, since ext4 does not retry writes in such cases. The flag itself is advisory in this case since ext4 checks for unaligned I/Os and uses appropriate locking up front, rather than on a retry in response to -EAGAIN. As it turns out, the warning check is susceptible to false positives because there are scenarios where -EAGAIN can be expected from lower layers without necessarily having IOCB_NOWAIT set on the iocb. For example, one instance of the warning has been seen where io_uring sets IOCB_HIPRI, which in turn results in REQ_POLLED|REQ_NOWAIT on the bio. This results in -EAGAIN if the block layer is unable to allocate a request, etc. [Note that there is an outstanding patch to untangle REQ_POLLED and REQ_NOWAIT such that the latter relies on IOCB_NOWAIT, which would also address this instance of the warning.] Another instance of the warning has been reproduced by syzbot. A dio write is interrupted down in __get_user_pages_locked() waiting on the mm lock and returns -EAGAIN up the stack. If the iomap dio iteration layer has made no progress on the write to this point, -EAGAIN returns up to the filesystem and triggers the warning. This use of the overwrite flag in ext4 is precautionary and half-baked. I.e., ext4 doesn't actually implement overwrite checking in the iomap callbacks when the flag is set, so the only extra verification it provides are i_size checks in the generic iomap dio layer. Combined with the tendency for false positives, the added verification is not worth the extra trouble. Remove the flag, associated warning, and update the comments to document when concurrent unaligned dio writes are allowed and why said flag is not used. Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+5050ad0fb47527b1808a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by:
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Fixes: 310ee090 ("ext4: allow concurrent unaligned dio overwrites") Signed-off-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Wang Jianjian authored
When setup_system_zone, flex_bg is not initialized so it is always 1. Use a new helper function, ext4_num_base_meta_blocks() which does not depend on sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex being initialized. [ Squashed two patches in the Link URL's below together into a single commit, which is simpler to review/understand. Also fix checkpatch warnings. --TYT ] Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian0@foxmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_21AF0D446A9916ED5C51492CC6C9A0A77B05@qq.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_D744D1450CC169AEA77FCF0A64719909ED05@qq.comSigned-off-by:
-
Cai Xinchen authored
These functions do not have its function implementation. So those function declaration is useless. Remove these Signed-off-by:
Cai Xinchen <caixinchen1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802030025.173148-1-caixinchen1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Su Hui authored
clang's static analysis warning: fs/ext4/mballoc.c line 4178, column 6, Branch condition evaluates to a garbage value. err is uninitialized and will be judged when 'len <= 0' or it first enters the loop while the condition "!ext4_sb_block_valid()" is true. Although this can't make problems now, it's better to correct it. Signed-off-by:
Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com> Reviewed-by:
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725043310.1227621-1-suhui@nfschina.comSigned-off-by:
-
Lu Hongfei authored
Signed-off-by:
Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@vivo.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707115907.26637-1-luhongfei@vivo.comSigned-off-by:
-
Lu Hongfei authored
The return value type of i_blocksize() is 'unsigned int', so the type of blocksize has been modified from 'int' to 'unsigned int' to ensure data type consistency. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhihao Cheng authored
Running generic/475(filesystem consistent tests after power cut) could easily trigger unattached inode error while doing fsck: Unattached zero-length inode 39405. Clear? no Unattached inode 39405 Connect to /lost+found? no Above inconsistence is caused by following process: P1 P2 ext4_create inode = ext4_new_inode_start_handle // itable records nlink=1 ext4_add_nondir err = ext4_add_entry // ENOSPC ext4_append ext4_bread ext4_getblk ext4_map_blocks // returns ENOSPC drop_nlink(inode) // won't be updated into disk inode ext4_orphan_add(handle, inode) ext4_orphan_file_add ext4_journal_stop(handle) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction // commit success >> power cut << ext4_fill_super ext4_load_and_init_journal // itable records nlink=1 ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_process_orphan if (inode->i_nlink) // true, inode won't be deleted Then, allocated inode will be reserved on disk and corresponds to no dentries, so e2fsck reports 'unattached inode' problem. The problem won't happen if orphan file feature is disabled, because ext4_orphan_add() will update disk inode in orphan list mode. There are several places not updating disk inode while putting inode into orphan area, such as ext4_add_nondir(), ext4_symlink() and whiteout in ext4_rename(). Fix it by updating inode into disk in all error branches of these places. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217605 Fixes: 02f310fc ("ext4: Speedup ext4 orphan inode handling") Signed-off-by:Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
We got a filesystem inconsistency issue below while running generic/475 I/O failure pressure test with fast_commit feature enabled. Symlink /p3/d3/d1c/d6c/dd6/dce/l101 (inode #132605) is invalid. If fast_commit feature is enabled, a special fast_commit journal area is appended to the end of the normal journal area. The journal->j_last point to the first unused block behind the normal journal area instead of the whole log area, and the journal->j_fc_last point to the first unused block behind the fast_commit journal area. While doing journal recovery, do_one_pass(PASS_SCAN) should first scan the normal journal area and turn around to the first block once it meet journal->j_last, but the wrap() macro misuse the journal->j_fc_last, so the recovering could not read the next magic block (commit block perhaps) and would end early mistakenly and missing tN and every transaction after it in the following example. Finally, it could lead to filesystem inconsistency. | normal journal area | fast commit area | +-------------------------------------------------+------------------+ | tN(rere) | tN+1 |~| tN-x |...| tN-1 | tN(front) | .... | +-------------------------------------------------+------------------+ / / / start journal->j_last journal->j_fc_last This patch fix it by use the correct ending journal->j_last. Fixes: 5b849b5f ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path") Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: -
Zhang Yi authored
ext4_get_journal() and ext4_get_dev_journal() return NULL if they failed to init journal, making them return proper error value instead, also rename them to ext4_open_{inode,dev}_journal(). [ Folded fix to ext4_calculate_overhead() to check for an ERR_PTR instead of NULL. ] Signed-off-by:
-
- 23 Aug, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Zhang Yi authored
Factor out a new helper form ext4_get_dev_journal() to get external journal bdev and check validation of this device, drop ext4_blkdev_get() helper, and also remove duplicate check of journal feature. It makes ext4_get_dev_journal() more clear than before. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
Current jbd2_journal_init_{dev,inode} return NULL if some error happens, make them to pass out proper error return value. [ Fix from Yang Yingliang folded in. ] Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Aug, 2023 9 commits
-
-
Zhang Yi authored
no_recovery is redundant, just drop it. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
Adjust the initialization sequence and error handle of journal_t, moving load superblock to the begin, and classify others initialization. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
If JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FAST_COMMIT bit is set, it means the journal have fast commit records need to recover, so the fast commit size should not be too large, and the leftover normal journal size should never less than JBD2_MIN_JOURNAL_BLOCKS. If it happens, the journal->j_last is likely to be wrong and will probably lead to incorrect journal recovery. So add a check into the journal_check_superblock(), and drop the pointless check when initializing the fastcommit parameters. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
Rename load_superblock() to journal_load_superblock(), move getting and reading superblock from journal_init_common() and journal_get_superblock() to this function, and also rename journal_get_superblock() to journal_check_superblock(), make it a pure check helper to check superblock validity from disk. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
jbd2_verify_csum_type() helper check checksum type in the superblock for v2 or v3 checksum feature, it always return true if these features are not enabled, and it has only one user, so open code it is more clear. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
journal_get_superblock() is used to check validity of the jounal supberblock, so move the features checks from jbd2_journal_load() to journal_get_superblock(). Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
Since load_superblock() has been moved to journal_init_common(), the in-memory superblock structure is initialized and contains valid data once the file system has a journal_t object, so it's safe to access it, let's drop the call to journal_get_superblock() from jbd2_journal_check_used_features() and also drop the setting/clearing of the veirfy bit of the superblock buffer. Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
Move the call to load_superblock() from jbd2_journal_load() and jbd2_journal_wipe() early into journal_init_common(), the journal superblock gets read and the in-memory journal_t structure gets initialised after calling jbd2_journal_init_{dev,inode}, it's safe to do following initialization according to it. Signed-off-by: -
Zhang Yi authored
Move load_superblock() declaration and the functions it calls before journal_init_common(). This is a preparation for moving a call to load_superblock() from jbd2_journal_load() and jbd2_journal_wipe() to journal_init_common(). No functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
- 05 Aug, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Ritesh Harjani authored
Using CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN only make sense for regular files, as for non-regular files we never normalize the allocation request length i.e. goal len is same as original length (ac_g_ex.fe_len == ac_o_ex.fe_len). Hence there is no scope of trimming the goal length to make it satisfy original request len. Thus this patch avoids using CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN criteria for non-regular files request. Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: 33122aa930f1 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") Reported-by:Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Jianjian authored
Since commit f7f497cb ("jbd2: kill t_handle_lock transaction spinlock"), this lock has been no use. Fixes: f7f497cb ("jbd2: kill t_handle_lock transaction spinlock") Signed-off-by:
-
Luís Henriques authored
If the filename casefolding fails, we'll be leaking memory from the fscrypt_name struct, namely from the 'crypto_buf.name' member. Make sure we free it in the error path on both ext4_fname_setup_filename() and ext4_fname_prepare_lookup() functions. Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: 1ae98e29 ("ext4: optimize match for casefolded encrypted dirs") Signed-off-by:
Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> Reviewed-by:
-
- 04 Aug, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Yang Li authored
The code calling function '__cp_buffer_busy' has been removed, so the function should also be removed. silence the warning: fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:48:20: warning: unused function '__cp_buffer_busy' Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5518Signed-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Zhihao Cheng authored
Following process will corrupt ext4 image: Step 1: jbd2_journal_commit_transaction __jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction) // Put jh into trans1->t_checkpoint_list journal->j_checkpoint_transactions = commit_transaction // Put trans1 into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions Step 2: do_get_write_access test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty，set jbd dirty __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction) // jh belongs to trans2 Step 3: drop_cache journal_shrink_one_cp_list jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) // lock bh, true if (buffer_dirty(bh)) // buffer is not dirty __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh) // remove jh from trans1->t_checkpoint_list Step 4: jbd2_log_do_checkpoint trans1 = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions // jh is not in trans1->t_checkpoint_list jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal) // trans1 is done Step 5: Power cut, trans2 is not committed, jh is lost in next mounting. Fix it by checking 'jh->b_transaction' before remove it from checkpoint. Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: 46f881b5 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy") Signed-off-by:
-
Zhang Yi authored
journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests below. Test cmd: ./fs_mark -d scratch -s 1024 -n 10000 -t 1 -D 100 -N 100 Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 95 10000 1024 8304.9 49033 After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 95 10000 1024 7649.0 50012 FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 95 10000 1024 2107.1 50871 After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~ 100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+. After this fix: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 95 10000 1024 8558.4 49109 Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: b98dba27 ("jbd2: remove journal_clean_one_cp_list()") Signed-off-by:
-
- 03 Aug, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We named criteria with CR_XXX, correct stale comment to criteria with raw number. Signed-off-by:
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good group is found after loop. Signed-off-by:
-
