This commit implements the runtime PM operations to disable eMMC card clock
when idle.
Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822195929.168552-2-limings@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

This commit adds handling in dwcmshc_resume() for different error
cases.
Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822195929.168552-1-limings@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Errata ERR010450 only shows up if voltage is 1.8V, but if the device is
supplied by 3v3 the errata can be ignored. So let's check for if quirk
SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V is defined or not before limiting the frequency.

Cc: Jim Reinhart <jimr@tekvox.com>
Cc: James Autry <jautry@tekvox.com>
Cc: Matthew Maron <matthewm@tekvox.com>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
Acked-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811214853.8623-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Now that sdhci_pltfm_unregister() has been removed, rename
sdhci_pltfm_register() to sdhci_pltfm_init_and_add_host() to better
reflect what it does.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-17-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Now that sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is unused, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-16-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-15-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-14-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-13-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-12-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-11-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-10-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-9-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-8-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-7-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-6-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-5-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() so that
devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() can be used for pltfm_host->clk.

This has the side effect that the order of operations on the error path
and remove path is not the same as it was before, but should be safe
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-4-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Use sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead of sdhci_pltfm_unregister() because
sdhci_pltfm_unregister() is going to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-3-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Add sdhci_pltfm_remove() to replace sdhci_pltfm_unregister().
The difference is that sdhci_pltfm_remove() does not do:
	clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
which allows drivers to choose to use devm_clk_get_enabled() or
similar, for pltfm_host->clk.

Once all drivers using sdhci_pltfm_unregister() have been amended to use
sdhci_pltfm_remove() instead, sdhci_pltfm_unregister() will be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811130351.7038-2-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-61-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Merge the mmc fixes for v6.5-rc[n] into the next branch, to allow them to
get tested together with the new mmc changes that are targeted for v6.6.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The order of function calls in sdhci_f_sdh30_remove is wrong,
let's call sdhci_pltfm_unregister first.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Fixes: 5def5c1c ("mmc: sdhci-f-sdh30: Replace with sdhci_pltfm")
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-62-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-60-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Returning an error code in a platform driver's remove function is wrong
most of the time and there is an effort to make the callback return
void. To prepare this rework the function not to exit early.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-59-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-58-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> # Broadcom
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-57-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-56-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-55-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-54-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-53-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-52-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-51-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-50-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-49-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@timesys.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-48-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-47-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-46-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-45-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-44-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-43-frank.li@vivo.comSigned-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>