- 09 Jun, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra super clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-65-971d5077e7d2@cerno.techSigned-off-by:
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra periph clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The STM32 composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The ST Flexgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Spreadtrum composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Ingenic TCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Ingenic CGU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The iMX SCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. The round_rate() implementation being shared with other clocks, it's not removed. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The TI DA8xx USB0 clk48 clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Acked-by:
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The SI5351 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The SI5351 msynth clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The SI5351 PLL clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The SI5341 output clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The cdce706 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The cdce706 divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The AXI clkgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Atmel SAM9x5 SMD clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Actions composite factor clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Actions composite divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the parent. However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not. Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on. Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The tlv320aic32x4 clkin clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Allwinner sun6i RTC clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by:
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The TI J721e Wiz clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems unlikely. Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The TI AM654 SerDes clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems unlikely. Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Cadence Torrent refclk clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems unlikely. Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Cadence Sierra PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems unlikely. Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra sor pad clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Versatile sp810 "timerclken" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. This mismatch is probably due to the fact that the driver introduction predates the determine_rate introduction, and it was never revised since then. The default, implicit, behaviour that has been in use so far has thus been to simply keep using the current parent in all cases. This is also the behaviour of the new clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper, so we can simply use it to make our expectation explicit. Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by:
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The UX500 sysctrl "set_parent" clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Acked-by:
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The UX500 PRCMU "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The PRCMU binding also allows to specify the default clock parent through a device tree cell. This will be enforced at prepare time by the driver. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. The result is that the driver relies on prepare to set the default parent, and thus the set_parent hook is effectively unused by design. We can make that decision explicit by setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() that will keep the same behaviour. Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Acked-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra periph nodiv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra super mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Tegra BPMP mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The STM32 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems unlikely. Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The SoCFGPA gate clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Renesas r9a06g032 bitselect clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by:
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The PXA "CKEN" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The Mediatek cpumux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The iMX SCU mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The iMX fixup mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The iMX busy clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
