- 29 May, 2023 7 commits
-
-
Heikki Krogerus authored
Removing the "svid" and "accessory" device property checks. Those properties are not supported on any platform. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230522215348.uoyboow26n2o3tel@ripper/Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526131434.46920-2-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Min-Hua Chen authored
hdr->opcode is __le32 type, use le32_to_cpu() to cast opcode to integer in the switch..case statement to fix the following sparse warnings: drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c:248:20: sparse: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c:248:20: sparse: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c:248:20: sparse: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer No functional change. Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230523162314.114274-1-minhuadotchen@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Mario Limonciello authored
power_supply_is_system_supplied() checks whether any power supplies are present that aren't batteries to decide whether the system is running on DC or AC. Downstream drivers use this to make performance decisions. Navi dGPUs include an UCSI function that has been exported since commit 17631e8c ("i2c: designware: Add driver support for AMD NAVI GPU"). This UCSI function registers a power supply since commit 992a60ed ("usb: typec: ucsi: register with power_supply class") but this is not a system power supply. As the power supply for a dGPU is only for powering devices connected to dGPU, create a device property to indicate that the UCSI endpoint is only for the scope of `POWER_SUPPLY_SCOPE_DEVICE`. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230516182541.5836-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com/Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Tested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230518161150.92959-1-mario.limonciello@amd.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Vladislav Efanov authored
Function dwc3_qcom_probe() allocates memory for resource structure which is pointed by parent_res pointer. This memory is not freed. This leads to memory leak. Use stack memory to prevent memory leak. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: 2bc02355 ("usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support for booting with ACPI") Signed-off-by: Vladislav Efanov <VEfanov@ispras.ru> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517172518.442591-1-VEfanov@ispras.ruSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Tom Rix authored
smatch reports drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c:323:29: warning: symbol 'pm8150b_typec_res' was not declared. Should it be static? This variable is only used in its defining file, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515114043.3452010-1-trix@redhat.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 uses more and stricter checks. This is what e.g. Debian recommends to build packages with. While at it fix a typo in the output of ./configure --help. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> Reviewed-By: Hongren Zheng <i@zenithal.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230503173622.1072787-1-ukleinek@debian.orgSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Galen Guyer authored
Suggest loading vhdi_hcd if it's not loaded to make error message less opaque Signed-off-by: Galen Guyer <galen@galenguyer.com> Reviewed-By: Hongren Zheng <i@zenithal.me> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230508212120.435329-1-galen@galenguyer.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 May, 2023 33 commits
-
-
Roger Quadros authored
The merge of 6.4-rc4 got the changes in drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c completely incorrect, so fix it up properly. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f604f836-7858-6140-4ec1-9ba95cba6991@kernel.org Fixes: 7e530d32 ("Merge 6.4-rc4 into usb-next") Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
We need the USB fixes in here and this resolves merge conflicts in: drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tipLinus Torvalds authored
Pull x86 cpu fix from Thomas Gleixner: "A single fix for x86: - Prevent a bogus setting for the number of HT siblings, which is caused by the CPUID evaluation trainwreck of X86. That recomputes the value for each CPU, so the last CPU "wins". That can cause completely bogus sibling values" * tag 'x86-urgent-2023-05-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/topology: Fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platforms
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-98-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-97-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-96-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-95-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-94-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-92-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-91-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-90-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-89-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-88-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-87-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-86-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tipLinus Torvalds authored
Pull perf fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "A small set of perf fixes: - Make the MSR-readout based CHA discovery work around broken discovery tables in some SPR firmwares. - Prevent saving PEBS configuration which has software bits set that cause a crash when restored into the relevant MSR" * tag 'perf-urgent-2023-05-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: perf/x86/uncore: Correct the number of CHAs on SPR perf/x86/intel: Save/restore cpuc->active_pebs_data_cfg when using guest PEBS
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-81-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-80-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-79-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-78-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-77-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-76-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-75-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-74-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-73-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-72-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-71-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-70-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-69-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-68-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-67-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-66-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-