1. 16 Jul, 2013 11 commits
    • Damien Lespiau's avatar
      drm/i915: We implement WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue on ilk and snb · 4bb35334
      Damien Lespiau authored
      v2: Put the comment a bit closer to the actual write (Paulo Zanoni)
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      [danvet: Fix space before tab.]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4bb35334
    • Damien Lespiau's avatar
      drm/i915: We implement WaFbcWaitForVBlankBeforeEnable for ilk and snb · 7457d617
      Damien Lespiau authored
      We also wait for that blank on other platforms but the w/a doesn't
      apply there. Not an issue at all.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7457d617
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: simplify rps interrupt enabling/disabling sequence · a0b3335a
      Daniel Vetter authored
      At the moment we have the following interrupt enabling sequence:
      1. irq preinstall hook
      2. enabling the interrupt handler and calling irq postinstall hook
      3. enable rps interrupts from the async work
      
      And the folliwing disable sequence:
      1. disabling the interrupt handler and calling the uninstall hook
      2. disabling the rps interrupt
      
      Since the postinstall hook now always sets up PMIIR, PMIER and PMIMR
      to known-good states there no way for an interrupt to sneak in in the
      enable sequence, so we can reinstate the WARN lost in
      
      commit eda63ffb
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:26 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Add PM regs to pre/post install
      
      Note that there's some room for future cleanups since most of the
      interrupt register clearing in the disable function is rather
      redundant. But that's better done in follow-up patches, if at all.
      
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a0b3335a
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: extract rps interrupt enable/disable helpers · 44fc7d5c
      Daniel Vetter authored
      The VECS enabling required some changes to how rps interrupts are
      enabled/disabled since VECS interrupts are handling with the PM
      interrupt registers.
      
      But now that the pre/postinstall sequences is identical for all
      platforms with rps support (snb, ivb, hsw, vlv) we can also use the
      exact same sequence to actually enable the rps interrupts. Strictly
      speaking using spinlocks is overkill on snb/ivb & vlv since they have
      no VECS ring, but imo that's more than made up by the common code.
      
      Hence this just unifies the vlv code with the snb-hsw code which
      matched exactly before the VECS enabling. See
      
      commit eda63ffb
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:26 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Add PM regs to pre/post install
      
      and
      
      commit 4848405c
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:27 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: make PM interrupt writes non-destructive
      
      for why the gen6 code (shared between snb, ivb and hsw) needed to be
      changed originally.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      44fc7d5c
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: unify GT/PM irq postinstall code · 0a9a8c91
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Again extract a common helper. For the postinstall hook things are a
      bit more complicated since we have more cases on ilk-hsw/vlv here.
      
      But since vlv was clearly broken by failing to initialize
      dev_priv->gt_irq_mask correctly the shared code is clearly justified.
      
      Also kill the PMIER setting in the async rps enable work. I should
      have been save, but also clearly looked rather fragile. PMIER setup is
      now all down in the irq pre/postinstall hooks.
      
      With this we now have the usual interrupt register sequence for GT/PM
      irq registers:
      
      - IER is setup once with all the interrupts we ever need in the
        postinstall hook and never touched again. Exceptions are SDEIER,
        which is touched in the preinstall hook (when the irq handler isn't
        enabled) and then only from the irq handler. And DEIER/VLV_IER with
        is used in the irq handler but also written to once in the
        postinstall hook. But since that write is essentially what enables
        the interrupt and we should always have MSI interrupts we should be
        save. In case we ever have non-MSI interrupts we'd be screwed.
      
      - IIR is cleared in the postinstall hook before we enable/unmask the
        respective interrupt sources. Hence we can't steal an interrupt
        event an accidentally trigger the spurious interrupt logic in the
        core kernel. Note that after some discussion with Ben Widawsky we
        think that we actually should clear the IIR registers in the
        preinstall hook. But doing that is a much larger patch series.
      
      - IMR regs are (usually) all masked off. Those are the only regs
        changed at runtime, which is all protected by dev_priv->irq_lock.
      
      This unification also kills the cargo-culted read-modify-write PM
      register setup for VECS. Interrupt setup is done without userspace
      being able to interfere, so we better know what values we want to put
      into those registers. RMW cycles otoh are really good at papering over
      races, until stuff magically blows up and no one has a clue why.
      
      v2: Touch the gen6+ PM interrupt registers only on gen6+.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: Add a comment to explain why the l3 parity interrupt is
      special.]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0a9a8c91
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: unify PM interrupt preinstall sequence · d18ea1b5
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Since the addition of VECS we have a slightly different enable
      sequence for PM interrupts on ivb/hsw vs snb and vlv. Usually that
      will end up in hard to track down surprises.
      
      Hence unifiy things and since we have copies of this code in 3 places
      now, extract it into its own little helper.
      
      Note that this changes the irq preinstall sequence a bit for snb and
      vlv: We now also clear the PM registers in the preinstall hook, in
      addition to the PM register clearing/setup already done when actually
      enabling rps. So this doesn't fix a bug but simply unifies the code
      across all platforms. After the postinstall hook is similarly unified
      we can rip out the then redundant PM interrupt setup from the rps
      code.
      
      v3: Rebase on top of the retained double-GTIIR clearing. Also
      resurrect the masking/disabling of the gen6+ PM interrupts as spotted
      by Ben Widaswky.
      
      v4: Move the DE interrupt reset code out of gen5_gt_irq_preinstall
      back to ironlake_irq_preinstall where it really belongs. Spotted by
      Paulo.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: s/GT/PM/ to fix up a comment which Ben spotted while
      reviewing.]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d18ea1b5
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC · 63573eb7
      Ben Widawsky authored
      To make users life a little easier figuring out what they have on their
      system.
      
      Ideally, I'd really like to report LLC size, but it turned out to be a
      bit of a pain. Maybe I'll revisit it in the future.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      63573eb7
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: Use eLLC/LLC by default when available · 4d15c145
      Ben Widawsky authored
      DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming
      cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve
      performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a
      problem elsewhere.
      
      In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from
      this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not
      using it is the special case for MOCS.
      
      References: http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf (page 57)
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4d15c145
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: store eLLC size · 59124506
      Ben Widawsky authored
      The eLLC cannot be determined by PCIID because as far as we know, even
      machines supporting eLLC may not have it enabled, or fused off or
      whatever. It's possible this isn't actually true, and at that point we
      can switch to a DEV_INFO flag instead.
      
      I've defined everything where the docs are clear, and left the rest as
      magic.
      
      But we need it before we set the pte_encode function pointers, which
      happens really early, in gtt_init.
      
      The problem with just doing the normal sequence earlier is we don't have
      the ability to use forcewake until after the pte functions have been set
      up.
      
      Since all solutions are somewhat ugly (barring rewriting all the init
      ordering), I've opted to do the detection really early, and the enabling
      later - since the register to detect doesn't require forcewake.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: Move dev_priv->ellc_size away from the dri1 dungeon to a nice
      place right next to the l3 parity stuff. Also squash in the follow-up
      commit to read out the eLLC size a bit earlier.]
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59124506
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: Define some of the eLLC magic · 05e21cc4
      Ben Widawsky authored
      The EDRAM present register isn't really defined in the docs. It just
      says check to see if it's set to 1. So I haven't defined the 1 value not
      knowing what it actually means.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      05e21cc4
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings. · 0d8ff15e
      Ben Widawsky authored
      The cacheability controls have changed, and the bits have been
      rearranged in general.
      
      Note that age 0 is the oldest (most likely to get evicted) and age 3
      is the youngest (most likely to stick around for a bit). We've picked
      0 for no reason, but atm it shouldn't matter anyway (since we don't
      yet try to differentiate between different objects).
      
      v2: Remove comments for snb/ivb cache leves, that's a separate change.
      
      v3: Resolve conflicts due to patch series reordering.
      
      v4: Rebased on top of Kenneth Graunke's ->pte_encode refactoring.
      
      v5: Removed eLLC bits for separate patch.
      
      In the internal repository this was:
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      [danvet: Add comment about cache ages as requested by Ben provoked due
      to a question from Damien.]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0d8ff15e
  2. 12 Jul, 2013 5 commits
  3. 11 Jul, 2013 11 commits
    • Damien Lespiau's avatar
      drm/i915: Use for_each_pipe() when possible · 08e2a7de
      Damien Lespiau authored
      Came accross two open coding of for_each_pipe(), might as well use the
      macro.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      08e2a7de
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: don't enable PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT · c0d6a3dd
      Daniel Vetter authored
      The code to handle it is broken - there's simply no code to clear CS
      parser errors on gen5+. And behold, for all the other rings we also
      don't enable it!
      
      Leave the handling code itself in place just to be consistent with the
      existing mess though. And in case someone feels like fixing it all up.
      
      This has been errornously enabled in
      
      commit 12638c57
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:31 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Enable vebox interrupts
      
      Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c0d6a3dd
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: unify ring irq refcounts (again) · c7113cc3
      Daniel Vetter authored
      With the simplified locking there's no reason any more to keep the
      refcounts seperate.
      
      v2: Readd the lost comment that ring->irq_refcount is protected by
      dev_priv->irq_lock.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7113cc3
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: kill dev_priv->rps.lock · 59cdb63d
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Now that the rps interrupt locking isn't clearly separated (at elast
      conceptually) from all the other interrupt locking having a different
      lock stopped making sense: It protects much more than just the rps
      workqueue it started out with. But with the addition of VECS the
      separation started to blurr and resulted in some more complex locking
      for the ring interrupt refcount.
      
      With this we can (again) unifiy the ringbuffer irq refcounts without
      causing a massive confusion, but that's for the next patch.
      
      v2: Explain better why the rps.lock once made sense and why no longer,
      requested by Ben.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59cdb63d
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: queue work outside spinlock in hsw_pm_irq_handler · 2adbee62
      Daniel Vetter authored
      And kill the comment about it. Queueing work is a barrier type event,
      no amount of locking will help in ordering things (as long as we queue
      the work after having updated all relevant data structures). Also, the
      queue_work works itself as a sufficient memory barrier.
      
      Again on the surface this is just a tiny micro-optimization to reduce
      the hold-time of dev_priv->irq_lock. But the better reason is that it
      reduces superficial locking and so makes it clearer what we actually
      need for correctness.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      2adbee62
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: streamline hsw_pm_irq_handler · 41a05a3a
      Daniel Vetter authored
      The if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) check was redunandant. Otoh
      adding a check for rps events allows us to avoid the spinlock grabbing
      for VECS interrupts.
      
      v2: Drop misplaced hunk which now moved to the right patch.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      41a05a3a
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: irq handlers don't need interrupt-safe spinlocks · d0ecd7e2
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Since we only have one interrupt handler and interrupt handlers are
      non-reentrant.
      
      To drive the point really home give them all an _irq_handler suffix.
      
      This is a tiny micro-optimization but even more important it makes it
      clearer what locking we actually need. And in case someone screws this
      up: lockdep will catch hardirq vs. other context deadlocks.
      
      v2: Fix up compile fail.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d0ecd7e2
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: kill lpt pch transcoder->crtc mapping code for fifo underruns · de28075d
      Daniel Vetter authored
      It's racy: There's no guarantee that we won't walk this code (due to a
      pch fifo underrun interrupt) while someone is changing the pointers
      around.
      
      The only reason we do this is to use the righ crtc for the pch fifo
      underrun accounting. But we never expose this to userspace, so
      essentially no one really cares if we use the "wrong" crtc.
      
      So let's just rip it out.
      
      With this patch fifo underrun code will always use crtc A for tracking
      underruns on the (only) pch transcoder on LPT.
      
      v2: Add a big comment explaining what's going on. Requested by Paulo.
      
      v3: Fixup spelling in comment as spotted by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      de28075d
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: improve GEN7_ERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 7336df65
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Same treatment as for SERR_INT: If we clear only the bit for the pipe
      we're enabling (but unconditionally) then we can always check for
      possible underruns after having disabled the interrupt. That way pipe
      underruns won't be lost, but at worst only get reported in a delayed
      fashion.
      
      v2: The same logic bug as in the SERR handling change also existed
      here. The same bugfix of only reporting missed underruns when the
      error interrupt was masked applies, too.
      
      v3: Do the same fixes as for the SERR handling that Paulo suggested in
      his review:
      - s/%i/%c/ fix in the debug output
      - move the DE_ERR_INT_IVB read into the respective if block
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      [danvet: Fix up the checkpatch bikeshed Paulo noticed.]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7336df65
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: improve SERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 1dd246fb
      Daniel Vetter authored
      The current code won't report any fifo underruns on cpt if just one
      pipe has fifo underrun reporting disabled. We can't enable the
      interrupts, but we can still check the per-transcoder bits and so
      report the underrun delayed if:
      - We always clear the transcoder's bit (and none of the other bits)
        when enabling.
      - We check the transcoder's bit after disabling (to avoid racing with
        the interrupt handler).
      
      v2: I've forgotten to actually remove the old SERR_INT clearing.
      
      v3: Use transcoder_name as suggested by Paulo Zanoni. Paulo also
      noticed a logic bug: When an underrun interrupt fires we report it
      both in the interrupt handler and when checking for underruns when
      disabling it in cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But that second check
      is only required if the interrupt is disabled and we're switching of
      underrun reporting (e.g. because we're disabling the crtc). Hence
      check for that condition.
      
      At first I wanted to rework the code to pass that bit of information
      from the uppper functions down to cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But
      that turned out too messy. Hence the quick&dirty check whether the
      south error interrupt source is masked off or not.
      
      v4: Streamline the control flow a bit.
      
      v5: s/pipe/pch transcoder/ in the dmesg output, suggested by Paulo.
      
      v6: Review from Paulo:
      - Reorder the was_enabled assignment to only read the register when we
        need it. Also add a comment that we need to do that before updating
        the register.
      - s/%i/%c/ fix for the debug output.
      - Fix the checkpath complaint in the SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN
        #define.
      
      v7: Hopefully put that elusive SERR hunk back into this patch, spotted
      by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1dd246fb
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: extract ibx_display_interrupt_update · fee884ed
      Daniel Vetter authored
      This way all changes to SDEIMR all go through the same function, with
      the exception of the (single-threaded) setup/teardown code.
      
      For paranoia again add an assert_spin_locked.
      
      v2: For even more paranoia also sprinkle a spinlock assert over
      cpt_can_enable_serr_int since we need to have that one there, too.
      
      v3: Fix the logic of interrupt enabling, add enable/disable macros for
      the simple cases in the fifo code and add a comment. All requested by
      Paulo.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      fee884ed
  4. 10 Jul, 2013 2 commits
    • Maarten Lankhorst's avatar
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: don't frob mm.suspended when not using ums · db1b76ca
      Daniel Vetter authored
      In kernel modeset driver mode we're in full control of the chip,
      always. So there's no need at all to set mm.suspended in
      i915_gem_idle. Hence move that out into the leavevt ioctl. Since
      i915_gem_idle doesn't suspend gem any more we can also drop the
      re-enabling for KMS in the thaw function.
      
      Also clean up the handling of mm.suspend at driver load by coalescing
      all the assignments.
      
      Stumbled over while reading through our resume code for unrelated
      reasons.
      
      v2: Shovel mm.suspended into the (newly created) ums dungeon as
      suggested by Chris Wilson. The plan is that once we've completely
      stopped relying on the register save/restore code we could shovel even
      that in there.
      
      v3: Improve the locking for the entervt/leavevt ioctls a bit by moving
      the dev->struct_mutex locking outside of i915_gem_idle. Also don't
      clear dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended for the kms case, we allocate it with
      kzalloc. Both suggested by Chris Wilson.
      
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2)
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      db1b76ca
  5. 09 Jul, 2013 4 commits
  6. 08 Jul, 2013 7 commits
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: convert debugfs creation/destruction to table · 34b9674c
      Daniel Vetter authored
      At least for the common cases where we only need special file
      operations. The forcewake file is still rather more special.
      
      v2: Fix up the debugfs unregister code.
      
      v3: Actually squash in the right fixup.
      Acked-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      34b9674c
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: dvo needs a P2 divisor of 4 · 5d536e28
      Daniel Vetter authored
      Section 1.5.4, "DPLL A Control Register" from Bspec about bit 23
      "FPA0/A1 P2 Clock Divide":
      
      0 = Divide by 2
      1 = Divide by 4. This bit must be set in DVO non-gang mode
      
      So copy the current limits (which should be good for i8xx) and create
      a new set for dvo encoders.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5d536e28
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      drm/i915: fix dvo DPLL regression · 4a33e48d
      Daniel Vetter authored
      I've missed that intel_dvo_mode_set changes the dpll configuration.
      Hence when I've reworked the sequence to only enable the dpll in the
      crtc_enable callback in
      
      commit 66e3d5c0
      Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Date:   Sun Jun 16 21:24:16 2013 +0200
      
          drm/i915: move i9xx dpll enabling into crtc enable function
      
      that special DVO bit was lost. Some BSpec reading confirms that it's
      only needed for DVO encoders. Section 1.5.4, "DPLL A Control Register"
      for bit 30:
      
      "2X Clock Enable. When driving In non-gang DVO modes such as a
      connected flat panel or TV, a 2X" version of the clock is needed. When
      not using the 2X output it should be disabled. This bit cannot be set
      when driving the integrated LVDS port on devices such as Montara-GM."
      
      Fix this regression up.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66516
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reported-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Partially-tested-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4a33e48d
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: Embed drm_mm_node in i915 gem obj · c6cfb325
      Ben Widawsky authored
      Embedding the node in the obj is more natural in the transition to VMAs
      which will also have embedded nodes. This change also helps transition
      away from put_block to remove node.
      
      Though it's quite an uncommon occurrence, it's somewhat convenient to not
      fail at bind time because we cannot allocate the node. Though in
      practice there are other allocations (like the request structure) which
      would probably make this point not terribly useful.
      
      Quoting Daniel:
      Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is
      that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need
      anyway and hence is just wasted space.
      
      v2: Clean up the stolen preallocation code.
      Rebased on the reserve_node patches
      renames ggtt_ stuff to gtt_ stuff
      WARN_ON if the object is already bound (which doesn't mean it's in the
      bound list, tricky)
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c6cfb325
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: Kill obj->gtt_offset · edd41a87
      Ben Widawsky authored
      With the getters in place from the previous patch this members serves no
      purpose other than saving one spare pointer chase, which will be killed
      in the next patch anyway.
      
      Moving to VMAs, this members adds unnecessary confusion since an object
      may exist at different offsets in different VMs.
      
      v2: Properly preserve the stolen offset. This code is a bit hacky but it
      all goes away when we embed the drm_mm_node and removes the need for the
      incorrect patch I submitted previously: "Use gtt_space->start for stolen
      reservation"
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      edd41a87
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm/i915: Getter/setter for object attributes · f343c5f6
      Ben Widawsky authored
      Soon we want to gut a lot of our existing assumptions how many address
      spaces an object can live in, and in doing so, embed the drm_mm_node in
      the object (and later the VMA).
      
      It's possible in the future we'll want to add more getter/setter
      methods, but for now this is enough to enable the VMAs.
      
      v2: Reworked commit message (Ben)
      Added comments to the main functions (Ben)
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_set_color/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_set_color/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_bound/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_bound/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_size/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_offset/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      (Daniel)
      
      v3: Rebased on new reserve_node patch
      Changed DRM_DEBUG_KMS to actually work (will need fixing later)
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      f343c5f6
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      drm: Change create block to reserve node · 338710e7
      Ben Widawsky authored
      With the previous patch we no longer actually create a node, we simply
      find the correct hole and occupy it. This very well could have been
      squashed with the last patch, but since I already had David's review, I
      figured it's easiest to keep it distinct.
      
      Also update the users in i915. Conveniently this is the only user of the
      interface.
      
      CC: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      CC: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarDavid Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      338710e7