- 15 Oct, 2023 10 commits
-
-
Priyansh Jain authored
Add compatibility string for the thermal sensors on sa8775p platform. Signed-off-by: Priyansh Jain <quic_priyjain@quicinc.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230926085948.23046-2-quic_priyjain@quicinc.com
-
Minjie Du authored
debugfs_create_dir() function returns an error value embedded in the pointer (PTR_ERR). Evaluate the return value using IS_ERR rather than checking for NULL. Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@vivo.com> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921091057.3812-1-duminjie@vivo.com
-
Kuan-Wei Chiu authored
In the previous code, the 'mds' and 'nrhandler' variables were not utilized in the codebase. Additionally, there was a potential NULL pointer dereference and memory leak due to improper handling of memory reallocation failure. This patch removes the unused 'mds' and 'nrhandler' variables along with the associated code, addressing the unused variable issue, NULL pointer dereference issue and the memory leak issue. Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230926173736.1142420-1-visitorckw@gmail.com
-
Fabio Estevam authored
imx8dxl also contains the SCU thermal block. Add an entry for 'fsl,imx8dxl-sc-thermal'. Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230926122957.341094-5-festevam@gmail.com
-
Bragatheswaran Manickavel authored
Added identifier names to respective definitions for fix warnings reported by checkpatch.pl WARNING: function definition argument 'void *' should also have an identifier name WARNING: function definition argument 'int *' should also have an identifier name Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230917083443.3220-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com
-
Rob Herring authored
dt-bindings: thermal: nvidia,tegra124-soctherm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are present for any node. Add unevaluatedProperties as needed, and then add any missing properties flagged by the addition. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230926164500.101593-1-robh@kernel.org
-
Frank Wunderlich authored
Add Support for Mediatek Filogic 880/MT7988 LVTS. Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> Tested-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922055020.6436-5-linux@fw-web.de
-
Frank Wunderlich authored
The upcoming mt7988 has different temperature coefficients so we cannot use constants in the functions lvts_golden_temp_init, lvts_golden_temp_init and lvts_raw_to_temp anymore. Add a field in the lvts_ctrl pointing to the lvts_data which now contains the soc-specific temperature coefficents. To make the code better readable, rename static int coeff_b to golden_temp_offset, COEFF_A to temp_factor and COEFF_B to temp_offset. Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Tested-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922055020.6436-4-linux@fw-web.de
-
Frank Wunderlich authored
Add sensor constants for MT7988. Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922055020.6436-3-linux@fw-web.de
-
Frank Wunderlich authored
Add compatible string for mt7988 lvts application processor. Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922055020.6436-2-linux@fw-web.de
-
- 12 Oct, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Merge thermal control changes related to switching over platform drivers to using void remove callbacks. * thermal-misc: (31 commits) thermal: amlogic: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: uniphier: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: ti-bandgap: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: tegra-bpmp: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: soctherm: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: stm: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: sprd: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: spear: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: exynos_tmu: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: rzg2l: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: rockchip: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: rcar: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: rcar_gen3: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: tsens: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: lvts: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: kirkwood: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: k3_j72xx_bandgap: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: k3_bandgap: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: int3406: Convert to platform remove callback returning void thermal: int3403: Convert to platform remove callback returning void ...
-
- 11 Oct, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Dan Carpenter authored
The dev->id value comes from ida_alloc() so it's a number between zero and INT_MAX. If it's too high then these sprintf()s will overflow. Fixes: 203d3d4a ("the generic thermal sysfs driver") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Lukasz Luba authored
Become designated reviewer and help thermal subsystem in development process. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Amit Kucheria has not been participating in kernel development in any way or form for quite some time, so it is not useful to list him as a designated reviewer for the thermal subsystem or as the thermal zone DT binding maintainer. Remove him from the THERMAL entry in MAINTAINERS and list Daniel Lezcano as the new thermal zone DT binding maintainer. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>
-
- 05 Oct, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Add a wrapper around for_each_thermal_trip(), called thermal_zone_for_each_trip(), that will invoke the former under the thermal zone lock and pass its return value to the caller. Two drivers will be modified subsequently to use this new function. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
-
- 02 Oct, 2023 11 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). amlogic_thermal_disable() always returned zero. Change it to return no value and then trivially convert the driver to .remove_new() and fix a whitespace inconsitency en passant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 Sep, 2023 14 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-