- 15 Dec, 2011 15 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'for-chris' of http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into integration Conflicts: fs/btrfs/inode.c Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
btrfs_update_inode is sometimes called with a null reservation. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported a problem booting into a new kernel with the old format inodes. He was panicing in cow_file_range while writing out the inode cache. This is because if the block group is not cached we'll just skip writing out the cache, however if it gets dirtied again in the same transaction and it finished caching we'd go ahead and write it out, but since we set cache_generation to the transid we think we've already truncated it and will just carry on, running into cow_file_range and blowing up. We need to make sure we only set cache_generation if we've done the truncate. The user tested this patch and verified that the panic no longer occured. Thanks, Reported-and-Tested-by:
Klaus Bitto <klaus.bitto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
I've been hitting this BUG_ON() in btrfs_orphan_add when running xfstest 269 in a loop. This is because we will add an orphan item, do the truncate, the truncate will fail for whatever reason (*cough*ENOSPC*cough*) and then we're left with an orphan item still in the fs. Then we come back later to do another truncate and it blows up because we already have an orphan item. This is ok so just fix the BUG_ON() to only BUG() if ret is not EEXIST. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We were occasionaly leaking space when running xfstest 269. This is because if we failed to start the transaction in the truncate loop we'd just goto out, but we need to break so that the inode is removed from the orphan list and the space is properly freed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Running xfstests 269 with some tracing my scripts kept spitting out errors about releasing bytes that we didn't actually have reserved. This took me down a huge rabbit hole and it turns out the way we deal with reserved_extents is wrong, we need to only be setting it if the reservation succeeds, otherwise the free() method will come in and unreserve space that isn't actually reserved yet, which can lead to other warnings and such. The math was all working out right in the end, but it caused all sorts of other issues in addition to making my scripts yell and scream and generally make it impossible for me to track down the original issue I was looking for. The other problem is with our error handling in the reservation code. There are two cases that we need to deal with 1) We raced with free. In this case free won't free anything because csum_bytes is modified before we dro the lock in our reservation path, so free rightly doesn't release any space because the reservation code may be depending on that reservation. However if we fail, we need the reservation side to do the free at that point since that space is no longer in use. So as it stands the code was doing this fine and it worked out, except in case #2 2) We don't race with free. Nobody comes in and changes anything, and our reservation fails. In this case we didn't reserve anything anyway and we just need to clean up csum_bytes but not free anything. So we keep track of csum_bytes before we drop the lock and if it hasn't changed we know we can just decrement csum_bytes and carry on. Because of the case where we can race with free()'s since we have to drop our spin_lock to do the reservation, I'm going to serialize all reservations with the i_mutex. We already get this for free in the heavy use paths, truncate and file write all hold the i_mutex, just needed to add it to page_mkwrite and various ioctl/balance things. With this patch my space leak scripts no longer scream bloody murder. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Now that we're properly keeping track of delayed inode space we've been getting a lot of warnings out of btrfs_dirty_inode() when running xfstest 83. This is because a bunch of people call mark_inode_dirty, which is void so we can't return ENOSPC. This needs to be fixed in a few areas 1) file_update_time - this updates the mtime and such when writing to a file, which will call mark_inode_dirty. So copy file_update_time into btrfs so we can call btrfs_dirty_inode directly and return an error if we get one appropriately. 2) fix symlinks to use btrfs_setattr for ->setattr. For some reason we weren't setting ->setattr for symlinks, even though we should have been. This catches one of the cases where we were getting errors in mark_inode_dirty. 3) Fix btrfs_setattr and btrfs_setsize to call btrfs_dirty_inode directly instead of mark_inode_dirty. This lets us return errors properly for truncate and chown/anything related to setattr. 4) Add a new btrfs_fs_dirty_inode which will just call btrfs_dirty_inode and print an error if we have one. The only remaining user we can't control for this is touch_atime(), but we don't really want to keep people from walking down the tree if we don't have space to save the atime update, so just complain but don't worry about it. With this patch xfstests 83 complains a handful of times instead of hundreds of times. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Al pointed out we have some random problems with the way we account for num_workers_starting in the async thread stuff. First of all we need to make sure to decrement num_workers_starting if we fail to start the worker, so make __btrfs_start_workers do this. Also fix __btrfs_start_workers so that it doesn't call btrfs_stop_workers(), there is no point in stopping everybody if we failed to create a worker. Also check_pending_worker_creates needs to call __btrfs_start_work in it's work function since it already increments num_workers_starting. People only start one worker at a time, so get rid of the num_workers argument everywhere, and make btrfs_queue_worker a void since it will always succeed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Casey Schaufler authored
The Smack LSM hook for security_d_instantiate checks the inode's i_op->getxattr value to determine if the containing filesystem supports extended attributes. The BTRFS filesystem sets the inode's i_op value only after it has instantiated the inode. This results in Smack incorrectly giving new BTRFS inodes attributes from the filesystem defaults on the assumption that values can't be stored on the filesystem. This patch moves the assignment of inode operation vectors ahead of the calls to d_instantiate, letting Smack know that the filesystem supports extended attributes. There should be no impact on the performance or behavior of BTRFS. Signed-off-by:
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
If we have a constant stream of end_io completions or crc work, we can hit softlockup messages from the async helper threads. This adds a cond_resched() into the loop to avoid them. Signed-off-by: -
Li Zefan authored
To reproduce the bug: # touch /mnt/tmp # stat /mnt/tmp | grep Change Change: 2011-12-09 09:32:23.412105981 +0800 # chattr +i /mnt/tmp # stat /mnt/tmp | grep Change Change: 2011-12-09 09:32:43.198105295 +0800 # umount /mnt # mount /dev/loop1 /mnt # stat /mnt/tmp | grep Change Change: 2011-12-09 09:32:23.412105981 +0800 We should update ctime of in-memory inode before calling btrfs_update_inode(). Signed-off-by:Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Arne Jansen authored
Since we have the free space caches, btrfs_orphan_cleanup also runs for the tree_root. Unfortunately this also cleans up the orphans used to mark subvol deletions in progress. Currently if a subvol deletion gets interrupted twice by umount/mount, the deletion will not be continued and the space permanently lost, though it would be possible to write a tool to recover those lost subvol deletions. This patch checks if the orphan belongs to a subvol (dead root) and skips the deletion. Signed-off-by:
Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When we use raid0 as the data profile, df command may show us a very inaccurate value of the available space, which may be much less than the real one. It may make the users puzzled. Fix it by changing the calculation of the available space, and making it be more similar to a fake chunk allocation. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Btrfsck report errors after the 83th case of xfstests was run, The error number is 400, it means the used disk space of the file is wrong. The reason of this bug is that: The file truncation may fail when the space of the file system is not enough, and leave some file extents, whose offset are beyond the end of the files. When we want to expand those files, we will drop those file extents, and put in dummy file extents, and then we should update the i-node. But btrfs forgets to do it. This patch adds the forgotten i-node update. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Btrfsck report error 100 after the 83th case of xfstests was run, it means the i_size of the file is wrong. The reason of this bug is that: Btrfs increased i_size of the file at the beginning, but it failed to expand the file, and failed to update the i_size to the old size because there is no enough space in the file system, so we found a wrong i_size. This patch fixes this bug by updating the i_size just when we pass the file expanding and get enough space to update i-node. Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Dec, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
btrfs_end_bio checks the number of errors on a bio against the max number of errors allowed before sending any EIOs up to the higher levels. If we got enough copies of the bio done for a given raid level, it is supposed to clear the bio error flag and return success. We have pointers to the original bio sent down by the higher layers and pointers to any cloned bios we made for raid purposes. If the original bio happens to be the one that got an io error, but not the last one to finish, it might not have the BIO_UPTODATE bit set. Then, when the last bio does finish, we'll call bio_end_io on the original bio. It won't have the uptodate bit set and we'll end up sending EIO to the higher layers. We already had a check for this, it just was conditional on getting the IO error on the very last bio. Make the check unconditional so we eat the EIOs properly. Signed-off-by:
-
- 08 Dec, 2011 4 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
Drop spin lock in convert_extent_bit() when memory alloc fails, otherwise, it will be a deadlock. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
If we call ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_ADD_DEV) directly, we'll succeed in adding a readonly device to a btrfs filesystem, and btrfs will write to that device, emitting kernel errors: [ 3109.833692] lost page write due to I/O error on loop2 [ 3109.833720] lost page write due to I/O error on loop2 ... Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
When we find an existing cluster, we switch to its block group as the current block group, possibly skipping multiple blocks in the process. Furthermore, under heavy contention, multiple threads may fail to allocate from a cluster and then release just-created clusters just to proceed to create new ones in a different block group. This patch tries to allocate from an existing cluster regardless of its block group, and doesn't switch to that group, instead proceeding to try to allocate a cluster from the group it was iterating before the attempt. Signed-off-by:
Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
If we reach LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE, we won't even try to use a cluster that others might have set up. Odds are that there won't be one, but if someone else succeeded in setting it up, we might as well use it, even if we don't try to set up a cluster again. Signed-off-by:
-
- 01 Dec, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Jan Schmidt authored
Commit 4a54c8c1 introduced raid-repair, killing the individual readpage_io_failed_hook entries from inode.c and disk-io.c. Commit 4bb31e92 introduced new readahead code, adding a readpage_io_failed_hook to disk-io.c. The raid-repair commit had logic to disable raid-repair, if readpage_io_failed_hook is set. Thus, the readahead commit effectively disabled raid-repair for meta data. This commit changes the logic to always attempt raid-repair when needed and call the readpage_io_failed_hook in case raid-repair fails. This is much more straight forward and should have been like that from the beginning. Signed-off-by:
Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Reported-by:
Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
- 30 Nov, 2011 10 commits
-
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
If we don't have a cluster, don't bother trying to allocate from it, jumping right away to the attempt to allocate a new cluster. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
We test whether a block group has enough free space to hold the requested block, but when we're doing clustered allocation, we can save some cycles by testing whether it has enough room for the cluster upfront, otherwise we end up attempting to set up a cluster and failing. Only in the NO_EMPTY_SIZE loop do we attempt an unclustered allocation, and by then we'll have zeroed the cluster size, so this patch won't stop us from using the block group as a last resort. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
Instead of starting at zero (offset is always zero), request a cluster starting at search_start, that denotes the beginning of the current block group. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
The field that indicates the size of the largest contiguous chunk of free space in the cluster is not initialized when setting up bitmaps, it's only increased when we find a larger contiguous chunk. We end up retaining a larger value than appropriate for highly-fragmented clusters, which may cause pointless searches for large contiguous groups, and even cause clusters that do not meet the density requirements to be set up. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
We're failing to create clusters with bitmaps because setup_cluster_no_bitmap checks that the list is empty before inserting the bitmap entry in the list for setup_cluster_bitmap, but the list field is only initialized when it is restored from the on-disk free space cache, or when it is written out to disk. Besides a potential race condition due to the multiple use of the list field, filesystem performance severely degrades over time: as we use up all non-bitmap free extents, the try-to-set-up-cluster dance is done at every metadata block allocation. For every block group, we fail to set up a cluster, and after failing on them all up to twice, we fall back to the much slower unclustered allocation. To make matters worse, before the unclustered allocation, we try to create new block groups until we reach the 1% threshold, which introduces additional bitmaps and thus block groups that we'll iterate over at each metadata block request.
-
Li Zefan authored
To reproduce this bug: # dd if=/dev/zero of=img bs=1M count=256 # mkfs.btrfs img # losetup -r /dev/loop1 img # mount /dev/loop1 /mnt OOPS!! It triggered BUG_ON(!nr_devices) in btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(). To fix this, instead of checking write-only devices, we check all open deivces: # df -h /dev/loop1 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/loop1 250M 28K 238M 1% /mnt Signed-off-by: -
Mike Fleetwood authored
It seems overly harsh to fail a resize of a btrfs file system to the same size when a shrink or grow would succeed. User app GParted trips over this error. Allow it by bypassing the shrink or grow operation. Signed-off-by:Mike Fleetwood <mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com>
-
Miao Xie authored
When I ran the xfstests, I found the test tasks was blocked on meta-data reservation. By debugging, I found the reason of this bug: start transaction | v reserve meta-data space | v flush delay allocation -> iput inode -> evict inode ^ | | v wait for delay allocation flush <- reserve meta-data space And besides that, the flush on evicting inode will block the thread, which is reclaiming the memory, and make oom happen easily. Fix this bug by skipping the flush step when evicting inode. Signed-off-by: -
Arnd Hannemann authored
The location of the btrfs-progs repository has been changed. This patch updates the documentation accordingly. Signed-off-by:Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
-
Dan Carpenter authored
init_ipath() can return an ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). Signed-off-by:Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
-
- 21 Nov, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
The log replay code only partially loads block groups, since the block group caching code is able to detect and deal with extents the logging code has pinned down. While the logging code is pinning down block groups, there is a bogus WARN_ON we're hitting if the code wasn't able to find an extent in the cache. This commit removes the warning because it can happen any time there isn't a valid free space cache for that block group. Signed-off-by:
-
- 20 Nov, 2011 8 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
We've been hitting BUG()'s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop. This is because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets, which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to btrfs_get_extent for similar areas that are sectorsize aligned. With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in a loop for a couple of hours and didn't hit the problem that I could previously hit in at most 20 minutes. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
When doing the io_ctl helpers to clean up the free space cache stuff I stopped using our normal prepare_pages stuff, which means I of course forgot to do things like set the pages extent mapped, which will cause us all sorts of wonderful propblems. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We've been hitting panics when running xfstest 13 in a loop for long periods of time. And actually this problem has always existed so we've been hitting these things randomly for a while. Basically what happens is we get a thread coming into the allocator and reading the space cache off of disk and adding the entries to the free space cache as we go. Then we get another thread that comes in and tries to allocate from that block group. Since block_group->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_NO it goes ahead and tries to do the allocation. We do this because if we're doing the old slow way of caching we don't want to hold people up and wait for everything to finish. The problem with this is we could end up discarding the space cache at some arbitrary point in the future, which means we could very well end up allocating space that is either bad, or when the real caching happens it could end up thinking the space isn't in use when it really is and cause all sorts of other problems. The solution is to add a new flag to indicate we are loading the free space cache from disk, and always try to cache the block group if cache->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED. That way if we are loading the space cache anybody else who tries to allocate from the block group will have to wait until it's finished to make sure it completes successfully. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Arnd Hannemann authored
For the user it is confusing to find something like: [10197.627710] new size for /dev/mapper/vg0-usr_share is 3221225472 in kernel log, because it doesn't point directly to btrfs. This patch prefixes those messages with "btrfs:" like other btrfs related printks. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Round inode bytes and delalloc bytes up to real blocksize before converting to sector size. Otherwise eg. files smaller than 512 are reported with zero blocks due to incorrect rounding. Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
setup_cluster_no_bitmap() searches all the extents and bitmaps starting from offset. Therefore if it returns -ENOSPC, all the bitmaps starting from offset are in the bitmaps list, so it's sufficient to search from this list in setup_cluser_bitmap(). Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
Suppose there are two bitmaps [0, 256], [256, 512] and one extent [100, 120] in the free space cache, and we want to setup a cluster with offset=100, bytes=50. In this case, there will be only one bitmap [256, 512] in the temporary bitmaps list, and then setup_cluster_bitmap() won't search bitmap [0, 256]. The cause is, the list is constructed in setup_cluster_no_bitmap(), and only bitmaps with bitmap_entry->offset >= offset will be added into the list, and the very bitmap that convers offset has bitmap_entry->offset <= offset. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Schmidt authored
My previous patch introduced some u64 for failed_mirror variables, this one makes it consistent again. Signed-off-by:
-
