- 08 Dec, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
There are many arguments for __btrfs_drop_extents() and its wrapper btrfs_drop_extents(), which makes it hard to add more arguments to it and requires changing every caller. I have added a couple myself back in 2014 commit 1acae57b ("Btrfs: faster file extent item replace operations") and therefore know firsthand that it is a bit cumbersome to add additional arguments to these functions. Since I will need to add more arguments in a subsequent bug fix, this change is preparatory work and adds a data structure that holds all the arguments, for both input and output, that are passed to this function, with some comments in the structure's definition mentioning what each field is and how it relates to other fields. Callers of this function need only to zero out the content of the structure and setup only the fields they need. This also removes the need to have both __btrfs_drop_extents() and btrfs_drop_extents(), so now we have a single function named btrfs_drop_extents() that takes a pointer to this new data structure (struct btrfs_drop_extents_args). Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Both Filipe and Fedora QA recently hit the following lockdep splat: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.10.0-0.rc1.20201028gited8780e3.57.fc34.x86_64 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- rsync/2610 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89617ed48f20 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff8961757b1130 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&eb->lock); lock(&eb->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by rsync/2610: #0: ffff896107212b90 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: walk_component+0x10c/0x190 #1: ffff8961757b1130 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 2610 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.10.0-0.rc1.20201028gited8780e3.57.fc34.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 __lock_acquire.cold+0x12d/0x2a4 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 lock_acquire+0xc8/0x400 ? btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 ? read_block_for_search.isra.0+0xdd/0x320 _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0 ? btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140 btrfs_search_slot+0x616/0x9a0 btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x6c/0xb0 btrfs_lookup_dentry+0xa8/0x520 ? lockdep_init_map_waits+0x4c/0x210 btrfs_lookup+0xe/0x30 __lookup_slow+0x10f/0x1e0 walk_component+0x11b/0x190 path_lookupat+0x72/0x1c0 filename_lookup+0x97/0x180 ? strncpy_from_user+0x96/0x1e0 ? getname_flags.part.0+0x45/0x1a0 vfs_statx+0x64/0x100 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xff/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 __do_sys_newlstat+0x26/0x40 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xff/0x180 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 I have also seen a report of lockdep complaining about the lock class that was looked up being the same as the lock class on the lock we were using, but I can't find the report. These are problems that occur because we do not have the lockdep class set on the extent buffer until _after_ we read the eb in properly. This is problematic for concurrent readers, because we will create the extent buffer, lock it, and then attempt to read the extent buffer. If a second thread comes in and tries to do a search down the same path they'll get the above lockdep splat because the class isn't set properly on the extent buffer. There was a good reason for this, we generally didn't know the real owner of the eb until we read it, specifically in refcounted roots. However now all refcounted roots have the same class name, so we no longer need to worry about this. For non-refcounted trees we know which root we're on based on the parent. Fix this by setting the lockdep class on the eb at creation time instead of read time. This will fix the splat and the weirdness where the class changes in the middle of locking the block. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Now that we've plumbed all of the callers to have the owner root and the level, plumb it down into alloc_extent_buffer(). Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
The readahead infrastructure does raw reads of extent buffers, but we're going to need to know their owner and level in order to set the lockdep key properly, so plumb in the infrastructure that we'll need to have this information when we start allocating extent buffers. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we need to know the owner of the block. For non-refcounted trees this is straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from. For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-<level>. Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid we're using. In places like relocation and backref we could probably unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it, otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be a refcounted tree anyway. This is a preparation patch for further changes. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're open coding btrfs_read_node_slot in do_relocation, replace this with the proper helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We do not need to call read_tree_block() here, simply use the btrfs_read_node_slot helper. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have this open-coded nightmare in btrfs_realloc_node that does the same thing that the normal read path does, which is to see if we have the eb in memory already, and if not read it, and verify the eb is uptodate. Delete this open coding and simply use btrfs_read_node_slot. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We're going to pass around more information when we allocate extent buffers, in order to make that cleaner how we do readahead. Most of the callers have the parent node that we're getting our blockptr from, with the sole exception of relocation which simply has the bytenr it wants to read. Add a helper that takes the current arguments that we need (bytenr and gen), and add another helper for simply reading the slot out of a node. In followup patches the helper that takes all the extra arguments will be expanded, and the simpler helper won't need to have it's arguments adjusted. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have this weird problem where our lockdep class is set after we read a tree block, which can race with concurrent readers and result in erroneous lockdep errors. We want to set the lockdep class at allocation time if possible, but in certain cases we may not have the actual root owner, such as with relocation or any backref lookups. This is only really a problem for reference counted trees, because all other trees have their root reference set in their extent reference. Remove the fs tree specific lock class. We need to still keep the reloc tree one, it's still reference counted, because replace_path will lock the reloc tree and the destination tree, and if they're both set to tree-<level> we'll have issues. Reviewed-by:
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
After sysfs updates discard's iops_limit or kbps_limit it also needs to adjust current timer through rescheduling, otherwise the discard work may wait for a long time for the previous timer to expire or bumped by someone else. Reviewed-by:
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
If btrfs_discard_schedule_work() is called with override=true, it sets delay anew regardless how much time is left until the timer should have fired. If delays are long (that can happen, for example, with low kbps_limit), they might get constantly overridden without having a chance to run the discard work. Reviewed-by:
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
Most delay calculations are done in ns or ms, so store discard_ctl->delay in ms and convert the final delay to jiffies only at the end. Reviewed-by:
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
Instead of using iops_limit only for cutting off extremes, calculate the discard delay directly from it, so it closely follows iops_limit and doesn't under-discard even though quotas are not saturated. The iops limit could be hit more often in some cases and could increase the discard rate. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Function scrub_find_csum() is to locate the csum for bytenr @logical from sctx->csum_list. However it lacks a lot of comments to explain things like how the csum_list is organized and why we need to drop csum range which is before us. Refactor the function by: - Add more comments explaining the behavior - Add comment explaining why we need to drop the csum range - Put the csum copy in the main loop This is mostly for the incoming patches to make scrub_find_csum() able to find multiple checksums. Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The @force parameter for scrub_pages() is to indicate whether we want to force bio submission. Currently it's only used for the super block, and it can be easily determined by the @flags, so we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There are several call sites where we declare something like "struct scrub_page *page". This is confusing as we also use regular page in this code, rename it to 'spage' where applicable. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently csum_dirty_buffer() uses page to grab extent buffer, but that only works for sector size == PAGE_SIZE case. For subpage we need page + page_offset to grab extent buffer. Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() only needs to handle one extent buffer as currently one page maps to at most one extent buffer. For incoming subpage support, we need to extend the support where one page could contain multiple extent buffers. Split the function so we can call validate_extent_buffer on extent buffers independently. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For subpage size support, metadata blocks of nodesize are smaller than one page and this needs to be handled when calculating the checksum. The checksummed start and length need to be adjusted but only for the first page: - start is simply offset in the page - length is nodesize (subpage) or PAGE_SIZE for all other cases Reviewed-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since commit f28491e0 ("Btrfs: move the extent buffer radix tree into the fs_info"), fs_info can be grabbed from extent_buffer directly. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For subpage sector size support, one page can contain multiple tree blocks. The entries cannot be based on page size and index must be derived from the sectorsize. No change for page size == sector size. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When calling attach_extent_buffer_page(), either we're attaching anonymous pages, called from btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(), or we're attaching btree inode pages, called from alloc_extent_buffer(). For the latter case, we should hold page->mapping->private_lock to avoid parallel changes to page->private. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
While documenting the usage of the commit_root_sem, I noticed that we do not actually take the commit_root_sem in the case of the free space cache. This is problematic because we're supposed to hold that sem while we're reading the commit roots, which is what we do for the free space cache. The reason I did it inline when I originally wrote the code was because there's the case of unpinning where we need to make sure that the free space cache is loaded if we're going to use the free space cache. But we can accomplish the same thing by simply waiting for the cache to be loaded. Rework this code to load the free space cache asynchronously. This allows us to greatly cleanup the caching code because now it's all shared by the various caching methods. We also are now in a position to have the commit_root semaphore held while we're loading the free space cache. And finally our modification of ->last_byte_to_unpin is removed because it can be handled in the proper way on commit. Some care must be taken when replaying the log, when we expect that the free space cache will be read entirely before we start excluding space to replay. This could lead to overwriting space during replay. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Historically we've allowed recursive locking specifically for the free space inode. This is because we are only doing reads and know that it's safe. However we don't actually need this feature, we can get away with reading the commit root for the extents. In fact if we want to allow asynchronous loading of the free space cache we have to use the commit root, otherwise we will deadlock. Switch to using the commit root for the file extents. These are only read at load time, and are replaced as soon as we start writing the cache out to disk. The cache is never read again, so this is legitimate. This matches what we do for the inode itself, as we read that from the commit root as well. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
The free space cache has been special in that we would load it right away instead of farming the work off to a worker thread. This resulted in some weirdness that had to be taken into account for this fact, namely that if we every found a block group being cached the fast way we had to wait for it to finish, because we could get the cache before it had been validated and we may throw the cache away. To handle this particular case instead create a temporary btrfs_free_space_ctl to load the free space cache into. Then once we've validated that it makes sense, copy it's contents into the actual block_group->free_space_ctl. This allows us to avoid the problems of needing to wait for the caching to complete, we can clean up the discard extent handling stuff in __load_free_space_cache, and we no longer need to do the merge_space_tree() because the space is added one by one into the real free_space_ctl. This will allow further reworks of how we handle loading the free space cache. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This passes in the block_group and the free_space_ctl, but we can get this from the block group itself. Part of this is because we call it from __load_free_space_cache, which can be called for the inode cache as well. Move that call into the block group specific load section, wrap it in the right lock that we need for the assertion (but otherwise this is safe without the lock because this happens in single-thread context). Fix up the arguments to only take the block group. Add a lockdep_assert as well for good measure to make sure we don't mess up the locking again. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Currently unpin_extent_range happens in the transaction commit context, so we are protected from ->last_byte_to_unpin changing while we're unpinning, because any new transactions would have to wait for us to complete before modifying ->last_byte_to_unpin. However in the future we may want to change how this works, for instance with async unpinning or other such TODO items. To prepare for that future explicitly protect ->last_byte_to_unpin with the commit_root_sem so we are sure it won't change while we're doing our work. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While writing an explanation for the need of the commit_root_sem for btrfs_prepare_extent_commit, I realized we have a slight hole that could result in leaked space if we have to do the old style caching. Consider the following scenario commit root +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ |\\\\| |\\\\|\\\\| |\\\\|\\\\| +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 new commit root +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | | |\\\\| | |\\\\| +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prior to this patch, we run btrfs_prepare_extent_commit, which updates the last_byte_to_unpin, and then we subsequently run switch_commit_roots. In this example lets assume that caching_ctl->progress == 1 at btrfs_prepare_extent_commit() time, which means that cache->last_byte_to_unpin == 1. Then we go and do the switch_commit_roots(), but in the meantime the caching thread has made some more progress, because we drop the commit_root_sem and re-acquired it. Now caching_ctl->progress == 3. We swap out the commit root and carry on to unpin. The race can happen like: 1) The caching thread was running using the old commit root when it found the extent for [2, 3); 2) Then it released the commit_root_sem because it was in the last item of a leaf and the semaphore was contended, and set ->progress to 3 (value of 'last'), as the last extent item in the current leaf was for the extent for range [2, 3); 3) Next time it gets the commit_root_sem, will start using the new commit root and search for a key with offset 3, so it never finds the hole for [2, 3). So the caching thread never saw [2, 3) as free space in any of the commit roots, and by the time finish_extent_commit() was called for the range [0, 3), ->last_byte_to_unpin was 1, so it only returned the subrange [0, 1) to the free space cache, skipping [2, 3). In the unpin code we have last_byte_to_unpin == 1, so we unpin [0,1), but do not unpin [2,3). However because caching_ctl->progress == 3 we do not see the newly freed section of [2,3), and thus do not add it to our free space cache. This results in us missing a chunk of free space in memory (on disk too, unless we have a power failure before writing the free space cache to disk). Fix this by making sure the ->last_byte_to_unpin is set at the same time that we swap the commit roots, this ensures that we will always be consistent. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
While fixing up our ->last_byte_to_unpin locking I noticed that we will shorten len based on ->last_byte_to_unpin if we're caching when we're adding back the free space. This is correct for the free space, as we cannot unpin more than ->last_byte_to_unpin, however we use len to adjust the ->bytes_pinned counters and such, which need to track the actual pinned usage. This could result in WARN_ON(space_info->bytes_pinned) triggering at unmount time. Fix this by using a local variable for the amount to add to free space cache, and leave len untouched in this case. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
After the rwsem replaced the tree lock implementation, the extent buffer got smaller but leaving some holes behind. By changing log_index type and reordering, we can squeeze the size further to 240 bytes, measured on release config on x86_64. Log_index spans only 3 values and needs to be signed. Before: struct extent_buffer { u64 start; /* 0 8 */ long unsigned int len; /* 8 8 */ long unsigned int bflags; /* 16 8 */ struct btrfs_fs_info * fs_info; /* 24 8 */ spinlock_t refs_lock; /* 32 4 */ atomic_t refs; /* 36 4 */ atomic_t io_pages; /* 40 4 */ int read_mirror; /* 44 4 */ struct callback_head callback_head __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 48 16 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ pid_t lock_owner; /* 64 4 */ bool lock_recursed; /* 68 1 */ /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */ struct rw_semaphore lock; /* 72 40 */ short int log_index; /* 112 2 */ /* XXX 6 bytes hole, try to pack */ struct page * pages[16]; /* 120 128 */ /* size: 248, cachelines: 4, members: 14 */ /* sum members: 239, holes: 2, sum holes: 9 */ /* forced alignments: 1 */ /* last cacheline: 56 bytes */ } __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); After: struct extent_buffer { u64 start; /* 0 8 */ long unsigned int len; /* 8 8 */ long unsigned int bflags; /* 16 8 */ struct btrfs_fs_info * fs_info; /* 24 8 */ spinlock_t refs_lock; /* 32 4 */ atomic_t refs; /* 36 4 */ atomic_t io_pages; /* 40 4 */ int read_mirror; /* 44 4 */ struct callback_head callback_head __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 48 16 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ pid_t lock_owner; /* 64 4 */ bool lock_recursed; /* 68 1 */ s8 log_index; /* 69 1 */ /* XXX 2 bytes hole, try to pack */ struct rw_semaphore lock; /* 72 40 */ struct page * pages[16]; /* 112 128 */ /* size: 240, cachelines: 4, members: 14 */ /* sum members: 238, holes: 1, sum holes: 2 */ /* forced alignments: 1 */ /* last cacheline: 48 bytes */ } __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all this code. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are called. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The context structure unnecessarily stores copy of the checksum size, that can be now easily obtained from fs_info. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
