Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 20 Dec, 2018 31 commits
  3. 19 Dec, 2018 9 commits
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'neigh-get-support' · 24894bc6
      David S. Miller authored 
      Roopa Prabhu says:

====================
neigh get support

This series adds support for neigh get similar
to route and recently added fdb get.

v2: fix key len check. and some other fixes
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      24894bc6
    • Roopa Prabhu's avatar
      selftests: rtnetlink.sh: add testcase for neigh get · 8deecf35
      Roopa Prabhu authored 
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8deecf35
    • Roopa Prabhu's avatar
      neighbour: register rtnl doit handler · 82cbb5c6
      Roopa Prabhu authored 
      this patch registers neigh doit handler. The doit handler
returns a neigh entry given dst and dev. This is similar
to route and fdb doit (get) handlers. Also moves nda_policy
declaration from rtnetlink.c to neighbour.c
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      82cbb5c6
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'mlxsw-Make-driver-more-robust' · 4ab0edec
      David S. Miller authored 
      Ido Schimmel says:

====================
mlxsw: Make driver more robust

In recent months we fixed several bugs in the driver that could have
been avoided by re-evaluating some of the involved code paths and by
introducing relevant and comprehensive test cases.

This patchset tries to do that by introducing a set of small and mostly
non-functional changes in addition to a new test. I have further
improvements in mind, but they can be done in a different set.

Patch #1 makes sure we correctly sanitize upper devices of a VLAN
interface.

Patch #2 removes an unexpected behavior from the driver, in which routes
configured on a VLAN interface will cease being offloaded after certain
operations.

Patch #3 is a small cleanup.

Patch #4 simplifies the driver by removing reference counting from VLAN
entries configured on a port.

Patches #5-#6 simplify linking/unlinking from a bridge, especially when
LAG and VLAN devices are involved. They make both operations symmetric
even when ports are unlinked from a bridged LAG device.

Patch #7-#9 make router interface (RIF) deletion more robust by removing
reliance on device chain to indicate whether a NETDEV_DOWN event in the
inet{,6}addr notification chains should be processed. This is due to the
fact that IP addresses can be flushed from a netdev after it was
unlinked from its lower device.

Patch #10 adds a new test to for valid and invalid configurations over
mlxsw ports. Some of the test cases are derived from recent fixes. I
expect that more test cases will be added over time.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4ab0edec
    • Ido Schimmel's avatar
      selftests: mlxsw: Add rtnetlink tests · 489c25f9
      Ido Schimmel authored 
      Add a new test that is focused on rtnetlink configuration. Its purpose
is to test valid and invalid (as deemed by mlxsw) configurations and
make sure that they succeed / fail without producing a trace.

Some of the test cases are derived from recent fixes in order to make
sure that the fixed bugs are not introduced again.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      489c25f9
    • Ido Schimmel's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Hold a reference on RIF's netdev · b61cd7c6
      Ido Schimmel authored 
      Previous patches tried to make RIF deletion more robust and avoid
use-after-free situations.

As another precaution, hold a reference on a RIF's netdev and release it
when the RIF is deleted.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b61cd7c6
    • Ido Schimmel's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Make RIF deletion more robust · 965fa8e6
      Ido Schimmel authored 
      In the past we had multiple instances where RIFs were not properly
deleted.

One of the reasons for leaking a RIF was that at the time when IP
addresses were flushed from the respective netdev (prompting the
destruction of the RIF), the netdev was no longer a mlxsw upper. This
caused the inet{,6}addr notification blocks to ignore the NETDEV_DOWN
event and leak the RIF.

Instead of checking whether the netdev is our upper when an IP address
is removed, we can instead check if the netdev has a RIF configured.

To look up a RIF we need to access mlxsw private data, so the patch
stores the notification blocks inside a mlxsw struct. This then allows
us to use container_of() and extract the required private data.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      965fa8e6
    • Ido Schimmel's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Propagate 'struct mlxsw_sp' further · 21ffedb6
      Ido Schimmel authored 
      Next patch is going to make RIF deletion more robust by removing
reliance on fragile mlxsw_sp_lower_get(). This is because a netdev is
not necessarily our upper anymore when its IP addresses are flushed.

The inet{,6}addr notification blocks are going to resolve 'struct
mlxsw_sp' using container_of(), but the functions they call still use
mlxsw_sp_lower_get().

As a preparation for the next patch, propagate 'struct mlxsw_sp' down to
the functions called from the notification blocks and remove reliance on
mlxsw_sp_lower_get().
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      21ffedb6
    • Ido Schimmel's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: Properly cleanup LAG uppers when removing port from LAG · be2d6f42
      Ido Schimmel authored 
      When a LAG device or a VLAN device on top of it is enslaved to a bridge,
the driver propagates the CHANGEUPPER event to the LAG's slaves.

This causes each physical port to increase the reference count of the
internal representation of the bridge port by calling
mlxsw_sp_port_bridge_join().

However, when a port is removed from a LAG, the corresponding leave()
function is not called and the reference count is not decremented. This
leads to ugly hacks such as mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_should_destroy() that
try to understand if the bridge port should be destroyed even when its
reference count is not 0.

Instead, make sure that when a port is unlinked from a LAG it would see
the same events as if the LAG (or its uppers) were unlinked from a
bridge.

The above is achieved by walking the LAG's uppers when a port is
unlinked and calling mlxsw_sp_port_bridge_leave() for each upper that is
enslaved to a bridge.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      be2d6f42
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7