Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 21 Aug, 2023 28 commits
  3. 18 Aug, 2023 12 commits
    • Yonghong Song's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Fix a selftest compilation error · 0a55264c
      Yonghong Song authored 
      When building the kernel and selftest with clang compiler (llvm17 or llvm18),
I hit the following compilation failure:
  In file included from progs/test_lwt_redirect.c:3:
  In file included from /usr/include/linux/ip.h:21:
  In file included from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:5:
  In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:13:
  /usr/include/linux/swab.h:136:8: error: unknown type name '__always_inline'
    136 | static __always_inline unsigned long __swab(const unsigned long y)
        |        ^
  /usr/include/linux/swab.h:171:8: error: unknown type name '__always_inline'
    171 | static __always_inline __u16 __swab16p(const __u16 *p)
  ...

bpf_helpers.h file provided a definition for __always_inline.
Putting 'ip.h' after 'bpf_helpers.h' fixed the issue.

Fixes: 43a7c3ef ("selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECT")
Signed-off-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230818174312.1883381-1-yonghong.song@linux.devSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
      0a55264c
    • Dave Marchevsky's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs kfunc flavors tests · 63ae8eb2
      Dave Marchevsky authored 
      This patch adds selftests that exercise kfunc flavor relocation
functionality added in the previous patch. The actual kfunc defined
in kernel/bpf/helpers.c is:

  struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p)

The following relocation behaviors are checked:

  struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___one(struct task_struct *name)
    * Should succeed despite differing param name

  struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___two(struct task_struct *p, void *ctx)
    * Should fail because there is no two-param bpf_task_acquire

  struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___three(void *ctx)
    * Should fail because, despite vmlinux's bpf_task_acquire having one param,
      the types don't match
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230817225353.2570845-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
      63ae8eb2
    • Dave Marchevsky's avatar
      libbpf: Support triple-underscore flavors for kfunc relocation · 5964a223
      Dave Marchevsky authored 
      The function signature of kfuncs can change at any time due to their
intentional lack of stability guarantees. As kfuncs become more widely
used, BPF program writers will need facilities to support calling
different versions of a kfunc from a single BPF object. Consider this
simplified example based on a real scenario we ran into at Meta:

  /* initial kfunc signature */
  int some_kfunc(void *ptr)

  /* Oops, we need to add some flag to modify behavior. No problem,
    change the kfunc. flags = 0 retains original behavior */
  int some_kfunc(void *ptr, long flags)

If the initial version of the kfunc is deployed on some portion of the
fleet and the new version on the rest, a fleetwide service that uses
some_kfunc will currently need to load different BPF programs depending
on which some_kfunc is available.

Luckily CO-RE provides a facility to solve a very similar problem,
struct definition changes, by allowing program writers to declare
my_struct___old and my_struct___new, with ___suffix being considered a
'flavor' of the non-suffixed name and being ignored by
bpf_core_type_exists and similar calls.

This patch extends the 'flavor' facility to the kfunc extern
relocation process. BPF program writers can now declare

  extern int some_kfunc___old(void *ptr)
  extern int some_kfunc___new(void *ptr, int flags)

then test which version of the kfunc exists with bpf_ksym_exists.
Relocation and verifier's dead code elimination will work in concert as
expected, allowing this pattern:

  if (bpf_ksym_exists(some_kfunc___old))
    some_kfunc___old(ptr);
  else
    some_kfunc___new(ptr, 0);
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230817225353.2570845-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
      5964a223
    • Helge Deller's avatar
      bpf/tests: Enhance output on error and fix typos · b6594a17
      Helge Deller authored 
      If a testcase returns a wrong (unexpected) value, print the expected and
returned value in hex notation in addition to the decimal notation.

This is very useful in tests which bit-shift hex values left or right and
helped me a lot while developing the JIT compiler for the hppa architecture.

Additionally fix two typos: dowrd -> dword, tall calls -> tail calls.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZN6ZAAVoWZpsD1Jf@p100
      b6594a17
    • Yan Zhai's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REROUTE · 6c77997b
      Yan Zhai authored 
      There is no lwt test case for BPF_REROUTE yet. Add test cases for both
normal and abnormal situations. The abnormal situation is set up with an
fq qdisc on the reroute target device. Without proper fixes, overflow
this qdisc queue limit (to trigger a drop) would panic the kernel.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/62c8ddc1e924269dcf80d2e8af1a1e632cee0b3a.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
      6c77997b
    • Yan Zhai's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECT · 43a7c3ef
      Yan Zhai authored 
      There is no lwt_xmit test case for BPF_REDIRECT yet. Add test cases for
both normal and abnormal situations. For abnormal test cases, devices
are set down or have its carrier set down. Without proper fixes,
BPF_REDIRECT to either ingress or egress of such device would panic the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/96bf435243641939d9c9da329fab29cb45f7df22.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
      43a7c3ef
    • Yan Zhai's avatar
      lwt: Check LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE strictly · a171fbec
      Yan Zhai authored 
      LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE is implicitly assumed in ip(6)_finish_output2,
such that any positive return value from a xmit hook could cause
unexpected continue behavior, despite that related skb may have been
freed. This could be error-prone for future xmit hook ops. One of the
possible errors is to return statuses of dst_output directly.

To make the code safer, redefine LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE value to
distinguish from dst_output statuses and check the continue
condition explicitly.

Fixes: 3a0af8fd ("bpf: BPF for lightweight tunnel infrastructure")
Suggested-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/96b939b85eda00e8df4f7c080f770970a4c5f698.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
      a171fbec
    • Yan Zhai's avatar
      lwt: Fix return values of BPF xmit ops · 29b22bad
      Yan Zhai authored 
      BPF encap ops can return different types of positive values, such like
NET_RX_DROP, NET_XMIT_CN, NETDEV_TX_BUSY, and so on, from function
skb_do_redirect and bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute. At the xmit hook, such return
values would be treated implicitly as LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE in
ip(6)_finish_output2. When this happens, skbs that have been freed would
continue to the neighbor subsystem, causing use-after-free bug and
kernel crashes.

To fix the incorrect behavior, skb_do_redirect return values can be
simply discarded, the same as tc-egress behavior. On the other hand,
bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute returns useful errors to local senders, e.g. PMTU
information. Thus convert its return values to avoid the conflict with
LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE.

Fixes: 3a0af8fd ("bpf: BPF for lightweight tunnel infrastructure")
Reported-by: default avatarJordan Griege <jgriege@cloudflare.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Suggested-by: default avatarStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0d2b878186cfe215fec6b45769c1cd0591d3628d.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
      29b22bad
    • Xu Kuohai's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for arm64 · 5f6395fd
      Xu Kuohai authored 
      Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from
BPF test_progs selftests:

  # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap
  #115/1   ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK
  #115/2   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK
  #115/3   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK
  #115     ldsx_insn:OK
  #302/1   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK
  #302/2   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK
  #302/3   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK
  #302/4   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK
  #302/5   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK
  #302/6   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK
  #302     verifier_bswap:OK
  #316/1   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK
  #316/2   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK
  #316     verifier_gotol:OK
  #324/1   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK
  #324/2   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #324/3   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK
  #324/4   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #324/5   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK
  #324/6   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #324/7   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK
  #324/8   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK
  #324/9   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324/10  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK
  #324/11  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324     verifier_ldsx:OK
  #335/1   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK
  #335/2   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/3   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK
  #335/4   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/5   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK
  #335/6   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/7   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK
  #335/8   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/9   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK
  #335/10  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #335/11  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/12  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/13  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/14  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/15  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK
  #335/16  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #335/17  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/18  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/19  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/20  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/21  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK
  #335/22  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/23  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK
  #335/24  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK
  #335     verifier_movsx:OK
  #347/1   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/2   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/3   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/4   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/5   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/6   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/7   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/8   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/9   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/10  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/11  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/12  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/13  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/14  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/15  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/16  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/17  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/18  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/19  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/20  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/21  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/22  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/23  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/24  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/25  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/26  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/27  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/28  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/29  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/30  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/31  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/32  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/33  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/34  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/35  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/36  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/37  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/38  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/39  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/40  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/41  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/42  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/43  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/44  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/45  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/46  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/47  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/48  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/49  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/50  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/51  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/52  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/53  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/54  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/55  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/56  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/57  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/58  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/59  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/60  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/61  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/62  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/63  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/64  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/65  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/66  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/67  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/68  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/69  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/70  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/71  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/72  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/73  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/74  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/75  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/76  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/77  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/78  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/79  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/80  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/81  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/82  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/83  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/84  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/85  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/86  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/87  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/88  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/89  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/90  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/91  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/92  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/93  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/94  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/95  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/96  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/97  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/98  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/99  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347     verifier_sdiv:OK
  Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-8-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
      5f6395fd
    • Xu Kuohai's avatar
      bpf, arm64: Support signed div/mod instructions · 68b18191
      Xu Kuohai authored 
      Add JIT for signed div/mod instructions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-7-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
      68b18191
    • Xu Kuohai's avatar
      bpf, arm64: Support 32-bit offset jmp instruction · c32b6ee5
      Xu Kuohai authored 
      Add support for 32-bit offset jmp instructions. Given the arm64 direct jump
range is +-128MB, which is large enough for BPF prog, jumps beyond this range
are not supported.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-6-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
      c32b6ee5
    • Xu Kuohai's avatar
      bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap · 1104247f
      Xu Kuohai authored 
      Add JIT support for unconditional bswap instructions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: default avatarFlorent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-5-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
      1104247f
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7