- 27 May, 2011 40 commits
-
-
Graeme Gregory authored
The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select the correct regulator name depending on the subclass of device. Since V1 Use features passed via platform data instead of global variable. Signed-off-by:
Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk> Acked-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by:
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
Graeme Gregory authored
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how regulators are enabled and disabled. The names of the regulators also changed. The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well. Since V1 Use the features variable passed via platform data instead of calling global function. Change the very switch like if statements to be a more readable switch statement. Since V2 twl6025 doesn't use remap so remove it from the macros. Since V3 enable/disable functions for 4030/6030 were seperated upstream so rebase on top of this. Change DCDC reference to SMPS as this is used in TRM. Change list_voltage slightly to have less code. Signed-off-by:
-
Balaji T K authored
TWL6030: regulator is disabled via VREG_STATE TWL4030: regulator is disabled via VREG_GRP Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops Signed-off-by:
Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> Acked-by:
-
Balaji T K authored
TWL6030: regulator is enabled via VREG_STATE TWL4030: regulator is enabled via VREG_GRP Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
This driver adds functionality to the tps65911 chip driver. Two of the comparators are configurable by software and measures VCCS voltage to detect high or low voltage scenarios. Signed-off-by:
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> Acked-by:
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
GPIO 1 to 8 are added for TPS65911 chip version. The gpio driver now handles more than one gpio lines. Subsequent versions of the chip family can add new GPIO lines with minimal driver changes. Signed-off-by:
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
The GPIO driver should reside in drivers/gpio/ for better organization. Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
TPS65911 adds new interrupt sources, as well as two new registers to handle them, one for interrupt status and one for interrupt masking. The added irqs are: -VMBCH2 - Low and High threshold -GPIO1-8 - Rising and falling edge detection -WTCHDG - Watchdog interrupt -PWRDN - PWRDN reset interrupt The code should handle these new registers only when the chip version is TPS65911. Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
The tps65911 chip introduces new features, including changes in the regulator module. - VDD1 and VDD2 remain unchanged. - VDD3 is now named VDDCTRL and has a wider voltage range. - LDOs are now named LDO1...8 and voltage ranges are sequential, making LDOs easier to handle. Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
The TPS65911 is the next generation of the TPS65910 family of PMIC chips. It adds a few features: - Watchdog Timer - PWM & LED generators - Comparators for system control status It also adds a set of Interrupts and GPIOs, among other things. The driver exports a function to identify between different versions of the tps65910 family, allowing other modules to identify the capabilities of the current chip. Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
We use val as array index, thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1. Signed-off-by:
Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by:
-
Fabio Estevam authored
Voltage values should be expressed in microvolts, not in milivolts. Signed-off-by:
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Signed-off-by:
Ranjani Vaidyanathan <ra5478@freescale.com> Acked-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
In current implementation, the original macro implementation assumes the caller pass the parameter starting from 1 (to match the register names in datasheet). Thus we have unneeded plus one then minus one operations when using MAX8997_REG_BUCK1DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK2DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK5DVS macros. This patch removes these macros to avoid unneeded plus one then minus one operations without reducing readability. Signed-off-by:
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by:
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Acked-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
If bytes == (TPS65910_MAX_REGISTER + 1), we have a buffer overflow when doing memcpy(&msg[1], src, bytes). Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
When applying the set_voltage() requests from consumers skip over those consumers that haven't set anything, otherwise we'll come out with a maximum voltage of zero. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
If either a regulator driver can't tell us what the optimum mode is (or doesn't have modes in the first place) or the system doesn't allow DRMS changes then it's more helpful for users to just say that we're in the optimal mode, even if it's from a selection of one. Still report errors if the process of picking and setting a mode changes as this may indicate that we're stuck in a low power mode and unable to deliver a higher current that the consumer just asked for. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonghwan Choi authored
fix unreachable code. Signed-off-by:
Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
The desc_id variable should not be a static variable. The rest of the code assumes the desc_id must less than TPSxxxxx_NUM_REGULATOR. If we set desc_id to be a static variable, checking the return value of rdev_get_id() may return error. Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
On May 10, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:30:36 -0500 Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> wrote: >> >> On May 10, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi Liam, >>>> >>>> After merging the voltage tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >>>> allmodconfig) failed like this: >>>> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_gpio_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined! >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_irq_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined! >>>> ERROR: "irq_modify_status" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >>>> ERROR: "irq_set_chip_and_handler_name" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >>>> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >>>> >>>> I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 for today. >>> >>> Jorge, could you send a fix for this today. >> >> The following patch should solve this: >> >> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> >> MFD: Fix TPS65910 build >> >> Support for tps65910 as a module is not available. The driver can >> only be compiled as built-in. OTOH, the regulator driver can still >> be built as module without breaking the compilation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> > > Today (even with the above patch included) I got these errors from the > x86_64 allmodconfig build: > > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf4140): undefined reference to `i2c_master_send' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_read': > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf41d2): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_init': > tps65910.c:(.init.text+0xcb83): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_exit': > tps65910.c:(.exit.text+0x6e0): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver' > > I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 again today. Following patch should fix the dependency problems. Please review: From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> [PATCH] MFD: TPS65910: Fix I2C dependency TPS65910 driver can only be compiled built-in, so the I2C driver should be as well. Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug because MC13xxx_DEFINE explictly defines the order of each entry in the array. Thus revert the patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
These became unused with the IRQ removal patch, I'm fairly sure that a patch was sent earlier by someone else but it doesn't seem to have been applied and I don't have a copy sitting around any more. Signed-off-by:
-
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria authored
On May 10, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Liam, >> >> After merging the voltage tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >> ERROR: "tps65910_gpio_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: "tps65910_irq_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: "irq_modify_status" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: "irq_set_chip_and_handler_name" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined! >> >> I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 for today. > > Jorge, could you send a fix for this today. > > Thanks > > Liam > The following patch should solve this: From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> MFD: Fix TPS65910 build Support for tps65910 as a module is not available. The driver can only be compiled as built-in. OTOH, the regulator driver can still be built as module without breaking the compilation. Signed-off-by:
-
Graeme Gregory authored
The regulator module consists of 3 DCDCs and 8 LDOs. The output voltages are configurable and are meant to supply power to the main processor and other components Signed-off-by:
-
Graeme Gregory authored
This module controls the interrupt handling for the tps chip. The interrupt sources are the following: - GPIO falling/rising edge detection - Battery voltage below/above threshold - PWRON signal - PWRHOLD signal - Temperature detection - RTC alarm and periodic event Signed-off-by:
-
Graeme Gregory authored
TPS65910 has one configurable GPIO that can be used for several purposes. Subsequent versions of the TPS chip support more than one GPIO. Signed-off-by:
-
Graeme Gregory authored
The TPS65910 chip is a power management IC for multimedia and handheld devices. It contains the following components: - Regulators - GPIO controller - RTC The tps65910 core driver is registered as a platform driver and provides communication through I2C with the host device for the different components. Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
Currently, we call mc13xxx_reg_read and mc13xxx_reg_rmw for the same register. This can be converted to simply a mc13xxx_reg_read and a mc13xxx_reg_write, thus save a redundant register read. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
Some systems, particularly physically large systems used for early prototyping, may experience substantial voltage drops between the regulator and the consumers as a result of long traces in the system. With these systems voltages may need to be set higher than requested in order to ensure reliable system operation. Allow systems to work around such hardware issues by allowing constraints to supply an offset to be applied to any requested and reported voltages. This is not ideal, especially since the voltage drop may be load dependant, but is sufficient for most affected systems, it is not expected to be used in production hardware. The offset is applied after all constraint processing so constraints should be specified in terms of consumer values not physically configured values. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
supply_regulator_dev (using a struct pointer) has been deprecated in favour of supply_regulator (using a regulator name) for quite a few releases now with a warning generated if it is used and there are no current in tree users so just remove the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
In include/linux/mfd/mc13892.h, we define MC13892_VCOINCELL as 23. Thus VCOINCELL should be defined as 23th element in mc13892_regulators array, not the first one. This actually fixes an off-by-one bug while accessing mc13892_regulators array. For example, In mc13892_regulator_probe, we use MC13892_VCAM as array index of mc13892_regulators array. mc13892_regulators[MC13892_VCAM].desc.ops->set_mode = mc13892_vcam_set_mode; Currently, it access mc13892_regulators[12] ,which is VAUDIO not VCAM. Signed-off-by: -
Mark Brown authored
Don't go looking up the rdev pointer every time, just use a local variable like everything else. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
The second parameter of regulator_mode_constrain takes a pointer. This patch fixes below warning: drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_set_mode': drivers/regulator/core.c:2014: warning: passing argument 2 of 'regulator_mode_constrain' makes pointer from integer without a cast drivers/regulator/core.c:200: note: expected 'int *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int' Signed-off-by:
Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
-
Saquib Herman authored
Current set_mode logic does not support 6030. The logic for 4030 is not reusable for 6030 as the mode setting for 6030 now uses the new CFG_STATE register. We hence rename the old get_status as being specific to 4030. Signed-off-by:
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com> Acked-by:
-
Saquib Herman authored
Current get_status logic does not support 6030 get_status. The logic for 4030 is not reusable for 6030 as the status check for 6030 now depends on the new CFG_STATE register. We hence rename the old get_status as being specific to 4030 and remove the redundant check for the same. Signed-off-by:
-
Saquib Herman authored
With TWL6030, it is not enough to ensure that the regulator is the group of P1 group (CPU/Linux), but we need to check the state as far as APP is concerned as well. Split the current is_enabled to 6030 and 4030 specific ones. This split impacts few macros and variables as well, but sets up the stage for further fixes to set_mode and get_status in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by:
-
Saquib Herman authored
TWL6030 does not have remap register. The current implementation causes value of remap to be written to state register, accidentally causing the regulators which are probed to be switched on as well. This is wrong as regulators should be controllable based on calls to enable/disable for TWL regulator framework. Further, the values initialized make no sense as well. We hence remove this from the initalizers and also write to remap register only if the TWL is 4030. Signed-off-by:
-
Saquib Herman authored
TWL6030 requires an additional register write to CFG_STATE register to explicitly state that the regulator is in a certain state. Merely associating the regulator with the group is not enough. Add the required register field definitions and fix the handling for TWL6030 enable/disable. Signed-off-by:
-
Axel Lin authored
Otherwise, calling platform_get_drvdata in tps6105x_regulator_remove returns NULL. Signed-off-by:
-
