"smpboot: native_kick_ap: bad cpu 33" is absolutely useless information.

Replace it with something meaningful which allows to decode the failure
condition.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.170806023@linutronix.de

Put the processor accounting into a data structure, which will gain more
topology related information in the next steps, and sanitize the accounting.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.111451909@linutronix.de

Having the same check whether the number of assigned CPUs has reached the
nr_cpu_ids limit twice in the same code path is pointless. Repeating the
information that CPUs are ignored over and over is also pointless noise.

Remove the redundant check and reduce the noise by using a pr_warn_once().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.050264369@linutronix.de

Now that all external fiddling with num_processors and disabled_cpus is
gone, move the last user prefill_possible_map() into the topology code too
and remove the global visibility of these variables.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.994756960@linutronix.de

XENPV does not use the APIC. It's just piggy packing on the infrastructure
and fiddles with global variables as it sees fit.

These global variables are going away, so let XENPV register pseudo APIC
IDs to keep the accounting correct and keep up the illusion that XEN/PV is
something sane.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.940043512@linutronix.de

The MADT table for XEN/PV dom0 is not really useful and registering the
APICs is momentarily a pointless exercise because XENPV does not use an
APIC at all.

It overrides the x86_init.mpparse.parse_smp_config() callback, resets
num_processors and counts how many of them are provided by the hypervisor.

This is in the way of cleaning up the APIC registration. Prevent MADT
registration for XEN/PV temporarily until the rework is completed and
XEN/PV can use the MADT again.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.885489468@linutronix.de

Aside of switching over to the new interface, record the number of
registered CPUs locally, which allows to make num_processors and
disabled_cpus confined to the topology code.

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.830955273@linutronix.de

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.776009244@linutronix.de

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.720970412@linutronix.de

Use the new topology registration functions and make the early boot code
path __init. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.664738831@linutronix.de

generic_processor_info() aside of being a complete misnomer is used for
both early boot registration and ACPI CPU hotplug.

While it's arguable that this can share some code, it results in code which
is hard to understand and kept around post init for no real reason.

Also the call sites do lots of manual fiddling in topology related
variables instead of having proper interfaces for the purpose which handle
the topology internals correctly.

Provide topology_register_apic(), topology_hotplug_apic() and
topology_hotunplug_apic() which have the extra magic of the call sites
incorporated and for now are wrappers around generic_processor_info().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.605007456@linutronix.de

The APIC/CPU registration sits in the middle of the APIC code. In fact this
is a topology evaluation function and has nothing to do with the inner
workings of the local APIC.

Move it out into a file which reflects what this is about.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.543948812@linutronix.de

The ACPI ID for CPUs is preset with U32_MAX which is completely non
obvious. Use a proper define for it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.177504138@linutronix.de

Paranoia is not wrong, but having an APIC callback which is in most
implementations a complete NOOP and in one actually looking whether the
APICID of an upcoming CPU has been registered. The same APICID which was
used to bring the CPU out of wait for startup.

That's paranoia for the paranoia sake. Remove the voodoo.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.116510935@linutronix.de

There is absolutely no point to write the APIC ID which was read from the
local APIC earlier, back into the local APIC for the 64-bit UP case.

Remove that along with the apic callback which is solely there for this
pointless exercise.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.055288922@linutronix.de

physid_t is a wrapper around bitmap. Just remove the onion layer and use
bitmap functionality directly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.994904510@linutronix.de

There is no reason to have the early mptable evaluation conditionally
invoked only from the AMD numa topology code.

Make it explicit and invoke it from setup_arch() right after the
corresponding ACPI init call. Remove the pointless wrapper and invoke
x86_init::mpparse::early_parse_smp_config() directly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.931761608@linutronix.de

Now that all platforms have the new split SMP configuration callbacks set
up, flip the switch and remove the old callback pointer and mop up the
platform code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.870883080@linutronix.de

Initialize the new callbacks in preparation for switching the core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.808238769@linutronix.de

Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks
in.

No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.745028043@linutronix.de

Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks
in.

No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.683073662@linutronix.de

Initialize the split SMP configuration callbacks with NOOPs as MID is
strictly ACPI only.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.620189339@linutronix.de

Select x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() as SMP configuration parser in
preparation of splitting up the get_smp_config() callback.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.558085053@linutronix.de

x86_dtb_init() is a misnomer and it really should be used as a SMP
configuration parser which is selected by the platform via
x86_init::mpparse:parse_smp_config().

Rename it to x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() in preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.495992801@linutronix.de

In preparation of splitting the get_smp_config() callback, rename
default_get_smp_config() to mpparse_get_smp_config() and provide an early
and late wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.433811243@linutronix.de

The early argument of x86_init::mpparse::get_smp_config() is more than
confusing. Provide two callbacks, one for each purpose.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.370491894@linutronix.de

MPTABLE is no longer the default SMP configuration mechanism.  Rename it to
mpparse_find_mptable() because that's what it does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.306287711@linutronix.de

No more users.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.243307499@linutronix.de

No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is
an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid*
functions all over the place.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.181901887@linutronix.de

No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is
an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid*
functions all over the place.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.119261725@linutronix.de

There is no point for this function. The only case where this is used is
when there is no XAPIC available, which means the broadcast address is 0xF.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.057209154@linutronix.de

Yet another set_bit() operation wrapped in oring a mask.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.995080989@linutronix.de

There is no point to do that. The ATOMs have an XAPIC for which this
function is a pointless exercise.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.931617775@linutronix.de

Detect all possible combinations of mismatch right in the CPUID evaluation
code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.867699078@linutronix.de

The package shift has been already evaluated by the early CPU init.

Put the mindless copy right next to the original leaf 0xb parser.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.637385562@linutronix.de

The new topology CPUID parser installs already fake topology for XEN/PV,
which ends up with cpuinfo::max_cores = 1.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.576579177@linutronix.de

Now that the core code does not use this monstrosity anymore, it's time to
put it to rest.

The only real purpose was to read the APIC ID on UV and VSMP systems for
the actual evaluation. That's what the core code does now.

For doing the actual shift operation there is truly no APIC callback
required.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.516536121@linutronix.de

No more users.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.455839743@linutronix.de

No more users. Stick it into the ugly code museum.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.395230346@linutronix.de

Now that everything is converted switch it over and remove the intermediate
operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.334185785@linutronix.de