1. 18 Apr, 2020 27 commits
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      uapi: linux: fiemap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 6e88abb8
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      6e88abb8
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      uapi: linux: dlm_device.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · d6cdad87
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      d6cdad87
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      tpm_eventlog.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 06ccf63d
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      06ccf63d
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      ti_wilink_st.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 4ea19ecf
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      4ea19ecf
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      swap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 16c3380f
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      16c3380f
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      skbuff.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 5c91aa1d
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      5c91aa1d
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      sched: topology.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · fe946db6
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      fe946db6
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      rslib.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 9dd8bb5f
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      9dd8bb5f
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      rio.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · a1c4b924
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      a1c4b924
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      posix_acl.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 70f1451e
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      70f1451e
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      platform_data: wilco-ec.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 1223f3db
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      1223f3db
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      memcontrol.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 307ed94c
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      307ed94c
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      list_lru.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 859b4941
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      859b4941
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      lib: cpu_rmap: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 31232272
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      31232272
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      irq.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 7856e9f1
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      7856e9f1
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      ihex.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 1d9e13e8
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      1d9e13e8
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      igmp.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 0ead3364
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      0ead3364
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      genalloc.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 89f60a5d
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      89f60a5d
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      ethtool.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 5299a11a
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      5299a11a
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      energy_model.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · beb69f15
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      beb69f15
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      enclosure.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 19219946
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      19219946
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      dirent.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · a2008395
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      a2008395
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      digsig.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 1fa0949b
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      1fa0949b
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      can: dev: peak_canfd.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · e76018cb
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      e76018cb
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      blk_types: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 5a58ec8c
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      5a58ec8c
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      blk-mq: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · f36aaf8b
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      f36aaf8b
    • Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar
      bio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 0a368bf0
      Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
      this change:
      
      "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
      may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
      zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      0a368bf0
  2. 12 Apr, 2020 10 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Linux 5.7-rc1 · 8f3d9f35
      Linus Torvalds authored
      8f3d9f35
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      MAINTAINERS: sort field names for all entries · 3b50142d
      Linus Torvalds authored
      This sorts the actual field names too, potentially causing even more
      chaos and confusion at merge time if you have edited the MAINTAINERS
      file.  But the end result is a more consistent layout, and hopefully
      it's a one-time pain minimized by doing this just before the -rc1
      release.
      
      This was entirely scripted:
      
        ./scripts/parse-maintainers.pl --input=MAINTAINERS --output=MAINTAINERS --order
      Requested-by: default avatarJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3b50142d
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      MAINTAINERS: sort entries by entry name · 4400b7d6
      Linus Torvalds authored
      They are all supposed to be sorted, but people who add new entries don't
      always know the alphabet.  Plus sometimes the entry names get edited,
      and people don't then re-order the entry.
      
      Let's see how painful this will be for merging purposes (the MAINTAINERS
      file is often edited in various different trees), but Joe claims there's
      relatively few patches in -next that touch this, and doing it just
      before -rc1 is likely the best time.  Fingers crossed.
      
      This was scripted with
      
        /scripts/parse-maintainers.pl --input=MAINTAINERS --output=MAINTAINERS
      
      but then I also ended up manually upper-casing a few entry names that
      stood out when looking at the end result.
      Requested-by: default avatarJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4400b7d6
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'x86-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip · 4f8a3cc1
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
       "A set of three patches to fix the fallout of the newly added split
        lock detection feature.
      
        It addressed the case where a KVM guest triggers a split lock #AC and
        KVM reinjects it into the guest which is not prepared to handle it.
      
        Add proper sanity checks which prevent the unconditional injection
        into the guest and handles the #AC on the host side in the same way as
        user space detections are handled. Depending on the detection mode it
        either warns and disables detection for the task or kills the task if
        the mode is set to fatal"
      
      * tag 'x86-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        KVM: VMX: Extend VMXs #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC in guest
        KVM: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator
        x86/split_lock: Provide handle_guest_split_lock()
      4f8a3cc1
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'timers-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip · 0785249f
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull time(keeping) updates from Thomas Gleixner:
      
       - Fix the time_for_children symlink in /proc/$PID/ so it properly
         reflects that it part of the 'time' namespace
      
       - Add the missing userns limit for the allowed number of time
         namespaces, which was half defined but the actual array member was
         not added. This went unnoticed as the array has an exessive empty
         member at the end but introduced a user visible regression as the
         output was corrupted.
      
       - Prevent further silent ucount corruption by adding a BUILD_BUG_ON()
         to catch half updated data.
      
      * tag 'timers-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        ucount: Make sure ucounts in /proc/sys/user don't regress again
        time/namespace: Add max_time_namespaces ucount
        time/namespace: Fix time_for_children symlink
      0785249f
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'sched-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip · 590680d1
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull scheduler fixes/updates from Thomas Gleixner:
      
       - Deduplicate the average computations in the scheduler core and the
         fair class code.
      
       - Fix a raise between runtime distribution and assignement which can
         cause exceeding the quota by up to 70%.
      
       - Prevent negative results in the imbalanace calculation
      
       - Remove a stale warning in the workqueue code which can be triggered
         since the call site was moved out of preempt disabled code. It's a
         false positive.
      
       - Deduplicate the print macros for procfs
      
       - Add the ucmap values to the SCHED_DEBUG procfs output for completness
      
      * tag 'sched-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs
        sched/debug: Factor out printing formats into common macros
        sched/debug: Remove redundant macro define
        sched/core: Remove unused rq::last_load_update_tick
        workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()
        sched/fair: Fix negative imbalance in imbalance calculation
        sched/fair: Fix race between runtime distribution and assignment
        sched/fair: Align rq->avg_idle and rq->avg_scan_cost
      590680d1
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'perf-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip · 20e2aa81
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull perf fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
       "Three fixes/updates for perf:
      
         - Fix the perf event cgroup tracking which tries to track the cgroup
           even for disabled events.
      
         - Add Ice Lake server support for uncore events
      
         - Disable pagefaults when retrieving the physical address in the
           sampling code"
      
      * tag 'perf-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        perf/core: Disable page faults when getting phys address
        perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Ice Lake server uncore support
        perf/cgroup: Correct indirection in perf_less_group_idx()
        perf/core: Fix event cgroup tracking
      20e2aa81
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'locking-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip · 652fa53c
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull locking fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
       "Three small fixes/updates for the locking core code:
      
         - Plug a task struct reference leak in the percpu rswem
           implementation.
      
         - Document the refcount interaction with PID_MAX_LIMIT
      
         - Improve the 'invalid wait context' data dump in lockdep so it
           contains all information which is required to decode the problem"
      
      * tag 'locking-urgent-2020-04-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        locking/lockdep: Improve 'invalid wait context' splat
        locking/refcount: Document interaction with PID_MAX_LIMIT
        locking/percpu-rwsem: Fix a task_struct refcount
      652fa53c
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag '5.7-rc-smb3-fixes-part2' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6 · 4119bf9f
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull cifs fixes from Steve French:
       "Ten cifs/smb fixes:
      
         - five RDMA (smbdirect) related fixes
      
         - add experimental support for swap over SMB3 mounts
      
         - also a fix which improves performance of signed connections"
      
      * tag '5.7-rc-smb3-fixes-part2' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6:
        smb3: enable swap on SMB3 mounts
        smb3: change noisy error message to FYI
        smb3: smbdirect support can be configured by default
        cifs: smbd: Do not schedule work to send immediate packet on every receive
        cifs: smbd: Properly process errors on ib_post_send
        cifs: Allocate crypto structures on the fly for calculating signatures of incoming packets
        cifs: smbd: Update receive credits before sending and deal with credits roll back on failure before sending
        cifs: smbd: Check send queue size before posting a send
        cifs: smbd: Merge code to track pending packets
        cifs: ignore cached share root handle closing errors
      4119bf9f
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'nfs-for-5.7-2' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs · 50bda5fa
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull NFS client bugfix from Trond Myklebust:
       "Fix an RCU read lock leakage in pnfs_alloc_ds_commits_list()"
      
      * tag 'nfs-for-5.7-2' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs:
        pNFS: Fix RCU lock leakage
      50bda5fa
  3. 11 Apr, 2020 3 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'nios2-v5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lftan/nios2 · b032227c
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull nios2 updates from Ley Foon Tan:
      
       - Remove nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org from MAINTAINERS
      
       - remove 'resetvalue' property
      
       - rename 'altr,gpio-bank-width' -> 'altr,ngpio'
      
       - enable the common clk subsystem on Nios2
      
      * tag 'nios2-v5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lftan/nios2:
        MAINTAINERS: Remove nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org
        arch: nios2: remove 'resetvalue' property
        arch: nios2: rename 'altr,gpio-bank-width' -> 'altr,ngpio'
        arch: nios2: Enable the common clk subsystem on Nios2
      b032227c
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'dma-mapping-5.7-1' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping · 75e71883
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull dma-mapping fixes from Christoph Hellwig:
      
       - fix an integer truncation in dma_direct_get_required_mask
         (Kishon Vijay Abraham)
      
       - fix the display of dma mapping types (Grygorii Strashko)
      
      * tag 'dma-mapping-5.7-1' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping:
        dma-debug: fix displaying of dma allocation type
        dma-direct: fix data truncation in dma_direct_get_required_mask()
      75e71883
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'kbuild-v5.7-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild · b753101a
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Pull more Kbuild updates from Masahiro Yamada:
      
       - raise minimum supported binutils version to 2.23
      
       - remove old CONFIG_AS_* macros that we know binutils >= 2.23 supports
      
       - move remaining CONFIG_AS_* tests to Kconfig from Makefile
      
       - enable -Wtautological-compare warnings to catch more issues
      
       - do not support GCC plugins for GCC <= 4.7
      
       - fix various breakages of 'make xconfig'
      
       - include the linker version used for linking the kernel into
         LINUX_COMPILER, which is used for the banner, and also exposed to
         /proc/version
      
       - link lib-y objects to vmlinux forcibly when CONFIG_MODULES=y, which
         allows us to remove the lib-ksyms.o workaround, and to solve the last
         known issue of the LLVM linker
      
       - add dummy tools in scripts/dummy-tools/ to enable all compiler tests
         in Kconfig, which will be useful for distro maintainers
      
       - support the single switch, LLVM=1 to use Clang and all LLVM utilities
         instead of GCC and Binutils.
      
       - support LLVM_IAS=1 to enable the integrated assembler, which is still
         experimental
      
      * tag 'kbuild-v5.7-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild: (36 commits)
        kbuild: fix comment about missing include guard detection
        kbuild: support LLVM=1 to switch the default tools to Clang/LLVM
        kbuild: replace AS=clang with LLVM_IAS=1
        kbuild: add dummy toolchains to enable all cc-option etc. in Kconfig
        kbuild: link lib-y objects to vmlinux forcibly when CONFIG_MODULES=y
        MIPS: fw: arc: add __weak to prom_meminit and prom_free_prom_memory
        kbuild: remove -I$(srctree)/tools/include from scripts/Makefile
        kbuild: do not pass $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) to scripts/mkcompile_h
        Documentation/llvm: fix the name of llvm-size
        kbuild: mkcompile_h: Include $LD version in /proc/version
        kconfig: qconf: Fix a few alignment issues
        kconfig: qconf: remove some old bogus TODOs
        kconfig: qconf: fix support for the split view mode
        kconfig: qconf: fix the content of the main widget
        kconfig: qconf: Change title for the item window
        kconfig: qconf: clean deprecated warnings
        gcc-plugins: drop support for GCC <= 4.7
        kbuild: Enable -Wtautological-compare
        x86: update AS_* macros to binutils >=2.23, supporting ADX and AVX2
        crypto: x86 - clean up poly1305-x86_64-cryptogams.S by 'make clean'
        ...
      b753101a