Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 07 Feb, 2016 34 commits
  3. 06 Feb, 2016 6 commits
    • Eric Dumazet's avatar
      tcp: fastopen: call tcp_fin() if FIN present in SYNACK · e3e17b77
      Eric Dumazet authored 
      When we acknowledge a FIN, it is not enough to ack the sequence number
and queue the skb into receive queue. We also have to call tcp_fin()
to properly update socket state and send proper poll() notifications.

It seems we also had the problem if we received a SYN packet with the
FIN flag set, but it does not seem an urgent issue, as no known
implementation can do that.

Fixes: 61d2bcae ("tcp: fastopen: accept data/FIN present in SYNACK message")
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e3e17b77
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'tipc-topology-updates' · 9a23ac47
      David S. Miller authored 
      Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan says:

====================
tipc: cleanups, fixes & improvements for topology server

This series contains topology server cleanups, fixes and improvements.

Cleanups in #1-#4:
We remove duplicate data structures and aligin the rest of the code accordingly.

Fixes in #5-#8:
The bugs occur either during configuration or while running on SMP targets,
which are race conditions that pop up under different situations.

Improvements in #9-#10:
Updates to decrease timer usage and improve readability.

v2: Updated commit message in patch 6 based on feedback from
    Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9a23ac47
    • Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan's avatar
      tipc: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of WQ_UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1 · 06c8581f
      Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan authored 
      Until now, tipc_rcv and tipc_send workqueues in server are allocated
with parameters WQ_UNBOUND & max_active = 1.
This parameters passed to this function makes it equivalent to
alloc_ordered_workqueue(). The later form is more explicit and
can inherit future ordered_workqueue changes.

In this commit we replace alloc_workqueue() with more readable
alloc_ordered_workqueue().
Acked-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarParthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      06c8581f
    • Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan's avatar
      tipc: donot create timers if subscription timeout = TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER · ae245557
      Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan authored 
      Until now, we create timers even for the subscription requests
with timeout = TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER.
This can be improved by avoiding timer creation when the timeout
is set to TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER.

In this commit, we introduce a check to creates timers only
when timeout != TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER.
Acked-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarParthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ae245557
    • Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan's avatar
      tipc: protect tipc_subscrb_get() with subscriber spin lock · f3ad288c
      Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan authored 
      Until now, during subscription creation the mod_time() &
tipc_subscrb_get() are called after releasing the subscriber
spin lock.

In a SMP system when performing a subscription creation, if the
subscription timeout occurs simultaneously (the timer is
scheduled to run on another CPU) then the timer thread
might decrement the subscribers refcount before the create
thread increments the refcount.

This can be simulated by creating subscription with timeout=0 and
sometimes the timeout occurs before the create request is complete.
This leads to the following message:
[30.702949] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, kworker/u8:3/87
[30.703834] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[30.704826] CPU: 1 PID: 87 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 4.4.0-rc8+ #18
[30.704826] Workqueue: tipc_rcv tipc_recv_work [tipc]
[30.704826] task: ffff88003f878600 ti: ffff88003fae0000 task.ti: ffff88003fae0000
[30.704826] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8109196c>]  [<ffffffff8109196c>] spin_dump+0x5c/0xe0
[...]
[30.704826] Call Trace:
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff81091a16>] spin_bug+0x26/0x30
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff81091b75>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xe5/0x120
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff81684439>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x19/0x20
[30.704826]  [<ffffffffa0096f10>] tipc_subscrb_rcv_cb+0x1d0/0x330 [tipc]
[30.704826]  [<ffffffffa00a37b1>] tipc_receive_from_sock+0xc1/0x150 [tipc]
[30.704826]  [<ffffffffa00a31df>] tipc_recv_work+0x3f/0x80 [tipc]
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff8106a739>] process_one_work+0x149/0x3c0
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff8106aa16>] worker_thread+0x66/0x460
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff8106a9b0>] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff8106a9b0>] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff8107029d>] kthread+0xed/0x110
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff810701b0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x190/0x190
[30.704826]  [<ffffffff81684bdf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70

In this commit,
1. we remove the check for the return code for mod_timer()
2. we protect tipc_subscrb_get() using the subscriber spin lock.
   We increment the subscriber's refcount as soon as we add the
   subscription to subscriber's subscription list.
Acked-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarParthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f3ad288c
    • Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan's avatar
      tipc: hold subscriber->lock for tipc_nametbl_subscribe() · d4091899
      Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan authored 
      Until now, while creating a subscription the subscriber lock
protects only the subscribers subscription list and not the
nametable. The call to tipc_nametbl_subscribe() is outside
the lock. However, at subscription timeout and cancel both
the subscribers subscription list and the nametable are
protected by the subscriber lock.

This asymmetric locking mechanism leads to the following problem:
In a SMP system, the timer can be fire on another core before
the create request is complete.
When the timer thread calls tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe() before create
thread calls tipc_nametbl_subscribe(), we get a nullptr exception.

This can be simulated by creating subscription with timeout=0 and
sometimes the timeout occurs before the create request is complete.

The following is the oops:
[57.569661] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
[57.577498] IP: [<ffffffffa02135aa>] tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x8a/0x120 [tipc]
[57.584820] PGD 0
[57.586834] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[57.685506] CPU: 14 PID: 10077 Comm: kworker/u40:1 Tainted: P OENX 3.12.48-52.27.1.     9688.1.PTF-default #1
[57.703637] Workqueue: tipc_rcv tipc_recv_work [tipc]
[57.708697] task: ffff88064c7f00c0 ti: ffff880629ef4000 task.ti: ffff880629ef4000
[57.716181] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02135aa>]  [<ffffffffa02135aa>] tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x8a/   0x120 [tipc]
[...]
[57.812327] Call Trace:
[57.814806]  [<ffffffffa0211c77>] tipc_subscrp_delete+0x37/0x90 [tipc]
[57.821357]  [<ffffffffa0211e2f>] tipc_subscrp_timeout+0x3f/0x70 [tipc]
[57.827982]  [<ffffffff810618c1>] call_timer_fn+0x31/0x100
[57.833490]  [<ffffffff81062709>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f9/0x2b0
[57.839414]  [<ffffffff8105a795>] __do_softirq+0xe5/0x230
[57.844827]  [<ffffffff81520d1c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[57.850150]  [<ffffffff81004665>] do_softirq+0x55/0x90
[57.855285]  [<ffffffff8105aa35>] irq_exit+0x95/0xa0
[57.860290]  [<ffffffff815215b5>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60
[57.866644]  [<ffffffff8152005d>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80
[57.872686]  [<ffffffffa02121c5>] tipc_subscrb_rcv_cb+0x2a5/0x3f0 [tipc]
[57.879425]  [<ffffffffa021c65f>] tipc_receive_from_sock+0x9f/0x100 [tipc]
[57.886324]  [<ffffffffa021c826>] tipc_recv_work+0x26/0x60 [tipc]
[57.892463]  [<ffffffff8106fb22>] process_one_work+0x172/0x420
[57.898309]  [<ffffffff8107079a>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x3c0
[57.903871]  [<ffffffff81077114>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0
[57.908751]  [<ffffffff8151f318>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90

In this commit, we do the following at subscription creation:
1. set the subscription's subscriber pointer before performing
   tipc_nametbl_subscribe(), as this value is required further in
   the call chain ex: by tipc_subscrp_send_event().
2. move tipc_nametbl_subscribe() under the scope of subscriber lock
Acked-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarParthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d4091899
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7