- 28 Mar, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Ankit Nautiyal authored
The low voltage sku check can be ignored as OEMs need to consider that when designing the board and then put any limits in VBT. Same is now changed in Bspec pages. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5272Signed-off-by:
Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Mar, 2022 12 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Rename the DRRS functiosn to say "(de)activate" rather than "enable/disable". This let's us differentiate between the logically enabled vs. actually currently active cases. v2: Fix kernel doc for intel_drrs_deactivate() Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315132752.11849-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by:
José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Make sure the CDCLK is high enough to support the so called "maximum pipe read bandwidth" limitation. Specified as 51.2 x CDCLK. Signed-off-by:
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal share of the total bandwidth of the slice to each active plane on that slice. So we take the max bandwidth of any of the planes on each slice and multiply that by the number of active planes on the slice to get a worst case estimate on how much bandwidth we require. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
The current code also forgets to call intel_atomic_lock_global_state() when other stuff besides the final min_cdlck changes in the state. That means we may throw away data which actually has changed, and thus we can't be at all sure what the code ends up doing during subsequent commits. Do the write lock properly. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We should round up when doing bandwidth calculations to make sure our estimates don't fall short of the actual number. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk() is entirely pointless. All it manages to do is somehow conflate the per-pipe min cdclk with dbuf min cdclk. There is no (at least documented) dbuf min cdclk limit on pre-skl so let's just get rid of all this confusion. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
There's really no need to maintain these total[] arrays to track the size of each plane's ddb allocation. We just stick the results straight into the crtc_state ddb tracking structures. The main annoyance with all this is the mismatch between wm_uv vs. ddb_y on pre-icl. If only the hw was consistent in what it considers the primary source of information we could avoid some of the uglyness. But since that is not the case we need a bit of special casing for planar formats. v2: Keep the ddb entry zeroed when the plane is disabled Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Handle the plane relative data rate in exactly the same way as we already handle the real data rate. Ie. pre-calculate it during intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(), and assign/clear it for the Y plane as needed. This should guarantee that the tracking is 100% consistent, and makes me have to think less when the same apporach is used by both types of data rate. We might even want to consider replacing the relative data rate with the real data rate entirely, but it's not clear if that will produce less optimal plane ddb allocations. So for now lets keep using the current approach. v2: Rebase due to async flip wm optimization Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Split the currently combined plane data_rate into the proper Y vs. CbCr components. This matches how we now track the plane dbuf allocations, and thus will make the dbuf bandwidth calculations actually produce the correct numbers for each dbuf slice. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Let's store the plane allocation in a manner which more closely matches how the hw operates. That is, we store the packed/CbCr ddb in one struct, and the Y ddb in another. Currently we're storing packed/Y in one struct, CbCr in the other. This also works pretty well for icl+ where the UV plane is the main plane and the Y plane is subservient to it. Although in this case we do not even use ddb_y as we do the ddb allocation in terms of hw planes. v2: Rebase Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
A few more updates in the alderlake-P voltage swing tables. eDP HBR3 table was the same as icelake one but now it has changes for voltage 0 and pre-emphasis 2 line. And DP tables also had one line change in each. Bspec: 49291 Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The kernel preference is to use the __packed macro instead of the direct __attribute__. Signed-off-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 18 Mar, 2022 8 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Name all the ICL_PCODE_SAGV_DE_MEM_SS_CONFIG request/response bits in a manner that we can actually understand what they're doing. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Use separate bitmasks for QGV vs. PSF GV points during the computation. Makes the whole thing a lot less confusing. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Don't just mask off all the PSF GV points when SAGV gets disabled. This should in fact cause the Pcode to reject the request since at least one PSF point must remain enabled at all times. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Fixes: 192fbfb7 ("drm/i915: Implement PSF GV point support") Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Give the pre-icl SAGV control functions a skl_ prefix instead of the intel_ prefix to make it a bit more clear that they are not some kind of universal things that can be called on any platform. Also make the functions void since we never use the return value anyway. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
If the mailbox returns an exceesively large SAGV block time let's just reject it. This avoids having to worry about overflows when we add the SAGV block time to the wm0 latency. We shall put the limit arbitrarily at U16_MAX. >65msec latency doesn't really make sense to me in any case. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Instead of leaving the SAGV enable/disable to the first commit let's try to disable it first thing to see if we can do it or not (disabling SAGV is a safe thing to at any time). This avoids running the code in this funny intermediate state where we don't know if SAGV is available or not. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
I'd like to see the SAGV block time we got from the mailbox in the logs regardless of whether other factors prevent the use of SAGV. So let's adjust the code to always query the SAGV block time, log it, and then reset it if SAGV is not actually supported. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
For modern platforms the spec explicitly states that a SAGV block time of zero means that SAGV is not supported. Let's extend that to all platforms. Supposedly there should be no systems where this isn't true, and it'll allow us to: - use the same code regardless of older vs. newer platform - wm latencies already treat 0 as disabled, so this fits well with other related code - make it a bit more clear when SAGV is used vs. not - avoid overflows from adding U32_MAX with a u16 wm0 latency value which could cause us to miscalculate the SAGV watermarks on tgl+ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 17 Mar, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Jani Nikula authored
Remove the uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include from drm/i915_drm.h, and stop being a proxy for uapi/drm/i915_drm.h. Include uapi/drm/i915_drm.h and drm/i915_drm.h only where needed. Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
Move i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle() to i915_gem_tiling.[ch] as a i915_gem_object function related to tiling. Also un-inline while at it; does not seem like this is a function needed in hot paths. v2: i915_gem_tiling.[ch] instead of intel_ggtt_fencing.[ch] (Chris) Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220316095018.137998-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 16 Mar, 2022 10 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
ICL+ PLLs can't genenerate certain frequencies. Running the PLL algorithms through for all frequencies 25-594MHz we see a gap just above 500 MHz. Specifically 500-522.8MHZ for TC PLLs, and 500-533.2 MHz for combo PHY PLLs. Reject those frequencies hdmi_port_clock_valid() so that we properly filter out unsupported modes and/or color depths for HDMI. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5247Signed-off-by:
Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
DRRS operates on transcoder level, so we should only poke at it from the master crtc rather than letting every joined pipe give it potentially conflicting input. Signed-off-by:
Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Let's just do a full DRRS disable/enable across all pipe updates. This guarantees that the DRRS work doesn't interfere with anything while the atomic commit is busy reprogramming the pipe. Needed so that we can start reprogramming M/N seamlessly during fastsets whenever possible. Also avoids the pre-bdw DRRS PIPECONF rmw racing with the potential PIPECONF write from the atomic commit (eg. due to GAMMA_MODE changes). v2: Include has_drrs in state dump (José) Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Schedule the DRRS downclock work already from intel_drrs_enable() instead of waiting around for a frontbuffer flush that may or may not ever come. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Skip all the DRRS work cancel/schedule stuff if the pipe's frontbuffer bits were not among those affected by the frontbuffer rendering. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Pre-determine the frontbuffer_bits for the each pipe during intel_drrs_enable(). Will become useful for bigjoiner use cases soon. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Now that DRRS can operate on multiple pipes we need to make sure one pipe doesn't throw away the other pipe's frontbuffer_bits before said pipe can handle them. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
The DRRS refresh rate should be indented by one tab like the other per-crtc DRRS stuff. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
With static DRRS the user might ask for the lowest possible refresh rate of the panel, in which case we're not going to find a suitable downclock mode for it and we should not try to enable seamless DRRS. This will in fact oops. We used to check for the presence of the downclock mode here, but that got removed in commit f0a57798 ("drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_drrs_type()") as redundant (which it was at the time). But we do need the check again now that static DRRS is a thing. I must have not re-tested static DRRS fully after introducing intel_panel_drrs_type() :/ Fixes: c5ee2343 ("drm/i915: Implement static DRRS") Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
struct drm_display_mode embeds a list head, so overwriting the full struct with another one will corrupt the list (if the destination mode is on a list). Use drm_mode_copy() instead which explicitly preserves the list head of the destination mode. Even if we know the destination mode is not on any list using drm_mode_copy() seems decent as it sets a good example. Bad examples of not using it might eventually get copied into code where preserving the list head actually matters. Obviously one case not covered here is when the mode itself is embedded in a larger structure and the whole structure is copied. But if we are careful when copying into modes embedded in structures I think we can be a little more reassured that bogus list heads haven't been propagated in. @is_mode_copy@ @@ drm_mode_copy(...) { ... } @depends on !is_mode_copy@ struct drm_display_mode *mode; expression E, S; @@ ( - *mode = E + drm_mode_copy(mode, &E) | - memcpy(mode, E, S) + drm_mode_copy(mode, E) ) @depends on !is_mode_copy@ struct drm_display_mode mode; expression E; @@ ( - mode = E + drm_mode_copy(&mode, &E) | - memcpy(&mode, E, S) + drm_mode_copy(&mode, E) ) @@ struct drm_display_mode *mode; @@ - &*mode + mode Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Mar, 2022 2 commits
-
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be disabled for good but that is not happening. It would be disabled by the function handling the PSR error but then on the next fastset it would be enabled again in _intel_psr_post_plane_update(). It would only be disabled for good in the next modeset where has_psr will be set false. v2: - release psr lock before continue Fixes: 9ce5884e ("drm/i915/display: Only keep PSR enabled if there is active planes") Reported-by:
Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com> Reported-by:
Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Commit 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is some error or status that source needs to handle. When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power() is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored. So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended. v2: - renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd() - fixed indentation Fixes: 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off") Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 14 Mar, 2022 5 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Store the fixed_mode and downclock_mode as a real list, in preparation for exposing other supported modes as well. v2: Init the list in intel_sdvo_connector_alloc() too v3: Use list_first_entry_or_null() (Jani) Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Let's start supporting static DRRS by trying to match the refresh rate the user has requested, assuming the panel supports suitable timings. For now we stick to just our current two timings: - fixed_mode: the panel's preferred mode - downclock_mode: the lowest refresh rate mode we found Some panels may support more timings than that, but we'll have to convert our fixed_mode/downclock_mode pointers into a full list before we can handle that. v2: Rebase due to intel_panel_get_modes() Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1 Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Nothing special about ivb+ here, if DRRS works on ivb+ port A it should work just as well on ilk/snb. So let's enable that. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
No reason to keep the DRRS enable/disable hidden insider the encoder hooks. Let's just move them all the way up into platform independent code so that all platforms get to use them. These are nops when the state computation doesn't think DRRS is possible. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Ger rid of one more ugly crtc->config usage by storing the DRRS state under intel_crtc. intel_drrs_enable() copies what it needs from the crtc state, after which DRRS can be blissfully ignorant of anything going on around it. This also lets multiple pipes do DRRS simultanously and entirely independently. v2: Split out some stuff (Jani) Signed-off-by:
-
