- 30 Dec, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi authored
Several DRM drivers print the same initialization message right after drm_dev_register, so move that to common code. The exception is i915, which uses its own register handle, so let it keep its own message. Notice that this was tested only with Exynos, but looks simple enough for the other drivers. Signed-off-by:
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161228143216.26821-2-krisman@collabora.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
Currently at the end of drm_core_init() we print [ 0.735185] [drm] Initialized which does not provide any user information and is only a breadcrumb for developers, so reduce it from info to debug. Signed-off-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Shawn Guo authored
Function rockchip_crtc_from_pipe() does the exactly same thing as what crtc helper drm_crtc_from_index() provides. Use the helper to save some code. Signed-off-by:
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Shawn Guo authored
Function zx_find_crtc() does the exactly same thing as what crtc helper drm_crtc_from_index() provides. Use the helper to save some code. Signed-off-by:
-
Shawn Guo authored
It adds a crtc helper drm_crtc_from_index() to find the registered CRTC with a given index, just like drm_plane_from_index(). Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Including all drivers. I thought about keeping small compat functions to avoid having to change all drivers. But I really like the drm_printer idea, so figured spreading it more widely is a good thing. v2: Review from Chris: - Natural argument order and better name for drm_mm_print. - show_mm() macro in the selftest. Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> Reviewed-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483009764-8281-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Useful for dumping lots of data into dmesg, e.g. drm_mm. v2: Fixup export_symbol line, I misplaced a hunk (Chris). Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 29 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Our style guide should only be the delta compared to the overall one. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
- 28 Dec, 2016 13 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
A couple of parameters slipped through the kerneldoc net. Reported-by:
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Drivers need to take care. Motivated by a discussion between Mark and Rob on dri-devel. Cc: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Remove a superfluous helper as drm_mm_insert_node is equivalent to insert_node_in_range with a range of [0, U64_MAX]. Signed-off-by:
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
mm->color_adjust() compares the hole with its neighbouring nodes. They only abutt before we restrict the hole, so we have to apply color_adjust before we apply the range restriction. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Insulate users from changes to the internal hole tracking within struct drm_mm_node by using an accessor for hole_follows. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Using mm->color_adjust makes the eviction scanner much tricker since we don't know the actual neighbours of the target hole until after it is created (after scanning is complete). To work out whether we need to evict the neighbours because they impact upon the hole, we have to then check the hole afterwards - requiring an extra step in the user of the eviction scanner when they apply color_adjust. v2: Massage kerneldoc. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Since we mandate a strict reverse-order of drm_mm_scan_remove_block() after drm_mm_scan_add_block() we can further simplify the list manipulations when generating the temporary scan-hole. v2: Highlight the games being played with the lists to track the scan holes without allocation. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
For power-of-two alignments, we can avoid the 64bit divide and do a simple bitwise add instead. v2: s/alignment_mask/remainder_mask/ Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Compute the minimal required hole during scan and only evict those nodes that overlap. This enables us to reduce the number of nodes we need to evict to the bare minimum. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
The range restriction should be applied after the color adjustment, or else we may inadvertently apply the color adjustment to the restricted hole (and not against its neighbours). Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Doing the check is trivial (low cost in comparison to overall eviction) and helps simplify the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Acknowledging that we were building up the hole was more useful to me when reading the code, than knowing the relationship between this node and the previous node. Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Kbuild really doesn't like non-recursive Makefiles, but they do work as long as you build without O= Reported-by:
-
- 27 Dec, 2016 19 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
The scan state occupies a large proportion of the struct drm_mm and is rarely used and only contains temporary state. That makes it suitable to moving to its struct and onto the stack of the callers. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
A simple assert to ensure that we don't overflow start + size when initialising the drm_mm, or its scanner. In future, we may want to switch to tracking the value of ranges (rather than size) so that we can cover the full u64, for example like resource tracking. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Since commit ea7b1dd4 ("drm: mm: track free areas implicitly"), to test whether there are any nodes allocated within the range manager, we merely have to ask whether the node_list is empty. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Protect ourselves from a caller passing in node.start + node.size that will overflow and trick us into reserving that node. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
The nodes must be removed in the *reverse* order. This is correct in the overview, but backwards in the function description. Whilst here add Intel's copyright statement and tweak some formatting. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In places (e.g. i915.ko), the alignment is exported to userspace as u64 and there now exists hardware for which we can indeed utilize a u64 alignment. As such, we need to keep 64bit integers throughout when handling alignment. Testcase: igt/drm_mm/align64 Testcase: igt/gem_exec_alignment Signed-off-by:
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, restricted eviction scanning finds a suitable hole. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, eviction scanning finds a suitable hole. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, fitting of the node and its alignment are still correct. v2: s/no_color_touching/separate_adjacent_colors/ Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that if we request top-down allocation from drm_mm_insert_node() we receive the next available hole from the top. v2: Flip sign on conditional assert. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to a restrited eviction scanner in order to find the first minimal hole that matches our request. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to the eviction scanner in order to find the first minimal hole that matches our request. v2: Refactor out some common eviction code for later Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Check that we can request alignment to any power-of-two or prime using a plain drm_mm_node_insert(), and also handle a reasonable selection of primes. v2: Exercise all allocation flags Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(), check that we only allocate from the specified range. v2: Use all allocation flags v3: Don't pass in invalid ranges - these will be asserted later. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Reuse drm_mm_insert_node() with a temporary node to exercise drm_mm_replace_node(). We use the previous test in order to exercise the various lists following replacement. v2: Check that we copy across the important (user) details of the node. The internal details (such as lists and hole tracking) we hope to detect errors by exercise. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node(), check that we can't overfill a range and that the lists are correct after reserving/removing. v2: Extract helpers for the repeated tests v3: Iterate over all allocation flags Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Exercise drm_mm_reserve_node(), check that we can't reserve an already occupied range and that the lists are correct after reserving/removing. v2: Check for invalid node reservation. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Simple test to just exercise calling the debug dumper on the drm_mm. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Simple first test to just exercise initialisation of struct drm_mm. Signed-off-by:
-
