Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 25 Aug, 2021 4 commits
    • Mark Brown's avatar
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'regulator/for-5.15' into regulator-next · 7aa6d700
      Mark Brown authored
      7aa6d700
    • Mark Brown's avatar
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'regulator/for-5.14' into regulator-linus · c1ff8600
      Mark Brown authored
      c1ff8600
    • Chen-Yu Tsai's avatar
      regulator: vctrl: Avoid lockdep warning in enable/disable ops · 21e39809
      Chen-Yu Tsai authored 
      vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and
regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops
and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in
a lockdep warning.

Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply
as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still
needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise
lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it.

The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track
state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops
being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was
already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream
supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply,
while vctrl-regulator was not enabled.

The lockdep warning is as follows:

	WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
	5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted
	------------------------------------------------------
	swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
					  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
					  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)

	but task is already holding lock:
	ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
					  drivers/regulator/core.c:263)

	which lock already depends on the new lock.

	the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

	-> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199)
	regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:263)
	regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536)
	regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486)
	devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196)
	reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289)
	platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427)
	[...]

	-> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536)
	regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486)
	devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196)
	reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289)
	[...]

	-> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	__lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4))
	lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627)
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125)
	regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
				  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400)
	_regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617)
	_regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308
			  drivers/regulator/core.c:2809)
	_set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072)
	dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164)
	set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62)
	__cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216
				 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271)
	cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2))
	cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563)
	subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?)
	cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819)
	dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344)
	[...]

	other info that might help us debug this:

	Chain exists of:
	  regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex

	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	       CPU0                    CPU1
	       ----                    ----
	  lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
				       lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
				       lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
	  lock(regulator_list_mutex);

	 *** DEADLOCK ***

	6 locks held by swapper/0/1:
	#0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:
		__device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030)
	#1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at:
		cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2))
	#2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033)
	#3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285
				include/linux/cpumask.h:405
				drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399)
	#4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
		regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	#5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
		drivers/regulator/core.c:263)

	stack backtrace:
	CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa
	Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT)
	Call trace:
	dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161)
	show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218)
	dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2))
	dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113)
	print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?)
	check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?)
	__lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4))
	lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627)
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125)
	regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
				  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400)
	_regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617)
	_regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308
			  drivers/regulator/core.c:2809)
	_set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072)
	dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164)
	set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62)
	__cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216
				 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271)
	cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2))
	cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563)
	subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?)
	cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819)
	dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344)
	[...]
Reported-by: default avatarBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Fixes: f8702f9e ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Fixes: e9153311 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-3-wenst@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      21e39809
    • Chen-Yu Tsai's avatar
      regulator: vctrl: Use locked regulator_get_voltage in probe path · 98e47570
      Chen-Yu Tsai authored 
      In commit e9153311 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting
and setting the voltage"), all calls to get/set the voltage of the
control regulator were switched to unlocked versions to avoid deadlocks.
However, the call in the probe path is done without regulator locks
held. In this case the locked version should be used.

Switch back to the locked regulator_get_voltage() in the probe path to
avoid any mishaps.

Fixes: e9153311 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-2-wenst@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      98e47570
  3. 23 Aug, 2021 1 commit
  5. 22 Aug, 2021 2 commits
  7. 21 Aug, 2021 9 commits
  9. 20 Aug, 2021 24 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7