1. 19 Sep, 2014 3 commits
  2. 18 Sep, 2014 10 commits
  3. 17 Sep, 2014 2 commits
  4. 15 Sep, 2014 9 commits
  5. 14 Sep, 2014 12 commits
  6. 13 Sep, 2014 4 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge branches 'locking-urgent-for-linus' and 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of... · 1536340e
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Merge branches 'locking-urgent-for-linus' and 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
      
      Pull futex and timer fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
       "A oneliner bugfix for the jinxed futex code:
      
         - Drop hash bucket lock in the error exit path.  I really could slap
           myself for intruducing that bug while fixing all the other horror
           in that code three month ago ...
      
        and the timer department is not too proud about the following fixes:
      
         - Deal with a long standing rounding bug in the timeval to jiffies
           conversion.  It's a real issue and this fix fell through the cracks
           for quite some time.
      
         - Another round of alarmtimer fixes.  Finally this code gets used
           more widely and the subtle issues hidden for quite some time are
           noticed and fixed.  Nothing really exciting, just the itty bitty
           details which bite the serious users here and there"
      
      * 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        futex: Unlock hb->lock in futex_wait_requeue_pi() error path
      
      * 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
        alarmtimer: Lock k_itimer during timer callback
        alarmtimer: Do not signal SIGEV_NONE timers
        alarmtimer: Return relative times in timer_gettime
        jiffies: Fix timeval conversion to jiffies
      1536340e
    • Guy Martin's avatar
      parisc: Implement new LWS CAS supporting 64 bit operations. · 89206491
      Guy Martin authored
      The current LWS cas only works correctly for 32bit. The new LWS allows
      for CAS operations of variable size.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGuy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      89206491
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      vfs: fix bad hashing of dentries · 99d263d4
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Josef Bacik found a performance regression between 3.2 and 3.10 and
      narrowed it down to commit bfcfaa77 ("vfs: use 'unsigned long'
      accesses for dcache name comparison and hashing"). He reports:
      
       "The test case is essentially
      
            for (i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
                    mkdir("a$i");
      
        On xfs on a fio card this goes at about 20k dir/sec with 3.2, and 12k
        dir/sec with 3.10.  This is because we spend waaaaay more time in
        __d_lookup on 3.10 than in 3.2.
      
        The new hashing function for strings is suboptimal for <
        sizeof(unsigned long) string names (and hell even > sizeof(unsigned
        long) string names that I've tested).  I broke out the old hashing
        function and the new one into a userspace helper to get real numbers
        and this is what I'm getting:
      
            Old hash table had 1000000 entries, 0 dupes, 0 max dupes
            New hash table had 12628 entries, 987372 dupes, 900 max dupes
            We had 11400 buckets with a p50 of 30 dupes, p90 of 240 dupes, p99 of 567 dupes for the new hash
      
        My test does the hash, and then does the d_hash into a integer pointer
        array the same size as the dentry hash table on my system, and then
        just increments the value at the address we got to see how many
        entries we overlap with.
      
        As you can see the old hash function ended up with all 1 million
        entries in their own bucket, whereas the new one they are only
        distributed among ~12.5k buckets, which is why we're using so much
        more CPU in __d_lookup".
      
      The reason for this hash regression is two-fold:
      
       - On 64-bit architectures the down-mixing of the original 64-bit
         word-at-a-time hash into the final 32-bit hash value is very
         simplistic and suboptimal, and just adds the two 32-bit parts
         together.
      
         In particular, because there is no bit shuffling and the mixing
         boundary is also a byte boundary, similar character patterns in the
         low and high word easily end up just canceling each other out.
      
       - the old byte-at-a-time hash mixed each byte into the final hash as it
         hashed the path component name, resulting in the low bits of the hash
         generally being a good source of hash data.  That is not true for the
         word-at-a-time case, and the hash data is distributed among all the
         bits.
      
      The fix is the same in both cases: do a better job of mixing the bits up
      and using as much of the hash data as possible.  We already have the
      "hash_32|64()" functions to do that.
      Reported-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      99d263d4
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Make hash_64() use a 64-bit multiply when appropriate · 23d0db76
      Linus Torvalds authored
      The hash_64() function historically does the multiply by the
      GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_64 number with explicit shifts and adds, because
      unlike the 32-bit case, gcc seems unable to turn the constant multiply
      into the more appropriate shift and adds when required.
      
      However, that means that we generate those shifts and adds even when the
      architecture has a fast multiplier, and could just do it better in
      hardware.
      
      Use the now-cleaned-up CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER (together with
      "is it a 64-bit architecture") to decide whether to use an integer
      multiply or the explicit sequence of shift/add instructions.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      23d0db76