- 28 Jun, 2024 6 commits
-
-
Sam Protsenko authored
Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper instead of calling devm_clk_get() and then clk_prepare_enable(). It simplifies the error handling and makes the code more compact. Also use dev_err_probe() to handle possible -EPROBE_DEFER errors if the clock is not available yet. Signed-off-by:
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> Reviewed-by:
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by:
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
Sam Protsenko authored
Fix obvious style issues. Some of those were found with checkpatch, and some just contradict the kernel coding style guide. No functional change. Signed-off-by:
Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sam Protsenko authored
The TRNG block in Exynos850 is pretty much the same as in Exynos5250, but there are two clocks that has to be controlled to make it work: 1. Functional (operating) clock: called ACLK in Exynos850, the same as "secss" clock in Exynos5250 2. Interface (bus) clock: called PCLK in Exynos850. It has to be enabled in order to access TRNG registers Document Exynos850 compatible and the related clock changes. Signed-off-by: -
Jiwei Sun authored
If the following configurations are set, CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS=y CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER=y And run the following command, [root@localhost sys]# cat /sys/devices/pci0000:6b/0000:6b:00.0/qat_rl/pir The following warning log appears, ------------[ cut here ]------------ DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->magic != sem): count = 0x0, magic = 0x0, owner = 0x1, curr 0xff11000119288040, list not empty WARNING: CPU: 131 PID: 1254984 at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1280 down_read+0x439/0x7f0 CPU: 131 PID: 1254984 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc4+ #86 b2ae60c8ceabed15f4fd2dba03c1c5a5f7f4040c Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkServer SR660 V3/SR660 V3, BIOS T8E166X-2.54 05/30/2024 RIP: 0010:down_read+0x439/0x7f0 Code: 44 24 10 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 05 03 00 00 48 8b 13 41 54 48 c7 c6 a0 3e 0e b4 48 c7 c7 e0 3e 0e b4 4c 8b 4c 24 08 e8 77 d5 40 fd <0f> 0b 59 e9 bc fc ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 e2 fd ff ff 4c 8d 7b 08 RSP: 0018:ffa0000035f67a78 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ff1100012b03a658 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000080000002 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 1ff4000006becf53 R08: fff3fc0006becf17 R09: fff3fc0006becf17 R10: fff3fc0006becf16 R11: ffa0000035f678b7 R12: ffffffffb40e3e60 R13: ffffffffb627d1f4 R14: ff1100012b03a6d0 R15: ff1100012b03a6c8 FS: 00007fa9ff9a6740(0000) GS:ff1100081e600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa9ff984000 CR3: 00000002118ae006 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> pir_show+0x5d/0xe0 [intel_qat 9e297e249ab040329cf58b657b06f418fd5c5855] dev_attr_show+0x3f/0xc0 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1ce/0x400 seq_read_iter+0x3fa/0x10b0 vfs_read+0x6f5/0xb20 ksys_read+0xe9/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x8a/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7fa9ff6fd9b2 Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d ea 1d 0c 00 e8 c5 fd 01 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffc0616b968 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007fa9ff6fd9b2 RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007fa9ff985000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fa9ff985000 R08: 00007fa9ff984010 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000022000 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 </TASK> irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb102c126>] copy_process+0x21e6/0x6e70 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb102c176>] copy_process+0x2236/0x6e70 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The rate_limiting->user_input.lock rwsem lock is not initialized before use. Let's initialize it. Signed-off-by:
Jiwei Sun <sunjw10@lenovo.com> Reviewed-by:
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com> Reviewed-by:
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kyle Meyer authored
iaa_crypto depends on the deflate compression algorithm that's provided by deflate. If the algorithm is not available because CRYPTO_DEFLATE=m and deflate is not inserted, iaa_crypto will request "crypto-deflate-generic". Deflate will not be inserted because "crypto-deflate-generic" is not a valid alias. Add deflate-generic and crypto-deflate-generic aliases to deflate. Signed-off-by:
Kyle Meyer <kyle.meyer@hpe.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sergey Portnoy authored
Allow to run skcipher speed for given algorithm. Case 600 is modified to cover ENCRYPT and DECRYPT directions. Example: modprobe tcrypt mode=600 alg="qat_aes_xts" klen=32 If succeed, the performance numbers will be printed in dmesg: testing speed of multibuffer qat_aes_xts (qat_aes_xts) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 14596 cycles (16 bytes) ... test 6 (256 bit key, 4096 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8053 cycles (4096 bytes) Signed-off-by:
Sergey Portnoy <sergey.portnoy@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Jun, 2024 9 commits
-
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The crc32/crc32c implementations using the scalar CRC32 instructions are accessed via indirect calls, and so they must be annotated with type ids in order to execute correctly when kCFI is enabled. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by:
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Reviewed-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
With ARCH=arm, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/crypto/libsha256.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro to all files which have a MODULE_LICENSE(). This includes sha1.c and utils.c which, although they did not produce a warning with the arm allmodconfig configuration, may cause this warning with other configurations. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
With ARCH=arm, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm/crypto/aes-arm-bs.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm/crypto/crc32-arm-ce.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro to all files which have a MODULE_LICENSE(). This includes crct10dif-ce-glue.c and curve25519-glue.c which, although they did not produce a warning with the arm allmodconfig configuration, may cause this warning with other configurations. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiapeng Chong authored
Use existing swap() function rather than duplicating its implementation. ./lib/crypto/mpi/mpi-pow.c:211:11-12: WARNING opportunity for swap(). ./lib/crypto/mpi/mpi-pow.c:239:12-13: WARNING opportunity for swap(). Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9327Signed-off-by:
Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jiapeng Chong authored
Use existing swap() function rather than duplicating its implementation. ./lib/crypto/mpi/ec.c:1291:20-21: WARNING opportunity for swap(). ./lib/crypto/mpi/ec.c:1292:20-21: WARNING opportunity for swap(). Reported-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
With ARCH=arm, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm/crypto/poly1305-arm.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
With ARCH=arm64, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/char/hw_random/cavium-rng.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/char/hw_random/cavium-rng-vf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/char/hw_random/arm_smccc_trng.o Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
With ARCH=arm64, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-neon.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neon-bs.o Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
Now that the driver core allows for struct class to be in read-only memory, we should make all 'class' structures declared at build time placing them into read-only memory, instead of having to be dynamically allocated at runtime. Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Adam Guerin <adam.guerin@intel.com> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Shashank Gupta <shashank.gupta@intel.com> Cc: qat-linux@intel.com Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by:
-
- 16 Jun, 2024 5 commits
-
-
Stefan Berger authored
Fix an off-by-one error where the most significant digit was not initialized leading to signature verification failures by the testmgr. Example: If a curve requires ndigits (=9) and diff (=2) indicates that 2 digits need to be set to zero then start with digit 'ndigits - diff' (=7) and clear 'diff' digits starting from there, so 7 and 8. Reported-by:
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/619bc2de-b18a-4939-a652-9ca886bf6349@linux.ibm.com/T/#m045d8812409ce233c17fcdb8b88b6629c671f9f4 Fixes: 2fd2a82c ("crypto: ecdsa - Use ecc_digits_from_bytes to create hash digits array") Signed-off-by:
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by:
-
Stefan Berger authored
Add comment to ecc_digits_from_bytes kdoc that the first byte is expected to hold the most significant bits of the large integer that is converted into an array of digits. Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
The 'struct list' type is defined in types.h, no need to include list.h for that. Signed-off-by:
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Neil Armstrong authored
On newer SoCs, the random number generator can require a power-domain to operate, add it as optional. Signed-off-by:
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Acked-by:
Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Kim Phillips authored
Fix a null pointer dereference induced by DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE. Return from __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() if the psp_device or the sev_device structs are not initialized. Without the fix, the driver will produce the following splat: ccp 0000:55:00.5: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ccp 0000:55:00.5: sev enabled ccp 0000:55:00.5: psp enabled BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000f0 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI CPU: 262 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1+ #29 RIP: 0010:__sev_snp_shutdown_locked+0x2e/0x150 Code: 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 41 54 53 48 83 ec 10 41 89 f7 49 89 fe 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 45 d8 48 8b 05 6a 5a 7f 06 <4c> 8b a0 f0 00 00 00 41 0f b6 9c 24 a2 00 00 00 48 83 fb 02 0f 83 RSP: 0018:ffffb2ea4014b7b8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e4acd2e0a28 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffb2ea4014b808 RBP: ffffb2ea4014b7e8 R08: 0000000000000106 R09: 000000000003d9c0 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffffa39ff070 R12: ffff9e49d40590c8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffb2ea4014b808 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9e58b1e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000f0 CR3: 0000000418a3e001 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x6f/0xb0 ? __die+0xcc/0xf0 ? page_fault_oops+0x330/0x3a0 ? save_trace+0x2a5/0x360 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x583/0x630 ? exc_page_fault+0x81/0x120 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 ? __sev_snp_shutdown_locked+0x2e/0x150 __sev_firmware_shutdown+0x349/0x5b0 ? pm_runtime_barrier+0x66/0xe0 sev_dev_destroy+0x34/0xb0 psp_dev_destroy+0x27/0x60 sp_destroy+0x39/0x90 sp_pci_remove+0x22/0x60 pci_device_remove+0x4e/0x110 really_probe+0x271/0x4e0 __driver_probe_device+0x8f/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x24/0x120 __driver_attach+0xc7/0x280 ? driver_attach+0x30/0x30 bus_for_each_dev+0x10d/0x130 driver_attach+0x22/0x30 bus_add_driver+0x171/0x2b0 ? unaccepted_memory_init_kdump+0x20/0x20 driver_register+0x67/0x100 __pci_register_driver+0x83/0x90 sp_pci_init+0x22/0x30 sp_mod_init+0x13/0x30 do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x290 ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x10 ? local_clock_noinstr+0x3e/0x100 ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x21e/0x6a0 ? local_clock+0x1c/0x60 ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x21e/0x6a0 ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x10 ? local_clock_noinstr+0x3e/0x100 ? __lock_acquire+0xd90/0xe30 ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x10 ? local_clock_noinstr+0x3e/0x100 ? __create_object+0x66/0x100 ? local_clock+0x1c/0x60 ? __create_object+0x66/0x100 ? parameq+0x1b/0x90 ? parse_one+0x6d/0x1d0 ? parse_args+0xd7/0x1f0 ? do_initcall_level+0x180/0x180 do_initcall_level+0xb0/0x180 do_initcalls+0x60/0xa0 ? kernel_init+0x1f/0x1d0 do_basic_setup+0x41/0x50 kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x230 ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0 kernel_init+0x1f/0x1d0 ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3d/0x50 ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 00000000000000f0 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:__sev_snp_shutdown_locked+0x2e/0x150 Code: 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 41 54 53 48 83 ec 10 41 89 f7 49 89 fe 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 45 d8 48 8b 05 6a 5a 7f 06 <4c> 8b a0 f0 00 00 00 41 0f b6 9c 24 a2 00 00 00 48 83 fb 02 0f 83 RSP: 0018:ffffb2ea4014b7b8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e4acd2e0a28 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffb2ea4014b808 RBP: ffffb2ea4014b7e8 R08: 0000000000000106 R09: 000000000003d9c0 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffffa39ff070 R12: ffff9e49d40590c8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffb2ea4014b808 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9e58b1e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000f0 CR3: 0000000418a3e001 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel Offset: 0x1fc00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) Fixes: 1ca5614b ("crypto: ccp: Add support to initialize the AMD-SP for SEV-SNP") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Reviewed-by:
Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by:
John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> Reviewed-by:
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 07 Jun, 2024 20 commits
-
-
Jeff Johnson authored
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/char/hw_random/omap3-rom-rng.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/crypto/xilinx/zynqmp-aes-gcm.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/crypto/sa2ul.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/keembay-ocs-hcu.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/crypto/atmel-sha204a.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by:
-
Eric Biggers authored
Rewrite the AES-NI implementations of AES-GCM, taking advantage of things I learned while writing the VAES-AVX10 implementations. This is a complete rewrite that reduces the AES-NI GCM source code size by about 70% and the binary code size by about 95%, while not regressing performance and in fact improving it significantly in many cases. The following summarizes the state before this patch: - The aesni-intel module registered algorithms "generic-gcm-aesni" and "rfc4106-gcm-aesni" with the crypto API that actually delegated to one of three underlying implementations according to the CPU capabilities detected at runtime: AES-NI, AES-NI + AVX, or AES-NI + AVX2. - The AES-NI + AVX and AES-NI + AVX2 assembly code was in aesni-intel_avx-x86_64.S and consisted of 2804 lines of source and 257 KB of binary. This massive binary size was not really appropriate, and depending on the kconfig it could take up over 1% the size of the entire vmlinux. The main loops did 8 blocks per iteration. The AVX code minimized the use of carryless multiplication whereas the AVX2 code did not. The "AVX2" code did not actually use AVX2; the check for AVX2 was really a check for Intel Haswell or later to detect support for fast carryless multiplication. The long source length was caused by factors such as significant code duplication. - The AES-NI only assembly code was in aesni-intel_asm.S and consisted of 1501 lines of source and 15 KB of binary. The main loops did 4 blocks per iteration and minimized the use of carryless multiplication by using Karatsuba multiplication and a multiplication-less reduction. - The assembly code was contributed in 2010-2013. Maintenance has been sporadic and most design choices haven't been revisited. - The assembly function prototypes and the corresponding glue code were separate from and were not consistent with the new VAES-AVX10 code I recently added. The older code had several issues such as not precomputing the GHASH key powers, which hurt performance. This rewrite achieves the following goals: - Much shorter source and binary sizes. The assembly source shrinks from 4300 lines to 1130 lines, and it produces about 9 KB of binary instead of 272 KB. This is achieved via a better designed AES-GCM implementation that doesn't excessively unroll the code and instead prioritizes the parts that really matter. Sharing the C glue code with the VAES-AVX10 implementations also saves 250 lines of C source. - Improve performance on most (possibly all) CPUs on which this code runs, for most (possibly all) message lengths. Benchmark results are given in Tables 1 and 2 below. - Use the same function prototypes and glue code as the new VAES-AVX10 algorithms. This fixes some issues with the integration of the assembly and results in some significant performance improvements, primarily on short messages. Also, the AVX and non-AVX implementations are now registered as separate algorithms with the crypto API, which makes them both testable by the self-tests. - Keep support for AES-NI without AVX (for Westmere, Silvermont, Goldmont, and Tremont), but unify the source code with AES-NI + AVX. Since 256-bit vectors cannot be used without VAES anyway, this is made feasible by just using the non-VEX coded form of most instructions. - Use a unified approach where the main loop does 8 blocks per iteration and uses Karatsuba multiplication to save one pclmulqdq per block but does not use the multiplication-less reduction. This strikes a good balance across the range of CPUs on which this code runs. - Don't spam the kernel log with an informational message on every boot. The following tables summarize the improvement in AES-GCM throughput on various CPU microarchitectures as a result of this patch: Table 1: AES-256-GCM encryption throughput improvement, CPU microarchitecture vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Broadwell | 2% | 8% | 11% | 18% | 31% | 26% | Intel Skylake | 1% | 4% | 7% | 12% | 26% | 19% | Intel Cascade Lake | 3% | 8% | 10% | 18% | 33% | 24% | AMD Zen 1 | 6% | 12% | 6% | 15% | 27% | 24% | AMD Zen 2 | 8% | 13% | 13% | 19% | 26% | 28% | AMD Zen 3 | 8% | 14% | 13% | 19% | 26% | 25% | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Broadwell | 35% | 29% | 45% | 55% | 54% | Intel Skylake | 25% | 19% | 28% | 33% | 27% | Intel Cascade Lake | 36% | 28% | 39% | 49% | 54% | AMD Zen 1 | 27% | 22% | 23% | 29% | 26% | AMD Zen 2 | 32% | 24% | 22% | 25% | 31% | AMD Zen 3 | 30% | 24% | 22% | 23% | 26% | Table 2: AES-256-GCM decryption throughput improvement, CPU microarchitecture vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Broadwell | 3% | 8% | 11% | 19% | 32% | 28% | Intel Skylake | 3% | 4% | 7% | 13% | 28% | 27% | Intel Cascade Lake | 3% | 9% | 11% | 19% | 33% | 28% | AMD Zen 1 | 15% | 18% | 14% | 20% | 36% | 33% | AMD Zen 2 | 9% | 16% | 13% | 21% | 26% | 27% | AMD Zen 3 | 8% | 15% | 12% | 18% | 23% | 23% | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Broadwell | 36% | 31% | 40% | 51% | 53% | Intel Skylake | 28% | 21% | 23% | 30% | 30% | Intel Cascade Lake | 36% | 29% | 36% | 47% | 53% | AMD Zen 1 | 35% | 31% | 32% | 35% | 36% | AMD Zen 2 | 31% | 30% | 27% | 38% | 30% | AMD Zen 3 | 27% | 23% | 24% | 32% | 26% | The above numbers are percentage improvements in single-thread throughput, so e.g. an increase from 3000 MB/s to 3300 MB/s would be listed as 10%. They were collected by directly measuring the Linux crypto API performance using a custom kernel module. Note that indirect benchmarks (e.g. 'cryptsetup benchmark' or benchmarking dm-crypt I/O) include more overhead and won't see quite as much of a difference. All these benchmarks used an associated data length of 16 bytes. Note that AES-GCM is almost always used with short associated data lengths. I didn't test Intel CPUs before Broadwell, AMD CPUs before Zen 1, or Intel low-power CPUs, as these weren't readily available to me. However, based on the design of the new code and the available information about these other CPU microarchitectures, I wouldn't expect any significant regressions, and there's a good chance performance is improved just as it is above. Signed-off-by:Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Eric Biggers authored
Add implementations of AES-GCM for x86_64 CPUs that support VAES (vector AES), VPCLMULQDQ (vector carryless multiplication), and either AVX512 or AVX10. There are two implementations, sharing most source code: one using 256-bit vectors and one using 512-bit vectors. This patch improves AES-GCM performance by up to 162%; see Tables 1 and 2 below. I wrote the new AES-GCM assembly code from scratch, focusing on correctness, performance, code size (both source and binary), and documenting the source. The new assembly file aes-gcm-avx10-x86_64.S is about 1200 lines including extensive comments, and it generates less than 8 KB of binary code. The main loop does 4 vectors at a time, with the AES and GHASH instructions interleaved. Any remainder is handled using a simple 1 vector at a time loop, with masking. Several VAES + AVX512 implementations of AES-GCM exist from Intel, including one in OpenSSL and one proposed for inclusion in Linux in 2021 (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/1611386920-28579-6-git-send-email-megha.dey@intel.com/). These aren't really suitable to be used, though, due to the massive amount of binary code generated (696 KB for OpenSSL, 200 KB for Linux) and well as the significantly larger amount of assembly source (4978 lines for OpenSSL, 1788 lines for Linux). Also, Intel's code does not support 256-bit vectors, which makes it not usable on future AVX10/256-only CPUs, and also not ideal for certain Intel CPUs that have downclocking issues. So I ended up starting from scratch. Usually my much shorter code is actually slightly faster than Intel's AVX512 code, though it depends on message length and on which of Intel's implementations is used; for details, see Tables 3 and 4 below. To facilitate potential integration into other projects, I've dual-licensed aes-gcm-avx10-x86_64.S under Apache-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause, the same as the recently added RISC-V crypto code. The following two tables summarize the performance improvement over the existing AES-GCM code in Linux that uses AES-NI and AVX2: Table 1: AES-256-GCM encryption throughput improvement, CPU microarchitecture vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | ----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Ice Lake | 42% | 48% | 60% | 62% | 70% | 69% | Intel Sapphire Rapids | 157% | 145% | 162% | 119% | 96% | 96% | Intel Emerald Rapids | 156% | 144% | 161% | 115% | 95% | 100% | AMD Zen 4 | 103% | 89% | 78% | 56% | 54% | 54% | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | ----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Ice Lake | 66% | 48% | 49% | 70% | 53% | Intel Sapphire Rapids | 80% | 60% | 41% | 62% | 38% | Intel Emerald Rapids | 79% | 60% | 41% | 62% | 38% | AMD Zen 4 | 51% | 35% | 27% | 32% | 25% | Table 2: AES-256-GCM decryption throughput improvement, CPU microarchitecture vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | ----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Ice Lake | 42% | 48% | 59% | 63% | 67% | 71% | Intel Sapphire Rapids | 159% | 145% | 161% | 125% | 102% | 100% | Intel Emerald Rapids | 158% | 144% | 161% | 124% | 100% | 103% | AMD Zen 4 | 110% | 95% | 80% | 59% | 56% | 54% | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | ----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Intel Ice Lake | 67% | 56% | 46% | 70% | 56% | Intel Sapphire Rapids | 79% | 62% | 39% | 61% | 39% | Intel Emerald Rapids | 80% | 62% | 40% | 58% | 40% | AMD Zen 4 | 49% | 36% | 30% | 35% | 28% | The above numbers are percentage improvements in single-thread throughput, so e.g. an increase from 4000 MB/s to 6000 MB/s would be listed as 50%. They were collected by directly measuring the Linux crypto API performance using a custom kernel module. Note that indirect benchmarks (e.g. 'cryptsetup benchmark' or benchmarking dm-crypt I/O) include more overhead and won't see quite as much of a difference. All these benchmarks used an associated data length of 16 bytes. Note that AES-GCM is almost always used with short associated data lengths. The following two tables summarize how the performance of my code compares with Intel's AVX512 AES-GCM code, both the version that is in OpenSSL and the version that was proposed for inclusion in Linux. Neither version exists in Linux currently, but these are alternative AES-GCM implementations that could be chosen instead of mine. I collected the following numbers on Emerald Rapids using a userspace benchmark program that calls the assembly functions directly. I've also included a comparison with Cloudflare's AES-GCM implementation from https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65987/3. Table 3: VAES-based AES-256-GCM encryption throughput in MB/s, implementation name vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | ---------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ This implementation | 14171 | 12956 | 12318 | 9588 | 7293 | 6449 | AVX512_Intel_OpenSSL | 14022 | 12467 | 11863 | 9107 | 5891 | 6472 | AVX512_Intel_Linux | 13954 | 12277 | 11530 | 8712 | 6627 | 5898 | AVX512_Cloudflare | 12564 | 11050 | 10905 | 8152 | 5345 | 5202 | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | ---------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ This implementation | 4939 | 3688 | 1846 | 1821 | 738 | AVX512_Intel_OpenSSL | 4629 | 4532 | 2734 | 2332 | 1131 | AVX512_Intel_Linux | 4035 | 2966 | 1567 | 1330 | 639 | AVX512_Cloudflare | 3344 | 2485 | 1141 | 1127 | 456 | Table 4: VAES-based AES-256-GCM decryption throughput in MB/s, implementation name vs. message length in bytes: | 16384 | 4096 | 4095 | 1420 | 512 | 500 | ---------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ This implementation | 14276 | 13311 | 13007 | 11086 | 8268 | 8086 | AVX512_Intel_OpenSSL | 14067 | 12620 | 12421 | 9587 | 5954 | 7060 | AVX512_Intel_Linux | 14116 | 12795 | 11778 | 9269 | 7735 | 6455 | AVX512_Cloudflare | 13301 | 12018 | 11919 | 9182 | 7189 | 6726 | | 300 | 200 | 64 | 63 | 16 | ---------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ This implementation | 6454 | 5020 | 2635 | 2602 | 1079 | AVX512_Intel_OpenSSL | 5184 | 5799 | 2957 | 2545 | 1228 | AVX512_Intel_Linux | 4394 | 4247 | 2235 | 1635 | 922 | AVX512_Cloudflare | 4289 | 3851 | 1435 | 1417 | 574 | So, usually my code is actually slightly faster than Intel's code, though the OpenSSL implementation has a slight edge on messages shorter than 256 bytes in this microbenchmark. (This also holds true when doing the same tests on AMD Zen 4.) It can be seen that the large code size (up to 94x larger!) of the Intel implementations doesn't seem to bring much benefit, so starting from scratch with much smaller code, as I've done, seems appropriate. The performance of my code on messages shorter than 256 bytes could be improved through a limited amount of unrolling, but it's unclear it would be worth it, given code size considerations (e.g. caches) that don't get measured in microbenchmarks. Signed-off-by:
-
Chenghai Huang authored
Currently, the reg is queried based on the fixed address offset array. When the number of accelerator cores changes, the system can not flexibly respond to the change. Therefore, the reg to be queried is calculated based on the comp or decomp core base address. Signed-off-by:
Chenghai Huang <huangchenghai2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chenghai Huang authored
When the vf is enabled, the value of vfs_num must be assigned after the VF configuration is complete. Otherwise, the device may be accessed before the virtual configuration is complete, causing an error. When the vf is disabled, clear vfs_num and execute qm_pm_put_sync before hisi_qm_sriov_disable is return. Otherwise, if qm_clear_vft_config fails, users may access the device when the PCI virtualization is disabled, resulting in an error. Signed-off-by:
-
Herbert Xu authored
The SM2 algorithm has a single user in the kernel. However, it's never been integrated properly with that user: asymmetric_keys. The crux of the issue is that the way it computes its digest with sm3 does not fit into the architecture of asymmetric_keys. As no solution has been proposed, remove this algorithm. It can be resubmitted when it is integrated properly into the asymmetric_keys subsystem. Signed-off-by: -
Marek Vasut authored
Use sizeof(*priv) instead of sizeof(struct stm32_rng_private), the former makes renaming of struct stm32_rng_private easier if necessary, as it removes one site where such rename has to happen. No functional change. Signed-off-by:
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Acked-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Marek Vasut authored
Place device pointer in struct stm32_rng_private and use it all over the place to get rid of the horrible type casts throughout the driver. No functional change. Acked-by:
-
Marek Vasut authored
include/linux/pm_runtime.h pm_runtime_get_sync() description suggests to ... consider using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of it, especially if its return value is checked by the caller, as this is likely to result in cleaner code. This is indeed better, switch to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() which correctly suspends the device again in case of failure. Also add error checking into the RNG driver in case pm_runtime_resume_and_get() does fail, which is currently not done, and it does detect sporadic -EACCES error return after resume, which would otherwise lead to a hang due to register access on un-resumed hardware. Now the read simply errors out and the system does not hang. Acked-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 warns: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in arch/x86/crypto/curve25519-x86_64.o Add the missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro invocations. Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Berger authored
Since ecc_digits_from_bytes will provide zeros when an insufficient number of bytes are passed in the input byte array, use it to convert the r and s components of the signature to digits directly from the input byte array. This avoids going through an intermediate byte array that has the first few bytes filled with zeros. Signed-off-by:
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Berger authored
Since ecc_digits_from_bytes will provide zeros when an insufficient number of bytes are passed in the input byte array, use it to create the hash digits directly from the input byte array. This avoids going through an intermediate byte array (rawhash) that has the first few bytes filled with zeros. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Johnson authored
Fix the allmodconfig 'make W=1' warnings: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/crypto/libchacha.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/crypto/libarc4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/crypto/libdes.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/crypto/libpoly1305.o Signed-off-by:
-
Mario Limonciello authored
Some of the security attributes data is now populated from an HSTI command on some processors, so show the message after it has been populated. Signed-off-by:
-
Mario Limonciello authored
Older systems will not populate the security attributes in the capabilities register. The PSP on these systems, however, does have a command to get the security attributes. Use this command during ccp startup to populate the attributes if they're missing. Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/5284 Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/5675 Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/6253 Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/7280 Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/6323 Closes: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/discussions/5433Signed-off-by:
-
Mario Limonciello authored
Align the whitespace so that future messages will also be better aligned. Acked-by:
-
