Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 29 Jul, 2024 3 commits
    • Naohiro Aota's avatar
      btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block group read-write again · 8cd44dd1
      Naohiro Aota authored 
      When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all free regions in the
block group to space_info->bytes_readonly. That free space excludes
reserved and pinned regions. OTOH, when btrfs makes the block group
read-write again, it moves all the unused regions into the block group's
zone_unusable. That unused region includes reserved and pinned regions.
As a result, it counts too much zone_unusable bytes.

Fortunately (or unfortunately), having erroneous zone_unusable does not
affect the calculation of space_info->bytes_readonly, because free
space (num_bytes in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro) calculation is done based on
the erroneous zone_unusable and it reduces the num_bytes just to cancel the
error.

This behavior can be easily discovered by adding a WARN_ON to check e.g,
"bg->pinned > 0" in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(), and running fstests test
case like btrfs/282.

Fix it by properly considering pinned and reserved in
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(). Also, add a WARN_ON and introduce
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable() to catch a similar mistake.

Fixes: 169e0da9 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: default avatarNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8cd44dd1
    • Naohiro Aota's avatar
      btrfs: do not subtract delalloc from avail bytes · d89c285d
      Naohiro Aota authored 
      The block group's avail bytes printed when dumping a space info subtract
the delalloc_bytes. However, as shown in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() and
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(), it is added or subtracted along with
"reserved" for the delalloc case, which means the "delalloc_bytes" is a
part of the "reserved" bytes. So, excluding it to calculate the avail space
counts delalloc_bytes twice, which can lead to an invalid result.

Fixes: e50b122b ("btrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: default avatarNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBoris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d89c285d
    • Boris Burkov's avatar
      btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error · 47857437
      Boris Burkov authored 
      The btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which
has some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().
Specifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values
we continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the
folio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the
start of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like
this one from syzbot:

  BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure
  BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
  BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure
  assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!
  Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted
  6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
  Google 06/27/2024
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871
  Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d
  0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8
  6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89
  RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc
  R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001
  R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)
  knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]
  extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]
  btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373
  do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656
  filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397
  __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]
  __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]
  filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463
  btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547
  __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422
  task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222
  exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]
  do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877
  do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026
  __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]
  __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]
  __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035
  x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640
  arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232
  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9
  Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at
  0x7f5f075b709f.

I was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of
generic/475, which also hits IO errors by design.

I instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the
undesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:

  folio_unlock+5
  __process_pages_contig+475
  cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230
  cow_file_range+803
  btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566
  writepage_delalloc+332
  __extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here
  extent_write_cache_pages+622

Looking at the bisected-to patch in the syzbot report, Josef realized
that the logic of the cow_file_range_inline error path subtly changing.
In the past, on error, it jumped to out_unlock in cow_file_range(),
which honors the locked_page, so when we ultimately call
folio_end_all_writers(), the folio of interest is still locked. After
the change, we always unlocked ignoring the locked_page, on both success
and error. On the success path, this all results in returning 1 to
__extent_writepage(), which skips the folio_end_all_writers() call,
which makes it OK to have unlocked.

Fix the bug by wiring the locked_page into cow_file_range_inline() and
only setting locked_page to NULL on success.

Reported-by: syzbot+a14d8ac9af3a2a4fd0c8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0586d0a8 ("btrfs: move extent bit and page cleanup into cow_file_range_inline")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBoris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      47857437
  3. 25 Jul, 2024 2 commits
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      btrfs: fix corrupt read due to bad offset of a compressed extent map · de9f46cb
      Filipe Manana authored 
      If we attempt to insert a compressed extent map that has a range that
overlaps another extent map we have in the inode's extent map tree, we
can end up with an incorrect offset after adjusting the new extent map at
merge_extent_mapping() because we don't update the extent map's offset.

For example consider the following scenario:

1) We have a file extent item for a compressed extent covering the file
   range [108K, 144K) and currently there's no corresponding extent map
   in the inode's extent map tree;

2) The inode's size is 141K;

3) We have an encoded write (compressed) into the file range [120K, 128K),
   which overlaps the existing file extent item. The encoded write creates
   a matching extent map, adds it to the inode's extent map tree and
   creates an ordered extent for it.

   Note that the corresponding file extent item is added to the subvolume
   tree only when the ordered extent completes (when executing
   btrfs_finish_one_ordered());

4) We have a write into the file range [160K, 164K).

   This writes increases the i_size of the file, and there's a hole
   between the current i_size (141K) and the start offset of this write,
   and since the old i_size is in the middle of the block [140K, 144K),
   we have to write zeroes to the range [141K, 144K) (3072 bytes) and
   therefore dirty that page.

   We then call btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() with a start offset of 140K.
   We then end up at btrfs_find_new_delalloc_bytes() which will call
   btrfs_get_extent() for the range [140K, 144K);

5) The btrfs_get_extent() doesn't find any extent map in the inode's
   extent map tree covering the range [140K, 144K), so it searches the
   subvolume tree for any file extent items covering that range.

   There it finds the file extent item for the range [108K, 144K),
   creates a compressed extent map for that range and then calls
   btrfs_add_extent_mapping() with that extent map and passes the
   range [140K, 144K) via the "start" and "len" parameters;

6) The call to add_extent_mapping() done by btrfs_add_extent_mapping()
   fails with -EEXIST because there's an extent map, created at step 2
   for the [120K, 128K) range, that covers that overlaps with the range
   of the given extent map ([108K, 144K)).

   Then it does a lookup for extent map from step 2 add calls
   merge_extent_mapping() to adjust the input extent map ([108K, 144K)).
   That adjust the extent map to a start offset of 128K and a length
   of 16K (starting just after the extent map from step 2), but it does
   not update the offset field of the extent map, leaving it with a value
   of zero instead of updating to a value of 20K (128K - 108K = 20K).

   As a result any read for the range [128K, 144K) can return
   incorrect data since we read from a wrong section of the extent (unless
   both the correct and incorrect ranges happen to have the same data).

So fix this by changing merge_extent_mapping() to update the extent map's
offset even if it's compressed. Also add a test case to the self tests.
This didn't happen before the patchset that does big changes in the extent
map structure (which includes the commit in the Fixes tag below) because
we kept track of the original start offset in the extent map (member
"orig_start") so we could always calculate the correct offset by
subtracting that offset from the start offset.

A test case for fstests that triggered this problem using send/receive
with compressed writes will be added soon.

Fixes: 3d2ac992 ("btrfs: introduce new members for extent_map")
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      de9f46cb
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: tree-checker: validate dref root and objectid · f333a3c7
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      [CORRUPTION]
There is a bug report that btrfs flips RO due to a corruption in the
extent tree, the involved dumps looks like this:

 	item 188 key (402811572224 168 4096) itemoff 14598 itemsize 79
 		extent refs 3 gen 3678544 flags 1
 		ref#0: extent data backref root 13835058055282163977 objectid 281473384125923 offset 81432576 count 1
 		ref#1: shared data backref parent 1947073626112 count 1
 		ref#2: shared data backref parent 1156030103552 count 1
 BTRFS critical (device vdc1: state EA): unable to find ref byte nr 402811572224 parent 0 root 265 owner 28703026 offset 81432576 slot 189
 BTRFS error (device vdc1: state EA): failed to run delayed ref for logical 402811572224 num_bytes 4096 type 178 action 2 ref_mod 1: -2

[CAUSE]
The corrupted entry is ref#0 of item 188.
The root number 13835058055282163977 is beyond the upper limit for root
items (the current limit is 1 << 48), and the objectid also looks
suspicious.

Only the offset and count is correct.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Although it's still unknown why we have such many bytes corrupted
randomly, we can still enhance the tree-checker for data backrefs by:

- Validate the root value
  For now there should only be 3 types of roots can have data backref:
  * subvolume trees
  * data reloc trees
  * root tree
    Only for v1 space cache

- validate the objectid value
  The objectid should be a valid inode number.

Hopefully we can catch such problem in the future with the new checkers.
Reported-by: default avatarKai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAMthOuPjg5RDT-G_LXeBBUUtzt3cq=JywF+D1_h+JYxe=WKp-Q@mail.gmail.com/#tReviewed-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f333a3c7
  5. 19 Jul, 2024 1 commit
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: change BTRFS_MOUNT_* flags to 64bit type · c3ece6b7
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      Currently the BTRFS_MOUNT_* flags are already beyond 32 bits, this is
going to cause compilation errors for some 32 bit systems, as their
unsigned long is only 32 bits long, thus flag
BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNORESUPERFLAGS overflows and can lead to errors.

Fix the problem by:

- Migrate all existing BTRFS_MOUNT_* flags to unsigned long long
- Migrate all mount option related variables to unsigned long long
  * btrfs_fs_info::mount_opt
  * btrfs_fs_context::mount_opt
  * mount_opt parameter of btrfs_check_options()
  * old_opts parameter of btrfs_remount_begin()
  * old_opts parameter of btrfs_remount_cleanup()
  * mount_opt parameter of btrfs_check_mountopts_zoned()
  * mount_opt and opt parameters of check_ro_option()

Fixes: 32e62165 ("btrfs: introduce new "rescue=ignoresuperflags" mount option")
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c3ece6b7
  7. 11 Jul, 2024 34 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7