- 07 Oct, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Denis Efremov authored
btrfs_ioctl_send() used open-coded kvzalloc implementation earlier. The code was accidentally replaced with kzalloc() call [1]. Restore the original code by using kvzalloc() to allocate sctx->clone_roots. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9757891/#20529627 Fixes: 818e010b ("btrfs: replace opencoded kvzalloc with the helper") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by:
Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The passed in ordered_extent struct is always well-formed and contains the inode making the explicit argument redundant. Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's used to reference the csum root which can be done from the trans handle as well. Simplify the signature and while at it also remove the noinline attribute as the function uses only at most 16 bytes of stack space. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This makes reading the code a tad easier by decreasing the level of indirection by one. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's always set to 0 by the 2 callers so move it inside __do_readpage. Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's always set to 0 by its sole caller - btrfs_readpage. Simply remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's always set to 0 from the sole caller - btrfs_readpage. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Now that btrfs_readpage is the only caller of extent_read_full_page the latter can be open coded in the former. Use the occassion to rename __extent_read_full_page to extent_read_full_page. To facillitate this change submit_one_bio has to be exported as well. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's called only from btrfs_readpage which always passes 0 so just sink the argument into extent_read_full_page. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Now that this function is only responsible for reading data pages it's no longer necessary to pass get_extent_t parameter across several layers of functions. This patch removes this parameter from multiple functions: __get_extent_map/__do_readpage/__extent_read_full_page/ extent_read_full_page and simply calls btrfs_get_extent directly in __get_extent_map. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The sole purpose of this function was to satisfy the requirements of __do_readpage. Since that function is no longer used to read metadata pages the need to keep btree_get_extent around has also disappeared. Simply remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Metadata pages currently use __do_readpage to read metadata pages, unfortunately this function is also used to deal with ordinary data pages. This makes the metadata pages reading code to go through multiple hoops in order to adhere to __do_readpage invariants. Most of these are necessary for data pages which could be compressed. For metadata it's enough to simply build a bio and submit it. To this effect simply call submit_extent_page directly from read_extent_buffer_pages which is the only callpath used to populate extent_buffers with data. This in turn enables further cleanups. Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
There is no way for this function to be called as ->readpage() since it's called from generic_file_buffered_read/filemap_fault/do_read_cache_page/readhead code. BTRFS doesn't utilize the first 3 for the btree inode and implements it's owon readhead mechanism. So simply remove the function. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Logging directories with many entries can take a significant amount of time, and in some cases monopolize a cpu/core for a long time if the logging task doesn't happen to block often enough. Johannes and Lu Fengqi reported test case generic/041 triggering a soft lockup when the kernel has CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y. For this test case we log an inode with 3002 hard links, and because the test removed one hard link before fsyncing the file, the inode logging causes the parent directory do be logged as well, which has 6004 directory items to log (3002 BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY items plus 3002 BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY items), so it can take a significant amount of time and trigger the soft lockup. So just make tree-log.c:log_dir_items() reschedule when necessary, releasing the current search path before doing so and then resume from where it was before the reschedule. The stack trace produced when the soft lockup happens is the following: [10480.277653] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [xfs_io:28172] [10480.279418] Modules linked in: dm_thin_pool dm_persistent_data (...) [10480.284915] irq event stamp: 29646366 [10480.285987] hardirqs last enabled at (29646365): [<ffffffff85249b66>] __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0x60 [10480.288482] hardirqs last disabled at (29646366): [<ffffffff8579b00d>] irqentry_enter+0x1d/0x50 [10480.290856] softirqs last enabled at (4612): [<ffffffff85a00323>] __do_softirq+0x323/0x56c [10480.293615] softirqs last disabled at (4483): [<ffffffff85800dbf>] asm_call_on_stack+0xf/0x20 [10480.296428] CPU: 2 PID: 28172 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-default+ #1248 [10480.298948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [10480.302455] RIP: 0010:__slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x19/0x60 [10480.304151] Code: 86 e8 31 75 21 00 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 (...) [10480.309558] RSP: 0018:ffffadbe09397a58 EFLAGS: 00000282 [10480.311179] RAX: ffff8a495ab92840 RBX: 0000000000000282 RCX: 0000000000000006 [10480.313242] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff85249b66 [10480.315260] RBP: ffff8a497d04b740 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [10480.317229] R10: ffff8a497d044800 R11: ffff8a495ab93c40 R12: 0000000000000000 [10480.319169] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffffffffc01daf70 [10480.321104] FS: 00007fa1dc5c0e40(0000) GS:ffff8a497da00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [10480.323559] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [10480.325235] CR2: 00007fa1dc5befb8 CR3: 0000000004f8a006 CR4: 0000000000170ea0 [10480.327259] Call Trace: [10480.328286] ? overwrite_item+0x1f0/0x5a0 [btrfs] [10480.329784] __kmalloc+0x831/0xa20 [10480.331009] ? btrfs_get_32+0xb0/0x1d0 [btrfs] [10480.332464] overwrite_item+0x1f0/0x5a0 [btrfs] [10480.333948] log_dir_items+0x2ee/0x570 [btrfs] [10480.335413] log_directory_changes+0x82/0xd0 [btrfs] [10480.336926] btrfs_log_inode+0xc9b/0xda0 [btrfs] [10480.338374] ? init_once+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [10480.339711] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8d3/0xd10 [btrfs] [10480.341257] ? dget_parent+0x97/0x2e0 [10480.342480] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] [10480.343977] btrfs_sync_file+0x24b/0x5e0 [btrfs] [10480.345381] do_fsync+0x38/0x70 [10480.346483] __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20 [10480.347703] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 [10480.348891] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [10480.350444] RIP: 0033:0x7fa1dc80970b [10480.351642] Code: 0f 05 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 45 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 (...) [10480.356952] RSP: 002b:00007fffb3d081d0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a [10480.359458] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000562d93d45e40 RCX: 00007fa1dc80970b [10480.361426] RDX: 0000562d93d44ab0 RSI: 0000562d93d45e60 RDI: 0000000000000003 [10480.363367] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fa1dc7b2a40 [10480.365317] R10: 0000562d93d0e366 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000001 [10480.367299] R13: 0000562d93d45290 R14: 0000562d93d45e40 R15: 0000562d93d45e60 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20180713090216.GC575@fnst.localdomain/Reported-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We have this thing wrapped in an RCU lock, but it's really not needed. We create all the space_info's on mount, and we destroy them on unmount. The list never changes and we're protected from messing with it by the normal mount/umount path, so kill the RCU stuff around it. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reword and update formats to match variable types. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
That parameter can easily be derived based on the "data_size" and "nr" parameters exploit this fact to simply the function's signature. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The value of this argument can be derived from the total_data as it's simply the value of the data size + size of btrfs_items being touched. Move the parameter calculation inside the function. This results in a simpler interface and also a minor size reduction: ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.original fs/btrfs/ctree.o add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-34 (-34) Function old new delta btrfs_duplicate_item 260 259 -1 setup_items_for_insert 1200 1190 -10 btrfs_insert_empty_items 177 154 -23 Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Rearrange statements calculating the offset of the newly added items so that the calculation has to be done only once. No functional change. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
This reports the latest send stream version supported by the kernel as the feature in /sys/fs/btrfs/features/send_stream_version . Signed-off-by:
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
send_write_or_clone() basically has an open-coded copy of btrfs_file_extent_end() except that it (incorrectly) aligns to PAGE_SIZE instead of sectorsize. Fix and simplify the code by using btrfs_file_extent_end(). Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
send_write() currently copies from the page cache to sctx->read_buf, and then from sctx->read_buf to sctx->send_buf. Similarly, send_hole() zeroes sctx->read_buf and then copies from sctx->read_buf to sctx->send_buf. However, if we write the TLV header manually, we can copy to sctx->send_buf directly and get rid of sctx->read_buf. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
send_write()/fill_read_buf() have some logic for avoiding reading past i_size. However, everywhere that we call send_write()/send_extent_data(), we've already clamped the length down to i_size. Get rid of the i_size handling, which simplifies the next change. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Now that we use the same mechanism to replace all the extents in a file range with either a hole, an existing extent (when cloning) or a new extent (when using fallocate), the name of btrfs_insert_clone_extent() no longer reflects its genericity. So rename it to btrfs_insert_replace_extent(), since what it does is to either insert an existing extent or a new extent into a file range. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The function btrfs_punch_hole_range() is now used to replace all the file extents in a given file range with an extent described in the given struct btrfs_replace_extent_info argument. This extent can either be an existing extent that is being cloned or it can be a new extent (namely a prealloc extent). When that argument is NULL it only punches a hole (drops all the existing extents) in the file range. So rename the function to btrfs_replace_file_extents(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Now that we can use btrfs_clone_extent_info to convey information for a new prealloc extent as well, and not just for existing extents that are being cloned, rename it to btrfs_replace_extent_info, which reflects the fact that this is now more generic and it is used to replace all existing extents in a file range with the extent described by the structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The value of item_size of struct btrfs_clone_extent_info is always set to the size of a non-inline file extent item, and in fact the infrastructure that uses this structure (btrfs_punch_hole_range()) does not work with inline file extents at all (and it is not supposed to). So just remove that field from the structure and use directly sizeof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item) instead. Also assert that the file extent type is not inline at btrfs_insert_clone_extent(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an fallocate(), specially a zero range operation, we assume that reserving 3 units of metadata space is enough, that at most we touch one leaf in subvolume/fs tree for removing existing file extent items and inserting a new file extent item. This assumption is generally true for most common use cases. However when we end up needing to remove file extent items from multiple leaves, we can end up failing with -ENOSPC and abort the current transaction, turning the filesystem to RO mode. When this happens a stack trace like the following is dumped in dmesg/syslog: [ 1500.620934] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1500.620938] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 1500.620973] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 30807 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9724 __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs] [ 1500.620974] Modules linked in: btrfs intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel (...) [ 1500.621010] CPU: 2 PID: 30807 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1 [ 1500.621012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1500.621023] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs] [ 1500.621026] Code: 8b 40 50 f0 48 (...) [ 1500.621028] RSP: 0018:ffffb05fc8803ca0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 1500.621030] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9608af276488 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621032] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 1500.621033] RBP: ffffb05fc8803d90 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 1500.621035] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000003200000 [ 1500.621037] R13: 00000000ffffffe4 R14: ffff9608af275fe8 R15: ffff9608af275f60 [ 1500.621039] FS: 00007fb5b2368ec0(0000) GS:ffff9608b6600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1500.621041] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1500.621043] CR2: 00007fb5b2366fb8 CR3: 0000000202d38005 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 1500.621046] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621047] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 1500.621049] Call Trace: [ 1500.621076] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] [ 1500.621087] btrfs_fallocate+0xccd/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 1500.621108] vfs_fallocate+0x14d/0x290 [ 1500.621112] ksys_fallocate+0x3a/0x70 [ 1500.621117] __x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20 [ 1500.621120] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1500.621123] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1500.621126] RIP: 0033:0x7fb5b248c477 [ 1500.621128] Code: 89 7c 24 08 (...) [ 1500.621130] RSP: 002b:00007ffc7bee9060 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000011d [ 1500.621132] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fb5b248c477 [ 1500.621134] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 1500.621136] RBP: 0000557718faafd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621137] R10: 0000000003200000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000010 [ 1500.621139] R13: 0000557718faafb0 R14: 0000557718faa480 R15: 0000000000000003 [ 1500.621151] irq event stamp: 1026217 [ 1500.621154] hardirqs last enabled at (1026223): [<ffffffffba965570>] console_unlock+0x500/0x5c0 [ 1500.621156] hardirqs last disabled at (1026228): [<ffffffffba9654c7>] console_unlock+0x457/0x5c0 [ 1500.621159] softirqs last enabled at (1022486): [<ffffffffbb6003dc>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x606 [ 1500.621161] softirqs last disabled at (1022477): [<ffffffffbb4010b2>] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 1500.621162] ---[ end trace 2955b08408d8b9d4 ]--- [ 1500.621167] BTRFS: error (device sdj) in __btrfs_prealloc_file_range:9724: errno=-28 No space left When we use fallocate() internally, for reserving an extent for a space cache, inode cache or relocation, we can't hit this problem since either there aren't any file extent items to remove from the subvolume tree or there is at most one. When using plain fallocate() it's very unlikely, since that would require having many file extent items representing holes for the target range and crossing multiple leafs - we attempt to increase the range (merge) of such file extent items when punching holes, so at most we end up with 2 file extent items for holes at leaf boundaries. However when using the zero range operation of fallocate() for a large range (100+ MiB for example) that's fairly easy to trigger. The following example reproducer triggers the issue: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash umount /dev/sdj &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f -n 16384 -O ^no-holes /dev/sdj > /dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj # Create a 100M file with many file extent items. Punch a hole every 8K # just to speedup the file creation - we could do 4K sequential writes # followed by fsync (or O_SYNC) as well, but that takes a lot of time. file_size=$((100 * 1024 * 1024)) xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 10M 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar for ((i = 0; i < $file_size; i += 8192)); do xfs_io -c "fpunch $i 4096" /mnt/sdj/foobar done # Force a transaction commit, so the zero range operation will be forced # to COW all metadata extents it need to touch. sync xfs_io -c "fzero 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar umount /mnt/sdj $ ./reproducer.sh wrote 104857600/104857600 bytes at offset 0 100 MiB, 10 ops; 0.0669 sec (1.458 GiB/sec and 149.3117 ops/sec) fallocate: No space left on device $ dmesg <shows the same stack trace pasted before> To fix this use the existing infrastructure that hole punching and extent cloning use for replacing a file range with another extent. This deals with doing the removal of file extent items and inserting the new one using an incremental approach, reserving more space when needed and always ensuring we don't leave an implicit hole in the range in case we need to do multiple iterations and a crash happens between iterations. A test case for fstests will follow up soon. Reviewed-by: -
YueHaibing authored
It is not used since commit 0096420a ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit"). Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The function is short and simple, we can get rid of the declaration as it's not necessary for a static function. Move it before its first caller. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The function does not have a common exit block and returns immediatelly so there's no point having the goto. Remove the two cases. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
We can check the argument value directly, no need for the temporary variable. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
In the function btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(), the local variable devices is used only once, we can remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
On a mounted sprout filesystem, all threads now are using the sprout::device_list_mutex, and this is the only code using the seed::device_list_mutex. This patch converts to use the sprouts fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex. The same reasoning holds true here, that device delete is holding the sprout::device_list_mutex. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
On an fs mounted using a sprout device, the seed fs_devices are maintained in a linked list under fs_info->fs_devices. Each seeds fs_devices also has device_list_mutex initialized to protect against the potential race with delete threads. But the delete thread (at btrfs_rm_device()) is holding the fs_info::fs_devices::device_list_mutex mutex which belongs to sprout device_list_mutex instead of seed device_list_mutex. Moreover, there aren't any significient benefits in using the seed::device_list_mutex instead of sprout::device_list_mutex. So this patch converts them of using the seed::device_list_mutex to sprout::device_list_mutex. Reviewed-by:
-
