- 18 Apr, 2023 34 commits
-
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
Sidhartha Kumar removed the last caller of PageHeadHuge(), so we can now remove it and make folio_test_hugetlb() the real implementation. Add kernel-doc for folio_test_hugetlb(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327151050.1787744-1-willy@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-15-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-14-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
sh defines insane ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages. Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible defaults. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. [rppt@kernel.org: untweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range'] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-13-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-13-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. [rppt@kernel.org: tweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range'] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-12-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-12-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
PowerPC defines ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER some of which are insanely allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages. Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible defaults. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-11-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-10-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
nios2 defines range for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 19, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^19 pages or 2GiB. Drop bogus definition of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible default. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-9-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-8-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-7-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
It is enough to keep default values for base and huge pages without letting users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. Drop the prompt to make the option unvisible in *config. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-6-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The default value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER matches the generic default defined in the MM code, the architecture does not support huge pages, so there is no need to keep ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER option available. Drop it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-5-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. [rppt@kernel.org: change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER dependencies] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-4-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-4-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand implications of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and ranges don't help here. Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt visible only if EXPERT=y Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-3-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
Patch series "arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER", v3. Several architectures have ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER in their Kconfig and they all have wrong and misleading prompt and help text for this option. Besides, some define insane limits for possible values of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, some carefully define ranges only for a subset of possible configurations, some make this option configurable by users for no good reason. This set updates the prompt and help text everywhere and does its best to update actual definitions of ranges where applicable. kbuild generated a bunch of false positives because it assigns -1 to ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, hopefully this will be fixed soon. This patch (of 14): The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-2-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Michal Hocko authored
Leonardo Bras has noticed that pcp charge cache draining might be disruptive on workloads relying on 'isolated cpus', a feature commonly used on workloads that are sensitive to interruption and context switching such as vRAN and Industrial Control Systems. There are essentially two ways how to approach the issue. We can either allow the pcp cache to be drained on a different rather than a local cpu or avoid remote flushing on isolated cpus. The current pcp charge cache is really optimized for high performance and it always relies to stick with its cpu. That means it only requires local_lock (preempt_disable on !RT) and draining is handed over to pcp WQ to drain locally again. The former solution (remote draining) would require to add an additional locking to prevent local charges from racing with the draining. This adds an atomic operation to otherwise simple arithmetic fast path in the try_charge path. Another concern is that the remote draining can cause a lock contention for the isolated workloads and therefore interfere with it indirectly via user space interfaces. Another option is to avoid draining scheduling on isolated cpus altogether. That means that those remote cpus would keep their charges even after drain_all_stock returns. This is certainly not optimal either but it shouldn't really cause any major problems. In the worst case (many isolated cpus with charges - each of them with MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH i.e 64 page) the memory consumption of a memcg would be artificially higher than can be immediately used from other cpus. Theoretically a memcg OOM killer could be triggered pre-maturely. Currently it is not really clear whether this is a practical problem though. Tight memcg limit would be really counter productive to cpu isolated workloads pretty much by definition because any memory reclaimed induced by memcg limit could break user space timing expectations as those usually expect execution in the userspace most of the time. Also charges could be left behind on memcg removal. Any future charge on those isolated cpus will drain that pcp cache so this won't be a permanent leak. Considering cons and pros of both approaches this patch is implementing the second option and simply do not schedule remote draining if the target cpu is isolated. This solution is much more simpler. It doesn't add any new locking and it is more more predictable from the user space POV. Should the pre-mature memcg OOM become a real life problem, we can revisit this decision. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: memcontrol.c needs sched/isolation.h] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303180617.7E3aIlHf-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Reported-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
Patch series "memcg, cpuisol: do not interfere pcp cache charges draining with cpuisol workloads". Leonardo has reported [1] that pcp memcg charge draining can interfere with cpu isolated workloads. The said draining is done from a WQ context with a pcp worker scheduled on each CPU which holds any cached charges for a specific memcg hierarchy. Operation is not really a common operation [2]. It can be triggered from the userspace though so some care is definitely due. Leonardo has tried to address the issue by allowing remote charge draining [3]. This approach requires an additional locking to synchronize pcp caches sync from a remote cpu from local pcp consumers. Even though the proposed lock was per-cpu there is still potential for contention and less predictable behavior. This patchset addresses the issue from a different angle. Rather than dealing with a potential synchronization, cpus which are isolated are simply never scheduled to be drained. This means that a small amount of charges could be laying around and waiting for a later use or they are flushed when a different memcg is charged from the same cpu. More details are in patch 2. The first patch from Frederic is implementing an abstraction to tell whether a specific cpu has been isolated and therefore require a special treatment. This patch (of 2): Provide this new API to check if a CPU has been isolated either through isolcpus= or nohz_full= kernel parameter. It aims at avoiding kernel load deemed to be safely spared on CPUs running sensitive workload that can't bear any disturbance, such as pcp cache draining. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-1-mhocko@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-2-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Ivan Orlov authored
Syzkaller reported the following issue: kernel BUG at mm/khugepaged.c:1823! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 5097 Comm: syz-executor220 Not tainted 6.2.0-syzkaller-13154-g857f1268 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/16/2023 RIP: 0010:collapse_file mm/khugepaged.c:1823 [inline] RIP: 0010:hpage_collapse_scan_file+0x67c8/0x7580 mm/khugepaged.c:2233 Code: 00 00 89 de e8 c9 66 a3 ff 31 ff 89 de e8 c0 66 a3 ff 45 84 f6 0f 85 28 0d 00 00 e8 22 64 a3 ff e9 dc f7 ff ff e8 18 64 a3 ff <0f> 0b f3 0f 1e fa e8 0d 64 a3 ff e9 93 f6 ff ff f3 0f 1e fa 4c 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003dff4e0 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffffffff81e95988 RBX: 00000000000001c1 RCX: ffff8880205b3a80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001c0 RDI: 00000000000001c1 RBP: ffffc90003dff830 R08: ffffffff81e90e67 R09: fffffbfff1a433c3 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc90003dff6c0 R14: 00000000000001c0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fdbae5ee700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fdbae6901e0 CR3: 000000007b2dd000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> madvise_collapse+0x721/0xf50 mm/khugepaged.c:2693 madvise_vma_behavior mm/madvise.c:1086 [inline] madvise_walk_vmas mm/madvise.c:1260 [inline] do_madvise+0x9e5/0x4680 mm/madvise.c:1439 __do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1452 [inline] __se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1450 [inline] __x64_sys_madvise+0xa5/0xb0 mm/madvise.c:1450 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd The xas_store() call during page cache scanning can potentially translate 'xas' into the error state (with the reproducer provided by the syzkaller the error code is -ENOMEM). However, there are no further checks after the 'xas_store', and the next call of 'xas_next' at the start of the scanning cycle doesn't increase the xa_index, and the issue occurs. This patch will add the xarray state error checking after the xas_store() and the corresponding result error code. Tested via syzbot. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: update include/trace/events/huge_memory.h's SCAN_STATUS] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230329145330.23191-1-ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7d6bb3760e026ece7524500fe44fb024a0e959fcSigned-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+9578faa5475acb35fa50@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@gmail.com> Cc: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
Some unknown -mllvm options (i.e. those starting with the letter "h") don't cause an error to be returned by clang, so the cc-option helper adds the unknown hwasan-kernel-mem-intrinsic-prefix=1 flag to CFLAGS with compilers that are new enough for hwasan but too old for this option. This causes a rather unreadable build failure: fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.empty.o.d: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:252: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 2 fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.devicetable-offsets.s.d: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:114: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 2 Add a version check to only allow this option with clang-15, gcc-13 or later versions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230418122350.1646391-1-arnd@kernel.org Fixes: 51287dcb ("kasan: emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNMwYosrvqh4ogDO8rgn+SeDHM2b-shD21wTypm_6MMe=g@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Sergey Senozhatsky authored
The current implementation of the compaction loop fails to set the source zspage pointer to NULL in all cases, leading to a potential issue where __zs_compact() could use a stale zspage pointer. This pointer could even point to a previously freed zspage, causing unexpected behavior in the putback_zspage() and migrate_write_unlock() functions after returning from the compaction loop. Address the issue by ensuring that the source zspage pointer is always set to NULL when it should be. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417130850.1784777-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org Fixes: 5a845e9f ("zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm") Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Reported-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Tested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
clang produces a build failure on x86 for some randconfig builds after a change that moves around code to mm/mm_init.c: Cannot find symbol for section 2: .text. mm/mm_init.o: failed I have not been able to figure out why this happens, but the __weak annotation on arch_has_descending_max_zone_pfns() is the trigger here. Removing the weak function in favor of an open-coded Kconfig option check avoids the problem and becomes clearer as well as better to optimize by the compiler. [arnd@arndb.de: fix logic bug] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230415081904.969049-1-arnd@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414080418.110236-1-arnd@kernel.org Fixes: 9420f89d ("mm: move most of core MM initialization to mm/mm_init.c") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
23baf831 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") results in various boot failures (hang) on arm targets Debug messages reveal the reason. ########### MAX_ORDER=10 start=0 __ffs(start)=-1 min()=10 min_t=-1 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If start==0, __ffs(start) returns 0xfffffff or (as int) -1, which min_t() interprets as such, while min() apparently uses the returned unsigned long value. Obviously a negative order isn't received well by the rest of the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Mike] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZDBa7HWZK69dKKzH@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406072529.vupqyrzqnhyozeyh@box.shutemov.name Fixes: 23baf831 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") Signed-off-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9460377a-38aa-4f39-ad57-fb73725f92db@roeck-us.netReviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Andrew Morton authored
-
Ryusuke Konishi authored
Syzbot still reports uninit-value in nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs() for KMSAN enabled kernels after applying commit 73970316 ("nilfs2: initialize "struct nilfs_binfo_dat"->bi_pad field"). This is because the unused bytes at the end of each block in segment summaries are not initialized. So this fixes the issue by padding the unused bytes with null bytes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417173513.12598-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+048585f3f4227bb2b49b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=048585f3f4227bb2b49b Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mel Gorman authored
A bug was reported by Yuanxi Liu where allocating 1G pages at runtime is taking an excessive amount of time for large amounts of memory. Further testing allocating huge pages that the cost is linear i.e. if allocating 1G pages in batches of 10 then the time to allocate nr_hugepages from 10->20->30->etc increases linearly even though 10 pages are allocated at each step. Profiles indicated that much of the time is spent checking the validity within already existing huge pages and then attempting a migration that fails after isolating the range, draining pages and a whole lot of other useless work. Commit eb14d4ee ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig") removed two checks, one which ignored huge pages for contiguous allocations as huge pages can sometimes migrate. While there may be value on migrating a 2M page to satisfy a 1G allocation, it's potentially expensive if the 1G allocation fails and it's pointless to try moving a 1G page for a new 1G allocation or scan the tail pages for valid PFNs. Reintroduce the PageHuge check and assume any contiguous region with hugetlbfs pages is unsuitable for a new 1G allocation. The hpagealloc test allocates huge pages in batches and reports the average latency per page over time. This test happens just after boot when fragmentation is not an issue. Units are in milliseconds. hpagealloc 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 vanilla hugeallocrevert-v1r1 hugeallocsimple-v1r2 Min Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%) 1st-qrtle Latency 356.61 ( 0.00%) 5.34 ( 98.50%) 19.85 ( 94.43%) 2nd-qrtle Latency 697.26 ( 0.00%) 5.47 ( 99.22%) 20.44 ( 97.07%) 3rd-qrtle Latency 972.94 ( 0.00%) 5.50 ( 99.43%) 20.81 ( 97.86%) Max-1 Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%) Max-5 Latency 82.14 ( 0.00%) 5.11 ( 93.78%) 19.31 ( 76.49%) Max-10 Latency 150.54 ( 0.00%) 5.20 ( 96.55%) 19.43 ( 87.09%) Max-90 Latency 1164.45 ( 0.00%) 5.53 ( 99.52%) 20.97 ( 98.20%) Max-95 Latency 1223.06 ( 0.00%) 5.55 ( 99.55%) 21.06 ( 98.28%) Max-99 Latency 1278.67 ( 0.00%) 5.57 ( 99.56%) 22.56 ( 98.24%) Max Latency 1310.90 ( 0.00%) 8.06 ( 99.39%) 26.62 ( 97.97%) Amean Latency 678.36 ( 0.00%) 5.44 * 99.20%* 20.44 * 96.99%* 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 vanilla revert-v1 hugeallocfix-v2 Duration User 0.28 0.27 0.30 Duration System 808.66 17.77 35.99 Duration Elapsed 830.87 18.08 36.33 The vanilla kernel is poor, taking up to 1.3 second to allocate a huge page and almost 10 minutes in total to run the test. Reverting the problematic commit reduces it to 8ms at worst and the patch takes 26ms. This patch fixes the main issue with skipping huge pages but leaves the page_count() out because a page with an elevated count potentially can migrate. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217022 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414141429.pwgieuwluxwez3rj@techsingularity.net Fixes: eb14d4ee ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig") Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by: Yuanxi Liu <y.liu@naruida.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Liam R. Howlett authored
The maple tree limits the gap returned to a window that specifically fits what was asked. This may not be optimal in the case of switching search directions or a gap that does not satisfy the requested space for other reasons. Fix the search by retrying the operation and limiting the search window in the rare occasion that a conflict occurs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414185919.4175572-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Fixes: 3499a131 ("mm/mmap: use maple tree for unmapped_area{_topdown}") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Liam R. Howlett authored
The internal function of mas_awalk() was incorrectly skipping the last entry in a node, which could potentially be NULL. This is only a problem for the left-most node in the tree - otherwise that NULL would not exist. Fix mas_awalk() by using the metadata to obtain the end of the node for the loop and the logical pivot as apposed to the raw pivot value. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414145728.4067069-2-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Fixes: 54a611b6 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Liam R. Howlett authored
Stop using maple state min/max for the range by passing through pointers for those values. This will allow the maple state to be reused without resetting. Also add some logic to fail out early on searching with invalid arguments. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414145728.4067069-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Fixes: 54a611b6 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Alexander Potapenko authored
Similarly to kmsan_vmap_pages_range_noflush(), kmsan_ioremap_page_range() must also properly handle allocation/mapping failures. In the case of such, it must clean up the already created metadata mappings and return an error code, so that the error can be propagated to ioremap_page_range(). Without doing so, KMSAN may silently fail to bring the metadata for the page range into a consistent state, which will result in user-visible crashes when trying to access them. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413131223.4135168-2-glider@google.com Fixes: b073d7f8 ("mm: kmsan: maintain KMSAN metadata for page operations") Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Reported-by: Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANX2M5ZRrRA64k0hOif02TjmY9kbbO2aCBPyq79es34RXZ=cAw@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Alexander Potapenko authored
As reported by Dipanjan Das, when KMSAN is used together with kernel fault injection (or, generally, even without the latter), calls to kcalloc() or __vmap_pages_range_noflush() may fail, leaving the metadata mappings for the virtual mapping in an inconsistent state. When these metadata mappings are accessed later, the kernel crashes. To address the problem, we return a non-zero error code from kmsan_vmap_pages_range_noflush() in the case of any allocation/mapping failure inside it, and make vmap_pages_range_noflush() return an error if KMSAN fails to allocate the metadata. This patch also removes KMSAN_WARN_ON() from vmap_pages_range_noflush(), as these allocation failures are not fatal anymore. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413131223.4135168-1-glider@google.com Fixes: b073d7f8 ("mm: kmsan: maintain KMSAN metadata for page operations") Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Reported-by: Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANX2M5ZRrRA64k0hOif02TjmY9kbbO2aCBPyq79es34RXZ=cAw@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
SeongJae Park authored
Commit 799fb82a ("tools/vm: rename tools/vm to tools/mm") missed renaming 'vm' in 'tools/Makefile' to 'mm'. As a result, 'make clean' under 'tools/' directory fails as below: $ make -C tools clean DESCEND vm make[1]: Entering directory '/linux/tools/vm' make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'clean'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory '/linux/tools/vm' make: *** [Makefile:173: vm_clean] Error 2 make: Leaving directory '/linux/tools' Do the missed rename. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230415203110.13858-1-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 799fb82a ("tools/vm: rename tools/vm to tools/mm") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Reported-by: Ricardo Pardini <ricardo@pardini.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230415202454.13558-1-sj@kernel.org/Tested-by: Ricardo Pardini <ricardo@pardini.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mathieu Desnoyers authored
commit f1a79412 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into percpu_counter") introduces a memory leak by missing a call to destroy_context() when a percpu_counter fails to allocate. Before introducing the per-cpu counter allocations, init_new_context() was the last call that could fail in mm_init(), and thus there was no need to ever invoke destroy_context() in the error paths. Adding the following percpu counter allocations adds error paths after init_new_context(), which means its associated destroy_context() needs to be called when percpu counters fail to allocate. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330133822.66271-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Fixes: f1a79412 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into percpu_counter") Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Tetsuo Handa authored
syzbot is reporting circular locking dependency which involves zonelist_update_seq seqlock [1], for this lock is checked by memory allocation requests which do not need to be retried. One deadlock scenario is kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) from an interrupt handler. CPU0 ---- __build_all_zonelists() { write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq); // makes zonelist_update_seq.seqcount odd // e.g. timer interrupt handler runs at this moment some_timer_func() { kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) { __alloc_pages_slowpath() { read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) { // spins forever because zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd } } } } // e.g. timer interrupt handler finishes write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq); // makes zonelist_update_seq.seqcount even } This deadlock scenario can be easily eliminated by not calling read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) from !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation requests, for retry is applicable to only __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation requests. But Michal Hocko does not know whether we should go with this approach. Another deadlock scenario which syzbot is reporting is a race between kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) from tty_insert_flip_string_and_push_buffer() with port->lock held and printk() from __build_all_zonelists() with zonelist_update_seq held. CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- pty_write() { tty_insert_flip_string_and_push_buffer() { __build_all_zonelists() { write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq); build_zonelists() { printk() { vprintk() { vprintk_default() { vprintk_emit() { console_unlock() { console_flush_all() { console_emit_next_record() { con->write() = serial8250_console_write() { spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); tty_insert_flip_string() { tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() { __tty_buffer_request_room() { tty_buffer_alloc() { kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN) { __alloc_pages_slowpath() { zonelist_iter_begin() { read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq); // spins forever because zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); // spins forever because port->lock is held } } } } } } } } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags); // message is printed to console spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags); } } } } } } } } } write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq); } } } This deadlock scenario can be eliminated by preventing interrupt context from calling kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) and preventing printk() from calling console_flush_all() while zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd. Since Petr Mladek thinks that __build_all_zonelists() can become a candidate for deferring printk() [2], let's address this problem by disabling local interrupts in order to avoid kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) and disabling synchronous printk() in order to avoid console_flush_all() . As a side effect of minimizing duration of zonelist_update_seq.seqcount being odd by disabling synchronous printk(), latency at read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) for both !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM and __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation requests will be reduced. Although, from lockdep perspective, not calling read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) (i.e. do not record unnecessary locking dependency) from interrupt context is still preferable, even if we don't allow calling kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) inside write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq)/write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq) section... Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8796b95c-3da3-5885-fddd-6ef55f30e4d3@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Fixes: 3d36424b ("mm/page_alloc: fix race condition between build_all_zonelists and page allocation") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZCrs+1cDqPWTDFNM@alley [2] Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+223c7461c58c58a4cb10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=223c7461c58c58a4cb10 [1] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Cc: Patrick Daly <quic_pdaly@quicinc.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Ondrej Mosnacek authored
Linux Security Modules (LSMs) that implement the "capable" hook will usually emit an access denial message to the audit log whenever they "block" the current task from using the given capability based on their security policy. The occurrence of a denial is used as an indication that the given task has attempted an operation that requires the given access permission, so the callers of functions that perform LSM permission checks must take care to avoid calling them too early (before it is decided if the permission is actually needed to perform the requested operation). The __sys_setres[ug]id() functions violate this convention by first calling ns_capable_setid() and only then checking if the operation requires the capability or not. It means that any caller that has the capability granted by DAC (task's capability set) but not by MAC (LSMs) will generate a "denied" audit record, even if is doing an operation for which the capability is not required. Fix this by reordering the checks such that ns_capable_setid() is checked last and -EPERM is returned immediately if it returns false. While there, also do two small optimizations: * move the capability check before prepare_creds() and * bail out early in case of a no-op. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230217162154.837549-1-omosnace@redhat.com Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 Apr, 2023 6 commits
-
-
Andrew Morton authored
-
Peter Xu authored
This is a proposal to revert commit 914eedcb. I found this when writing a simple UFFDIO_API test to be the first unit test in this set. Two things breaks with the commit: - UFFDIO_API check was lost and missing. According to man page, the kernel should reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if uffdio_api.api != 0xaa. This check is needed if the api version will be extended in the future, or user app won't be able to identify which is a new kernel. - Feature flags checks were removed, which means UFFDIO_API with a feature that does not exist will also succeed. According to the man page, we should (and it makes sense) to reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if unknown features passed in. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722201513.1624158-1-axelrasmussen@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412163922.327282-2-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: 914eedcb ("userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Baokun Li authored
KASAN report null-ptr-deref: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0 Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000000 by task sync/943 CPU: 5 PID: 943 Comm: sync Tainted: 6.3.0-rc5-next-20230406-dirty #461 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0xc0 print_report+0x2ba/0x340 kasan_report+0xc4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x1b7/0x2e0 __kasan_check_write+0x24/0x40 bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0 sync_inodes_sb+0x195/0x630 sync_inodes_one_sb+0x3a/0x50 iterate_supers+0x106/0x1b0 ksys_sync+0x98/0x160 [...] ================================================================== The race that causes the above issue is as follows: cpu1 cpu2 -------------------------|------------------------- inode_switch_wbs INIT_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn) queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work) // queue_work async inode_switch_wbs_work_fn wb_put_many(old_wb, nr_switched) percpu_ref_put_many ref->data->release(ref) cgwb_release queue_work(cgwb_release_wq, &wb->release_work) // queue_work async &wb->release_work cgwb_release_workfn ksys_sync iterate_supers sync_inodes_one_sb sync_inodes_sb bdi_split_work_to_wbs kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC) // alloc memory failed percpu_ref_exit ref->data = NULL kfree(data) wb_get(wb) percpu_ref_get(&wb->refcnt) percpu_ref_get_many(ref, 1) atomic_long_add(nr, &ref->data->count) atomic64_add(i, v) // trigger null-ptr-deref bdi_split_work_to_wbs() traverses &bdi->wb_list to split work into all wbs. If the allocation of new work fails, the on-stack fallback will be used and the reference count of the current wb is increased afterwards. If cgroup writeback membership switches occur before getting the reference count and the current wb is released as old_wd, then calling wb_get() or wb_put() will trigger the null pointer dereference above. This issue was introduced in v4.3-rc7 (see fix tag1). Both sync_inodes_sb() and __writeback_inodes_sb_nr() calls to bdi_split_work_to_wbs() can trigger this issue. For scenarios called via sync_inodes_sb(), originally commit 7fc5854f ("writeback: synchronize sync(2) against cgroup writeback membership switches") reduced the possibility of the issue by adding wb_switch_rwsem, but in v5.14-rc1 (see fix tag2) removed the "inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, old_wb)" from inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() so that wb->state contains WB_has_dirty_io, thus old_wb is not skipped when traversing wbs in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(), and the issue becomes easily reproducible again. To solve this problem, percpu_ref_exit() is called under RCU protection to avoid race between cgwb_release_workfn() and bdi_split_work_to_wbs(). Moreover, replace wb_get() with wb_tryget() in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(), and skip the current wb if wb_tryget() fails because the wb has already been shutdown. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230410130826.1492525-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Fixes: b817525a ("writeback: bdi_writeback iteration must not skip dying ones") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Cc: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Peng Zhang authored
In mas_alloc_nodes(), "node->node_count = 0" means to initialize the node_count field of the new node, but the node may not be a new node. It may be a node that existed before and node_count has a value, setting it to 0 will cause a memory leak. At this time, mas->alloc->total will be greater than the actual number of nodes in the linked list, which may cause many other errors. For example, out-of-bounds access in mas_pop_node(), and mas_pop_node() may return addresses that should not be used. Fix it by initializing node_count only for new nodes. Also, by the way, an if-else statement was removed to simplify the code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411041005.26205-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com Fixes: 54a611b6 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure") Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Steve Chou authored
When using cull option with 'tg' flag, the fprintf is using pid instead of tgid. It should use tgid instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411034929.2071501-1-steve_chou@pesi.com.tw Fixes: 9c8a0a8e ("tools/vm/page_owner_sort.c: support for user-defined culling rules") Signed-off-by: Steve Chou <steve_chou@pesi.com.tw> Cc: Jiajian Ye <yejiajian2018@email.szu.edu.cn> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Jonathan Toppins authored
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d79bc6eaf65e68bd1c2a1e1510ab6291ce5926a6.1681162487.git.jtoppins@redhat.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-