As reported by cocinelle:

drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:573:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 574
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:575:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 576
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:577:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 578
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:579:2-27: code aligned with following code on line 580
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:581:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 582
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:583:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 584
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:585:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 586
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:587:2-27: code aligned with following code on line 588
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:589:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 590
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:591:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 592
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:593:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 594
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:595:2-26: code aligned with following code on line 596
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:597:2-30: code aligned with following code on line 598
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:599:2-27: code aligned with following code on line 600
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:601:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 602
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:603:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 604
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:605:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 606
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:607:2-26: code aligned with following code on line 608
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:609:2-28: code aligned with following code on line 610
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:611:2-30: code aligned with following code on line 612
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:613:2-31: code aligned with following code on line 614
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:615:2-30: code aligned with following code on line 616
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:617:2-33: code aligned with following code on line 618
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:619:2-33: code aligned with following code on line 620
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:621:2-32: code aligned with following code on line 622
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:623:2-34: code aligned with following code on line 624
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:625:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 626
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:627:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 628
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:629:2-30: code aligned with following code on line 630
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:631:2-29: code aligned with following code on line 632
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Acked-by: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Make sure pm_runtime_* calls does not use unnecessary
IS_ERR_VALUE().

Reported by scripts/coccinelle/api/pm_runtime.cocci script.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using if (foo == false), just use
if (!foo).

That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using if (foo == false), just use
if (!foo).

That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

instead of testing bools if they are false or true, just use
if (!foo) or if (foo). That makes the code easier to
read and shorter.

Also, properly initialize booleans with true or false.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

lml33dpatch is boolean. So, the possible values are
true or false.

Instead of using if (lml33dpath), just use
if (!lml33dpath).

That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using if (on == true), just use
if (on).

That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

instead of testing if it is false or true, just use
if (!foo) or if (foo). That makes the code easier to
read and shorter.

Also, properly initialize booleans with true or false.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using if (foo == false), just use
if (!foo).

That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.

Also, instead of testing foo == false, just use the
simplified notation if(!foo).
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false
defines.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

The error return code STV0900_NO_ERROR happens only once, at
the end of the functions. So, just return it directly.

This driver should actually be fixed to return standard
Linux error codes, instead of its own macros, but this
should be done on a separate patchset.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>