Since 9e8cd2f5 ("workqueue: implement apply_workqueue_attrs()"),
init_and_link_pwq() may be called to initialize a new pool_workqueue
for a workqueue which is already online, but the function was setting
pwq->max_active to wq->saved_max_active without proper
synchronization.

Fix it by calling pwq_adjust_max_active() under proper locking instead
of manually setting max_active.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Rename pwq_set_max_active() to pwq_adjust_max_active() and move
pool_workqueue->max_active synchronization and max_active
determination logic into it.

The new function should be called with workqueue_lock held for stable
workqueue->saved_max_active, determines the current max_active value
the target pool_workqueue should be using from @wq->saved_max_active
and the state of the associated pool, and applies it with proper
synchronization.

The current two users - workqueue_set_max_active() and
thaw_workqueues() - are updated accordingly.  In addition, the manual
freezing handling in __alloc_workqueue_key() and
freeze_workqueues_begin() are replaced with calls to
pwq_adjust_max_active().

This centralizes max_active handling so that it's less error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

pwq_set_max_active() is gonna be modified and used during
pool_workqueue init.  Move it above init_and_link_pwq().

This patch is pure code reorganization and doesn't introduce any
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Implement a function which queries whether it currently is running off
a workqueue rescuer.  This will be used to convert writeback to
workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

There are cases where workqueue users want to expose control knobs to
userland.  e.g. Unbound workqueues with custom attributes are
scheduled to be used for writeback workers and depending on
configuration it can be useful to allow admins to tinker with the
priority or allowed CPUs.

This patch implements workqueue_sysfs_register(), which makes the
workqueue visible under /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/WQ_NAME.  There
currently are two attributes common to both per-cpu and unbound pools
and extra attributes for unbound pools including nice level and
cpumask.

If alloc_workqueue*() is called with WQ_SYSFS,
workqueue_sysfs_register() is called automatically as part of
workqueue creation.  This is the preferred method unless the workqueue
user wants to apply workqueue_attrs before making the workqueue
visible to userland.

v2: Disallow exposing ordered workqueues as ordered workqueues can't
    be tuned in any way.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Kay tells me the most appropriate place to expose workqueues to
userland would be /sys/devices/virtual/workqueues/WQ_NAME which is
symlinked to /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/WQ_NAME and that we're lacking
a way to do that outside of driver core as virtual_device_parent()
isn't exported and there's no inteface to conveniently create a
virtual subsystem.

This patch implements subsys_virtual_register() by factoring out
subsys_register() from subsys_system_register() and using it with
virtual_device_parent() as the origin directory.  It's identical to
subsys_system_register() other than the origin directory but we aren't
gonna restrict the device names which should be used under it.

This will be used to expose workqueue attributes to userland.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>

We have cpulist_parse() but not cpumask_parse().  Implement it using
bitmap_parse().

bitmap_parse() is weird in that it takes @len for a string in
kernel-memory which also is inconsistent with bitmap_parselist().
Make cpumask_parse() calculate the length and don't expose the
inconsistency to cpumask users.  Maybe we can fix up bitmap_parse()
later.

This will be used to expose workqueue cpumask knobs to userland via
sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Adjusting max_active of or applying new workqueue_attrs to an ordered
workqueue breaks its ordering guarantee.  The former is obvious.  The
latter is because applying attrs creates a new pwq (pool_workqueue)
and there is no ordering constraint between the old and new pwqs.

Make apply_workqueue_attrs() and workqueue_set_max_active() trigger
WARN_ON() if those operations are requested on an ordered workqueue
and fail / ignore respectively.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

We're gonna add another internal WQ flag.  Let's make the distinction
clear.  Prefix WQ_DRAINING with __ and move it to bit 16.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Implement apply_workqueue_attrs() which applies workqueue_attrs to the
specified unbound workqueue by creating a new pwq (pool_workqueue)
linked to worker_pool with the specified attributes.

A new pwq is linked at the head of wq->pwqs instead of tail and
__queue_work() verifies that the first unbound pwq has positive refcnt
before choosing it for the actual queueing.  This is to cover the case
where creation of a new pwq races with queueing.  As base ref on a pwq
won't be dropped without making another pwq the first one,
__queue_work() is guaranteed to make progress and not add work item to
a dead pwq.

init_and_link_pwq() is updated to return the last first pwq the new
pwq replaced, which is put by apply_workqueue_attrs().

Note that apply_workqueue_attrs() is almost identical to unbound pwq
part of alloc_and_link_pwqs().  The only difference is that there is
no previous first pwq.  apply_workqueue_attrs() is implemented to
handle such cases and replaces unbound pwq handling in
alloc_and_link_pwqs().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Because per-cpu workqueues have multiple pwqs (pool_workqueues) to
serve the CPUs, to guarantee that a single work item isn't queued on
one pwq while still executing another, __queue_work() takes a look at
the previous pool the target work item was on and if it's still
executing there, queue the work item on that pool.

To support changing workqueue_attrs on the fly, unbound workqueues too
will have multiple pwqs and thus need non-reentrancy test when
queueing.  This patch modifies __queue_work() such that the reentrancy
test is performed regardless of the workqueue type.

per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu) used to be used to determine the
matching pwq for the last pool.  This can't be used for unbound
workqueues and is replaced with worker->current_pwq which also happens
to be simpler.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Unbound pwqs (pool_workqueues) will be dynamically created and
destroyed with the scheduled unbound workqueue w/ custom attributes
support.  This patch synchronizes pwq linking and unlinking against
flush_workqueue() so that its operation isn't disturbed by pwqs coming
and going.

Linking and unlinking a pwq into wq->pwqs is now protected also by
wq->flush_mutex and a new pwq's work_color is initialized to
wq->work_color during linking.  This ensures that pwqs changes don't
disturb flush_workqueue() in progress and the new pwq's work coloring
stays in sync with the rest of the workqueue.

flush_mutex during unlinking isn't strictly necessary but it's simpler
to do it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Add pool_workqueue->refcnt along with get/put_pwq().  Both per-cpu and
unbound pwqs have refcnts and any work item inserted on a pwq
increments the refcnt which is dropped when the work item finishes.

For per-cpu pwqs the base ref is never dropped and destroy_workqueue()
frees the pwqs as before.  For unbound ones, destroy_workqueue()
simply drops the base ref on the first pwq.  When the refcnt reaches
zero, pwq_unbound_release_workfn() is scheduled on system_wq, which
unlinks the pwq, puts the associated pool and frees the pwq and wq as
necessary.  This needs to be done from a work item as put_pwq() needs
to be protected by pool->lock but release can't happen with the lock
held - e.g. put_unbound_pool() involves blocking operations.

Unbound pool->locks are marked with lockdep subclas 1 as put_pwq()
will schedule the release work item on system_wq while holding the
unbound pool's lock and triggers recursive locking warning spuriously.

This will be used to implement dynamic creation and destruction of
unbound pwqs.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

* Move initialization and linking of pool_workqueues into
  init_and_link_pwq().

* Make the failure path use destroy_workqueue() once pool_workqueue
  initialization succeeds.

These changes are to prepare for dynamic management of pool_workqueues
and don't introduce any functional changes.

While at it, convert list_del(&wq->list) to list_del_init() as a
precaution as scheduled changes will make destruction more complex.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

WQ_RESCUER is superflous.  WQ_MEM_RECLAIM indicates that the user
wants a rescuer and testing wq->rescuer for NULL can answer whether a
given workqueue has a rescuer or not.  Drop WQ_RESCUER and test
wq->rescuer directly.

This will help simplifying __alloc_workqueue_key() failure path by
allowing it to use destroy_workqueue() on a partially constructed
workqueue, which in turn will help implementing dynamic management of
pool_workqueues.

While at it, clear wq->rescuer after freeing it in
destroy_workqueue().  This is a precaution as scheduled changes will
make destruction more complex.

This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

There are gonna be multiple unbound pools.  Include pool ID in the
name of unbound kworkers.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

All per-cpu pools are standard, so there's no need to use both "cpu"
and "std" and for_each_std_worker_pool() is confusing in that it can
be used only for per-cpu pools.

* s/cpu_std_worker_pools/cpu_worker_pools/

* s/for_each_std_worker_pool()/for_each_cpu_worker_pool()/
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Workqueue no longer makes use of unbound_std_worker_pools[].  All
unbound worker_pools are created dynamically and there's nothing
special about the standard ones.  With unbound_std_worker_pools[]
unused, workqueue no longer has places where it needs to treat the
per-cpu pools-cpu and unbound pools together.

Remove unbound_std_worker_pools[] and the helpers wrapping it to
present unified per-cpu and unbound standard worker_pools.

* for_each_std_worker_pool() now only walks through per-cpu pools.

* for_each[_online]_wq_cpu() which don't have any users left are
  removed.

* std_worker_pools() and std_worker_pool_pri() are unused and removed.

* get_std_worker_pool() is removed.  Its only user -
  alloc_and_link_pwqs() - only used it for per-cpu pools anyway.  Open
  code per_cpu access in alloc_and_link_pwqs() instead.

This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

This patch makes unbound worker_pools reference counted and
dynamically created and destroyed as workqueues needing them come and
go.  All unbound worker_pools are hashed on unbound_pool_hash which is
keyed by the content of worker_pool->attrs.

When an unbound workqueue is allocated, get_unbound_pool() is called
with the attributes of the workqueue.  If there already is a matching
worker_pool, the reference count is bumped and the pool is returned.
If not, a new worker_pool with matching attributes is created and
returned.

When an unbound workqueue is destroyed, put_unbound_pool() is called
which decrements the reference count of the associated worker_pool.
If the refcnt reaches zero, the worker_pool is destroyed in sched-RCU
safe way.

Note that the standard unbound worker_pools - normal and highpri ones
with no specific cpumask affinity - are no longer created explicitly
during init_workqueues().  init_workqueues() only initializes
workqueue_attrs to be used for standard unbound pools -
unbound_std_wq_attrs[].  The pools are spawned on demand as workqueues
are created.

v2: - Comment added to init_worker_pool() explaining that @pool should
      be in a condition which can be passed to put_unbound_pool() even
      on failure.

    - pool->refcnt reaching zero and the pool being removed from
      unbound_pool_hash should be dynamic.  pool->refcnt is converted
      to int from atomic_t and now manipulated inside workqueue_lock.

    - Removed an incorrect sanity check on nr_idle in
      put_unbound_pool() which may trigger spuriously.

    All changes were suggested by Lai Jiangshan.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Introduce struct workqueue_attrs which carries worker attributes -
currently the nice level and allowed cpumask along with helper
routines alloc_workqueue_attrs() and free_workqueue_attrs().

Each worker_pool now carries ->attrs describing the attributes of its
workers.  All functions dealing with cpumask and nice level of workers
are updated to follow worker_pool->attrs instead of determining them
from other characteristics of the worker_pool, and init_workqueues()
is updated to set worker_pool->attrs appropriately for all standard
pools.

Note that create_worker() is updated to always perform set_user_nice()
and use set_cpus_allowed_ptr() combined with manual assertion of
PF_THREAD_BOUND instead of kthread_bind().  This simplifies handling
random attributes without affecting the outcome.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

v2: Missing cpumask_var_t definition caused build failure on some
    archs.  linux/cpumask.h included.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

This will be used to implement unbound pools with custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS is used to synchronize the manager role.
Synchronizing among workers doesn't need blocking and that's why it's
implemented as a flag.

It got converted to a mutex a while back to add blocking wait from CPU
hotplug path - 60373152 ("workqueue: use mutex for global_cwq
manager exclusion").  Later it turned out that synchronization among
workers and cpu hotplug need to be done separately.  Eventually,
POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS is restored and workqueue->manager_mutex got
morphed into workqueue->assoc_mutex - 552a37e9 ("workqueue: restore
POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS") and b2eb83d1 ("workqueue: rename
manager_mutex to assoc_mutex").

Now, we're gonna need to be able to lock out managers from
destroy_workqueue() to support multiple unbound pools with custom
attributes making it again necessary to be able to block on the
manager role.  This patch replaces POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS with
worker_pool->manager_arb.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

v2: s/manager_mutex/manager_arb/
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Make worker_pool_idr protected by workqueue_lock for writes and
sched-RCU protected for reads.  Lockdep assertions are added to
for_each_pool() and get_work_pool() and all their users are converted
to either hold workqueue_lock or disable preemption/irq.

worker_pool_assign_id() is updated to hold workqueue_lock when
allocating a pool ID.  As idr_get_new() always performs RCU-safe
assignment, this is enough on the writer side.

As standard pools are never destroyed, there's nothing to do on that
side.

The locking is superflous at this point.  This is to help
implementation of unbound pools/pwqs with custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

v2: Updated for_each_pwq() use if/else for the hidden assertion
    statement instead of just if as suggested by Lai.  This avoids
    confusing the following else clause.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Make workqueue->pwqs protected by workqueue_lock for writes and
sched-RCU protected for reads.  Lockdep assertions are added to
for_each_pwq() and first_pwq() and all their users are converted to
either hold workqueue_lock or disable preemption/irq.

alloc_and_link_pwqs() is updated to use list_add_tail_rcu() for
consistency which isn't strictly necessary as the workqueue isn't
visible.  destroy_workqueue() isn't updated to sched-RCU release pwqs.
This is okay as the workqueue should have on users left by that point.

The locking is superflous at this point.  This is to help
implementation of unbound pools/pwqs with custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

v2: Updated for_each_pwq() use if/else for the hidden assertion
    statement instead of just if as suggested by Lai.  This avoids
    confusing the following else clause.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

get_pwq() takes @cpu, which can also be WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, and @wq and
returns the matching pwq (pool_workqueue).  We want to move away from
using @cpu for identifying pools and pwqs for unbound pools with
custom attributes and there is only one user - workqueue_congested() -
which makes use of the WQ_UNBOUND conditional in get_pwq().  All other
users already know whether they're dealing with a per-cpu or unbound
workqueue.

Replace get_pwq() with explicit per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu) for
per-cpu workqueues and first_pwq() for unbound ones, and open-code
WQ_UNBOUND conditional in workqueue_congested().

Note that this makes workqueue_congested() behave sligntly differently
when @cpu other than WORK_CPU_UNBOUND is specified.  It ignores @cpu
for unbound workqueues and always uses the first pwq instead of
oopsing.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

workqueue->pool_wq union is used to point either to percpu pwqs
(pool_workqueues) or single unbound pwq.  As the first pwq can be
accessed via workqueue->pwqs list, there's no reason for the single
pointer anymore.

Use list_first_entry(workqueue->pwqs) to access the unbound pwq and
drop workqueue->pool_wq.single pointer and the pool_wq union.  It
simplifies the code and eases implementing multiple unbound pools w/
custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Workqueue is mixing unsigned int and int for @cpu variables.  There's
no point in using unsigned int for cpus - many of cpu related APIs
take int anyway.  Consistently use int for @cpu variables so that we
can use negative values to mark special ones.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Similar to how pool_workqueue iteration used to be, raising and
servicing mayday requests is based on CPU numbers.  It's hairy because
cpumask_t may not be able to handle WORK_CPU_UNBOUND and cpumasks are
assumed to be always set on UP.  This is ugly and can't handle
multiple unbound pools to be added for unbound workqueues w/ custom
attributes.

Add workqueue_struct->maydays.  When a pool_workqueue needs rescuing,
it gets chained on the list through pool_workqueue->mayday_node and
rescuer_thread() consumes the list until it's empty.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

The three freeze/thaw related functions - freeze_workqueues_begin(),
freeze_workqueues_busy() and thaw_workqueues() - need to iterate
through all pool_workqueues of all freezable workqueues.  They did it
by first iterating pools and then visiting all pwqs (pool_workqueues)
of all workqueues and process it if its pwq->pool matches the current
pool.  This is rather backwards and done this way partly because
workqueue didn't have fitting iteration helpers and partly to avoid
the number of lock operations on pool->lock.

Workqueue now has fitting iterators and the locking operation overhead
isn't anything to worry about - those locks are unlikely to be
contended and the same CPU visiting the same set of locks multiple
times isn't expensive.

Restructure the three functions such that the flow better matches the
logical steps and pwq iteration is done using for_each_pwq() inside
workqueue iteration.

* freeze_workqueues_begin(): Setting of FREEZING is moved into a
  separate for_each_pool() iteration.  pwq iteration for clearing
  max_active is updated as described above.

* freeze_workqueues_busy(): pwq iteration updated as described above.

* thaw_workqueues(): The single for_each_wq_cpu() iteration is broken
  into three discrete steps - clearing FREEZING, restoring max_active,
  and kicking workers.  The first and last steps use for_each_pool()
  and the second step uses pwq iteration described above.

This makes the code easier to understand and removes the use of
for_each_wq_cpu() for walking pwqs, which can't support multiple
unbound pwqs which will be needed to implement unbound workqueues with
custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

With the scheduled unbound pools with custom attributes, there will be
multiple unbound pools, so it wouldn't be able to use
for_each_wq_cpu() + for_each_std_worker_pool() to iterate through all
pools.

Introduce for_each_pool() which iterates through all pools using
worker_pool_idr and use it instead of for_each_wq_cpu() +
for_each_std_worker_pool() combination in freeze_workqueues_begin().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Introduce for_each_pwq() which iterates all pool_workqueues of a
workqueue using the recently added workqueue->pwqs list and replace
for_each_pwq_cpu() usages with it.

This is primarily to remove the single unbound CPU assumption from pwq
iteration for the scheduled unbound pools with custom attributes
support which would introduce multiple unbound pwqs per workqueue;
however, it also simplifies iterator users.

Note that pwq->pool initialization is moved to alloc_and_link_pwqs()
as that now is the only place which is explicitly handling the two pwq
types.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Add workqueue_struct->pwqs list and chain all pool_workqueues
belonging to a workqueue there.  This will be used to implement
generic pool_workqueue iteration and handle multiple pool_workqueues
for the scheduled unbound pools with custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

pool_workqueues need to be aligned to 1 << WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS as
the lower bits of work->data are used for flags when they're pointing
to pool_workqueues.

Due to historical reasons, unbound pool_workqueues are allocated using
kzalloc() with sufficient buffer area for alignment and aligned
manually.  The original pointer is stored at the end which free_pwqs()
retrieves when freeing it.

There's no reason for this hackery anymore.  Set alignment of struct
pool_workqueue to 1 << WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS, add kmem_cache for
pool_workqueues with proper alignment and replace the hacky alloc and
free implementation with plain kmem_cache_zalloc/free().

In case WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS gets shrunk too much and makes fields of
pool_workqueues misaligned, trigger WARN if the alignment of struct
pool_workqueue becomes smaller than that of long long.

Note that assertion on IS_ALIGNED() is removed from alloc_pwqs().  We
already have another one in pwq init loop in __alloc_workqueue_key().

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

workqueue_lock will be used to synchronize areas which require
irq-safety and there isn't much benefit in keeping it not irq-safe.
Make it irq-safe.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Workqueue has been using mostly BUG_ON()s for sanity checks, which
fail unnecessarily harshly when the assertion doesn't hold.  Most
assertions can converted to be less drastic such that things can limp
along instead of dying completely.  Convert BUG_ON()s to
WARN_ON[_ONCE]()s with softer failure behaviors - e.g. if assertion
check fails in destroy_worker(), trigger WARN and silently ignore
destruction request.

Most conversions are trivial.  Note that sanity checks in
destroy_workqueue() are moved above removal from workqueues list so
that it can bail out without side-effects if assertion checks fail.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes during
normal operation.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Rescuers visit different worker_pools to process work items from pools
under pressure.  Currently, rescuer->pool is updated outside any
locking and when an outsider looks at a rescuer, there's no way to
tell when and whether rescuer->pool is gonna change.  While this
doesn't currently cause any problem, it is nasty.

With recent worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() changes, we can move
rescuer->pool updates inside pool locks such that if rescuer->pool
equals a locked pool, it's guaranteed to stay that way until the pool
is unlocked.

Move rescuer->pool inside pool->lock.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior difference.

tj: Updated the description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() currently takes @worker but only cares
about @worker->pool.  This patch updates worker_maybe_bind_and_lock()
to take @pool instead of @worker.  This will be used to better define
synchronization rules regarding rescuer->pool updates.

This doesn't introduce any functional change.

tj: Updated the comments and description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() uses both @worker->task and @current at
the same time.  As worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() can only be called by
the current worker task, they are always the same.

Update worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() to use %current consistently.

This doesn't introduce any functional change.

tj: Massaged the description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

When a work item is off-queue, its work->data contains WORK_STRUCT_*
and WORK_OFFQ_* flags.  As WORK_OFFQ_* flags are used only while a
work item is off-queue, it can occupy bits of work->data which aren't
used while off-queue.  WORK_OFFQ_* currently only use bits used by
on-queue CWQ pointer.  As color bits aren't used while off-queue,
there's no reason to not use them.

Lower WORK_OFFQ_FLAG_BASE from WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS to
WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT thus giving 4 more bits to off-queue flag
space which is also used to record worker_pool ID while off-queue.

This doesn't introduce any visible behavior difference.

tj: Rewrote the description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>