pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of mtk_disp_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_imx_tpm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_imx_tpm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of cros_ec_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of brcmstb_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of atmel_tcb_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results in a
resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of atmel_hlcdc_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

With devm_pwmchip_add() there is no need to explicitly call
pwmchip_remove(), so this call can be dropped from the remove callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

There are no arm64 specific constructs in this driver and it compiles
just fine with ARCH=arm.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

There are no mips specific constructs in this driver and it compiles
just fine with ARCH=arm.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

Since commit f9a8ee8c ("pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID
dynamically") there is no effect any more for assigning this variable.
When the patch resulting in f9a8ee8c was created, this driver didn't
exist yet, so this was missed.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

The driver is supposed to stay functional until pwmchip_remove()
returns. So disable clocks only after that.

pwmchip_remove() always returns 0, so the return code can be ignored
which keeps ehrpwm_pwm_remove() a bit simpler and eventually allows to
make pwmchip_remove() return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

The driver is supposed to stay functional until pwmchip_remove()
returns. So disable clocks only after that.

pwmchip_remove() always returns 0, so the return code can be ignored
which keeps rockchip_pwm_remove() a bit simpler and allows to eventually
make pwmchip_remove() return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

The driver is supposed to stay functional until pwmchip_remove()
returns. So disable clocks and reset the hardware only after that.

The return value of pwmchip_remove doesn't need to be checked because
it returns zero anyhow and should be changed to return void eventually.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This fixes a race condition: After pwmchip_add() is called there might
already be a consumer and then modifying the hardware behind the
consumer's back is bad. So reset before calling pwmchip_add().

Note that reseting the hardware isn't the right thing to do if the PWM
is already running as it might e.g. disable (or even enable) a backlight
that is supposed to be on (or off).

Fixes: 4dce82c1 ("pwm: add pwm-mxs support")
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This fixes a race condition: After pwmchip_add() is called there might
already be a consumer and then modifying the hardware behind the
consumer's back is bad. So set the default before.

(Side-note: I don't know what this register setting actually does, if
this modifies the polarity there is an inconsistency because the
inversed polarity isn't considered if the PWM is already running during
.probe().)

Fixes: acfd92fd ("pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit to default value")
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

The assumption that lead to commit 5e5da1e9 ("pwm: ab8500:
Explicitly allocate pwm chip base dynamically") was wrong: The
pwm-ab8500 devices are not directly instantiated from device tree, but
from the ab8500 mfd driver. So the pdev->id isn't -1, but a number
between 1 and 3. Now that pwmchip ids are always allocated dynamically,
this cannot easily be reverted.

Introduce a new member in the driver data struct that tracks the
hardware id and use this to calculate the register offset.

Side-note: Using chip->base to calculate the offset was never robust
because if there was already a PWM with id 1 at the time ab8500-pwm.1
was probed, the associated pwmchip would get assigned chip->base = 2 (or
something bigger).

Fixes: 5e5da1e9 ("pwm: ab8500: Explicitly allocate pwm chip base dynamically")
Fixes: 6173f8f4 ("pwm: Move AB8500 PWM driver to PWM framework")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>