Yonghong Song says:

====================

LLVM patches ([1] for clang, [2] and [3] for BPF backend)
added support for btf_type_tag attributes. This patch
added support for the kernel.

The main motivation for btf_type_tag is to bring kernel
annotations __user, __rcu etc. to btf. With such information
available in btf, bpf verifier can detect mis-usages
and reject the program. For example, for __user tagged pointer,
developers can then use proper helper like bpf_probe_read_kernel()
etc. to read the data.

BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG may also useful for other tracing
facility where instead of to require user to specify
kernel/user address type, the kernel can detect it
by itself with btf.

Patch 1 added support in kernel, Patch 2 for libbpf and Patch 3
for bpftool. Patches 4-9 are for bpf selftests and Patch 10
updated docs/bpf/btf.rst file with new btf kind.

  [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
  [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D113222
  [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D113496

Changelogs:
  v2 -> v3:
    - rebase to resolve merge conflicts.
  v1 -> v2:
    - add more dedup tests.
    - remove build requirement for LLVM=1.
    - remove testing macro __has_attribute in bpf programs
      as it is always defined in recent clang compilers.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG documentation in btf.rst.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012656.1509082-1-yhs@fb.com

btf_tag selftest needs certain llvm versions (>= llvm14).
Make it clear in the selftests README.rst file.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012651.1508549-1-yhs@fb.com

The following is the main btf_type_tag usage in the
C test:
  #define __tag1 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1")))
  #define __tag2 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2")))
  struct btf_type_tag_test {
       int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *p;
  } g;

The bpftool raw dump with related types:
  [4] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  [11] STRUCT 'btf_type_tag_test' size=8 vlen=1
          'p' type_id=14 bits_offset=0
  [12] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=16
  [13] TYPE_TAG 'tag2' type_id=12
  [14] PTR '(anon)' type_id=13
  [15] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=4
  [16] PTR '(anon)' type_id=15
  [17] VAR 'g' type_id=11, linkage=global

With format C dump, we have
  struct btf_type_tag_test {
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) * __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) *p;
  };
The result C code is identical to the original definition except macro's are gone.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012646.1508231-1-yhs@fb.com

Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c so we can introduce
progs/btf_type_tag.c in the next patch.

Also create a subtest for btf_decl_tag in prog_tests/btf_tag.c
so we can introduce btf_type_tag subtest in the next patch.

I also took opportunity to remove the check whether __has_attribute
is defined or not in progs/btf_decl_tag.c since all recent
clangs should already support this macro.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012641.1507144-1-yhs@fb.com

Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG duplication unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012635.1506853-1-yhs@fb.com

Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012630.1506095-1-yhs@fb.com

Add unit tests for btf__add_type_tag().
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012625.1505748-1-yhs@fb.com

Add bpftool support for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012620.1505506-1-yhs@fb.com

Add libbpf support for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012614.1505315-1-yhs@fb.com

LLVM patches ([1] for clang, [2] and [3] for BPF backend)
added support for btf_type_tag attributes. This patch
added support for the kernel.

The main motivation for btf_type_tag is to bring kernel
annotations __user, __rcu etc. to btf. With such information
available in btf, bpf verifier can detect mis-usages
and reject the program. For example, for __user tagged pointer,
developers can then use proper helper like bpf_probe_read_user()
etc. to read the data.

BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG may also useful for other tracing
facility where instead of to require user to specify
kernel/user address type, the kernel can detect it
by itself with btf.

  [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
  [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D113222
  [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D113496Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012609.1505032-1-yhs@fb.com

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

This patch set continues the work of revamping libbpf APIs that are not
extensible, as they were added before we figured out all the intricacies of
building APIs that can preserve ABI compatibility (both backward and forward).

What makes them tricky is that (most of) these APIs are actively used by
multiple applications, so we need to be careful about refactoring them. See
individual patches for details, but the general approach is similar to
previous bpf_prog_load() API revamp. The biggest different and complexity is
in changing btf_dump__new(), because function overloading through macro magic
doesn't work based on number of arguments, as both new and old APIs have
4 arguments. Because of that, another overloading approach is taken; overload
happens based on argument types.

I've validated manually (by using local test_progs-shared flavor that is
compiling test_progs against libbpf as a shared library) that compiling "old
application" (selftests before being adapted to using new variants of revamped
APIs) are compiled and successfully run against newest libbpf version as well
as the older libbpf version (provided no new variants are used). All these
scenarios seem to be working as expected.

v1->v2:
  - add explicit printf_fn NULL check in btf_dump__new() (Alexei);
  - replaced + with || in __builtin_choose_expr() (Alexei);
  - dropped test_progs-shared flavor (Alexei).
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Use v1.0-compatible variants of btf_dump and perf_buffer "constructors".
This is also a demonstration of reusing struct perf_buffer_raw_opts as
OPTS-style option struct for new perf_buffer__new_raw() API.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-10-andrii@kernel.org

Use v1.0+ compatible variant of perf_buffer__new() call to prepare for
deprecation.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-9-andrii@kernel.org

Update to-be-deprecated forms of btf_dump__new().
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-8-andrii@kernel.org

Migrate all old-style perf_buffer__new() and perf_buffer__new_raw()
calls to new v1.0+ variants.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-7-andrii@kernel.org

Add new variants of perf_buffer__new() and perf_buffer__new_raw() that
use OPTS-based options for future extensibility ([0]). Given all the
currently used API names are best fits, re-use them and use
___libbpf_override() approach and symbol versioning to preserve ABI and
source code compatibility. struct perf_buffer_opts and struct
perf_buffer_raw_opts are kept as well, but they are restructured such
that they are OPTS-based when used with new APIs. For struct
perf_buffer_raw_opts we keep few fields intact, so we have to also
preserve the memory location of them both when used as OPTS and for
legacy API variants. This is achieved with anonymous padding for OPTS
"incarnation" of the struct.  These pads can be eventually used for new
options.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/311Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-6-andrii@kernel.org

Change btf_dump__new() and corresponding struct btf_dump_ops structure
to be extensible by using OPTS "framework" ([0]). Given we don't change
the names, we use a similar approach as with bpf_prog_load(), but this
time we ended up with two APIs with the same name and same number of
arguments, so overloading based on number of arguments with
___libbpf_override() doesn't work.

Instead, use "overloading" based on types. In this particular case,
print callback has to be specified, so we detect which argument is
a callback. If it's 4th (last) argument, old implementation of API is
used by user code. If not, it must be 2nd, and thus new implementation
is selected. The rest is handled by the same symbol versioning approach.

btf_ext argument is dropped as it was never used and isn't necessary
either. If in the future we'll need btf_ext, that will be added into
OPTS-based struct btf_dump_opts.

struct btf_dump_opts is reused for both old API and new APIs. ctx field
is marked deprecated in v0.7+ and it's put at the same memory location
as OPTS's sz field. Any user of new-style btf_dump__new() will have to
set sz field and doesn't/shouldn't use ctx, as ctx is now passed along
the callback as mandatory input argument, following the other APIs in
libbpf that accept callbacks consistently.

Again, this is quite ugly in implementation, but is done in the name of
backwards compatibility and uniform and extensible future APIs (at the
same time, sigh). And it will be gone in libbpf 1.0.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/283Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-5-andrii@kernel.org

btf__dedup() and struct btf_dedup_opts were added before we figured out
OPTS mechanism. As such, btf_dedup_opts is non-extensible without
breaking an ABI and potentially crashing user application.

Unfortunately, btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts are short and succinct
names that would be great to preserve and use going forward. So we use
___libbpf_override() macro approach, used previously for bpf_prog_load()
API, to define a new btf__dedup() variant that accepts only struct btf *
and struct btf_dedup_opts * arguments, and rename the old btf__dedup()
implementation into btf__dedup_deprecated(). This keeps both source and
binary compatibility with old and new applications.

The biggest problem was struct btf_dedup_opts, which wasn't OPTS-based,
and as such doesn't have `size_t sz;` as a first field. But btf__dedup()
is a pretty rarely used API and I believe that the only currently known
users (besides selftests) are libbpf's own bpf_linker and pahole.
Neither use case actually uses options and just passes NULL. So instead
of doing extra hacks, just rewrite struct btf_dedup_opts into OPTS-based
one, move btf_ext argument into those opts (only bpf_linker needs to
dedup btf_ext, so it's not a typical thing to specify), and drop never
used `dont_resolve_fwds` option (it was never used anywhere, AFAIK, it
makes BTF dedup much less useful and efficient).

Just in case, for old implementation, btf__dedup_deprecated(), detect
non-NULL options and error out with helpful message, to help users
migrate, if there are any user playing with btf__dedup().

The last remaining piece is dedup_table_size, which is another
anachronism from very early days of BTF dedup. Since then it has been
reduced to the only valid value, 1, to request forced hash collisions.
This is only used during testing. So instead introduce a bool flag to
force collisions explicitly.

This patch also adapts selftests to new btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts
use to avoid selftests breakage.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/281Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-4-andrii@kernel.org

Few clean ups and single-line simplifications. Also split CLEAN command
into multiple $(RM) invocations as it gets dangerously close to too long
argument list. Make sure that -o <output.o> is used always as the last
argument for saner verbose make output.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-3-andrii@kernel.org

When dealing with verbose Makefile output, it's extremely confusing when
compiler invocation commands don't specify -o <output.o> as the last
argument. Normalize bpftool's Makefile to do just that, as most other
BPF-related Makefiles are already doing that.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-2-andrii@kernel.org

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

Fix the ability to request verbose (log_level=1) or very verbose (log_level=2)
logs with test_progs's -vv or -vvv parameters. This ability regressed during
recent bpf_prog_load() API refactoring. Also add
bpf_program__set_extra_flags() API to allow setting extra testing flags
(BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32), which was also dropped during recent changes.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

After recent refactoring bpf_prog_test_load(), used across multiple
selftests, lost ability to specify extra log_level 1 or 2 (for -vv and
-vvv, respectively). Fix that problem by using bpf_object__load_xattr()
API that supports extra log_level flags. Also restore
BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 prog_flags by utilizing new bpf_program__set_extra_flags()
API.

Fixes: f87c1930 ("selftests/bpf: Merge test_stub.c into testing_helpers.c")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111051758.92283-3-andrii@kernel.org

Add bpf_program__flags() API to retrieve prog_flags that will be (or
were) supplied to BPF_PROG_LOAD command.

Also add bpf_program__set_extra_flags() API to allow to set *extra*
flags, in addition to those determined by program's SEC() definition.
Such flags are logically OR'ed with libbpf-derived flags.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111051758.92283-2-andrii@kernel.org

Mark Pashmfouroush says:

====================

BPF_SK_LOOKUP users may want to have access to the ifindex of the skb
which triggered the socket lookup. This may be useful for selectively
applying programmable socket lookup logic to packets that arrive on a
specific interface, or excluding packets from an interface.

v3:
- Rename ifindex field to ingress_ifindex for consistency. (Yonghong)

v2:
- Fix inaccurate comment (Alexei)
- Add more details to commit messages (John)
====================
Revieview-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

A new field was added to the bpf_sk_lookup data that users can access.
Add tests that validate that the new ingress_ifindex field contains the
right data.
Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-3-markpash@cloudflare.com

It may be helpful to have access to the ifindex during bpf socket
lookup. An example may be to scope certain socket lookup logic to
specific interfaces, i.e. an interface may be made exempt from custom
lookup code.

Add the ifindex of the arriving connection to the bpf_sk_lookup API.
Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-2-markpash@cloudflare.com

Bpftool is dual-licensed under GPLv2 and BSD-2-Clause. In commit
907b2236 ("tools: bpftool: dual license all files") we made sure
that all its source files were indeed covered by the two licenses, and
that they had the correct SPDX tags.

However, bpftool's Makefile, the Makefile for its documentation, and the
.gitignore file were skipped at the time (their GPL-2.0-only tag was
added later). Let's update the tags.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Acked-by: Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105221904.3536-1-quentin@isovalent.com

The minimum supported C standard version is C89, with use of GNU
extensions, hence make sure to catch any instances that would break
the build for this mode by passing -std=gnu89.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105234243.390179-4-memxor@gmail.com

Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer
is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and
execution of the BPF program progresses.

To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference
for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the
exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new
task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should
not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and
task_works->func are 0.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com

Commit 91fc957c ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module
memory") restricts BPF JIT program allocation to a 128MB region to ensure
BPF programs are still in branching range of each other. However this
restriction should not apply to the aarch64 JIT, since BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL
are implemented as a 64-bit move into a register and then a BLR instruction -
which has the effect of being able to call anything without proximity
limitation.

The practical reason to relax this restriction on JIT memory is that 128MB of
JIT memory can be quickly exhausted, especially where PAGE_SIZE is 64KB - one
page is needed per program. In cases where seccomp filters are applied to
multiple VMs on VM launch - such filters are classic BPF but converted to
BPF - this can severely limit the number of VMs that can be launched. In a
world where we support BPF JIT always on, turning off the JIT isn't always an
option either.

Fixes: 91fc957c ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module memory")
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <russell.king@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com

Song Liu says:

====================

Changes v4 => v5:
1. Clean up and style change in 2/2. (Andrii)

Changes v3 => v4:
1. Move mmap_unlock_work to task_iter.c to fix build for .config without
   !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS. (kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)

Changes v2 => v3:
1. Avoid using x86 only function in selftests. (Yonghong)
2. Add struct file and struct vm_area_struct to btf_task_struct_ids, and
   use it in bpf_find_vma and stackmap.c. (Yonghong)
3. Fix inaccurate comments. (Yonghong)

Changes v1 => v2:
1. Share irq_work with stackmap.c. (Daniel)
2. Add tests for illegal writes to task/vma from the callback function.
   (Daniel)
3. Other small fixes.

Add helper bpf_find_vma. This can be used in some profiling use cases. It
might also be useful for LSM.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The
perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of
bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program,
on the other hand, does not have this constraint.

Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback
function. The verifier should reject both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com

In some profiler use cases, it is necessary to map an address to the
backing file, e.g., a shared library. bpf_find_vma helper provides a
flexible way to achieve this. bpf_find_vma maps an address of a task to
the vma (vm_area_struct) for this address, and feed the vma to an callback
BPF function. The callback function is necessary here, as we need to
ensure mmap_sem is unlocked.

It is necessary to lock mmap_sem for find_vma. To lock and unlock mmap_sem
safely when irqs are disable, we use the same mechanism as stackmap with
build_id. Specifically, when irqs are disabled, the unlocked is postponed
in an irq_work. Refactor stackmap.c so that the irq_work is shared among
bpf_find_vma and stackmap helpers.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-2-songliubraving@fb.com

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

Fix all the memory leaks reported by ASAN. All but one are just improper
resource clean up in selftests. But one memory leak was discovered in libbpf,
leaving inner map's name leaked.

First patch fixes selftests' Makefile by passing through SAN_CFLAGS to linker.
Without that compiling with SAN_CFLAGS=-fsanitize=address kept failing.

Running selftests under ASAN in BPF CI is the next step, we just need to make
sure all the necessary libraries (libasan and liblsan) are installed on the
host and inside the VM. Would be great to get some help with that, but for now
make sure that test_progs run is clean from leak sanitizer errors.

v3->v4:
  - rebase on latest bpf-next;
v2->v3:
  - fix per-cpu array memory leaks in btf_iter.c selftests (Hengqi);
v1->v2:
  - call bpf_map__destroy() conditionally if map->inner_map is present.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

skb_ctx selftest didn't close bpf_object implicitly allocated by
bpf_prog_test_load() helper. Fix the problem by explicitly calling
bpf_object__close() at the end of the test.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-10-andrii@kernel.org

bpf_link__detach() was confused with bpf_link__destroy() and leaves
leaked FD in the process. Fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-9-andrii@kernel.org

btf__parse() is repeated after successful setup, leaving the first
instance leaked. Remove redundant and premature call.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-8-andrii@kernel.org

Free up used resources at the end and on error. Also make it more
obvious that there is btf__parse() call that creates struct btf
instance.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-7-andrii@kernel.org

Inner array of allocated strings wasn't freed on success. Now it's
always freed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-6-andrii@kernel.org