Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 05 Nov, 2008 5 commits
    • Ingo Molnar's avatar
      sched: re-tune balancing · 9fcd18c9
      Ingo Molnar authored 
      Impact: improve wakeup affinity on NUMA systems, tweak SMP systems

Given the fixes+tweaks to the wakeup-buddy code, re-tweak the domain
balancing defaults on NUMA and SMP systems.

Turn on SD_WAKE_AFFINE which was off on x86 NUMA - there's no reason
why we would not want to have wakeup affinity across nodes as well.
(we already do this in the standard NUMA template.)

lat_ctx on a NUMA box is particularly happy about this change:

before:

 |   phoenix:~/l> ./lat_ctx -s 0 2
 |   "size=0k ovr=2.60
 |   2 5.70

after:

 |   phoenix:~/l> ./lat_ctx -s 0 2
 |   "size=0k ovr=2.65
 |   2 2.07

a 2.75x speedup.

pipe-test is similarly happy about it too:

 |  phoenix:~/sched-tests> ./pipe-test
 |   18.26 usecs/loop.
 |   14.70 usecs/loop.
 |   14.38 usecs/loop.
 |   10.55 usecs/loop.              # +WAKE_AFFINE on domain0+domain1
 |   8.63 usecs/loop.
 |   8.59 usecs/loop.
 |   9.03 usecs/loop.
 |   8.94 usecs/loop.
 |   8.96 usecs/loop.
 |   8.63 usecs/loop.

Also:

 - disable SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE on NUMA and SMP domains (keep it for siblings)
 - enable SD_WAKE_BALANCE on SMP domains

Sysbench+postgresql improves all around the board, quite significantly:

           .28-rc3-11474e2c  .28-rc3-11474e2c-tune
-------------------------------------------------
    1:             571              688    +17.08%
    2:            1236             1206    -2.55%
    4:            2381             2642    +9.89%
    8:            4958             5164    +3.99%
   16:            9580             9574    -0.07%
   32:            7128             8118    +12.20%
   64:            7342             8266    +11.18%
  128:            7342             8064    +8.95%
  256:            7519             7884    +4.62%
  512:            7350             7731    +4.93%
-------------------------------------------------
  SUM:           55412            59341    +6.62%

So it's a win both for the runup portion, the peak area and the tail.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9fcd18c9
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      sched: fix buddies for group scheduling · 02479099
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Impact: scheduling order fix for group scheduling

For each level in the hierarchy, set the buddy to point to the right entity.
Therefore, when we do the hierarchical schedule, we have a fair chance of
ending up where we meant to.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      02479099
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      sched: backward looking buddy · 4793241b
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Impact: improve/change/fix wakeup-buddy scheduling

Currently we only have a forward looking buddy, that is, we prefer to
schedule to the task we last woke up, under the presumption that its
going to consume the data we just produced, and therefore will have
cache hot benefits.

This allows co-waking producer/consumer task pairs to run ahead of the
pack for a little while, keeping their cache warm. Without this, we
would interleave all pairs, utterly trashing the cache.

This patch introduces a backward looking buddy, that is, suppose that
in the above scenario, the consumer preempts the producer before it
can go to sleep, we will therefore miss the wakeup from consumer to
producer (its already running, after all), breaking the cycle and
reverting to the cache-trashing interleaved schedule pattern.

The backward buddy will try to schedule back to the task that woke us
up in case the forward buddy is not available, under the assumption
that the last task will be the one with the most cache hot task around
barring current.

This will basically allow a task to continue after it got preempted.

In order to avoid starvation, we allow either buddy to get wakeup_gran
ahead of the pack.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      4793241b
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      sched: fix fair preempt check · d95f98d0
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Impact: fix cross-class preemption

Inter-class wakeup preemptions should go on class order.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d95f98d0
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      sched: cleanup fair task selection · f4b6755f
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Impact: cleanup

Clean up task selection
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f4b6755f
  3. 04 Nov, 2008 15 commits
  5. 03 Nov, 2008 20 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7