- 09 Feb, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(): $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c: (...) static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ... { (...) WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); (...) } (...) The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following: [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186 [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...) [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50 [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000 [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488 [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460 [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0 [947.571072] Call Trace: [947.572354] <TASK> [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998 [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156 [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407 [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139 [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32 [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [947.597561] </TASK> [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]--- This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made by commit ce8ea7cc ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning, and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability. We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem() is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report. To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it. This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered elsewhere. An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather recent commit e076ab2a ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example: [ 8948.247280] ====================================================== [ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted [ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock: [ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.250638] but task is already holding lock: [ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.252018] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 8948.252710] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 8948.253343] -> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 8948.253950] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900 [ 8948.254354] start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.254859] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.255408] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 8948.255942] btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs] [ 8948.256406] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 8948.256870] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8948.257413] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [ 8948.257961] btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs] [ 8948.258418] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 8948.258793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 8948.259146] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 8948.259709] -> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 8948.260330] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900 [ 8948.260692] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.261234] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 8948.261766] btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [ 8948.262379] btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs] [ 8948.262909] open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs] [ 8948.263359] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 8948.263863] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 8948.264242] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 8948.264594] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 8948.265017] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.265462] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 8948.265851] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 8948.266203] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 8948.266554] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 8948.266940] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 8948.267300] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 8948.267790] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 8948.268322] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260 [ 8948.268733] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 8948.269092] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.269591] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.270087] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 8948.270588] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs] [ 8948.271051] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.271586] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs] [ 8948.272071] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs] [ 8948.272579] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs] [ 8948.273113] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs] [ 8948.273573] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0 [ 8948.273942] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90 [ 8948.274371] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.274876] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.275417] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs] [ 8948.275863] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs] [ 8948.276438] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0 [ 8948.276829] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0 [ 8948.277189] kthread+0xf2/0x120 [ 8948.277506] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 8948.277868] other info that might help us debug this: [ 8948.278548] Chain exists of: sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex [ 8948.279601] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 8948.280102] CPU0 CPU1 [ 8948.280508] ---- ---- [ 8948.280915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex); [ 8948.281271] lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex); [ 8948.281915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex); [ 8948.282487] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 8948.282800] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570: [ 8948.283750] #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0 [ 8948.284609] #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0 [ 8948.285637] #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.286674] #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.287596] stack backtrace: [ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 [ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] [ 8948.290298] Call Trace: [ 8948.290517] <TASK> [ 8948.290700] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73 [ 8948.291026] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 8948.291375] ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.291826] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260 [ 8948.292241] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 8948.292714] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.293241] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140 [ 8948.293601] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.294055] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.294518] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.294957] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 8948.295312] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs] [ 8948.295813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 8948.296270] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs] [ 8948.296691] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.297175] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs] [ 8948.297678] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs] [ 8948.298123] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs] [ 8948.298570] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs] [ 8948.299061] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs] [ 8948.299495] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0 [ 8948.299817] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110 [ 8948.300160] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0 [ 8948.300494] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90 [ 8948.300874] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 8948.301243] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.301706] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0 [ 8948.302055] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.302564] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs] [ 8948.302970] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs] [ 8948.303510] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0 [ 8948.303860] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 8948.304221] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0 [ 8948.304543] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 8948.304904] kthread+0xf2/0x120 [ 8948.305184] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 8948.305598] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 8948.305921] </TASK> It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different code paths. So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/Reviewed-by:Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ add more link reports ] Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Once we start writeback (have called btrfs_run_delalloc_range()), we allocate an extent, create an extent map point to that extent, with a generation of (u64)-1, created the ordered extent and then clear the DELALLOC bit from the range in the inode's io tree. Such extent map can pass the first call of defrag_collect_targets(), as its generation is (u64)-1, meets any possible minimal generation check. And the range will not have DELALLOC bit, also passing the DELALLOC bit check. It will only be re-checked in the second call of defrag_collect_targets(), which will wait for writeback. But at that stage we have already spent our time waiting for some IO we may or may not want to defrag. Let's reject such extents early so we won't waste our time. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There is a user report about "btrfs filesystem defrag" causing 120s timeout problem. For btrfs_defrag_file() it will iterate all file extents if called from defrag ioctl, thus it can take a long time. There is no reason not to release the CPU during such a long operation. Add cond_resched() after defragged one cluster. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/10e51417-2203-f0a4-2021-86c8511cc367@gmx.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 31 Jan, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
After the recent changes made by commit c2e39305 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it") and its followup fix, commit 651740a5 ("btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an extent buffer"), we can now end up not cleaning up space reservations of log tree extent buffers after a transaction abort happens, as well as not cleaning up still dirty extent buffers. This happens because if writeback for a log tree extent buffer failed, then we have cleared the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE from the extent buffer and we have also set the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR on it. Later on, when trying to free the log tree with free_log_tree(), which iterates over the tree, we can end up getting an -EIO error when trying to read a node or a leaf, since read_extent_buffer_pages() returns -EIO if an extent buffer does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE set and has the EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR bit set. Getting that -EIO means that we return immediately as we can not iterate over the entire tree. In that case we never update the reserved space for an extent buffer in the respective block group and space_info object. When this happens we get the following traces when unmounting the fs: [174957.284509] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1913: errno=-5 IO failure [174957.286497] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in free_log_tree:3420: errno=-5 IO failure [174957.399379] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [174957.402497] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:127 btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs] [174957.407523] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...) [174957.424917] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1 [174957.426689] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [174957.428716] RIP: 0010:btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs] [174957.429717] Code: 21 48 8b bd (...) [174957.432867] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffdd0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [174957.433632] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: ffff8b0758edd1c8 [174957.434689] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0b467e7 RDI: ffff8b0758edd000 [174957.436068] RBP: ffff8b0758edd000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [174957.437114] R10: 0000000000000246 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b09c3848148 [174957.438140] R13: ffff8b09c3848198 R14: ffff8b0758edd188 R15: dead000000000100 [174957.439317] FS: 00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [174957.440402] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [174957.441164] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [174957.442117] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [174957.443076] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [174957.443948] Call Trace: [174957.444264] <TASK> [174957.444538] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x255/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.445238] close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs] [174957.445803] ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290 [174957.446250] generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120 [174957.446832] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [174957.447305] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [174957.447890] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0 [174957.448440] cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0 [174957.448888] task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 [174957.449336] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0 [174957.449934] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40 [174957.450512] do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 [174957.450980] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [174957.451605] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97 [174957.452059] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 (...) [174957.454320] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [174957.455262] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97 [174957.456131] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0 [174957.457118] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40 [174957.458005] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [174957.459113] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000 [174957.460193] </TASK> [174957.460534] irq event stamp: 0 [174957.461003] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.461947] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.463147] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.465116] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.466323] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3af ]--- [174957.467282] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [174957.468184] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3976 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.470066] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...) [174957.483137] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1 [174957.484691] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [174957.486853] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.488050] Code: 00 00 00 ad de (...) [174957.491479] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffde0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [174957.492520] RAX: ffff8b08d79310b0 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [174957.493868] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: fffff443055ee600 RDI: ffffffffb1131846 [174957.495183] RBP: ffff8b08d79310b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [174957.496580] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b08d7931000 [174957.498027] R13: ffff8b09c38492b0 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [174957.499438] FS: 00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [174957.500990] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [174957.502117] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [174957.503513] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [174957.504864] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [174957.506167] Call Trace: [174957.506654] <TASK> [174957.507047] close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs] [174957.507867] ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290 [174957.508567] generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120 [174957.509447] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [174957.510194] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [174957.511123] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0 [174957.511976] cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0 [174957.512610] task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 [174957.513309] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0 [174957.514231] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40 [174957.515069] do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 [174957.515718] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [174957.516688] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97 [174957.517413] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 d8 (...) [174957.521052] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [174957.522514] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97 [174957.523950] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0 [174957.525375] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40 [174957.526763] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [174957.528058] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000 [174957.529404] </TASK> [174957.529843] irq event stamp: 0 [174957.530256] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.531061] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.532075] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.533083] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.533865] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3b0 ]--- [174957.534452] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info 4 has 1070841856 free, is not full [174957.535404] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info total=1073741824, used=2785280, pinned=0, reserved=49152, may_use=0, readonly=65536 zone_unusable=0 [174957.537029] BTRFS info (device dm-0): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.537859] BTRFS info (device dm-0): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.538697] BTRFS info (device dm-0): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.539552] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.540403] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 This also means that in case we have log tree extent buffers that are still dirty, we can end up not cleaning them up in case we find an extent buffer with EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR set on it, as in that case we have no way for iterating over the rest of the tree. This issue is very often triggered with test cases generic/475 and generic/648 from fstests. The issue could almost be fixed by iterating over the io tree attached to each log root which keeps tracks of the range of allocated extent buffers, log_root->dirty_log_pages, however that does not work and has some inconveniences: 1) After we sync the log, we clear the range of the extent buffers from the io tree, so we can't find them after writeback. We could keep the ranges in the io tree, with a separate bit to signal they represent extent buffers already written, but that means we need to hold into more memory until the transaction commits. How much more memory is used depends a lot on whether we are able to allocate contiguous extent buffers on disk (and how often) for a log tree - if we are able to, then a single extent state record can represent multiple extent buffers, otherwise we need multiple extent state record structures to track each extent buffer. In fact, my earlier approach did that: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/3aae7c6728257c7ce2279d6660ee2797e5e34bbd.1641300250.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ However that can cause a very significant negative impact on performance, not only due to the extra memory usage but also because we get a larger and deeper dirty_log_pages io tree. We got a report that, on beefy machines at least, we can get such performance drop with fsmark for example: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220117082426.GE32491@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ 2) We would be doing it only to deal with an unexpected and exceptional case, which is basically failure to read an extent buffer from disk due to IO failures. On a healthy system we don't expect transaction aborts to happen after all; 3) Instead of relying on iterating the log tree or tracking the ranges of extent buffers in the dirty_log_pages io tree, using the radix tree that tracks extent buffers (fs_info->buffer_radix) to find all log tree extent buffers is not reliable either, because after writeback of an extent buffer it can be evicted from memory by the release page callback of the btree inode (btree_releasepage()). Since there's no way to be able to properly cleanup a log tree without being able to read its extent buffers from disk and without using more memory to track the logical ranges of the allocated extent buffers do the following: 1) When we fail to cleanup a log tree, setup a flag that indicates that failure; 2) Trigger writeback of all log tree extent buffers that are still dirty, and wait for the writeback to complete. This is just to cleanup their state, page states, page leaks, etc; 3) When unmounting the fs, ignore if the number of bytes reserved in a block group and in a space_info is not 0 if, and only if, we failed to cleanup a log tree. Also ignore only for metadata block groups and the metadata space_info object. This is far from a perfect solution, but it serves to silence test failures such as those from generic/475 and generic/648. However having a non-zero value for the reserved bytes counters on unmount after a transaction abort, is not such a terrible thing and it's completely harmless, it does not affect the filesystem integrity in any way. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Rix authored
Clang static analysis reports this problem ioctl.c:3333:8: warning: 3rd function call argument is an uninitialized value ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info, cancel is only set in one branch of an if-check and is always used. So initialize to false. Fixes: 1a15eb72 ("btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls") Reviewed-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot: 1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots; 2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list; 3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free. This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by:
-
Su Yue authored
Check item size before accessing the device item to avoid out of bound access, similar to inode_item check. Signed-off-by:
Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Reviewed-by:
-
Su Yue authored
while mounting the crafted image, out-of-bounds access happens: [350.429619] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/btrfs/struct-funcs.c:161:1 [350.429636] index 1048096 is out of range for type 'page *[16]' [350.429650] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1 [350.429652] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [350.429653] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [350.429772] Call Trace: [350.429774] <TASK> [350.429776] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c [350.429780] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50 [350.429786] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x66/0x70 [350.429791] btrfs_get_16+0xfd/0x120 [btrfs] [350.429832] check_leaf+0x754/0x1a40 [btrfs] [350.429874] ? filemap_read+0x34a/0x390 [350.429878] ? load_balance+0x175/0xfc0 [350.429881] validate_extent_buffer+0x244/0x310 [btrfs] [350.429911] btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs] [350.429935] end_bio_extent_readpage+0x3af/0x850 [btrfs] [350.429969] ? newidle_balance+0x259/0x480 [350.429972] end_workqueue_fn+0x29/0x40 [btrfs] [350.429995] btrfs_work_helper+0x71/0x330 [btrfs] [350.430030] ? __schedule+0x2fb/0xa40 [350.430033] process_one_work+0x1f6/0x400 [350.430035] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430036] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 [350.430037] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430038] kthread+0x165/0x190 [350.430041] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [350.430043] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [350.430047] </TASK> [350.430077] BTRFS warning (device loop0): bad eb member start: ptr 0xffe20f4e start 20975616 member offset 4293005178 size 2 check_leaf() is checking the leaf: corrupt leaf: root=4 block=29396992 slot=1, bad key order, prev (16140901064495857664 1 0) current (1 204 12582912) leaf 29396992 items 6 free space 3565 generation 6 owner DEV_TREE leaf 29396992 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 fs uuid a62e00e8-e94e-4200-8217-12444de93c2e chunk uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 item 0 key (16140901064495857664 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3955 itemsize 40 generation 0 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 17592186044416 block group 0 mode 52667 links 33 uid 0 gid 2104132511 rdev 94223634821136 sequence 100305 flags 0x2409000a(none) atime 0.0 (1970-01-01 08:00:00) ctime 2973280098083405823.4294967295 (-269783007-01-01 21:37:03) mtime 18446744071572723616.4026825121 (1902-04-16 12:40:00) otime 9249929404488876031.4294967295 (622322949-04-16 04:25:58) item 1 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 12582912) itemoff 3907 itemsize 48 dev extent chunk_tree 3 chunk_objectid 256 chunk_offset 12582912 length 8388608 chunk_tree_uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 The corrupted leaf of device tree has an inode item. The leaf passed checksum and others checks in validate_extent_buffer until check_leaf_item(). Because of the key type BTRFS_INODE_ITEM, check_inode_item() is called even we are in the device tree. Since the item offset + sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item) > eb->len, out-of-bounds access is triggered. The item end vs leaf boundary check has been done before check_leaf_item(), so fix it by checking item size in check_inode_item() before access of the inode item in extent buffer. Other check functions except check_dev_item() in check_leaf_item() have their item size checks. The commit for check_dev_item() is followed. No regression observed during running fstests. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ CC: Wenqing Liu <wenqingliu0120@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki authored
Quota disable ioctl starts a transaction before waiting for the qgroup rescan worker completes. However, this wait can be infinite and results in deadlock because of circular dependency among the quota disable ioctl, the qgroup rescan worker and the other task with transaction such as block group relocation task. The deadlock happens with the steps following: 1) Task A calls ioctl to disable quota. It starts a transaction and waits for qgroup rescan worker completes. 2) Task B such as block group relocation task starts a transaction and joins to the transaction that task A started. Then task B commits to the transaction. In this commit, task B waits for a commit by task A. 3) Task C as the qgroup rescan worker starts its job and starts a transaction. In this transaction start, task C waits for completion of the transaction that task A started and task B committed. This deadlock was found with fstests test case btrfs/115 and a zoned null_blk device. The test case enables and disables quota, and the block group reclaim was triggered during the quota disable by chance. The deadlock was also observed by running quota enable and disable in parallel with 'btrfs balance' command on regular null_blk devices. An example report of the deadlock: [372.469894] INFO: task kworker/u16:6:103 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [372.479944] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.485067] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.493898] task:kworker/u16:6 state:D stack: 0 pid: 103 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.503285] Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [372.510782] Call Trace: [372.514092] <TASK> [372.521684] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.530104] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.538842] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.547092] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.555591] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.561894] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x18bb/0x2610 [btrfs] [372.570506] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [372.578875] ? free_unref_page+0x3f2/0x650 [372.585484] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.591594] ? release_extent_buffer+0x224/0x420 [btrfs] [372.599264] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xc13/0x10c0 [btrfs] [372.607157] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [372.613054] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extent+0xda0/0xda0 [btrfs] [372.620960] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [372.627137] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.633215] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [372.639404] btrfs_work_helper+0x1ae/0xa90 [btrfs] [372.646268] process_one_work+0x7e9/0x1320 [372.652321] ? lock_release+0x6d0/0x6d0 [372.658081] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 [372.664513] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.670529] worker_thread+0x59e/0xf90 [372.676172] ? process_one_work+0x1320/0x1320 [372.682440] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [372.687550] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [372.693811] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [372.700052] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [372.705517] </TASK> [372.709747] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2347 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [372.729827] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.745907] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.767106] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid: 2347 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.787776] Call Trace: [372.801652] <TASK> [372.812961] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.830011] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.852547] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.871761] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.886792] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.901685] wait_current_trans+0x22c/0x310 [btrfs] [372.919743] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x3d0/0x3d0 [btrfs] [372.938923] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.959085] ? join_transaction+0xc75/0xe30 [btrfs] [372.977706] start_transaction+0x938/0x10a0 [btrfs] [372.997168] transaction_kthread+0x19d/0x3c0 [btrfs] [373.013021] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0xfc0/0xfc0 [btrfs] [373.031678] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [373.047420] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.064645] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [373.078571] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [373.091197] </TASK> [373.105611] INFO: task btrfs:3145 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.114147] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.120401] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.130393] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3145 ppid: 3141 flags:0x00004000 [373.140998] Call Trace: [373.145501] <TASK> [373.149654] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.155306] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.161965] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.168469] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [373.175468] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.180814] wait_for_commit+0x104/0x150 [btrfs] [373.187643] ? test_and_set_bit+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.194772] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.201191] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x69/0x3d0 [btrfs] [373.208738] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [373.214704] ? __btrfs_end_transaction+0x347/0x7b0 [btrfs] [373.222342] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x44d/0x2610 [btrfs] [373.230233] ? join_transaction+0x255/0xe30 [btrfs] [373.237334] ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] [373.245251] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [373.253296] relocate_block_group+0x105/0xc20 [btrfs] [373.260533] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1270/0x1270 [373.267516] ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x85/0x180 [btrfs] [373.275155] ? merge_reloc_roots+0x710/0x710 [btrfs] [373.283602] ? btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0xd30/0xd30 [btrfs] [373.291934] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.298180] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x35c/0x930 [btrfs] [373.306047] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x85/0x210 [btrfs] [373.313229] btrfs_balance+0x12f4/0x2d20 [btrfs] [373.320227] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.326206] ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x210/0x210 [btrfs] [373.333591] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.340031] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 [373.346910] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x548/0x700 [btrfs] [373.354207] btrfs_ioctl+0x7f2/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.360774] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.367957] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.375327] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.383841] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.389993] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.395828] ? mntput_no_expire+0xf7/0xad0 [373.402083] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.408249] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.414486] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.420938] ? trace_raw_output_lock+0xb4/0xe0 [373.427442] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.434224] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.440660] ? force_qs_rnp+0x2a0/0x6b0 [373.446534] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x140 [373.452763] ? __blkcg_punt_bio_submit+0x1b0/0x1b0 [373.459732] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.466089] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.472022] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.477513] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.484823] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f4af7e2bb [373.490493] RSP: 002b:00007ffcbf936178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.500197] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f8f4af7e2bb [373.509451] RDX: 00007ffcbf936220 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.518659] RBP: 00007ffcbf93774a R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f8f4b02d4e0 [373.527872] R10: 00007f8f4ae87740 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [373.537222] R13: 00007ffcbf936220 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002 [373.546506] </TASK> [373.550878] INFO: task btrfs:3146 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.559383] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.565748] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.575748] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3146 ppid: 2168 flags:0x00000000 [373.586314] Call Trace: [373.590846] <TASK> [373.595121] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.600901] ? __lock_acquire+0x23db/0x5030 [373.607176] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.613954] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.619157] schedule_timeout+0x168/0x220 [373.625170] ? usleep_range_state+0x150/0x150 [373.631653] ? mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0 [373.637767] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [373.643993] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x17b/0x410 [373.651267] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.657677] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.664103] wait_for_completion+0x163/0x250 [373.670437] ? bit_wait_timeout+0x160/0x160 [373.676585] btrfs_quota_disable+0x176/0x9a0 [btrfs] [373.683979] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0x12f0/0x12f0 [btrfs] [373.691340] ? down_write+0xd0/0x130 [373.696880] ? down_write_killable+0x150/0x150 [373.703352] btrfs_ioctl+0x3945/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.710061] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.716192] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.722047] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x23cd/0x3050 [373.728486] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.737032] ? set_pte+0x6a/0x90 [373.742271] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x1f0 [373.748506] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.754792] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.761083] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.767521] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.774247] ? __up_read+0x182/0x6e0 [373.780026] ? count_memcg_events.constprop.0+0x46/0x60 [373.787281] ? up_write+0x460/0x460 [373.792932] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.799232] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.805237] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.810947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.818102] RIP: 0033:0x7f1383ea02bb [373.823847] RSP: 002b:00007fffeb4d71f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.833641] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1383ea02bb [373.842961] RDX: 00007fffeb4d7210 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.852179] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000078 [373.861408] R10: 00007f1383daec78 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fffeb4d874a [373.870647] R13: 0000000000493099 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [373.879838] </TASK> [373.884018] Showing all locks held in the system: [373.894250] 3 locks held by kworker/4:1/58: [373.900356] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/63: [373.906333] #0: ffffffff8945ff60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260 [373.917307] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/103: [373.923938] #0: ffff888127b4f138 ((wq_completion)btrfs-qgroup-rescan){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x712/0x1320 [373.936555] #1: ffff88810b817dd8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x73f/0x1320 [373.951109] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x1f6/0x10c0 [btrfs] [373.964027] 2 locks held by less/1803: [373.969982] #0: ffff88813ed56098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x80 [373.981295] #1: ffffc90000b3b2e8 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: n_tty_read+0x9e2/0x1060 [373.992969] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/2347: [373.999893] #0: ffff88813d4887a8 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0xe3/0x3c0 [btrfs] [374.015872] 3 locks held by btrfs/3145: [374.022298] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xc3/0x700 [btrfs] [374.034456] #1: ffff88813d48a0a0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0xfe5/0x2d20 [btrfs] [374.047646] #2: ffff88813d488838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x354/0x930 [btrfs] [374.063295] 4 locks held by btrfs/3146: [374.069647] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38b1/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.081601] #1: ffff88813d488bb8 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38fd/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.094283] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xc8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.106885] #3: ffff88813d489800 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xd5/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.126780] ============================================= To avoid the deadlock, wait for the qgroup rescan worker to complete before starting the transaction for the quota disable ioctl. Clear BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag before the wait and the transaction to request the worker to complete. On transaction start failure, set the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag again. These BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag changes can be done safely since the function btrfs_quota_disable is not called concurrently because of fs_info->subvol_sem. Also check the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag in qgroup_rescan_init to avoid another qgroup rescan worker to start after the previous qgroup worker completed. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Suggested-by:Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following super simple script would crash btrfs at unmount time, if CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT() is set. mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" $mnt/file umount $mnt mount -r ro $dev $mnt btrfs scrub start -Br $mnt umount $mnt This will trigger the following ASSERT() introduced by commit 0a31daa4 ("btrfs: add assertion for empty list of transactions at late stage of umount"). That patch is definitely not the cause, it just makes enough noise for developers. [CAUSE] We will start transaction for the following call chain during scrub: scrub_enumerate_chunks() |- btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() |- btrfs_join_transaction() However for RO mount, there is no running transaction at all, thus btrfs_join_transaction() will start a new transaction. Furthermore, since it's read-only mount, btrfs_sync_fs() will not call btrfs_commit_super() to commit the new but empty transaction. And leads to the ASSERT(). The bug has been there for a long time. Only the new ASSERT() makes it noisy enough to be noticed. [FIX] For read-only scrub on read-only mount, there is no need to start a transaction nor to allocate new chunks in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(). Just do extra read-only mount check in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), and if it's read-only, skip all chunk allocation and go inc_block_group_ro() directly. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When starting a defrag, we should update the writeback index of the inode's mapping in case it currently has a value beyond the start of the range we are defragging. This can help performance and often result in getting less extents after writeback - for e.g., if the current value of the writeback index sits somewhere in the middle of a range that gets dirty by the defrag, then after writeback we can get two smaller extents instead of a single, larger extent. We used to have this before the refactoring in 5.16, but it was removed without any reason to do so. Originally it was added in kernel 3.1, by commit 2a0f7f57 ("Btrfs: fix recursive auto-defrag"), in order to fix a loop with autodefrag resulting in dirtying and writing pages over and over, but some testing on current code did not show that happening, at least with the test described in that commit. So add back the behaviour, as at the very least it is a nice to have optimization. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
A defrag operation can dirty a lot of pages, specially if operating on the entire file or a large file range. Any task dirtying pages should periodically call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(), as stated in that function's comments, otherwise they can leave too many dirty pages in the system. This is what we did before the refactoring in 5.16, and it should have remained, just like in the buffered write path and relocation. So restore that behaviour. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When defragging we can end up collecting a range for defrag that has already pages under delalloc (dirty), as long as the respective extent map for their range is not mapped to a hole, a prealloc extent or the extent map is from an old generation. Most of the time that is harmless from a functional perspective at least, however it can result in a deadlock: 1) At defrag_collect_targets() we find an extent map that meets all requirements but there's delalloc for the range it covers, and we add its range to list of ranges to defrag; 2) The defrag_collect_targets() function is called at defrag_one_range(), after it locked a range that overlaps the range of the extent map; 3) At defrag_one_range(), while the range is still locked, we call defrag_one_locked_target() for the range associated to the extent map we collected at step 1); 4) Then finally at defrag_one_locked_target() we do a call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(), which will reserve data and metadata space. If the space reservations can not be satisfied right away, the flusher might be kicked in and start flushing delalloc and wait for the respective ordered extents to complete. If this happens we will deadlock, because both flushing delalloc and finishing an ordered extent, requires locking the range in the inode's io tree, which was already locked at defrag_collect_targets(). So fix this by skipping extent maps for which there's already delalloc. Fixes: eb793cf8 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to collect target file extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
- 19 Jan, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] After commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") autodefrag no longer properly re-defrag the file from previously finished location. [CAUSE] The recent refactoring of defrag only focuses on defrag ioctl subpage support, doesn't take autodefrag into consideration. There are two problems involved which prevents autodefrag to restart its scan: - No range.start update Previously when one defrag target is found, range->start will be updated to indicate where next search should start from. But now btrfs_defrag_file() doesn't update it anymore, making all autodefrag to rescan from file offset 0. This would also make autodefrag to mark the same range dirty again and again, causing extra IO. - No proper quick exit for defrag_one_cluster() Currently if we reached or exceed @max_sectors limit, we just exit defrag_one_cluster(), and let next defrag_one_cluster() call to do a quick exit. This makes @cur increase, thus no way to properly know which range is defragged and which range is skipped. [FIX] The fix involves two modifications: - Update range->start to next cluster start This is a little different from the old behavior. Previously range->start is updated to the next defrag target. But in the end, the behavior should still be pretty much the same, as now we skip to next defrag target inside btrfs_defrag_file(). Thus if auto-defrag determines to re-scan, then we still do the skip, just at a different timing. - Make defrag_one_cluster() to return >0 to indicate a quick exit So that btrfs_defrag_file() can also do a quick exit, without increasing @cur to the range end, and re-use @cur to update @range->start. - Add comment for btrfs_defrag_file() to mention the range->start update Currently only autodefrag utilize this behavior, as defrag ioctl won't set @max_to_defrag parameter, thus unless interrupted it will always try to defrag the whole range. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There are users using autodefrag mount option reporting obvious increase in IO: > If I compare the write average (in total, I don't have it per process) > when taking idle periods on the same machine: > Linux 5.16: > without autodefrag: ~ 10KiB/s > with autodefrag: between 1 and 2MiB/s. > > Linux 5.15: > with autodefrag:~ 10KiB/s (around the same as without > autodefrag on 5.16) [CAUSE] When autodefrag mount option is enabled, btrfs_defrag_file() will be called with @max_sectors = BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH (1024) to limit how many sectors we can defrag in one try. And then use the number of sectors defragged to determine if we need to re-defrag. But commit b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") uses wrong unit to increase @sectors_defragged, which should be in unit of sector, not byte. This means, if we have defragged any sector, then @sectors_defragged will be >= sectorsize (normally 4096), which is larger than BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH. This makes the @max_sectors check in defrag_one_cluster() to underflow, rendering the whole @max_sectors check useless. Thus causing way more IO for autodefrag mount options, as now there is no limit on how many sectors can really be defragged. [FIX] Fix the problems by: - Use sector as unit when increasing @sectors_defragged - Include @sectors_defragged > @max_sectors case to break the loop - Add extra comment on the return value of btrfs_defrag_file() Reported-by:
Anthony Ruhier <aruhier@mailbox.org> Fixes: b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
During defrag, at btrfs_defrag_file(), we have this loop that iterates over a file range in steps no larger than 256K subranges. If the range is too long, there's no way to interrupt it. So make the loop check in each iteration if there's signal pending, and if there is, break and return -AGAIN to userspace. Before kernel 5.16, we used to allow defrag to be cancelled through a signal, but that was lost with commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()"). This change adds back the possibility to cancel a defrag with a signal and keeps the same semantics, returning -EAGAIN to user space (and not the usually more expected -EINTR). This is also motivated by a recent bug on 5.16 where defragging a 1 byte file resulted in iterating from file range 0 to (u64)-1, as hitting the bug triggered a too long loop, basically requiring one to reboot the machine, as it was not possible to cancel defrag. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When attempting to defrag a file with a single byte, we can end up in a too long loop, which is nearly infinite because at btrfs_defrag_file() we end up with the variable last_byte assigned with a value of 18446744073709551615 (which is (u64)-1). The problem comes from the fact we end up doing: last_byte = round_up(last_byte, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1; So if last_byte was assigned 0, which is i_size - 1, we underflow and end up with the value 18446744073709551615. This is trivial to reproduce and the following script triggers it: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT echo -n "X" > $MNT/foobar btrfs filesystem defragment $MNT/foobar umount $MNT So fix this by not decrementing last_byte by 1 before doing the sector size round up. Also, to make it easier to follow, make the round up right after computing last_byte. Reported-by:
-
- 07 Jan, 2022 23 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Print extra information about how many dirty bytes an uncommitted has at the end of mount. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we extended the size of a swapfile after its header was created (by the mkswap utility) and then try to activate it, we will map the entire file when activating the swap file, instead of limiting to the max size defined in the swap file's header. Currently test case generic/643 from fstests fails because we do not respect that size limit defined in the swap file's header. So fix this by not mapping file ranges beyond the max size defined in the swap header. This is the same type of bug that iomap used to have, and was fixed in commit 36ca7943 ("mm/swap: consider max pages in iomap_swapfile_add_extent"). Fixes: ed46ff3d ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com Signed-off-by:
-
Yang Li authored
The warnings were found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is caused by using 'make W=1'. fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Function parameter or member 'bio_ctrl' not described in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'bio' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'prev_bio_flags' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Excess function parameter 'root' description in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' Note: this is fixing only the warnings regarding parameter list, the first line is not strictly conforming to the kdoc format as the btrfs codebase does not stick to that and keeps the first line more free form (because it's only for internal use). Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Su Yue authored
btrfs_decompress_bio, the only caller of compression_decompress_bio gets type from @cb and passes it to compression_decompress_bio. However, compression_decompress_bio can get compression type directly from @cb. So remove the parameter and access it through @cb. No functional change. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When code modifying extent-io-tree get modified and got that selftest failed, it can take some time to pin down the cause. To make it easier to expose the problem, dump the extent io tree if the selftest failed. This can save developers debug time, especially since the selftest we can not use the trace events, thus have to manually add debug trace points. Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of btrfs_stripe() has similar problems of scrub_chunk(): - Duplicated and ambiguous @base argument Can be fetched from btrfs_block_group::bg. - Ambiguous argument @length It's again device extent length - Ambiguous argument @num The instinctive guess would be mirror number, but in fact it's stripe index. Fix it by: - Remove @base parameter - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len - Rename @num to @stripe_index Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of scrub_chunk() has the following problems: - Duplicated @chunk_offset It is the same as btrfs_block_group::start. - Confusing @length The most instinctive guess is chunk length, and one may want to delete it, but the truth is, it's the device extent length. Fix this by: - Remove @chunk_offset Use btrfs_block_group::start instead. - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len Also rename the caller to remove the ambiguous naming. - Rename @cache to @bg The "_cache" suffix for btrfs_block_group has been removed for a while. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and that's scrub. But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such feature). Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata readahead: - Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada - Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached. - Poor layer separation Metadata readahead works kinda at device level. This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all. This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings unnecessary complexity. - Dead code In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all the debug related code useless and unable to test. Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism completely. [BENCHMARK] There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada. For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5% performance drop for scrub. For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance difference. The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s. The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a resolution of 1 second. Old New Diff SSD 455.3 466.332 +2.42% HDD 103.927 98.012 -5.69% Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For scrub, we trigger two readaheads for two trees, extent tree to get where to scrub, and csum tree to get the data checksum. For csum tree we already trigger readahead in btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), by setting path->reada. But for extent tree we don't have any path based readahead. Add the readahead for extent tree as well, so we can later remove the btrfs_reada_add() based readahead. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In function scrub_stripe() we allocated two btrfs_path's, one @path for extent tree search and another @ppath for full stripe extent tree search for RAID56. This is totally umncessary, as the @ppath usage is completely inside scrub_raid56_parity(), thus we can move the path allocation into scrub_raid56_parity() completely. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The purpose of this function is to unlock all nodes in a btrfs path which are above 'lowest_unlock' and whose slot used is different than 0. As such it used slightly awkward structure of 'if' as well as somewhat cryptic "no_skip" control variable which denotes whether we should check the current level of skipability or no. This patch does the following (cosmetic) refactorings: * Renames 'no_skip' to 'check_skip' and makes it a boolean. This variable controls whether we are below the lowest_unlock/skip_level levels. * Consolidates the 2 conditions which warrant checking whether the current level should be skipped under 1 common if (check_skip) branch, this increase indentation level but is not critical. * Consolidates the 'skip_level < i && i >= lowest_unlock' and 'i >= lowest_unlock && i > skip_level' condition into a common branch since those are identical. * Eliminates the local extent_buffer variable as in this case it doesn't bring anything to function readability. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At ioctl.c:create_subvol(), when we fail to create a subvolume we always commit the transaction. In most cases this is a no-op, since all the error paths, except for one, abort the transaction - the only exception is when we fail to insert the new root item into the root tree, in that case we don't abort the transaction because we didn't do anything that is irreversible - however we end up committing the transaction which although is not a functional problem, it adds unnecessary rotation of the backup roots in the superblock and unnecessary work. So change that to commit a transaction only when no error happened, otherwise just call btrfs_end_transaction() to release our reference on the transaction. Reviewed-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
The ZNS specification defines a limit on the number of "active" zones. That limit impose us to limit the number of block groups which can be used for an allocation at the same time. Not to exceed the limit, we reuse the existing active block groups as much as possible when we can't activate any other zones without sacrificing an already activated block group in commit a85f05e5 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space"). However, the check is wrong in two ways. First, it checks the condition for every raid index (ffe_ctl->index). Even if it reaches the condition and "ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >= ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size" is met, there can be other block groups having enough space to hold ffe_ctl->num_bytes. (Actually, this won't happen in the current zoned code as it only supports SINGLE profile. But, it can happen once it enables other RAID types.) Second, it checks the active zone availability depending on the raid index. The raid index is just an index for space_info->block_groups, so it has nothing to do with chunk allocation. These mistakes are causing a faulty allocation in a certain situation. Consider we are running zoned btrfs on a device whose max_active_zone == 0 (no limit). And, suppose no block group have a room to fit ffe_ctl->num_bytes but some room to meet ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size (i.e. max_extent_size > num_bytes >= min_alloc_size). In this situation, the following occur: - With SINGLE raid_index, it reaches the chunk allocation checking code - The check returns true because we can activate a new zone (no limit) - But, before allocating the chunk, it iterates to the next raid index (RAID5) - Since there are no RAID5 block groups on zoned mode, it again reaches the check code - The check returns false because of btrfs_can_activate_zone()'s "if (raid_index != BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)" part - That results in returning -ENOSPC without allocating a new chunk As a result, we end up hitting -ENOSPC too early. Move the check to the right place in the can_allocate_chunk() hook, and do the active zone check depending on the allocation flag, not on the raid index. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Introduce a new hook for an extent allocator policy. With the new hook, a policy can decide to allocate a new block group or not. If not, it will return -ENOSPC, so btrfs_reserve_extent() will cut the allocation size in half and retry the allocation if min_alloc_size is large enough. The hook has a place holder and will be replaced with the real implementation in the next patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Allocating an extent from a block group can fail for various reasons. When an allocation from a dedicated block group (for tree-log or relocation data) fails, we need to unregister it as a dedicated one so that we can allocate a new block group for the dedicated one. However, we are returning early when the block group in case it is read-only, fully used, or not be able to activate the zone. As a result, we keep the non-usable block group as a dedicated one, leading to further allocation failure. With many block groups, the allocator will iterate hopeless loop to find a free extent, results in a hung task. Fix the issue by delaying the return and doing the proper cleanups. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND can only work on zoned devices, so it is redundant to check if the filesystem is zoned when REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND is set as the bio's bio_op. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone() so we don't need to do it in all callers. Also as btrfs_repair_one_zone() doesn't return a sensible error, make it a boolean function and return false in case it got called on a non-zoned filesystem and true on a zoned filesystem. Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer() will always be called with a NULL 'cache_ret' argument. As there's no need to check if we have a valid block_group passed in remove these checks. Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Encapsulate the inode lock needed for serializing the data relocation writes on a zoned filesystem into a helper. This streamlines the code reading flow and hides special casing for zoned filesystems. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
In the case of the seed device, the fsid can be different from the mounted sprout fsid. The userland has to read the device superblock to know the fsid but, that idea fails if the device is missing. So add a sysfs interface devinfo/<devid>/fsid to show the fsid of the device. For example: $ cd /sys/fs/btrfs/b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8 $ cat devinfo/1/fsid c44d771f-639d-4df3-99ec-5bc7ad2af93b $ cat devinfo/3/fsid b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8 Though it's related to seeding, the name of the sysfs file is plain fsid as it matches what blkid says. A path to the device's fsid will aid scripting. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Filipe reported a problem where sometimes he'd get an ENOSPC abort when running delayed refs with generic/619 and the free space tree enabled. This is partly because we do not reserve space for modifying the free space tree, nor do we have a block rsv associated with that tree. The delayed_refs_rsv tracks the amount of space required to run delayed refs. This means 1 modification means 1 change to the extent root. With the free space tree this turns into 2 changes, because modifying 1 extent means updating the extent tree and potentially updating the free space tree to either remove that entry or add the free space. Thus if we have the FST enabled, simply double the reservation size for our modification. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Filipe reported a problem where generic/619 was failing with an ENOSPC abort while running delayed refs, like the following BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 522920 at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1049 add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs] CPU: 3 PID: 522920 Comm: kworker/u16:19 Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc2-btrfs-next-106 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] RIP: 0010:add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs] RSP: 0000:ffffa65087fb7b20 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9131eeaa RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff8d62e26481b8 R08: ffffffff9ad97ce0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 R13: ffff8d61c25fe688 R14: ffff8d61ebd88800 R15: ffff8d61ebd88a90 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d64ed400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa46a8b1000 CR3: 0000000148d18003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __btrfs_free_extent+0x516/0x950 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] flush_space+0x403/0x630 [btrfs] ? call_rcu_tasks_generic+0x50/0x80 ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0xb5/0x290 [btrfs] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x320 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5b0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 kthread+0x17c/0x1a0 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 There's a couple of reasons for this, but in generic/619's case the largest reason is because it is a very small file system, ad we do not reserve enough space for the global reserve. With the free space tree we now have the free space tree that we need to modify when running delayed refs. This means we need the global reserve to take this into account when it calculates the minimum size it needs to be. This is especially important for very small file systems. Fix this by adjusting the minimum global block rsv size math to include the size of the free space tree when calculating the size. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These two values were introduced in commit ff023aac ("Btrfs: add code to scrub to copy read data to another disk") as an optimization. But the truth is, block layer scheduler can do whatever it wants to merge/split bios to improve performance. Doing such "optimization" is not really going to affect much, especially considering how good current block layer optimizations are doing. Remove such old and immature optimization from our code. Since we're here, also change BUG_ON()s using these two macros to use ASSERT()s. Signed-off-by:
-
