As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Extended attribute copy-up functionality added via 19472b69
("selinux: Implementation for inode_copy_up_xattr() hook") sees
"security.selinux" contexts dropped, instead relying on contexts
applied via the inode_copy_up() hook.

When copy-up takes place during early boot, prior to selinux
initialization / policy load, the context stripping can be unwanted
and unexpected.

With this change, filtering of "security.selinux" xattrs will only occur
after selinux initialization.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Instead of returning -EINVAL if any type of error occurs, limit
-EINVAL to only those errors caused by passing a bad/invalid socket
or packet/skb.  In other cases where everything is correct but there
isn't a valid peer label we return -ENOPROTOOPT.

This helps make selinux_socket_getpeersec_dgram() more consistent
with selinux_socket_getpeersec_stream().
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

We only need to call inode_mode_to_security_class() once in
selinux_inode_init_security().
Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Pull more bcachefs updates from Kent Overstreet:
 "Some fixes, Some refactoring, some minor features:

   - Assorted prep work for disk space accounting rewrite

   - BTREE_TRIGGER_ATOMIC: after combining our trigger callbacks, this
     makes our trigger context more explicit

   - A few fixes to avoid excessive transaction restarts on
     multithreaded workloads: fstests (in addition to ktest tests) are
     now checking slowpath counters, and that's shaking out a few bugs

   - Assorted tracepoint improvements

   - Starting to break up bcachefs_format.h and move on disk types so
     they're with the code they belong to; this will make room to start
     documenting the on disk format better.

   - A few minor fixes"

* tag 'bcachefs-2024-01-21' of https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs: (46 commits)
  bcachefs: Improve inode_to_text()
  bcachefs: logged_ops_format.h
  bcachefs: reflink_format.h
  bcachefs; extents_format.h
  bcachefs: ec_format.h
  bcachefs: subvolume_format.h
  bcachefs: snapshot_format.h
  bcachefs: alloc_background_format.h
  bcachefs: xattr_format.h
  bcachefs: dirent_format.h
  bcachefs: inode_format.h
  bcachefs; quota_format.h
  bcachefs: sb-counters_format.h
  bcachefs: counters.c -> sb-counters.c
  bcachefs: comment bch_subvolume
  bcachefs: bch_snapshot::btime
  bcachefs: add missing __GFP_NOWARN
  bcachefs: opts->compression can now also be applied in the background
  bcachefs: Prep work for variable size btree node buffers
  bcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting
  ...

Pull timer updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Updates for time and clocksources:

   - A fix for the idle and iowait time accounting vs CPU hotplug.

     The time is reset on CPU hotplug which makes the accumulated
     systemwide time jump backwards.

   - Assorted fixes and improvements for clocksource/event drivers"

* tag 'timers-core-2024-01-21' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  tick-sched: Fix idle and iowait sleeptime accounting vs CPU hotplug
  clocksource/drivers/ep93xx: Fix error handling during probe
  clocksource/drivers/cadence-ttc: Fix some kernel-doc warnings
  clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix make W=n kerneldoc warnings
  clocksource/timer-riscv: Add riscv_clock_shutdown callback
  dt-bindings: timer: Add StarFive JH8100 clint
  dt-bindings: timer: thead,c900-aclint-mtimer: separate mtime and mtimecmp regs

Pull powerpc fixes from Aneesh Kumar:

 - Increase default stack size to 32KB for Book3S

Thanks to Michael Ellerman.

* tag 'powerpc-6.8-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux:
  powerpc/64s: Increase default stack size to 32KB

Add line breaks - inode_to_text() is now much easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>