Add bpf_program__flags() API to retrieve prog_flags that will be (or
were) supplied to BPF_PROG_LOAD command.

Also add bpf_program__set_extra_flags() API to allow to set *extra*
flags, in addition to those determined by program's SEC() definition.
Such flags are logically OR'ed with libbpf-derived flags.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111051758.92283-2-andrii@kernel.org

Mark Pashmfouroush says:

====================

BPF_SK_LOOKUP users may want to have access to the ifindex of the skb
which triggered the socket lookup. This may be useful for selectively
applying programmable socket lookup logic to packets that arrive on a
specific interface, or excluding packets from an interface.

v3:
- Rename ifindex field to ingress_ifindex for consistency. (Yonghong)

v2:
- Fix inaccurate comment (Alexei)
- Add more details to commit messages (John)
====================
Revieview-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

A new field was added to the bpf_sk_lookup data that users can access.
Add tests that validate that the new ingress_ifindex field contains the
right data.
Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-3-markpash@cloudflare.com

It may be helpful to have access to the ifindex during bpf socket
lookup. An example may be to scope certain socket lookup logic to
specific interfaces, i.e. an interface may be made exempt from custom
lookup code.

Add the ifindex of the arriving connection to the bpf_sk_lookup API.
Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-2-markpash@cloudflare.com

Bpftool is dual-licensed under GPLv2 and BSD-2-Clause. In commit
907b2236 ("tools: bpftool: dual license all files") we made sure
that all its source files were indeed covered by the two licenses, and
that they had the correct SPDX tags.

However, bpftool's Makefile, the Makefile for its documentation, and the
.gitignore file were skipped at the time (their GPL-2.0-only tag was
added later). Let's update the tags.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Acked-by: Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105221904.3536-1-quentin@isovalent.com

The minimum supported C standard version is C89, with use of GNU
extensions, hence make sure to catch any instances that would break
the build for this mode by passing -std=gnu89.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105234243.390179-4-memxor@gmail.com

Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer
is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and
execution of the BPF program progresses.

To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference
for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the
exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new
task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should
not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and
task_works->func are 0.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com

Commit 91fc957c ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module
memory") restricts BPF JIT program allocation to a 128MB region to ensure
BPF programs are still in branching range of each other. However this
restriction should not apply to the aarch64 JIT, since BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL
are implemented as a 64-bit move into a register and then a BLR instruction -
which has the effect of being able to call anything without proximity
limitation.

The practical reason to relax this restriction on JIT memory is that 128MB of
JIT memory can be quickly exhausted, especially where PAGE_SIZE is 64KB - one
page is needed per program. In cases where seccomp filters are applied to
multiple VMs on VM launch - such filters are classic BPF but converted to
BPF - this can severely limit the number of VMs that can be launched. In a
world where we support BPF JIT always on, turning off the JIT isn't always an
option either.

Fixes: 91fc957c ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module memory")
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <russell.king@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com

Song Liu says:

====================

Changes v4 => v5:
1. Clean up and style change in 2/2. (Andrii)

Changes v3 => v4:
1. Move mmap_unlock_work to task_iter.c to fix build for .config without
   !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS. (kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)

Changes v2 => v3:
1. Avoid using x86 only function in selftests. (Yonghong)
2. Add struct file and struct vm_area_struct to btf_task_struct_ids, and
   use it in bpf_find_vma and stackmap.c. (Yonghong)
3. Fix inaccurate comments. (Yonghong)

Changes v1 => v2:
1. Share irq_work with stackmap.c. (Daniel)
2. Add tests for illegal writes to task/vma from the callback function.
   (Daniel)
3. Other small fixes.

Add helper bpf_find_vma. This can be used in some profiling use cases. It
might also be useful for LSM.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The
perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of
bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program,
on the other hand, does not have this constraint.

Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback
function. The verifier should reject both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com

In some profiler use cases, it is necessary to map an address to the
backing file, e.g., a shared library. bpf_find_vma helper provides a
flexible way to achieve this. bpf_find_vma maps an address of a task to
the vma (vm_area_struct) for this address, and feed the vma to an callback
BPF function. The callback function is necessary here, as we need to
ensure mmap_sem is unlocked.

It is necessary to lock mmap_sem for find_vma. To lock and unlock mmap_sem
safely when irqs are disable, we use the same mechanism as stackmap with
build_id. Specifically, when irqs are disabled, the unlocked is postponed
in an irq_work. Refactor stackmap.c so that the irq_work is shared among
bpf_find_vma and stackmap helpers.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-2-songliubraving@fb.com

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

Fix all the memory leaks reported by ASAN. All but one are just improper
resource clean up in selftests. But one memory leak was discovered in libbpf,
leaving inner map's name leaked.

First patch fixes selftests' Makefile by passing through SAN_CFLAGS to linker.
Without that compiling with SAN_CFLAGS=-fsanitize=address kept failing.

Running selftests under ASAN in BPF CI is the next step, we just need to make
sure all the necessary libraries (libasan and liblsan) are installed on the
host and inside the VM. Would be great to get some help with that, but for now
make sure that test_progs run is clean from leak sanitizer errors.

v3->v4:
  - rebase on latest bpf-next;
v2->v3:
  - fix per-cpu array memory leaks in btf_iter.c selftests (Hengqi);
v1->v2:
  - call bpf_map__destroy() conditionally if map->inner_map is present.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

skb_ctx selftest didn't close bpf_object implicitly allocated by
bpf_prog_test_load() helper. Fix the problem by explicitly calling
bpf_object__close() at the end of the test.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-10-andrii@kernel.org

bpf_link__detach() was confused with bpf_link__destroy() and leaves
leaked FD in the process. Fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-9-andrii@kernel.org

btf__parse() is repeated after successful setup, leaving the first
instance leaked. Remove redundant and premature call.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-8-andrii@kernel.org

Free up used resources at the end and on error. Also make it more
obvious that there is btf__parse() call that creates struct btf
instance.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-7-andrii@kernel.org

Inner array of allocated strings wasn't freed on success. Now it's
always freed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-6-andrii@kernel.org

Array holding per-cpu values wasn't freed. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-5-andrii@kernel.org

Free up memory and resources used by temporary allocated memstream and
btf_dump instance.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-4-andrii@kernel.org

It's not enough to just free(map->inner_map), as inner_map itself can
have extra memory allocated, like map name.

Fixes: 646f02ff ("libbpf: Add BTF-defined map-in-map support")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-3-andrii@kernel.org

When adding -fsanitize=address to SAN_CFLAGS, it has to be passed both
to compiler through CFLAGS as well as linker through LDFLAGS. Add
SAN_CFLAGS into LDFLAGS to allow building selftests with ASAN.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-2-andrii@kernel.org

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

This patch set adds unified OPTS-based low-level bpf_prog_load() API for
loading BPF programs directly into kernel without utilizing libbpf's
bpf_object abstractions. This OPTS-based interface allows for future
extensions without breaking backwards or forward API and ABI compatibility.
Similar approach will be used for other low-level APIs that require extensive
sets of parameters, like BPF_MAP_CREATE command.

First half of the patch set adds libbpf API, cleans up internal usage of
to-be-deprecated APIs, etc. Second half cleans up and converts selftests away
from using deprecated APIs. See individual patches for more details.

v1->v2:
  - dropped exposing sys_bpf() into public API (Alexei, Daniel);
  - also dropped bpftool/cgroup.c fix for unistd.h include because it's not
    necessary due to sys_bpf() staying as is.

Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Remove the second part of prog loading testing helper re-definition:

  -Dbpf_load_program=bpf_test_load_program

This completes the clean up of deprecated libbpf program loading APIs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-13-andrii@kernel.org

-Dbpf_prog_load_deprecated=bpf_prog_test_load trick is both ugly and
breaks when deprecation goes into effect due to macro magic. Convert all
the uses to explicit bpf_prog_test_load() calls which avoid deprecation
errors and makes everything less magical.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-12-andrii@kernel.org

Move testing prog and object load wrappers (bpf_prog_test_load and
bpf_test_load_program) into testing_helpers.{c,h} and get rid of
otherwise useless test_stub.c. Make testing_helpers.c available to
non-test_progs binaries as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-11-andrii@kernel.org

Convert all the uses of legacy low-level BPF program loading APIs
(mostly bpf_load_program_xattr(), but also some bpf_verify_program()) to
bpf_prog_load() uses.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-10-andrii@kernel.org

Fix few more SEC() definitions that were previously missed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-9-andrii@kernel.org

This deprecation annotation has no effect because for struct deprecation
attribute has to be declared after struct definition. But instead of
moving it to the end of struct definition, remove it. When deprecation
will go in effect at libbpf v0.7, this deprecation attribute will cause
libbpf's own source code compilation to trigger deprecation warnings,
which is unavoidable because libbpf still has to support that API.

So keep deprecation of APIs, but don't mark structs used in API as
deprecated.

Fixes: e21d585c ("libbpf: Deprecate multi-instance bpf_program APIs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-8-andrii@kernel.org

Switch to bpf_prog_load() instead.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-7-andrii@kernel.org

Remove all the internal uses of libbpf APIs that are slated to be
deprecated in v0.7.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-6-andrii@kernel.org

Remove all the internal uses of bpf_load_program_xattr(), which is
slated for deprecation in v0.7.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-5-andrii@kernel.org

Add a new unified OPTS-based low-level API for program loading,
bpf_prog_load() ([0]).  bpf_prog_load() accepts few "mandatory"
parameters as input arguments (program type, name, license,
instructions) and all the other optional (as in not required to specify
for all types of BPF programs) fields into struct bpf_prog_load_opts.

This makes all the other non-extensible APIs variant for BPF_PROG_LOAD
obsolete and they are slated for deprecation in libbpf v0.7:
  - bpf_load_program();
  - bpf_load_program_xattr();
  - bpf_verify_program().

Implementation-wise, internal helper libbpf__bpf_prog_load is refactored
to become a public bpf_prog_load() API. struct bpf_prog_load_params used
internally is replaced by public struct bpf_prog_load_opts.

Unfortunately, while conceptually all this is pretty straightforward,
the biggest complication comes from the already existing bpf_prog_load()
*high-level* API, which has nothing to do with BPF_PROG_LOAD command.

We try really hard to have a new API named bpf_prog_load(), though,
because it maps naturally to BPF_PROG_LOAD command.

For that, we rename old bpf_prog_load() into bpf_prog_load_deprecated()
and mark it as COMPAT_VERSION() for shared library users compiled
against old version of libbpf. Statically linked users and shared lib
users compiled against new version of libbpf headers will get "rerouted"
to bpf_prog_deprecated() through a macro helper that decides whether to
use new or old bpf_prog_load() based on number of input arguments (see
___libbpf_overload in libbpf_common.h).

To test that existing
bpf_prog_load()-using code compiles and works as expected, I've compiled
and ran selftests as is. I had to remove (locally) selftest/bpf/Makefile
-Dbpf_prog_load=bpf_prog_test_load hack because it was conflicting with
the macro-based overload approach. I don't expect anyone else to do
something like this in practice, though. This is testing-specific way to
replace bpf_prog_load() calls with special testing variant of it, which
adds extra prog_flags value. After testing I kept this selftests hack,
but ensured that we use a new bpf_prog_load_deprecated name for this.

This patch also marks bpf_prog_load() and bpf_prog_load_xattr() as deprecated.
bpf_object interface has to be used for working with struct bpf_program.
Libbpf doesn't support loading just a bpf_program.

The silver lining is that when we get to libbpf 1.0 all these
complication will be gone and we'll have one clean bpf_prog_load()
low-level API with no backwards compatibility hackery surrounding it.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/284Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-4-andrii@kernel.org

Allow to control number of BPF_PROG_LOAD attempts from outside the
sys_bpf_prog_load() helper.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-3-andrii@kernel.org

It's confusing that libbpf-provided helper macro doesn't start with
LIBBPF. Also "declare" vs "define" is confusing terminology, I can never
remember and always have to look up previous examples.

Bypass both issues by renaming DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS into a short and
clean LIBBPF_OPTS. To avoid breaking existing code, provide:

  #define DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS LIBBPF_OPTS

in libbpf_legacy.h. We can decide later if we ever want to remove it or
we'll keep it forever because it doesn't add any maintainability burden.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-2-andrii@kernel.org

Fix the `int i` declaration inside the for statement. This is non-C89
compliant. See [0] for user report breaking BCC build.

  [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/403

Fixes: 18f4fccb ("libbpf: Update gen_loader to emit BTF_KIND_FUNC relocations")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105191055.3324874-1-andrii@kernel.org

Mark bpf_program__load() as deprecated ([0]) since v0.6. Also rename few
internal program loading bpf_object helper functions to have more
consistent naming.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/301Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103051449.1884903-1-andrii@kernel.org

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================

Few patches fixing various issues discovered by oss-fuzz project fuzzing
bpf_object__open() call. Fixes are mostly focused around additional simple
sanity checks of ELF format: symbols, relos, etc.

v1->v2:
  - address Yonghong's feedback.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add few sanity checks for relocations to prevent div-by-zero and
out-of-bounds array accesses in libbpf.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103173213.1376990-6-andrii@kernel.org

e_shnum does include section #0 and as such is exactly the number of ELF
sections that we need to allocate memory for to use section indices as
array indices. Fix the off-by-one error.

This is purely accounting fix, previously we were overallocating one
too many array items. But no correctness errors otherwise.

Fixes: 25bbbd7a ("libbpf: Remove assumptions about uniqueness of .rodata/.data/.bss maps")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103173213.1376990-5-andrii@kernel.org

.BTF and .BTF.ext ELF sections should have SHT_PROGBITS type and contain
data. If they are not, ELF is invalid or corrupted, so bail out.
Otherwise this can lead to data->d_buf being NULL and SIGSEGV later on.
Reported by oss-fuzz project.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103173213.1376990-4-andrii@kernel.org