- 11 Dec, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The quick check in tick_do_update_jiffies64() whether jiffies need to be updated is not really correct under all circumstances and on all architectures, especially not on 32bit systems. The quick check does: if (now < READ_ONCE(tick_next_period)) return; and the counterpart in the update is: WRITE_ONCE(tick_next_period, next_update_time); This has two problems: 1) On weakly ordered architectures there is no guarantee that the stores before the WRITE_ONCE() are visible which means that other CPUs can operate on a stale jiffies value. 2) On 32bit the store of tick_next_period which is an u64 is split into two 32bit stores. If the first 32bit store advances tick_next_period far out and the second 32bit store is delayed (virt, NMI ...) then jiffies will become stale until the second 32bit store happens. Address this by seperating the handling for 32bit and 64bit. On 64bit problem #1 is addressed by replacing READ_ONCE() / WRITE_ONCE() with smp_load_acquire() / smp_store_release(). On 32bit problem #2 is addressed by protecting the quick check with the jiffies sequence counter. The load and stores can be plain because the sequence count mechanics provides the required barriers already. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87czzpc02w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The code for the legacy RTC and the RTC class based update are pretty much the same. Consolidate the common parts into one function and just invoke the actual setter functions. For RTC class based devices the update code checks whether the offset is valid for the device, which is usually not the case for the first invocation. If it's not the same it stores the correct offset and lets the caller try again. That's not much different from the previous approach where the first invocation had a pretty low probability to actually hit the allowed window. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220542.355743355@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The current RTC set_offset_nsec value is not really intuitive to understand. tsched twrite(t2.tv_sec - 1) t2 (seconds increment) The offset is calculated from twrite based on the assumption that t2 - twrite == 1s. That means for the MC146818 RTC the offset needs to be negative so that the write happens 500ms before t2. It's easier to understand when the whole calculation is based on t2. That avoids negative offsets and the meaning is obvious: t2 - twrite: The time defined by the chip when seconds increment after the write. twrite - tsched: The time for the transport to the point where the chip is updated. ==> set_offset_nsec = t2 - tsched ttransport = twrite - tsched tRTCinc = t2 - twrite ==> set_offset_nsec = ttransport + tRTCinc tRTCinc is a chip property and can be obtained from the data sheet. ttransport depends on how the RTC is connected. It is close to 0 for directly accessible RTCs. For RTCs behind a slow bus, e.g. i2c, it's the time required to send the update over the bus. This can be estimated or even calibrated, but that's a different problem. Adjust the implementation and update comments accordingly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220542.263204937@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
rtc_set_ntp_time() is not really RTC functionality as the code is just a user of RTC. Move it into the NTP code which allows further cleanups. Requested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220542.166871172@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Miroslav reported that the periodic RTC synchronization in the NTP code fails more often than not to hit the specified update window. The reason is that the code uses delayed_work to schedule the update which needs to be in thread context as the underlying RTC might be connected via a slow bus, e.g. I2C. In the update function it verifies whether the current time is correct vs. the requirements of the underlying RTC. But delayed_work is using the timer wheel for scheduling which is inaccurate by design. Depending on the distance to the expiry the wheel gets less granular to allow batching and to avoid the cascading of the original timer wheel. See 500462a9 ("timers: Switch to a non-cascading wheel") and the code for further details. The code already deals with this by splitting the 660 seconds period into a long 659 seconds timer and then retrying with a smaller delta. But looking at the actual granularities of the timer wheel (which depend on the HZ configuration) the 659 seconds timer ends up in an outer wheel level and is affected by a worst case granularity of: HZ Granularity 1000 32s 250 16s 100 40s So the initial timer can be already off by max 12.5% which is not a big issue as the period of the sync is defined as ~11 minutes. The fine grained second attempt schedules to the desired update point with a timer expiring less than a second from now. Depending on the actual delta and the HZ setting even the second attempt can end up in outer wheel levels which have a large enough granularity to make the correctness check fail. As this is a fundamental property of the timer wheel there is no way to make this more accurate short of iterating in one jiffies steps towards the update point. Switch it to an hrtimer instead which schedules the actual update work. The hrtimer will expire precisely (max 1 jiffie delay when high resolution timers are not available). The actual scheduling delay of the work is the same as before. The update is triggered from do_adjtimex() which is a bit racy but not much more racy than it was before: if (ntp_synced()) queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sync_work, 0); which is racy when the work is currently executed and has not managed to reschedule itself. This becomes now: if (ntp_synced() && !hrtimer_is_queued(&sync_hrtimer)) queue_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sync_work, 0); which is racy when the hrtimer has expired and the work is currently executed and has not yet managed to rearm the hrtimer. Not a big problem as it just schedules work for nothing. The new implementation has a safe guard in place to catch the case where the hrtimer is queued on entry to the work function and avoids an extra update attempt of the RTC that way. Reported-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220542.062910520@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The offset which is used to steer the start of an RTC synchronization update via rtc_set_ntp_time() is huge. The math behind this is: tsched twrite(t2.tv_sec - 1) t2 (seconds increment) twrite - tsched is the transport time for the write to hit the device. t2 - twrite depends on the chip and is for most chips one second. The rtc_set_ntp_time() calculation of tsched is: tsched = t2 - 1sec - (t2 - twrite) The default for the sync offset is 500ms which means that twrite - tsched is 500ms assumed that t2 - twrite is one second. This is 0.5 seconds off for RTCs which are directly accessible by IO writes and probably for the majority of i2C/SPI based RTC off by an order of magnitude. Set it to 5ms which should bring it closer to reality. The default can be adjusted by drivers (rtc_cmos does so) and could be adjusted further by a calibration method which is an orthogonal problem. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220541.960333166@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The offset for rtc_cmos must be -500ms to work correctly with the current implementation of rtc_set_ntp_time() due to the following: tsched twrite(t2.tv_sec - 1) t2 (seconds increment) twrite - tsched is the transport time for the write to hit the device, which is negligible for this chip because it's accessed directly. t2 - twrite = 500ms according to the datasheet. But rtc_set_ntp_time() calculation of tsched is: tsched = t2 - 1sec - (t2 - twrite) The default for the sync offset is 500ms which means that the write happens at t2 - 1.5 seconds which is obviously off by a second for this device. Make the offset -500ms so it works correct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220541.830517160@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
No need to hold the lock and disable interrupts for doing math. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220541.709243630@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The MC146818 driver is prone to read garbage from the RTC. There are several issues all related to the update cycle of the MC146818. The chip increments seconds obviously once per second and indicates that by a bit in a register. The bit goes high 244us before the actual update starts. During the update the readout of the time values is undefined. The code just checks whether the update in progress bit (UIP) is set before reading the clock. If it's set it waits arbitrary 20ms before retrying, which is ample because the maximum update time is ~2ms. But this check does not guarantee that the UIP bit goes high and the actual update happens during the readout. So the following can happen 0.997 UIP = False -> Interrupt/NMI/preemption 0.998 UIP -> True 0.999 Readout <- Undefined To prevent this rework the code so it checks UIP before and after the readout and if set after the readout try again. But that's not enough to cover the following: 0.997 UIP = False Readout seconds -> NMI (or vCPU scheduled out) 0.998 UIP -> True update completes UIP -> False 1.000 Readout minutes,.... UIP check succeeds That can make the readout wrong up to 59 seconds. To prevent this, read the seconds value before the first UIP check, validate it after checking UIP and after reading out the rest. It's amazing that the original i386 code had this actually correct and the generic implementation of the MC146818 driver got it wrong in 2002 and it stayed that way until today. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220541.594826678@linutronix.de
-
- 03 Dec, 2020 14 commits
-
-
https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linuxThomas Gleixner authored
Pull clocksource/event driver updates from Daniel Lezcano: - Add static annotation for the sp804 init functions (Zhen Lei) - Code cleanups and error code path at init time fixes on the sp804 (Kefen Wang) - Add new OST timer driver device tree bindings (Zhou Yanjie) - Remove EZChip NPS clocksource driver corresponding to the NPS platform which was removed from the ARC architecture (Vineet Gupta) - Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() on error path for Orion (Yang Yingliang) - Add device tree bindings documentation for Renesas r8a774e1 (Marian-Cristian Rotariu) - Convert Renesas TMU to json-schema (Geert Uytterhoeven) - Fix memory leak on the error path at init time on the cadence_ttc driver (Yu Kuai) - Fix section mismatch for Ingenic timer driver (Daniel Lezcano) - Make RISCV_TIMER depends on RISCV_SBI (Kefeng Wang) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/028084fa-d29b-a1d5-7eab-17f77ef69863@linaro.org
-
Kefeng Wang authored
The riscv timer is set via SBI timer call, let's make RISCV_TIMER depends on RISCV_SBI, and it also fixes some build issue. Fixes: d5be89a8 ("RISC-V: Resurrect the MMIO timer implementation for M-mode systems") Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201028131230.72907-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
-
Daniel Lezcano authored
The function ingenic_tcu_get_clock() is annotated for the __init section but it is actually called from the online cpu callback. That will lead to a crash if a CPU is hotplugged after boot time. Remove the __init annotation for the ingenic_tcu_get_clock() function. Fixes: f19d838d (clocksource/drivers/ingenic: Add high resolution timer support for SMP/SMT) Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Tested-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201125102346.1816310-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
-
Yu Kuai authored
If clk_notifier_register() failed, ttc_setup_clockevent() will return without freeing 'ttcce', which will leak memory. Fixes: 70504f31 ("clocksource/drivers/cadence_ttc: Convert init function to return error") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116135123.2164033-1-yukuai3@huawei.com
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
Convert the Renesas R-Mobile/R-Car Timer Unit (TMU) Device Tree binding documentation to json-schema. Document missing properties. Update the example to match reality. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201110162014.3290109-3-geert+renesas@glider.be
-
Marian-Cristian Rotariu authored
Document RZ/G2H (R8A774E1) SoC in the Renesas TMU bindings. Signed-off-by: Marian-Cristian Rotariu <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@bp.renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201110162014.3290109-2-geert+renesas@glider.be
-
Yang Yingliang authored
After calling clk_prepare_enable(), clk_disable_unprepare() need be called on error path. Fixes: fbe4b356 ("clocksource/drivers/orion: Convert init function...") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201111064706.3397156-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
-
Vineet Gupta authored
NPS platform has been removed from ARC port and there are no in-tree users of it now. So RIP ! Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105212210.1891598-2-vgupta@synopsys.com
-
周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) authored
The new OST has one global timer and two or four percpu timers, so there will be three combinations in the upcoming new OST driver: the original GLOBAL_TIMER + PERCPU_TIMER, the new GLOBAL_TIMER + PERCPU_TIMER0/1 and GLOBAL_TIMER + PERCPU_TIMER0/1/2/3, For this, add the macro definition about OST_CLK_PERCPU_TIMER0/1/2/3. And in order to ensure that all the combinations work normally, the original ABI values of OST_CLK_PERCPU_TIMER and OST_CLK_GLOBAL_TIMER need to be exchanged to ensure that in any combinations, the clock can be registered (by calling clk_hw_register()) from index 0. Before this patch, OST_CLK_PERCPU_TIMER and OST_CLK_GLOBAL_TIMER are only used in two places, one is when using "assigned-clocks" to configure the clocks in the DTS file; the other is when registering the clocks in the sysost driver. When the values of these two ABIs are exchanged, the ABI value used by sysost driver when registering the clock, and the ABI value used by DTS when configuring the clock using "assigned-clocks" will also change accordingly. Therefore, there is no situation that causes the wrong clock to the configured. Therefore, exchanging ABI values will not cause errors in the existing codes when registering and configuring the clocks. Currently, in the mainline, only X1000 and X1830 are using sysost driver, and the upcoming X2000 will also use sysost driver. This patch has been tested on all three SoCs and all works fine. Tested-by: 周正 (Zhou Zheng) <sernia.zhou@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026155842.10196-2-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Add pr_fmt to prefix pr_<level> output. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029123317.90286-5-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
-
Kefeng Wang authored
clk_get_rate won't return negative value, correct clk_get_rate handle. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029123317.90286-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Directly use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029123317.90286-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
-
Kefeng Wang authored
drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:38:31: warning: symbol 'arm_sp804_timer' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:47:31: warning: symbol 'hisi_sp804_timer' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:120:12: warning: symbol 'sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:219:12: warning: symbol 'sp804_clockevents_init' was not declared. Should it be static? And move __initdata after the variables. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029123317.90286-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
-
Zhen Lei authored
Add static for sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init() and sp804_clockevents_init(), they are only used in timer-sp804.c now. Otherwise, the following warning will be reported: drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:68:12: warning: no previous prototype \ for 'sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:162:12: warning: no previous prototype \ for 'sp804_clockevents_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] Fixes: 975434f8 ("clocksource/drivers/sp804: Delete the leading "__" of some functions") Fixes: 65f4d7dd ("clocksource/drivers/sp804: Remove unused sp804_timer_disable() and timer-sp804.h") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201021012259.2067-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
-
- 19 Nov, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The variable tick_period is initialized to NSEC_PER_TICK / HZ during boot and never updated again. If NSEC_PER_TICK is not an integer multiple of HZ this computation is less accurate than TICK_NSEC which has proper rounding in place. Aside of the inaccuracy there is no reason for having this variable at all. It's just a pointless indirection and all usage sites can just use the TICK_NSEC constant. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.766643526@linutronix.de
-
Yunfeng Ye authored
calc_load_global() does not need the sequence count protection. [ tglx: Split it up properly and added comments ] Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.660902274@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Now that it's clear that there is always one tick to account, simplify the calculations some more. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.565663056@linutronix.de
-
Yunfeng Ye authored
If jiffies are up to date already (caller lost the race against another CPU) there is no point to change the sequence count. Doing that just forces other CPUs into the seqcount retry loop in tick_nohz_next_event() for nothing. Just bail out early. [ tglx: Rewrote most of it ] Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.462195901@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
No point in doing calculations. tick_next_period = last_jiffies_update + tick_period Just check whether now is before tick_next_period to figure out whether jiffies need an update. Add a comment why the intentional data race in the quick check is safe or not so safe in a 32bit corner case and why we don't worry about it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.337366695@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The protection rules for tick_next_period and last_jiffies_update are blury at best. Clarify this. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.197713794@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot() accesses tick_next_period twice without any serialization. This is wrong in two aspects: - Reading it twice might make the broadcast data inconsistent if the variable is updated concurrently. - On 32bit systems the access might see an partial update Protect it with jiffies_lock. That's safe as none of the callchains leading up to this function can create a lock ordering violation: timer interrupt run_local_timers() hrtimer_run_queues() hrtimer_switch_to_hres() tick_init_highres() tick_switch_to_oneshot() tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot() or tick_check_oneshot_change() tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() tick_switch_to_oneshot() tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot() Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.061341507@linutronix.de
-
- 16 Nov, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
The hrtimer_get_remaining() markup is documenting, instead, __hrtimer_get_remaining(), as it is placed at the C file. In order to properly document it, a kernel-doc markup is needed together with the function prototype. So, add a new one, while preserving the existing one, just fixing the function name. The hrtimer_is_queued prototype has a typo: it is using '=' instead of '-' to split: identifier - description as required by kernel-doc markup. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dc87808c2fd07b7e050bafcd033c5ef05808fea.1605521731.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
No users outside of the timer code. Move the caller below this function to avoid a pointless forward declaration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 15 Nov, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Alex Shi authored
The kernel-doc parser complains: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1543: warning: Function parameter or member 'ts' not described in 'read_persistent_clock64' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:764: warning: Function parameter or member 'tk' not described in 'timekeeping_forward_now' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1331: warning: Function parameter or member 'ts' not described in 'timekeeping_inject_offset' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1331: warning: Excess function parameter 'tv' description in 'timekeeping_inject_offset' Add the missing parameter documentations and rename the 'tv' parameter of timekeeping_inject_offset() to 'ts' so it matches the implemention. [ tglx: Reworded a few docs and massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Alex Shi authored
Address the following kernel-doc markup warnings: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1563: warning: Function parameter or member 'wall_time' not described in 'read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1563: warning: Function parameter or member 'boot_offset' not described in 'read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset' The parameters are described but miss the leading '@' and the colon after the parameter names. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-6-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Alex Shi authored
The kernel-doc parser complains about: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:651: warning: Function parameter or member 'nb' not described in 'pvclock_gtod_register_notifier' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:670: warning: Function parameter or member 'nb' not described in 'pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier' Add the missing parameter explanations. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Alex reported the following warning: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:464: warning: Function parameter or member 'tkf' not described in '__ktime_get_fast_ns' which is not entirely correct because the documented function is ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() which does not have a parameter, but the kernel-doc parser looks at the function declaration which follows the comment and complains about the missing parameter documentation. Aside of that the documentation for the rest of the NMI safe accessors is either incomplete or missing. - Move the function documentation to the right place - Fixup the references and inconsistencies - Add the missing documentation for ktime_get_raw_fast_ns() Reported-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
Alex Shi authored
Address the following warning: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:415: warning: Function parameter or member 'tkf' not described in 'update_fast_timekeeper' [ tglx: Remove the bogus ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() part ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Alex Shi authored
Various static functions in the timekeeping code have function comments which pretend to be kernel-doc, but are incomplete and trigger parser warnings. As these functions are local to the timekeeping core code there is no need to expose them via kernel-doc. Remove the double star kernel-doc marker and remove excess newlines. [ tglx: Massaged changelog and removed excess newlines ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-4-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Alex Shi authored
Address these kernel-doc warnings: kernel/time/timeconv.c:79: warning: Function parameter or member 'totalsecs' not described in 'time64_to_tm' kernel/time/timeconv.c:79: warning: Function parameter or member 'offset' not described in 'time64_to_tm' kernel/time/timeconv.c:79: warning: Function parameter or member 'result' not described in 'time64_to_tm' The parameters are described but lack colons after the parameter name. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605252275-63652-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
PREEMPT_RT does not spin and wait until a running timer completes its callback but instead it blocks on a sleeping lock to prevent a livelock in the case that the task waiting for the callback completion preempted the callback. This cannot be done for timers flagged with TIMER_IRQSAFE. These timers can be canceled from an interrupt disabled context even on RT kernels. The expiry callback of such timers is invoked with interrupts disabled so there is no need to use the expiry lock mechanism because obviously the callback cannot be preempted even on RT kernels. Do not use the timer_base::expiry_lock mechanism when waiting for a running callback to complete if the timer is flagged with TIMER_IRQSAFE. Also add a lockdep assertion for RT kernels to validate that the expiry lock mechanism is always invoked in preemptible context. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201103190937.hga67rqhvknki3tp@linutronix.de
-