- 24 Nov, 2014 3 commits
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This converts the vibrator protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync, removing the hand-rolled version of the same function, as well as removing an open-coded version for a request when turning on the vibrator motor. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This converts the battery protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync, removing the hand-rolled version of the same function. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
Everyone keeps doing the same create/send/destroy logic all over the place, so abstract that out to a simple function that can handle any arbritrary request and/or response. This will let us save lots of duplicated logic in the protocol drivers. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
-
- 22 Nov, 2014 9 commits
-
-
Alex Elder authored
The only time we need a completion signaled on a request is when the request provided no callback function. In that case, we wait for a completion on behalf of the caller. If an interrupt occurs, we attempt to cancel the message that's been sent, but we don't actually complete the operation as required. Instead of simply waiting for the completion, put in place a special callback function for the synchronous operation. The only job the callback has is to signal completion, allowing the waiter to know it's done. This means gb_operation_complete() will always have a non-null callback pointer, so it becomes a simple wrapper, and we can get rid of it and invoke the callback directly, in gb_operation_work(). Be defensive by checking for a null callback pointer, and reset it to NULL once it's been called. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
When a caller wants an operation to complete synchronously, there is generally no need for any other threads to wait for the operation's completion. So here's no need for gb_operation_wait() to be available for synchronous requests. At the moment, all operations are done synchronously. Knowing that, get rid of the public gb_operation_wait() function, and open-code it in gb_operation_request_send(). The public wait function can be re-implemented when it's really needed. With that function gone, the only waiter for the completion of an operation is the submitter itself, and only then if it's synchronous. So rather than complete_all(), we can simply use complete() to signal the submitter. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Cancel the operation--not just the request message--if waiting for a synchronous operation to complete is interrupted. Return the operation result (which in that case will be -EINTR). The cancelation will result in the normal operation completion path being taken before returning. Make gb_operation_wait() private, since it's only ever used for for synchronous operations. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
If an operation times out, we need to cancel whatever message it has in-flight. Do that instead of completing the operation, in the timeout handler. When the in-flight request message is canceled its completion function will lead to the proper completion of the operation. Change gb_operation_cancel() so it takes the errno that it's supposed to assign as the result of the operation. Note that we want to preserve the original -ETIMEDOUT error, so don't overwrite the operation result value if it has already been set. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Any time we queue work on the operation work queue we need to have set the operation errno first. This patch moves the assignment of that field to be immediately prior to the queue_work() call in gb_connection_recv_response(), so it is easier to see at a glance that this has been done. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Grab an extra reference to an operation before sending it. Drop that reference at the end of its completion handling. It turns out gb_operation_get() got deleted along the way, so this re-introduces it. We're assuming we only get a reference when there's at least one in existence so we don't need a semaphore to protect it. Emphasize this by *not* returning a pointer to the referenced operation. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
The data sent callback can execute in atomic context. If an error occurred, we shouldn't be completing the operation right then and there. Instead, hand it off to the operation workqueue to complete the operation. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Change the operation "receive workqueue" to be just the operation "workqueue". All it does is complete an operation in non-atomic context. This is all that's required for an outgoing request. Similarly, ignore any notion that a response will only exist for outgoing requests in gb_operation_cancel(). I'm doing this in the interest of getting the outgoing request path verified without the encumbrance of any preconceptions about how incoming requests need to work. When I finally turn my full attenion to incoming requests I'll adapt the code as needed. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
An in-core operation structure tracks the progress of an operation. Currently it holds a result field that was intended to take the status value that arrives in an operation response message header. But operations can fail for reasons other than that, and it's inconvenient to try to represent those using the operation status codes. So change the operation->result field to be an int, and switch to storing negative errno values in it. Rename it "errno" to make it obvious how to interpret the value. This patch makes another change, which simplifies the protocol drivers a lot. It's being done as part of this patch because it affects all the same code as the above change does. If desired I can split this into two separate patches. If a caller makes a synchronous gb_operation_request_send() request (i.e., no callback function is supplied), and the operation request and response messages were transferred successfully, have gb_operation_request_send() return the result of the request (i.e., operation->errno). This allows the caller (or more generally, any caller of gb_request_wait() to avoid having to look at this field for every successful send. Any caller that does an asynchronous request will of course need to look at request->errno in the callback function to see the result of the operation. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
- 21 Nov, 2014 10 commits
-
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
This function is associated with a host device (interface), not a CPort. Change its name to reflect that, and to match its "sent" callback counterpart. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Define greybus_data_sent(), which is a callback the host driver makes when a buffer send request has completed. The main use for this is to actively detect errors that can occur while sending. (Something like this existed at one time and was removed.) This also defines gb_hd_message_find(), which looks up a message pointer associated with a buffer sent over a given host device. This is now a pretty trival mapping. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Embed the buffer for message data into the message structure itself. This allows us to use a single allocation for each message, and more importantly will allow us to derive the message structure describing a message from the buffer itself. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Have an operation's request and response messages be dynamically allocated rather than embedded in an operation. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
The beginning of an operation message always contains the message header. Rename the "buffer" field in an operation message to be "header" to reflect this. Change its type as well. The size of a message is the combined size of its header and its payload. Rename the "buffer_size" field in a message header to be simply "size", so message->size describes exactly that. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Rather than having the host driver allocate the buffers that the Greybus core uses to hold its data for sending or receiving, have the host driver define what it requires those buffers to look like. Two constraints define what the host driver requires: the maximum number of bytes that the host device can send in a single request; and a statement of the "headroom" that needs to be present for use by the host device. The direct description of the headroom is that it's the extra byte the host device needs at the beginning of the "data" portion of the buffer so the ES1 driver can insert the destination CPort id. But more generally, the host driver could put other data in there as well. By stating these two parameters, Greybus can allocate the buffers it uses by itself. The host driver still allocates the buffers it uses for receiving data--the content of those are copied as needed into Greybus buffers when data arrives. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
If a response arrives for an operation request and the allotted buffer isn't big enough we report the error, but we don't finish processing the response. Instead, set the operation result, but then finish processing the response (no different from any other operation error). This will allow the normal completion handling to occur for this error case. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Whenever we send a request message we start a timer to ensure the we don't wait too long for the matching response to arrive. Currently we set up the timeout *after* sending the message, but that is subject to a race--the response could arrive (and the timeout prematurely disabled) before the timeout is even set up. Set up the timeout before sending the message. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
One structure, gb_gpio_activate_response, was not deleted even though it now has no contents. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
- 20 Nov, 2014 12 commits
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
In an attempt to turn on as many options as we can to catch warnings early, let's enable -Wall. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This was a compiler warning, which looked correct, but was trying to tell us something else... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
This is a pervasive change, but not really a big one. However: ============== Pay attention to this ============== If you're doing any testing with "gbsim" you need to update that program in sync with this change, because it changes the protocol used between them. ============== Pay attention to this ============== The status of a request is now recorded in the header of a response message. The previous patch put that header status byte in place, and this one removes the status byte from all the response messages. And finally, since we're modifying all these files anyway... Use gb_operation_status_map() to come up with a return code to use, given an operation response. Right now most errors simply result in -EIO getting returned. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Define a common function that maps an operation status value to a Linux negative errno. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Define a result byte in an operation response message header. All the protocols now define the mandatory status as the first byte in their response message. Assume that, for the moment, and save that value into the header result field (until we can get the simulator set up to handle the new protocol). Record the result from the response header as the result of the overall operation. Start enforcing the rule that we ignore all response payload (in fact, the entire message) if we see a non-zero result value. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
When we remove the mandatory status byte from response messages we will no longer be able to use a zero-sized response to indicate an operation is to be used for an incoming request. Define a new function gb_operation_create_incoming() to be used for incoming operations. Change (and rename) gb_operation_create() to be a helper that takes a Boolean to indicate which type is to be created, and use a simple wrapper to expose the outgoing operation creation routine. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
In "uart-gb.c", request_operation() function is only used by get_version(). Since it's not reused, it probably subtracts rather than adds value. So just incorporate what it does into get_version() and get rid of request_operation(). Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This hooks up throttle/unthrottle to properly toggle the RTS line or do XON/XOFF if that is how the port is set up. Note, if the UART itself can handle XON/XOFF, we would need to send the correct character down to it, to have the firmware in the device set up the chip to use it automatically when needed. The odds of someone wanting to use this type of flow control is slim, so this isn't implemented at this point in time. Also fill in a few more fields in the get_serial_info ioctl, to make tools like stty(1) happier. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
And this fixes a problem similar the last two, this time found in the vibrator protcool driver code. Change a variable name in get_version() to reflect that it holds a response message, not a request message. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
This fixes a problem similar to what was found in the battery protcool driver code. There's no need to allocate a local buffer, that already set up by gb_operation_create(). Just use that instead. Change a few variable names to reflect that they hold response messages, not request messages. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
This patch fixes some problems with the battery protocol driver. First, when gb_operation_create() is called, it creates buffers of the requested sizes to hold the operation request and response messages. There is therefore no reason to allocate a local response buffer. By the time the (synchronous) gb_operation_request_send() call returns, the operation response buffer will have been filled in. (In addition, the content of local_response was not being filled before its contents were used...) Next, all the message structures are misnamed. The structures that are defined are all the content of operation response messages (not request messages). So this changes all the types names to properly reflect their role. All the local variables using these types are similarly renamed. I added a new type, gb_generic_battery_response, to be used for casting the fake_response used in battery_operation(). Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
- 19 Nov, 2014 6 commits
-
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Define two helper functions to break down handling of a received message. One is used to handle receiving an incoming request message, the other for a response message. Three other changes are made: - We verify message size recorded in the message header does not exceed the amount of data that's arriving. - We no longer warn if a request' recorded message size differs from the number of bytes that have arrived. - We now record the operation id for an incoming request. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
A message header contains a field "id" that is an operation id. Since the field doesn't identify the message itself, rename this field so it's clearer what it's referring to. Similarly gb_pending_operation_find() has a parameter "id" that is really an operation id, so rename that as well. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
We (sort of) maintain the status of each message, but we shouldn't need to. Right now we're not using it consistently in any case. If a message fails to send, the caller will know to destroy the operation that contained it. If a message has been sent (i.e., handed to the host device layer) it'll have a non-null cookie pointer. If a does complete in error, we can update the status of the operation that contains it. That isn't happening right now but it will soon. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
The only use of local variable "es1" in in svc_in_callback() and cport_in_callback() is to get at its hd field. But we already have that, so we can get rid of that local variable. Also, rename the "cport" variable "cport_id" in cport_in_callback() is to match the convention used elsewhere, and make it the proper u16 type. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
Alex Elder authored
Use simple macros to mark the conversion of an URB pointer into an opaque cookie value (and vice-versa). We scramble some bits, but the main point is to make it explicit where we're returning and using opaque values. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-