Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

It, debugfs_create_dir() and debugfs_create_link() use the common helper
now.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

same as for nfs et.al.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

a) ->d_iput() is wrong here - what we do to inode is completely usual, it's
dentry->d_fsdata that we want to drop.  Just use ->d_release().

b) switch to ->s_d_op - no need to play with d_set_d_op()
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

all callers want the same thing, actually - a kinda-sorta analog of
kern_path_create().  I.e. they want parent vfsmount/dentry (with
->i_mutex held, to make sure the child dentry is still their child)
+ the child dentry.

Signed-off-by Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Since commit 197e37d9, the banner comment on lookup_open() no longer matches
what the function returns.  It used to return a struct file pointer or NULL and
now it returns an integer and is passed the struct file pointer it is to use
amongst its arguments.  Update the comment to reflect this.

Also add a banner comment to atomic_open().
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

all we want is a boolean flag, same as the method gets now
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument.  And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

just the flags...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

since the method wrapped by it doesn't need that anymore...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just the lookup flags.  Die, bastard, die...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

just pass the flags
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... and get rid of a couple of arguments and a pointless reassignment
in finish_open() case.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

namely, 1 ;-)  That's what we want to return from ->atomic_open()
instances after finish_no_open().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Same conventions as for ->atomic_open().  Trimmed the
forest of labels a bit, while we are at it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just pass struct file *.  Methods are happier that way...
There's no need to return struct file * from finish_open() now,
so let it return int.  Next: saner prototypes for parts in
namei.c
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

->filp->f_path is there for purpose...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Change of calling conventions:
old		new
NULL		1
file		0
ERR_PTR(-ve)	-ve

Caller *knows* that struct file *; no need to return it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

make put_filp() conditional on flag set by finish_open()
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... and let finish_open() report having opened the file via that sucker.
Next step: don't modify od->filp at all.

[AV: FILE_CREATE was already used by cifs; Miklos' fix folded]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Perform open_check_o_direct() in a common place in do_last after opening the
file.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Move the lookup retry logic to the bottom of the function to make the normal
case simpler to read.
Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Consistently use bool for boolean values in do_last().
Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

All users of open intents have been converted to use ->atomic_{open,create}.

This patch gets rid of nd->intent.open and related infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic open+create
operation implemented via ->create.  No functionality is changed.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic lookup+open+create
operation implemented via ->lookup and ->create operations.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

What was the purpose of this?
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic lookup+open+create
operation implemented via ->lookup and ->create operations.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic open+create
operation implemented via ->create.  No functionality is changed.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

is_atomic_open() is now only used by nfs4_lookup_revalidate() to check whether
it's okay to skip normal revalidation.

It does a racy check for mount read-onlyness and falls back to normal
revalidation if the open would fail.  This makes little sense now that this
function isn't used for determining whether to actually open the file or not.

The d_mountpoint() check still makes sense since it is an indication that we
might be following a mount and so open may not revalidate the dentry.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>