This feature is not actually MA1-specific, so get rid of the `MA1' in
the name.

Some updated copyright noticed and an unnecessary variable deleted.

This updates the v850 Kconfig and kernel/Makefile to reflect preceding
changes.

This patch adds support for the `sim85e2s' simulation of the NA85E2S
processor implementation.  As part of this, cache-flushing support for
the common v850e2 cache implementation is added.

It also cleans up a bunch of code that was duplicated between different
v850e2 processors.

This adds a port to the V850E/ME2 processor, and the `SolutionGear mini'
RTE-V850E/ME2-CB evaluation board.

This allows ports that support the v850 RTE-CB `GBUS' interrupts to use
both them and processor-board-specific interrupts at the same time.

(1) Add support for the V850E/ME2 processor

(2) Clean up the cache-flushing function naming a bit

(3) Similar to previous patches, rename everything from `nb85e' to `v850e'.
    This patch renames some files, and so contains a number of whole-file
    add/removes.

The v850 family contains several related-but-not-identical on-chip
UARTs.  This patch factors out the common code and uses it to implement
both types (only one was supported before).

Also, this patch changes the way the v850 UART is initialized, to use
the same method as other linux serial drivers.

This patch renames the UART code to be `v850e_uart' rather than
`nb85e_uart', as the former is more correct.  As this change renames
some files too, the patch contains a number of whole-file add/removes.

The term `nb85e' is incorrect (caused by my confusion when starting the
v850 port), so this renames all occurances to `v850e'.

Because this change renames some files too, it contains a number of
whole-file add/removes.

(Jean-Christoph Vaugeois, Matthieu Delahaye,Helge Deller, Alex deVries)

(Ladislav Michl)

(I've got a patch pending from someone to redo the lot using memset so
its safe from padding suprises)

(Francois Romieu)

(Steven Cole)

(Overzealous C&P of Red Hat license template 8))

(Stephan Maciej)

(Frank Cusack)

(Jamie Hicks)

(Vita Samel)

maybe the set function should return the old value instead ?

(Taral)

For 2.4.x we made the file r-------- but for 2.6 we can do a nicer job

C doesn't define >> by 32 for 32bit systems, and on some gcc leaves
you with the original value...

Also apply the right fix to the yenta hang problem