While running xfstests I ran into the following:

[20892.242791] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[20892.243776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[20892.245874] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[20892.247329] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse$
[20892.258488] CPU: 0 PID: 13299 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[20892.262011] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[20892.264738]  0000000000000009 ffff880427f8bc18 ffffffff8142fa46 ffffffff8108b6a2
[20892.266244]  ffff880427f8bc68 ffff880427f8bc58 ffffffff81045ea5 ffff880427f8bc48
[20892.267761]  ffffffffa0509a6d 00000000fffffffe ffff8803545d6f40 ffffffffa05a15a0
[20892.269378] Call Trace:
[20892.269915]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[20892.271097]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[20892.272173]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[20892.273386]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.274857]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[20892.275851]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.277341]  [<ffffffffa0515e10>] write_one_cache_group+0x68/0xaf [btrfs]
[20892.278628]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
[20892.280191]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
[20892.281781]  [<ffffffff8107d33d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[20892.282873]  [<ffffffffa054163b>] btrfs_sync_file+0x313/0x387 [btrfs]
[20892.284111]  [<ffffffff8117acad>] vfs_fsync_range+0x95/0xa4
[20892.285203]  [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[20892.286290]  [<ffffffff8123960b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[20892.287469]  [<ffffffff8117acd8>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
[20892.288412]  [<ffffffff8117ae54>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e
[20892.289348]  [<ffffffff8117b07c>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
[20892.290255]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[20892.291316] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245373 ]---
[20892.293955] BTRFS: error (device sdg) in write_one_cache_group:3184: errno=-2 No such entry
[20892.297390] BTRFS info (device sdg): forced readonly

This happens because in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups() we splice the
transaction's list of dirty block groups into a local list and then we
keep extracting the first element of the list without holding the
cache_write_mutex mutex. This means that before we acquire that mutex
the first block group on the list might be removed by a conurrent task
running btrfs_remove_block_group(). So make sure we extract the first
element (and test the list emptyness) while holding that mutex.

Fixes: 1bbc621e ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout
                      outside critical section in commit")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

__btrfs_write_out_cache is holding the ctl->tree_lock while it prepares
a list of bitmaps to record in the free space cache.  It was dropping
the lock while it worked on other components, which made a window for
free_bitmap() to free the bitmap struct without removing it from the
list.

This changes things to hold the lock the whole time, and also makes sure
we hold the lock during enospc cleanup.
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The code to fix stalls during free spache cache IO wasn't using
the correct root when waiting on the IO for inode caches.  This
is only a problem when the inode cache is enabled with

mount -o inode_cache

This fixes the inode cache writeout to preserve any error values and
makes sure not to override the root when inode cache writeout is done.
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Previous patch modified the in memory struct but it's not written in
quota tree until next commit.
So user will still get old data using "btrfs qgroup show" after
assign/remove.

This patch will call btrfs_run_qgroups in assign ioctl so it will be
updated to in memory quota trees and user will get up-to-date results.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs: quota: Automatically update related qgroups or mark INCONSISTENT flags when assigning/deleting a qgroup relations.

Operation like qgroups assigning/deleting qgroup relations will mostly
cause qgroup data inconsistent, since it needs to do the full rescan to
determine whether shared extents are exclusive or still shared in
parent qgroups.

But there are some exceptions, like qgroup with only exclusive extents
(qgroup->excl == qgroup->rfer), in that case, we only needs to
modify all its parents' excl and rfer.

So this patch adds a quick path for such qgroup in qgroup
assign/remove routine, and if quick path failed, the qgroup status will
be marked INCONSISTENT, and return 1 to info user-land.

BTW since the quick path is much the same of qgroup_excl_accounting(),
so move the core of it to __qgroup_excl_accounting() and reuse it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

we forgot to clear STATUS_FLAG_ON in quota_disable(), it
will cause a problem shown as below:

	# mount /dev/sdc /mnt
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs quota disable /mnt
	# btrfs quota rescan /mnt
	quota rescan started <--- expecting it fail here.
	# echo $?
	0
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Update qgroup status when rescan is done.

Before this patch, status item is not updated on rescan finish, which
causing the RESCAN and INCONSISTENT flags never cleared.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old qgroup_rescan_leaf() comment indicates ret == 2 as complete and
cleared INCONSISTENT flag.

This is not true since it will never return 2, and inside it no codes
will clear INCONSISTENT flag.
The flag clearance is done in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_work().
This caused the bug that INCONSISTENT flag is never cleared.

So change the comment and fix the dead judgment.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Btrfs will create qgroup on subvolume creation if quota is enabled, but
qgroup uses the high bits(currently 16 bits) as level, to build the
inheritance.

However it is fully possible a subvolume can be created with a
subvolumeid larger than 1 << BTRFS_QGROUP_LEVEL_SHIFT, so it will be
considered as level 1 and can't be assigned to other qgroup in level 1.

This patch will prevent such things so qgroup inheritance will not be
screwed up.
The downside is very clear, btrfs subvolume number limit will decrease
from (u64 max - 256(fisrt free objectid) - 256(last free objectid)) to
(u48 max -256(first free objectid)).
But we still have near u48(that's 15 digits in dec), so that should not
be a huge problem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Although we have qgroup level check in btrfs-progs, it's not enough
since other programe may still call ioctl directly not using
btrfs-progs. For example, systemd.

But it's btrfs-progs to be blame since we don't provide a
full-function(like subvolume create things) btrfs library with enough
check, and only rely on kernel ioctl.

So Add level checks in kernel too.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When a qgroup has parents but no child, it should be removable in
Theory I think. But currently, we can not remove it when it has
either parent or child.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup create 1/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup create 2/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup assign 1/0 2/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer  excl  max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----  ----  -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      16384 16384 0        0        ---     ---
1/0      0     0     0        0        2/0     ---
2/0      0     0     0        0        ---     1/0

At this time, there is no subvol or qgroup depending on it.
Just a qgroup 2/0 is its parent, but 2/0 can work well without
1/0. So I think 1/0 should be removalbe. But:
	# btrfs qgroup destroy 1/0 /mnt
ERROR: unable to destroy quota group: Device or resource busy

This patch remove the check of qgroup->parent in removing it,
then we can remove a qgroup when it has a parent.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we create a subvol inheriting a qgroup, we need to check the level
of them. Otherwise, there is a chance a qgroup can inherit another qgroup
at the same level.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

There are two problems in qgroup:

a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.

b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.

The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.

In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currenly, in data writing, ->reserved is accounted in
fill_delalloc(), but ->may_use is released in clear_bit_hook()
which is called by btrfs_finish_ordered_io(). That's too late,
that said, between fill_delalloc() and btrfs_finish_ordered_io(),
the data is doublely accounted by qgroup. It will cause some
unexpected -EDQUOT.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /root/btrfs-auto-test/
	# btrfs subvolume create /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
	Create subvolume '/root/btrfs-auto-test/sub'
	# btrfs qgroup limit 1G /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file bs=1024 count=1500000
	dd: error writing '/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file': Disk quota exceeded
	681353+0 records in
	681352+0 records out
	697704448 bytes (698 MB) copied, 8.15563 s, 85.5 MB/s
It's (698 MB) when we got an -EDQUOT, but we limit it by 1G.

This patch move the btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() for data from
btrfs_delalloc_reserve/release_metadata() to btrfs_check_data_free_space()
and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Then the accounter in qgroup
will be updated at the same time with the accounter in space_info updated.
In this way, the unexpected -EDQUOT will be killed.
Reported-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, for pre_alloc or delay_alloc, the bytes will be accounted
in space_info by the three guys.
space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
But on the other hand, in qgroup, there are only two counters to account the
bytes, qgroup->reserved and qgroup->excl. And qg->reserved accounts
bytes in space_info->bytes_may_use and qg->excl accounts bytes in
space_info->used. So the bytes in space_info->reserved is not accounted
in qgroup. If so, there is a window we can exceed the quota limit when
bytes is in space_info->reserved.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
	# sync
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer     excl     max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----     ----     -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      20987904 20987904 0        10485760 ---     ---

qg->excl is 20987904 larger than max_excl 10485760.

This patch introduce a new counter named may_use to qgroup, then
there are three counters in qgroup to account bytes in space_info
as below.
space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
qgroup->may_use           --- qgroup->reserved     --- qgroup->excl

With this patch applied:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
fallocate: /mnt/data9: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data10: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data11: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data12: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data13: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data14: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data15: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data16: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data17: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data18: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data19: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
	# sync
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer    excl    max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----    ----    -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      9453568 9453568 0        10485760 ---     ---
Reported-by: Cyril SCETBON <cyril.scetbon@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we exceed quota limit in writing, we will free
some reserved extent when we need to drop but not free
account in qgroup. It means, each time we exceed quota
in writing, there will be some remain space in qg->reserved
we can not use any more. If things go on like this, the
all space will be ate up.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_limit_group use arg limit to override the old qgroup_limit of
corresponding qgroup. However, we should override part of old qgroup_limit
according to the bit which has been set in arg limit.
Signed-off-by: Fan Chengniang <fancn.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we commit_transaction(), qgroups in btree should be updated.
But, limit info is not considered currently. It will cause a problem
when a qgroup of a snapshot inherit the limit info from srcqgroup,
then there is an inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Cleanup: Change the parameter of update_qgroup_limit_item() to the family of
update_qgroup_xxx_item().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we call btrfs_qgroup_inherit() with BTRFS_QGROUP_INHERIT_SET_LIMITS,
btrfs will update the limit info of qgroup in btree but forget to update
the qgroup in rbtree at the same time. It obviousely will cause an inconsistency.

This patch fix it by updating the rbtree at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, when we snapshot a subvol, snapshot will not copy the limits
from srcqgroup.

This patch make the qgroup in snapshot inherit the limit info when create
a snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Reproduce:
 while true; do
   dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file count=[75% fs_size]
   rm /mnt/btrfs/file
 done
 Then we can see above loop failed on NO_SPACE.

It it long-term problem since very beginning, because delayed-iput
after rm are not run.

We already have commit_transaction() in alloc_space code, but it is
not triggered in above case.
This patch trigger commit_transaction() to run delayed-iput and
reflash pinned-space to to make write success.

It is based on previous fix of delayed-iput in commit_transaction(),
need to be applied on top of:
btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Steps to reproduce:
  while true; do
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%]
    rm /btrfs_dir/file
    sync
  done

  And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE.

Reason:
  Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't
  done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs
  from list before, but do iput() after next write.

  This is log:
  [ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin

  [ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  [ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  [ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end

  [ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin
  [ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28

  [ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888
  [ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512
  ...
  [ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496
  [ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end

Fix:
  Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's
  delayed-iputs() done in end.

Test:
  Use script similar to above(more complex),
  before patch:
    7 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
  after patch:
    0 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

space_info's value calculation is some complex and easy to cause
bug, add WARN_ON() to help debug.

Changelog v1->v2:
 Put WARN_ON()s under the ENOSPC_DEBUG mount option.
 Suggested by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Bug1:
  space_info->bytes_readonly was set to very large(negative) value in
  btrfs_remove_block_group().

Reason:
  Current code set block_group_cache->pinned = 0 in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(),
  but above space was not counted to space_info->bytes_readonly.

  Then in btrfs_remove_block_group():
    block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly -= block_group->key.offset;
  We can see following value in trace:
    btrfs_remove_block_group: pid=2677 comm=btrfs-cleaner WARNING: bytes_readonly=12582912, key.offset=134217728

Bug2:
  space_info->total_bytes_pinned grow to value larger than fs size.
  In a 1.2G fs, we can get following trace log:
  at first:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2710 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 869793792 + 95944704 = 965738496
  after some op:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2770 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 1780178944 + 95944704 = 1876123648
  after some op:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=3193 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 2924568576 + 95551488 = 3020120064
  ...

Reason:
  Similar to bug1, we also need to adjust space_info->total_bytes_pinned
  in above code block.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we have any chance to make a successful write, we should not give up.

This patch adjust commit-transaction condition from:
  pinned >= wanted
to
  left + pinned >= wanted
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It is another reason for NO_SPACE case.

When we found enough free space in loop and saved them to
max_hole_start/size before, and tail space contains pending extent,
origional innocent max_hole_start/size are reset in retry.

As a result, find_free_dev_extent() returns less space than it can,
and cause NO_SPACE in user program.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old code bypass commit transaction when we don't have enough
pinned space, but another case is there exist freed bgs in current
transction, it have possibility to make alloc_chunk success.

This patch modify the condition to:
if (have_free_bg || have_pinned_space) commit_transaction()

Confirmed above action by printk before and after patch.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Commit 0d97a64e0 creates a new variable but doesn't always set it up.
This puts it back to the original method (key.offset + 1) for the cases
not covered by Filipe's new logic.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
following warning:

[ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
[ 3914.638636]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3914.639620]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3914.640789]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.642041]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3914.643236]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.644441]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3914.645711]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3914.646914]  [<ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3914.648058]  [<ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3914.650105]  [<ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
[ 3914.651361]  [<ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 3914.652761]  [<ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
[ 3914.654128]  [<ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[ 3914.655320]  [<ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---

This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
keeps dumping the following warning over and over:

[ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
[ 3915.137913]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3915.139154]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3915.140316]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.141505]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3915.142709]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.143849]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3915.145120]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 3915.146352]  [<ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 3915.147565]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3915.148785]  [<ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3915.149931]  [<ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
[ 3915.151154]  [<ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 3915.152094]  [<ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
[ 3915.153081]  [<ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
[ 3915.154062]  [<ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
[ 3915.155193]  [<ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 3915.156274]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---

So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
(same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).

This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
made for fstests:

  mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
  mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT

  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
  umount $SCRATCH_MNT

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we pass a length of 0 to the extent_same ioctl, we end up locking an
extent range with a start offset greater then its end offset (if the
destination file's offset is greater than zero). This results in a warning
from extent_io.c:insert_state through the following call chain:

  btrfs_extent_same()
    btrfs_double_lock()
      lock_extent_range()
        lock_extent(inode->io_tree, offset, offset + len - 1)
          lock_extent_bits()
            __set_extent_bit()
              insert_state()
                --> WARN_ON(end < start)

This leads to an infinite loop when evicting the inode. This is the same
problem that my previous patch titled
"Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" addressed
but for the extent_same ioctl instead of the clone ioctl.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While searching for extents to clone we might find one where we only use
a part of it coming from its tail. If our destination inode is the same
the source inode, we end up removing the tail part of the extent item and
insert after a new one that point to the same extent with an adjusted
key file offset and data offset. After this we search for the next extent
item in the fs/subvol tree with a key that has an offset incremented by
one. But this second search leaves us at the new extent item we inserted
previously, and since that extent item has a non-zero data offset, it
it can make us call btrfs_drop_extents with an empty range (start == end)
which causes the following warning:

[23978.537119] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 16251 at fs/btrfs/file.c:550 btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]()
(...)
[23978.557266] Call Trace:
[23978.557978]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[23978.559191]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[23978.560699]  [<ffffffffa047f0ea>] ? btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]
[23978.562389]  [<ffffffff8104544d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[23978.563613]  [<ffffffffa047f0ea>] btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]
[23978.565103]  [<ffffffff810e3a18>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x15/0x28
[23978.566294]  [<ffffffff81079ff8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[23978.567438]  [<ffffffffa047f73d>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x6b/0x9e1 [btrfs]
[23978.568702]  [<ffffffff8107c03f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[23978.569763]  [<ffffffff811441c0>] ? ____cache_alloc+0x69/0x2eb
[23978.570817]  [<ffffffff81142269>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x36
[23978.571872]  [<ffffffff81143c15>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.42+0x16c/0x1cb
[23978.573466]  [<ffffffff811420d5>] ? kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.52+0x16/0x18
[23978.574962]  [<ffffffffa0480d07>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x66/0x7f [btrfs]
[23978.576179]  [<ffffffffa049aa35>] btrfs_clone+0x516/0xaf5 [btrfs]
[23978.577311]  [<ffffffffa04983dc>] ? lock_extent_range+0x7b/0xcd [btrfs]
[23978.578520]  [<ffffffffa049b2a2>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x28e/0x39f [btrfs]
[23978.580282]  [<ffffffffa049d9ae>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x219a [btrfs]
(...)
[23978.591887] ---[ end trace 988ec2a653d03ed3 ]---

Then we attempt to insert a new extent item with a key that already
exists, which makes btrfs_insert_empty_item return -EEXIST resulting in
abortion of the current transaction:

[23978.594355] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 16251 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
(...)
[23978.622589] Call Trace:
[23978.623181]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[23978.624359]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[23978.625573]  [<ffffffffa044ab6c>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[23978.626971]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[23978.628003]  [<ffffffff8108a6c8>] ? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x1f
[23978.629138]  [<ffffffffa044ab6c>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[23978.630528]  [<ffffffffa049ad1b>] btrfs_clone+0x7fc/0xaf5 [btrfs]
[23978.631635]  [<ffffffffa04983dc>] ? lock_extent_range+0x7b/0xcd [btrfs]
[23978.632886]  [<ffffffffa049b2a2>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x28e/0x39f [btrfs]
[23978.634119]  [<ffffffffa049d9ae>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x219a [btrfs]
(...)
[23978.647714] ---[ end trace 988ec2a653d03ed4 ]---

This is wrong because we should not process the extent item that we just
inserted previously, and instead process the extent item that follows it
in the tree

For example for the test case I wrote for fstests:

   bs=$((64 * 1024))
   mkfs.btrfs -f -l $bs -O ^no-holes /dev/sdc
   mount /dev/sdc /mnt

   xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa $(($bs * 2)) $(($bs * 2))" /mnt/foo

   $CLONER_PROG -s $((3 * $bs)) -d $((267 * $bs)) -l 0 /mnt/foo /mnt/foo
   $CLONER_PROG -s $((217 * $bs)) -d $((95 * $bs)) -l 0 /mnt/foo /mnt/foo

The second clone call fails with -EEXIST, because when we process the
first extent item (offset 262144), we drop part of it (counting from the
end) and then insert a new extent item with a key greater then the key we
found. The next time we search the tree we search for a key with offset
262144 + 1, which leaves us at the new extent item we have just inserted
but we think it refers to an extent that we need to clone.

Fix this by ensuring the next search key uses an offset corresponding to
the offset of the key we found previously plus the data length of the
corresponding extent item. This ensures we skip new extent items that we
inserted and works for the case of implicit holes too (NO_HOLES feature).

A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Near the end of close_ctree, we're calling btrfs_free_block_rsv
to free up the orphan rsv.  The problem is this call updates the
space_info, which has already been freed.

This adds a new __ function that directly calls kfree instead of trying
to update the space infos.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache.  In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.

If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.

This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit.  We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In order to create the free space cache concurrently with FS modifications,
we need to take a few block group locks.

The cache code also does kmap, which would schedule with the locks held.
Instead of going through kmap_atomic, lets just use lowmem for the cache
pages.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Block group cache writeout is currently waiting on the pages for each
block group cache before moving on to writing the next one.  This commit
switches things around to send down all the caches and then wait on them
in batches.

The end result is much faster, since we're keeping the disk pipeline
full.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We'll need to put the io_ctl into the block_group cache struct, so
name it struct btrfs_io_ctl and move it into ctree.h
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_evict_inode() needs to be more careful about stealing from the
global_rsv.  We dont' want to end up aborting commit with ENOSPC just
because the evict_inode code was too greedy.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We're triggering a huge number of commits from
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space.  These aren't really requried,
because everyone calling the async reclaim code is going to end up
triggering a commit on their own.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>