- 15 May, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Jun Tian authored
Signed-off-by:
Jun Tian <jun.j.tian@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Nick Kralevich authored
Remove limitations on the size of a read / write request. AFAIK, there's no consequence to allowing the upper layers to specify different read / write sizes. This is needed to support running ext4 on goldfish. Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=38561Signed-off-by:
Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Octavian Purdila authored
This patchs adds a new register to pass the upper 32bits for the device name address when running in 64bit mode. Signed-off-by:
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jun Tian authored
When using multiple adb on 64 bit kernel to transfer data, the goldfish pipe interrupt will crash the kernel. Signed-off-by:
-
Jun Tian authored
Support 64-bit channel and address for the goldfish pipe driver. Signed-off-by:
Brian Wood <brian.j.wood@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christian Engelmayer authored
Pointer 'pwdev_priv' in function rtw_wdev_free() is unused - thus remove it. Signed-off-by:
Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@gmx.at> Signed-off-by:
-
Dan Carpenter authored
The break and the "unknown++" are at the same indent level so my static checker complains. The if statement should be indented more. Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
For bizarre reason we have unused variables IOTPeer both in struct sta_info and struct odm_sta_info. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
We don't need two copies of the same struct, it just leads to pointless typecasts. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Remove unused add_enable_bitmap and candidate_tid_bitmap from struct mlme_ext_info. In addition we don't need to use CHKBIT when we know we are dealing with a value in the range 0-15. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Since we only have one function for this, there is no point in keeping the HAL silliness. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
rtw_do_join23a() is declared in rtw_ioctl_set.c so move the prototype to it's correct place, and remove duplicate protoype from rtw_mlme.c Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Silly use-once macros that simply obfuscates the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
Inline the parsing of status codes. Long term we should pass back the proper status codes and get rid of the ugly _FAIL/_SUCCESS mess. This is one small step in that direction. Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
This was just a silly wrapper around list_empty() Signed-off-by:
-
Jes Sorensen authored
No point in passing in the pointer to free_recv_queue, when we always pass in the same value. Signed-off-by:
-
