- 14 Oct, 2003 1 commit
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
-
- 13 Oct, 2003 2 commits
-
-
Luca Tettamanti authored
Jindrich Makovicka <makovick@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz> ha scritto: > here is a trivial fix for Winbond sensor driver, which currently creates > useless entries in sys/bus/i2c due to missing braces after if statements > - author probably forgot about the macro expansion. IMHO it's better to fix the macro:
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
-
- 12 Oct, 2003 6 commits
-
-
Andi Kleen authored
From Pavel Machek. Make software suspend compile again on x86-64
-
Linus Torvalds authored
It can have gotten set by a stray interrupt if there were no handlers while the IRQ was disabled, and we shouldn't confuse other parts (ie this is another safety-net for the issues that Al Viro brought up about disable_irq() deadlocks when no handlers exist).
-
Matthew Dharm authored
This fixes a bug which was introduced when the code was switched to use atomic_read()s. The bug prevents hot-unplugging of SCSI (or emulated SCSI) devices from working. From Patrick Mansfield.
-
Linus Torvalds authored
They can happen on x86 as a result of interrupts in BIOS calls. Noted by Manfred Spraul.
-
http://lia64.bkbits.net/to-linus-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/for-linus-ppcLinus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
- 13 Oct, 2003 1 commit
-
-
Paul Mackerras authored
into samba.org:/stuff/paulus/kernel/for-linus-ppc
-
- 12 Oct, 2003 3 commits
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://bk.arm.linux.org.uk/linux-2.6-rmkLinus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Russell King authored
-
- 11 Oct, 2003 25 commits
-
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
jiffies based values to ms. This fix crazy key repeat on ADB based PowerMacs
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
use a NULL "driver" pointer and actually try to call it after casting it !
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
properly with HZ != 100, causing tb_to_us to be wrong and gettimeofday() to return strangely "off" results
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
core99 dual G4s).
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
registers exist on common CPUs and without those definitions, SMP won't build
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
without this, you get no display on machines with those cards
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
so that the kernel boots at least on POWER4 and G5 CPUs
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
(missing from a previous cset)
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
of "standard" configs on oldworld macs
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
the coff image to randomly fail
-
David Woodhouse authored
-
David Woodhouse authored
- Implement write-buffer flushing by garbage collection instead of padding. - Implement selective write-buffer flushing on fsync(). - Implement error recovery on write-buffer flush. - Fix remove_suid(). Writing to a suid file didn't previously mark the file non-suid. - Fix handling of full file systems, to avoid unlink() returning -ENOSPC. - Fix assorted memory leaks. - Improve garbage collection efficiency by merging fewer pages.
-
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-release-2.6.0Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/net-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/sparc-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Venkatesh Pallipadi authored
There is a bug in cpufreq call back funtion in timer_tsc routines, that can result in system deadlock. The issue is: grabbing the write_lock on xtime_lock without disabling the interrupts. So,=20 if we happen to get a timer interrupt while we are in this code, system will go into a deadlock. This bug only effects the kernels that have CONFIG_CPU_FREQ enabled.
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
into kernel.crashing.org:/home/benh/kernels/for-linus-ppc
-
Ingo Molnar authored
This fixes two del_timer_sync() races that are still in the timer code. The first race was actually triggered in a 2.4 backport of the 2.6 timer code. The second race was never triggered - it is mostly theoretical on a standalone kernel. (It's more likely in any virtualized or otherwise preemptable environment.) Both races happen when self-rearming timers are used. One mainstream example is kernel/itimer.c. The effect of the races is that del_timer_sync() lets a timer running instead of synchronizing with it, causing logic bugs (and crashes) in the affected kernel code. One typical incarnation of the race is a double add_timer(). race #1: this code in __run_timers() is running on CPU0: list_del(&timer->entry); timer->base = NULL; [*] set_running_timer(base, timer); spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); [**] fn(data); spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); CPU0 gets stuck at the [*] code-point briefly - after the timer->base has been set to NULL, but before the base->running_timer pointer has been set up. This is a fundamentally volatile scenario, as there's _zero_ knowledge in the data structures that this timer is about to be executed! Now CPU1 comes along and calls del_timer_sync(). It will find nothing - neither timer->base nor base->running_timer will cause it to synchronize. It will return and report that the timer has been deleted - shortly afterwards CPU1 continues to execute the timer fn, which will cause crashes. This particular race is easy to fix by reordering the timer->base clearing with set_running_timer(), and putting a wmb() between them, but there's more races: race #2 The checking of del_timer_sync() for 'pending or running timer' is fundamentally unrobust. Eg. if CPU0 gets stuck at the [***] point below: base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, i); if (base->running_timer == timer) { while (base->running_timer == timer) { cpu_relax(); preempt_check_resched(); } [***] break; } } smp_rmb(); if (timer_pending(timer)) goto del_again; then del_timer_sync() has already decided that this timer is not running (we just finished loop-waiting for it), but we have not done the timer_pending() check yet. If the timer has re-armed itself, and if the timer expires on CPU1 (this needs a long delay on CPU0 but that's not hard to achieve eg. in UML or with kernel preemption enabled), then CPU1 could start to expire the timer and gets to the [**] point in __run_timers (see above), then CPU1 gets stalled and CPU0 is unstalled, then the timer_pending() check in del_timer_sync() will not notice the running timer, and del_timer_sync() returns - while CPU1 is just about to run the timer! Fixing this second race is hard - it involves a heavy race-check operation that has to lock all bases, and has to re-check the base->running_timer value, and timer_pending condition atomically. This fix also fixes the first race, due to forcing del_timer_sync() to always observe the timer state atomically, so the [*] code point will always synchronize with del_timer_sync(). The patch is ugly but safe, and it has fixed the crashes in the 2.4 backport. I tested the patch on 2.6.0-test7 with some heavy itimer use and it works fine. Removing self-arming timers safely is the sole purpose of del_timer_sync(), so there's no way around this overhead i think. I believe we should ultimately fix all major del_timer_sync() users to not use self-arming timers - having del_timer_sync() in the thread-exit path is now a considerable source of SMP overhead. But this is out of the scope of current 2.6 fixes of course, and we have to support self-arming timers as well.
-
David S. Miller authored
-
Noah J. Misch authored
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
Julian Anastasov authored
-
David S. Miller authored
into nuts.ninka.net:/disk1/davem/BK/sparc-2.5
-
- 10 Oct, 2003 2 commits
-
-
bk://ppc@ppc.bkbits.net/for-linus-ppcBenjamin Herrenschmidt authored
into kernel.crashing.org:/home/benh/kernels/for-linus-ppc
-
Jesse Barnes authored
Now that it works, we can enable sn2 in generic builds. This should not only allow generic kernels to work on sn2, but also fix the build problems people have been seeing with the qla1280 driver. I tested a generic kernel built with this patch on zx1 and it worked.
-