- 14 Jan, 2010 4 commits
-
-
Tim Gardner authored
Enhance module information with the names of the firmware files that could be used by this driver. This helps tools like Jockey to correctly detect and/or install the firmware files relevant to this driver. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Luis R. Rodriguez authored
Country IEs triplets are getting an extra channel with the current count. This does not affect regulatory because we always took the intersection between what the AP gave and what CRDA believed is correct. This however does fix processing some Country IEs with multiple sequential 2 GHz triplets. Since our parser and the spec mandates all channels be monitonically increasing we would drop the IE after noticing the second triplet begins on a channel already processed. APs that send these type of country IEs seems rare though. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Tim Gardner authored
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488636 Enhances module information with the names of the firmware files that could be used by this driver. This helps tools like Jockey to correctly detect and/or install the firmware files relevant to this driver. Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
John W. Linville authored
This reverts commit 6c853da3. From Message-ID: <1262663293.551.117.camel@debian> On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 22:09 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote: > It don't think 6c853da3 is right. That's the patch > titled "iwmc3200wifi: fix array out-of-boundary access" > > Allocate priv->rx_packets[IWM_RX_ID_HASH + 1] because the max array > index is IWM_RX_ID_HASH according to IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH(). > > In 2.6.33-rc2 IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH() doesn't go as high as IWM_RX_ID_HASH > and I don't see any array out-of-bounds. > > #define IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH(id) ((id) % IWM_RX_ID_HASH) Ah, you are right. I took '%' for '&'. John, would you revert it? Sorry for the false alarm. Thanks, -yi Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 12 Jan, 2010 36 commits
-
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
As follows: - GET_HW_SPEC is now responsible for setting priv->{ap,sta}_macids_supported, which are bitmasks of supported macids for AP and STA mode. (Typically, STA firmware images will support only one macid, #0, in STA mode, and AP firmware images will support macids #0-7, in AP mode.) - Our wiphy ->interfaces_modes is now set based on the non-zero-ness of these two bitmasks. - We main priv->macids_used, a bitmask of which macids are currently in use. ->add_interface() will assign the lowest free macid for this interface type as it is created, or bail out if there are no more free macids to assign. ->delete_interface() will mark the macid as being free again. This enables the multi-BSS code added in the previous commits. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
SET_BEACON, SET_MAC_ADDR, BSS_START and SET_NEW_STN are the currently supported firmware commands that are actually per-vif commands. Use mwl8k_post_pervif_cmd() for these commands, so that the macid of the vif they operate on gets passed down into the firmware. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
One of the bytes in the mwl8k firmware command header is the 'macid' byte, which for per-vif commands indicates which of the BSSes this command is intended for. (For commands that are not per-vif commands, this byte can just be 0.) This patch adds mwl8k_post_pervif_cmd(), which will take the macid assigned to this interface (to be done in ->add_interface()), copy it into the command packet macid field, and post the command as usual. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
To prepare for adding multi-BSS support. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Make the decision about whether to register the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands with mac80211 by looking at the capability field in GET_HW_SPEC (STA firmware only for now). This enables 5 GHz STA operation. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Whenever mac80211 gives us a legacy rate bitmap in the context of the 5 GHz band, we need to remember to shift the bitmap left by 5 positions before giving it to the firmware, as the firmware follows the bitmap bit assignment of the 2.4 GHz rate table even if we're on the 5 GHz band, and the 2.4 GHz rate table includes five non-OFDM rates at the start that are not valid in the 5 GHz band. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
The mwl8k firmware uses indices into the 2.4 GHz band rate table for the receive descriptor channel field even if the packet was received on a 5 GHz channel, while mac80211 expects an index into the 5 GHz band rate table when packets are received on the 5 GHz band, which presents a mismatch as the 5 GHz band rate table lacks the five non-OFDM rates that the 2.4 GHz rate table starts with. To handle this properly, we need to substract 5 from the rate index field if the packet was received on a 5 GHz channel (and was not received at an MCS rate). Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
So that we can make 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz band registration conditional on the capability bitmask returned by the firmware. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
To prepare for adding 5 GHz band/channels/rates. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
0x2a43 is a single-band (2.4GHz only) 88w8366 mini-PCIe card. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
By storing the sequence counter in << 4 format, like other drivers do. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Add MODULE_FIRMWARE tags for the mwl8k firmware images that don't have them yet, and move them to where the firmware image names are declared. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
wl1251 firmware supports U-APSD just with a simple queue configuration change so enable it. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
The qos null data template is needed for U-APSD. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
The header can be used to create qos nullfunc frames, for example. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
To make U-APSD client mode effective, we must not wake up from dynamic power save when transmitting frames. So if dynamic power save is enabled, it needs check the queue the transmitted packet is in and decide if we need to wake up or not. In a perfect world, where all packets would have correct QoS tags, U-APSD enabled queues should not trigger wakeup from power save. But in the real world, where very few packets have correct QoS tags, this won't work. For example, if only voip class has U-APSD enabled and we send a packet in voip class, but the packets we receive are in best effort class, we would receive the packets with the legacy power save method. And that would increase latencies too much from a voip application point of view. The workaround is to enable U-APSD for all qeueus and still use dynamic ps wakeup for all other queues except voip. That way we can still save power with a voip application and not sacrifice latency. Normal traffic (in background, best effort or video class) would still trigger wakeup from dynamic power save. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
Currently dynamic ps check is in ieee80211_xmit(), but it's cleaner to have a separate tx handler for this. Also this is a prerequisite for U-APSD client mode which needs to know the queue frame is in. Also need_dynamic_ps() function is embedded to the tx handler. No functional changes expect that the code is run in a later phase than originally. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
Because it's not yet decided how to configure which queues are U-APSD enabled, add a debugfs interface for testing purposes. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Kalle Valo authored
Add Unscheduled Automatic Power-Save Delivery (U-APSD) client support. The idea is that the data frames from the client trigger AP to send the buffered frames with ACs which have U-APSD enabled. This decreases latency and makes it possible to save even more power. Driver needs to use IEEE80211_HW_UAPSD to enable the feature. The current implementation assumes that firmware takes care of the wakeup and hardware needing IEEE80211_HW_PS_NULLFUNC_STACK is not yet supported. Tested with wl1251 on a Nokia N900 and Cisco Aironet 1231G AP and running various test traffic with ping. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The type argument to DEBUGFS_ADD() isn't used and can be removed, it's around from before the conversion to debugfs_remove_recursive(). Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Since commit "mwl8k: handle station database update for AP's sta entry via ->sta_notify()", mwl8k every now and then gets a command timeout when ifconfig'ing a STA interface down. This turns out to be due to mwl8k_stop() being called while the work queue item that was scheduled by mwl8k_sta_notify() to remove the STA entry for the associated AP is still queued, and the former disables interrupts so that when the latter eventually runs, a command completion interrupt is never seen. Fix this by changing ieee80211_stop_device() so that the workqueue is flushed before drv_stop() is called, instead of doing it the other way around as is done now. (As ->stop() is allowed to sleep, there isn't any reason for drivers to queue work from within it.) Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Joe Perches authored
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
H Hartley Sweeten authored
void pointers do not need to be cast to other pointer types. Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
When setting invalid byte count in txq byte count table, read pointer should be used instead of write pointer. Reported-by: Guo, Chaohong <chaohong.guo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
"RADAR_NOTIFICATION" host command is not used and not supported by uCode, remove it from driver code. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
Update data structure to match latest statistics report from uCode. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
mac80211 do not check the return code now, what if mac80211 does start using the return code? IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_OPERATIONAL is a valid action, just iwlwifi driver do not need to take any action for it; so instead of return "-EINVAL", it is a good program practice to return "-EOPNOTSUPP" to make sure mac80211 will not get wrong impression. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
sparse pointed out that I made a mistake converting the return value of ieee80211_assoc_success to bool, this place should return false instead of one of the enum values (which would be true). Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Like how TX reclaim is done in a tasklet, move receive processing to tasklet context as well. This can have nice benefits for CPU utilisation and throughput, especially at 3-stream rates. (Use the same CLEAR_SEL trick as the TX reclaim tasklet does, to avoid having to touch the interrupt mask registers.) Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
By making use of the CLEAR_SEL feature of the mwl8k host interface interrupt controller, we can keep the TX_DONE interrupt source masked while the transmit reclaim tasklet is running (NAPI style) without having to touch the interrupt controller's interrupt mask register when entering or exiting polling mode, and without having to do any more register reads/writes than we do now. When CLEAR_SEL is enabled on the TX_DONE interrupt source, reading the interrupt status register will clear the TX_DONE status bit if it was set, allowing it to be set again if a new TX_DONE event arrives while we are running the TX reclaim tasklet, but such a new event will then not trigger another PCI interrupt until a zero is written to the TX_DONE interrupt status register bit. I.e., if we write a zero to the TX_DONE interrupt source bit in the interrupt status register when the TX reclaim tasklet thinks it's done, a PCI interrupt will be triggered if a new TX_DONE event arrived from the hardware between us deciding that there is no more work to do and re-enabling the TX_DONE interrupt source, thereby avoiding the classic NAPI poll mode exit race that would otherwise occur. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Lennert Buytenhek authored
Add a limit argument to mwl8k_txq_reclaim(), to allow limiting the number of packets that it will reclaim, and make it return the number of packets that it reclaimed. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-