- 27 Feb, 2018 11 commits
-
-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
We can still use PSR1 when PSR2 conditions are not met. So, let's split the check in a way that we make sure has_psr gets set independently of PSR2 criteria. v2: Duh! Handle proper return to avoid breaking PSR2. v3: (DK): - better name for psr2 conditions check function - Don't remove FIXME block and psr2.support check. - Add a debug message to show us what PSR or PSR2 is getting enabled now we have ways to enabled PSR on PSR2 panels. - s/PSR2 disabled/PSR2 not enabled Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
According to spec: "PSR2 is supported for pipe active sizes up to 3640 pixels wide and 2304 lines tall." BSpec: 7713 Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
eDP spec says - "If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit d7) must be set to 1." Reject PSR on panels without this cap bit set as such panels cannot be controlled via SET_POWER & SET_DP_PWR_VOLTAGE register and the DP source needs to be able to do that for PSR. Thanks to Nathan for debugging this. Panel cap checks like this can be done just once, let's fix this when PSR dpcd init movement lands. Cc: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
No functional change. Signed-off-by:
David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
The core already takes care of the delay before retrying. The delay now changes to (500, 600)us instead of (500 + 1000, 600 + 1500)us. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
The cap check should be specifically for bit 0 instead of any bit. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
intel_edp_init_dpcd() is cluttered with PSR specific DPCD checks and intel_dp.c is huge. No functional change intended. v2: Rebased. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
Frontbuffer flush and invalidate call psr, fbc and drrs functions that use mutexes but they can be called in atomic contexts in the fbdev path. The point where the spinlocks are acquired is up in the call stack that is not entirely easy to spot, so annotate with might_sleep(). Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
PSR on CNL requires AUX IO wells to be kept on and the existing AUX domain for AUX-A enables DC_OFF well too. This is not required, so add a new AUX_IO_A domain for AUX-A to allow DC states to remain enabled. Other AUX channels re-use the existing AUX domains. v4: Reword comment (Rodrigo and Ville) Rename _get and _put functions to include aux_io substring(Rodrigo) Remove unnecessary diff that got included. v3: Extract aux domain selection into a function (Ville) v2: Add AUX IO domain only for AUX-A Rebased on top of Ville's AUX series. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Suggested-by:Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Michał Winiarski authored
Since we're inhibiting context save of preempt context, we're no longer tracking the position of HEAD/TAIL. With GuC, we're adding a new breadcrumb for each preemption, which means that the HW will do more and more breadcrumb writes. Eventually the ring is filled, and we're submitting the preemption context with HEAD==TAIL==0, which won't result in breadcrumb write, but will trigger hangcheck instead. Instead of writing a new preempt breadcrumb for each preemption, let's just fill the ring once at init time (which also saves a couple of instructions in the tasklet). v2: Assert that context save restore is inhibited, don't assert on ring alignment. (Chris) v3: Cleanup checkpatch. Fixes: 517aaffe ("drm/i915/execlists: Inhibit context save/restore for the fake preempt context") Signed-off-by:Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180226163800.21745-1-michal.winiarski@intel.comReviewed-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Manasi Navare authored
The usual if ladder order should be from newest to oldest platform. However the CNL conditional statement was misplaced. This patch sets the DP source for platforms starting from the newest to oldest. Suggested-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1519701075-9894-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
-
- 23 Feb, 2018 6 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Sometimes we need to boost the priority of an in-flight request, which may lead to the situation where the second submission port then contains a higher priority context than the first and so we need to inject a preemption event. To do so we must always check inside execlists_dequeue() whether there is a priority inversion between the ports themselves as well as the head of the priority sorted queue, and we cannot just skip dequeuing if the queue is empty. As Michał noted, this doesn't simply extend to handling more than 2-port submission, as we may need to reorder within the array of executing requests which themselves are lower priority than the first. A task for later! Signed-off-by:
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
Michel Thierry authored
Mostly doc/print messages that were not updated after commit e61e0f51 ("drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request"). Signed-off-by:
Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Collect all the aux ch vfunc assignments into intel_dp_aux_init() instead of having it spread around. Reviewed-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222181036.15251-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Just store function pointers that give us the correct register offsets instead of storing the register offsets themselves. Slightly less efficient perhaps but saves a few bytes and better matches how we do things elsewhere. v2: Keep a local array of data registers (Chris) Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Since we no longer have a 1:1 correspondence between ports and AUX channels, let's give AUX channels their own enum. Makes it easier to tell the apples from the oranges, and we get rid of the port E AUX power domain FIXME since we now derive the power domain from the actual AUX CH. v2: Rebase due to AUX F v3: Split out the power domain fix (Rodrigo) Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> #v2 Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v2 Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Select the aux power domain based on the aux ch rather than based on the port. Now we can rid ourselves of the port E FIXME as well. v2: Split from the enum aux_ch patch (Rodrigo) Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> #v1 Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1 Signed-off-by:
-
- 22 Feb, 2018 13 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Currently the FBC code doesn't handle the 90/270 degree rotated case correctly. We would need the GTT tracking to monitor the fence on the normal GTT view (the rotated view doesn't even have a fence). Not quite sure how we should program the fence Y offset etc. in that case. For now we'll end up disabling FBC with 90/270 degree rotation. Add a FIXME to remind people about this fact. v2: Reword the text (Chris) Move the FIXME to the fbc code Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: -
Ville Syrjälä authored
We've replicated the fb pin/unpin code in a few places. Pull it into convenint helpers. Slight change in locking behaviour as intel_cleanup_plane_fb() now grab struct_mutex unconditionally. v2: Change the locking to be symmetric between pin and unpin Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
As only a subset of primary planes are FBC capable there's no need to waste fences on all of them. So let's skip the fence if the plane isn't even fbc capable. In the future we might extend this to skip the fence even for FBC capable planes if the crtc and/or plane state isn't suitable for FBC. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Let's record the information whether a plane can do fbc or not under struct inte_plane. v2: Rebase due to i9xx_plane_id Handle BDW/HSW correctly v3: Move inte_fbc_init() back since we depend on it happening even with i915.disable_display, and populate fbc->possible_framebuffer_bits directly from the plane init code instead v4: Add note about plane A being tied to pipe A on HSW+ Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: -
Ville Syrjälä authored
Currently we pin a fence on every plane doing tiled scanout. The number of planes we have available is fast apporaching the number of fences so we really should stop wasting them. Only FBC needs the fence on gen4+, so let's use fences only for the primary planes on those platforms. v2: drop the tiling check from plane_uses_fence() as the obj is NULL during initial_plane_config() and we don't rally need the check since i915_vma_pin_fence() does the check anyway Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: -
Ville Syrjälä authored
Gen2/3 display engine depends on the fence for tiled scanout. So if we fail to get a fence fail the entire operation. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Johnson Lin authored
Some panels support limited range output (16-235) compared to full range RGB values (0-255). Also userspace can control the RGB range using "Broadcast RGB" property. Currently the code to handle full range to limited range is broken. This patch fixes the same by properly scaling down all the full range co-efficients with limited range scaling factor. v2: Fixed Ville's review comments. v3: Changed input to const and used correct data types as suggested by Ville v4: Fixed some missing data type corrections. Signed-off-by:Johnson Lin <johnson.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
Slightly smaller code and a bit more logical layout. Signed-off-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Lionel Landwerlin authored
It turns out that HSW has a register that tells us how many EUs are disabled per half-slice (roughly a similar notion to subslice). We didn't read those registers so far as most userspace drivers didn't need those values prior to Gen8, but an internal library would like to have access to this. Since we already have the getparam interface, there is no harm in exposing this. v2: Rename bits value (Joonas) v3: s/GEM_BUG_ON/MISSING_CASE/ (Joonas) v4: s/GEM_BUG_ON/MISSING_CASE/ again... (Lionel) Signed-off-by:
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221204902.23084-1-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
Show GEN11 specific interrupt registers in debugfs v2: Update for POR changes. (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio) v3: get runtime pm ref. unify common parts with gen8 (Daniele) Cc: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220153755.13509-2-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
Paulo Zanoni authored
This is the current PCI ID list in our documentation. Let's leave the _gt#_ part out for now since our current documentation is not 100% clear and we don't need this info now anyway. v2: Use the new ICL_11 naming (Kelvin Gardiner). v3: Latest IDs as per BSpec (Oscar). v4: Make it compile (Paulo). v5: Remove comments (Lucas). v6: Multile rebases (Paulo). v7: Rebase (Mika) Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by:
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Print out the current request/context before doing the GEM_BUG_ON, so that we can inspect the values in the ftrace. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Include a GEM_TRACE to show when the context is complete and we advance the ELSP port. Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Feb, 2018 6 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Load an empty ringbuffer for preemption, ignoring the lite-restore workaround as we know the preempt context is always idle before preemption. Note that after some digging by Michal Winiarski, we found that RING_HEAD is no longer being updated (due to inhibiting context save restore) so this patch is already in effect! Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency, execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.) In short, the spatch: @@ @@ - struct drm_i915_gem_request + struct i915_request A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using 'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members, 'request' is still much preferred for its clarity. Signed-off-by:
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
No code changes, fixes doc build warnings and polish some doc text. Reported-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Noticed while reading some unrelated patches. Unfortunately Imre's patch to add our early/late hooks predated the device_link infrastructure by 2 years. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220132017.30719-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
Commit fe49789f ("drm/i915: Deconstruct execute fence") re-arranged the code and moved the i915_gem_request_execute tracepoint to before the global seqno is assigned to the request. We need to move the tracepoint a bit later so this information is once again available. Signed-off-by:
-
Joonas Lahtinen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
- 20 Feb, 2018 4 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Rather than trusting the cached value of plane_state->vma->fence to imply whether the plane_state itself holds a reference on the framebuffer's fence, use the information provided in the plane_state->flags (PLANE_HAS_FENCE). Note that we still assume that FBC is entirely bounded by the plane_state active life span; it's not clear if that is a safe assumption. Suggested-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Use the information about the fence state from the time of pinning to determine if the fbdev writes are going through a fence. This avoids any confusion in cases where the fence may appear or disappear unconnected to the use by fbdev. Suggested-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Currently we make the unilateral decision inside i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() where the VMA should resided (inside the fence and mappable region or above?). This is not our decision to make as it impacts on how the display engine can use the resulting scanout object, and it would rather instruct us where to place the VMA so that it can enable the features it wants. As such, make the pin flags an argument to i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() and control them from intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj() Whilst taking control of the mapping for ourselves, start tracking how we use it to avoid trying to free a fence we never claimed: <3>[ 227.151869] GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence->pin_count <= 0) <4>[ 227.152064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 227.152068] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:391! <4>[ 227.152084] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI <0>[ 227.152092] Dumping ftrace buffer: <0>[ 227.152099] (ftrace buffer empty) <4>[ 227.152102] Modules linked in: i915 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_codec_generic coretemp snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm lpc_ich e1000e mei_me mei prime_numbers <4>[ 227.152131] CPU: 1 PID: 1587 Comm: kworker/u16:49 Tainted: G U 4.16.0-rc1-gbab67b2f6177-kasan_7+ #1 <4>[ 227.152134] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 755 /0PU052, BIOS A08 02/19/2008 <4>[ 227.152236] Workqueue: events_unbound intel_atomic_commit_work [i915] <4>[ 227.152292] RIP: 0010:intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152295] RSP: 0018:ffff88005aad7b68 EFLAGS: 00010286 <4>[ 227.152300] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff88005c359580 RCX: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152304] RDX: 0000000000000026 RSI: ffffffff8707d840 RDI: ffffed000b55af63 <4>[ 227.152307] RBP: ffff880056817e58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152311] R10: ffff88005aad7b88 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800568184d0 <4>[ 227.152314] R13: ffff880065b5ab08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 <4>[ 227.152318] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006ac40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152322] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>[ 227.152325] CR2: 00007f5fb25550a8 CR3: 0000000068c78000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 <4>[ 227.152328] Call Trace: <4>[ 227.152385] intel_cleanup_plane_fb+0x6b/0xd0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152395] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x166/0x280 <4>[ 227.152452] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x159d/0x3380 [i915] <4>[ 227.152463] ? process_one_work+0x66e/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152516] ? skl_update_crtcs+0x9c0/0x9c0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152523] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152527] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152534] process_one_work+0x71a/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152540] ? __schedule+0x815/0x1e20 <4>[ 227.152547] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2b0/0x2b0 <4>[ 227.152553] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40 <4>[ 227.152559] worker_thread+0xdf/0xf60 <4>[ 227.152569] ? process_one_work+0x1460/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152573] kthread+0x2cf/0x3c0 <4>[ 227.152578] ? _kthread_create_on_node+0xa0/0xa0 <4>[ 227.152583] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4>[ 227.152591] Code: c6 00 11 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 bd 85 c0 e8 60 e7 a9 c4 0f ff e9 1f fe ff ff 48 c7 c6 40 10 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 ca 85 c0 e8 2b 95 bd c4 <0f> 0b 48 89 ef e8 4c 44 e8 c4 e9 ef fd ff ff e8 42 44 e8 c4 e9 <1>[ 227.152720] RIP: intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] RSP: ffff88005aad7b68 v2: i915_vma_pin_fence() is a no-op if a fence isn't required, so check vma->fence as well. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We cannot simply use !view as shorthand for all normal GGTT views as a few callers will always populate a i915_ggtt_view struct and set the type to NORMAL instead. So check for (!view || view->type == NORMAL) inside i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(). Signed-off-by:
-
