When recovering a relocation, if we run into a reloc root that has 0
refs we simply add it to the reloc_control->reloc_roots list, and then
clean it up later.  The problem with this is __del_reloc_root() doesn't
do anything if the root isn't in the radix tree, which in this case it
won't be because we never call __add_reloc_root() on the reloc_root.

This exit condition simply isn't correct really.  During normal
operation we can remove ourselves from the rb tree and then we're meant
to clean up later at merge_reloc_roots() time, and this happens
correctly.  During recovery we're depending on free_reloc_roots() to
drop our references, but we're short-circuiting.

Fix this by continuing to check if we're on the list and dropping
ourselves from the reloc_control root list and dropping our reference
appropriately.  Change the corresponding BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() that
does the correct thing if we aren't in the rb tree.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Comment for processed extent end of range has an unnecessary "in",
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nigel Christian <nigel.l.christian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

My recent patch set "A variety of lock contention fixes", found here

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1608319304.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/
(Tracked in https://github.com/btrfs/linux/issues/86)

that reduce lock contention on the extent root by running delayed refs
less often resulted in a regression in generic/371.  This test
fallocate()'s the fs until it's full, deletes all the files, and then
tries to fallocate() until full again.

Before these patches we would run all of the delayed refs during
flushing, and then would commit the transaction because we had plenty of
pinned space to recover in order to allocate.  However my patches made
it so we weren't running the delayed refs as aggressively, which meant
that we appeared to have less pinned space when we were deciding to
commit the transaction.

We use the space_info->total_bytes_pinned to approximate how much space
we have pinned.  It's approximate because if we remove a reference to an
extent we may free it, but there may be more references to it than we
know of at that point, but we account it as pinned at the creation time,
and then it's properly accounted when the delayed ref runs.

The way we account for pinned space is if the
delayed_ref_head->total_ref_mod is < 0, because that is clearly a
freeing option.  However there is another case, and that is where
->total_ref_mod == 0 && ->must_insert_reserved == 1.

When we allocate a new extent, we have ->total_ref_mod == 1 and we have
->must_insert_reserved == 1.  This is used to indicate that it is a
brand new extent and will need to have its extent entry added before we
modify any references on the delayed ref head.  But if we subsequently
remove that extent reference, our ->total_ref_mod will be 0, and that
space will be pinned and freed.  Accounting for this case properly
allows for generic/371 to pass with my delayed refs patches applied.

It's important to note that this problem exists without the referenced
patches, it just was uncovered by them.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently we pass things around to figure out if we maybe freeing data
based on the state of the delayed refs head.  This makes the accounting
sort of confusing and hard to follow, as it's distinctly separate from
the delayed ref heads stuff, but also depends on it entirely.

Fix this by explicitly adjusting the space_info->total_bytes_pinned in
the delayed refs code.  We now have two places where we modify this
counter, once where we create the delayed and destroy the delayed refs,
and once when we pin and unpin the extents.  This means there is a
slight overlap between delayed refs and the pin/unpin mechanisms, but
this is simply used by the ENOSPC infrastructure to determine if we need
to commit the transaction, so there's no adverse affect from this, we
might simply commit thinking it will give us enough space when it might
not.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Now that the btrfs' codebase is clean of almost all W=1 warnings let's
enable those checks unconditionally for the entire fs/btrfs/ and its
subdirectories to catch potential errors during development.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add some comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

These constants are really used internally by zstd and including
linux/zstd.h into users results in the following warnings:

In file included from fs/btrfs/zstd.c:19:
./include/linux/zstd.h:798:21: warning: ‘ZSTD_skippableHeaderSize’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
  798 | static const size_t ZSTD_skippableHeaderSize = 8;
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/zstd.h:796:21: warning: ‘ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_max’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
  796 | static const size_t ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_max = ZSTD_FRAMEHEADERSIZE_MAX;
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/zstd.h:795:21: warning: ‘ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_min’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
  795 | static const size_t ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_min = ZSTD_FRAMEHEADERSIZE_MIN;
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/zstd.h:794:21: warning: ‘ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_prefix’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
  794 | static const size_t ZSTD_frameHeaderSize_prefix = 5;

So fix those warnings by turning the constants into defines.
Reviewed-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This fixes warning:

fs/btrfs/zoned.c:491:6: warning: variable ‘zone_size’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  491 |  u64 zone_size;

which got introduced in 12659251 ("btrfs: implement log-structured
superblock for ZONED mode"). We'll enable the warning by default and
want clean build until the relevant zoned patches land.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This makes the file W=1 clean and fixes the following warnings:

fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'offset' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'prev_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'p_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'start_ret' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'end_ret' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'bits' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'start_ret' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'end_ret' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'bits' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4187: warning: Function parameter or member 'epd' not described in 'extent_write_cache_pages'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4187: warning: Excess function parameter 'data' description in 'extent_write_cache_pages'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

With these fixes space-info.c is clear for W=1 warnings, namely the
following ones are fixed:

fs/btrfs/space-info.c:575: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'may_commit_transaction'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:575: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in 'may_commit_transaction'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'ticket' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'orig_bytes' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'root' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_rsv' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'orig_bytes' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'bytes' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes following warnings:

fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:205: warning: Function parameter or member 'inode' not described in 'btrfs_inode_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:205: warning: Function parameter or member 'qgroup_free' not described in 'btrfs_inode_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Function parameter or member 'reserved' not described in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Function parameter or member 'qgroup_free' not described in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Excess function parameter 'release_bytes' description in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes fs/btrfs/inode.c:3101: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1570: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_rmap_block'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes fs/btrfs/discard.c:203: warning: Function parameter or member 'now' not described in 'peek_discard_list'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes following W=1 warnings:
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'root' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'inode' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctl' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_group' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'io_ctl' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This fixes the following warnings:

fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:80: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:80: warning: Function parameter or member 'nr' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'src' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'num_bytes' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:174: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:174: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This fixes following W=1 warnings:

fs/btrfs/file-item.c:27: warning: Cannot understand  * @inode:  the inode we want to update the disk_i_size for
 on line 27 - I thought it was a doc line
fs/btrfs/file-item.c:65: warning: Cannot understand  * @inode - the inode we're modifying
 on line 65 - I thought it was a doc line
fs/btrfs/file-item.c:91: warning: Cannot understand  * @inode - the inode we're modifying
 on line 91 - I thought it was a doc line
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This fixes the following compiler warnings:

fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_tree' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_in' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fixes fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:399: warning: Function parameter or member
'modified' not described in 'add_extent_mapping'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BUG]
There is a long existing bug in the last parameter of
btrfs_add_ordered_extent(), in commit 771ed689 ("Btrfs: Optimize
compressed writeback and reads") back to 2008.

In that ancient commit btrfs_add_ordered_extent() expects the @type
parameter to be one of the following:

- BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR
- BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW
- BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC
- BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED

But we pass 0 in cow_file_range(), which means BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE.

Ironically extra check in __btrfs_add_ordered_extent() won't set the bit
if we see (type == IO_DONE || type == IO_COMPLETE), and avoid any
obvious bug.

But this still leads to regular COW ordered extent having no bit to
indicate its type in various trace events, rendering REGULAR bit
useless.

[FIX]
Change the following aspects to avoid such problem:

- Reorder btrfs_ordered_extent::flags
  Now the type bits go first (REGULAR/NOCOW/PREALLCO/COMPRESSED), then
  DIRECT bit, finally extra status bits like IO_DONE/COMPLETE/IOERR.

- Add extra ASSERT() for btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*()

- Remove @type parameter for btrfs_add_ordered_extent_compress()
  As the only valid @type here is BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED.

- Remove the unnecessary special check for IO_DONE/COMPLETE in
  __btrfs_add_ordered_extent()
  This is just to make the code work, with extra ASSERT(), there are
  limited values can be passed in.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fix below warnings reported by coccicheck:
./fs/btrfs/raid56.c:237:2-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing
functions is not needed.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Zygo reported the following panic when testing my error handling patches
for relocation:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/backref.c:2545!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 PID: 8472 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W 14
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,

  Call Trace:
   btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x4df/0x530
   build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x225/0x280
   ? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2a6/0xb60
   ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x35/0x50
   ? do_relocation+0xc10/0xc10
   ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x6a3/0xcb0
   ? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
   ? rb_insert_color+0x342/0x360
   ? add_tree_block.isra.36+0x236/0x2b0
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   ? merge_reloc_roots+0x470/0x470
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x18f0
   ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
   ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
   ? lock_contended+0x620/0x6e0
   ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e0/0x1e0
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1f9/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4380
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
   ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
   ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
   ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags+0x26/0x30
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
   ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This occurs because of this check

  if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&upper->rb_node))
	  BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->upper));

As we are dropping the backref node, if we discover that our upper node
in the edge we just cleaned up isn't linked into the cache that we are
now done with this node, thus the BUG_ON().

However this is an erroneous assumption, as we will look up all the
references for a node first, and then process the pending edges.  All of
the 'upper' nodes in our pending edges won't be in the cache's rb_tree
yet, because they haven't been processed.  We could very well have many
edges still left to cleanup on this node.

The fact is we simply do not need this check, we can just process all of
the edges only for this node, because below this check we do the
following

  if (list_empty(&upper->lower)) {
	  list_add_tail(&upper->lower, &cache->leaves);
	  upper->lowest = 1;
  }

If the upper node truly isn't used yet, then we add it to the
cache->leaves list to be cleaned up later.  If it is still used then the
last child node that has it linked into its node will add it to the
leaves list and then it will be cleaned up.

Fix this problem by dropping this logic altogether.  With this fix I no
longer see the panic when testing with error injection in the backref
code.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ #206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This patch will extract the code to grab an extent buffer from a page
into a helper, grab_extent_buffer_from_page().

This reduces one indent level, and provides the work place for later
expansion for subapge support.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The original comment is from the initial merge, which has several
problems:

- No holes check any more
- No inline decision is made

Update the out-of-date comment with more correct one.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The refactoring involves the following modifications:

- iosize alignment
  In fact we don't really need to manually do alignment at all.
  All extent maps should already be aligned, thus basic ASSERT() check
  would be enough.

- redundant variables
  We have extra variable like blocksize/pg_offset/end.
  They are all unnecessary.

  @blocksize can be replaced by sectorsize size directly, and it's only
  used to verify the em start/size is aligned.

  @pg_offset can be easily calculated using @cur and page_offset(page).

  @end is just assigned from @page_end and never modified, use
  "start + PAGE_SIZE - 1" directly and remove @page_end.

- remove some BUG_ON()s
  The BUG_ON()s are for extent map, which we have tree-checker to check
  on-disk extent data item and runtime check.
  ASSERT() should be enough.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The parameter offset is confusing, it's supposed to be the disk bytenr
of metadata/data.  Rename it to disk_bytenr and update the comment.

Also rename each offset passed to submit_extent_page() as @disk_bytenr
so they're consistent.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The refactoring involves the following modifications:

- Return bool instead of int

- Parameter update for @cached of btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending()
  For btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending(), @cached is only used to
  return the finished ordered extent.
  Rename it to @finished_ret.

- Comment updates

  * Change one stale comment
    Which still refers to btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending(), but the
    context is calling  btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending().
  * Follow the common comment style for both functions
    Add more detailed descriptions for parameters and the return value
  * Move the reason why test_and_set_bit() is used into the call sites

- Change how the return value is calculated
  The most anti-human part of the return value is:

    if (...)
	ret = 1;
    ...
    return ret == 0;

  This means, when we set ret to 1, the function returns 0.
  Change the local variable name to @finished, and directly return the
  value of it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_dio_private::bytes is only assigned from bio::bi_iter::bi_size,
which is never larger than U32.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Following the rework in e076ab2a ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages
instead of full inodes") the nr variable is no longer passed by
reference to start_delalloc_inodes hence it cannot change. Additionally
we are always guaranteed for it to be positive number hence it's
redundant to have it as a condition in the loop. Simply remove that
usage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

It's currently u64 which gets instantly translated either to LONG_MAX
(if U64_MAX is passed) or cast to an unsigned long (which is in fact,
wrong because writeback_control::nr_to_write is a signed, long type).

Just convert the function's argument to be long time which obviates the
need to manually convert u64 value to a long. Adjust all call sites
which pass U64_MAX to pass LONG_MAX. Finally ensure that in
shrink_delalloc the u64 is converted to a long without overflowing,
resulting in a negative number.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

After commit 040ee612 ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range") we do not
use anymore the data_offset field of struct backref_ctx, as after that we
do all the necessary checks for the data offset of file extent items at
clone_range(). Since there are no more users of data_offset from that
structure, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Instead of having three 'if' to handle non-NULL return value consolidate
this in one 'if (ret)'. That way the code is more obvious:

 - Always drop delete_unused_bgs_mutex if ret is not NULL
 - If ret is negative -> goto done
 - If it's 1 -> reset ret to 0, release the path and finish the loop.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I noticed that shared ref entries in ref-verify didn't have the proper
owner set, which caused me to think there was something seriously wrong.
However the problem is if we have a parent we simply weren't filling out
the owner part of the reference, even though we have it.

Fix this by making sure we set all the proper fields when we modify a
reference, this way we'll have the proper owner if a problem happens and
we don't waste time thinking we're updating the wrong level.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I noticed that sometimes I would have the wrong level printed out with
ref-verify while testing some error injection related problems.  This is
because we only get the level from the main extent item, but our
references could go off the current leaf into another, and at that point
we lose our level.

Fix this by keeping track of the last tree block level that we found,
the same way we keep track of our bytenr and num_bytes, in case we
happen to wander into another leaf while still processing the references
for a bytenr.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I was attempting to reproduce a problem that Zygo hit, but my error
injection wasn't firing for a few of the common calls to
btrfs_should_cancel_balance.  This is because the compiler decided to
inline it at these spots.  Keep this from happening by explicitly
marking the function as noinline so that error injection will always
work.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The following patches are going to address error handling in relocation,
in order to test those patches I need to be able to inject errors in
btrfs_search_slot and btrfs_cow_block, as we call both of these pretty
often in different cases during relocation.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

It's no longer used. While at it also remove new_dirid in create_subvol
as it's used in a single place and open code it. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Adjust the way free_objectid is being initialized, it now stores
BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID rather than the, somewhat arbitrary,
BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID - 1. This change also has the added benefit
that now it becomes unnecessary to explicitly initialize free_objectid
for a newly create fs root.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reflects the true purpose of the member as it's being used solely
in context where a new objectid is being allocated. Future changes will
also change the way it's being used to closely follow this semantics.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>