1. 14 Jan, 2019 14 commits
  2. 10 Jan, 2019 7 commits
  3. 09 Jan, 2019 6 commits
  4. 08 Jan, 2019 5 commits
  5. 07 Jan, 2019 7 commits
  6. 06 Jan, 2019 1 commit
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Change mincore() to count "mapped" pages rather than "cached" pages · 574823bf
      Linus Torvalds authored
      The semantics of what "in core" means for the mincore() system call are
      somewhat unclear, but Linux has always (since 2.3.52, which is when
      mincore() was initially done) treated it as "page is available in page
      cache" rather than "page is mapped in the mapping".
      
      The problem with that traditional semantic is that it exposes a lot of
      system cache state that it really probably shouldn't, and that users
      shouldn't really even care about.
      
      So let's try to avoid that information leak by simply changing the
      semantics to be that mincore() counts actual mapped pages, not pages
      that might be cheaply mapped if they were faulted (note the "might be"
      part of the old semantics: being in the cache doesn't actually guarantee
      that you can access them without IO anyway, since things like network
      filesystems may have to revalidate the cache before use).
      
      In many ways the old semantics were somewhat insane even aside from the
      information leak issue.  From the very beginning (and that beginning is
      a long time ago: 2.3.52 was released in March 2000, I think), the code
      had a comment saying
      
        Later we can get more picky about what "in core" means precisely.
      
      and this is that "later".  Admittedly it is much later than is really
      comfortable.
      
      NOTE! This is a real semantic change, and it is for example known to
      change the output of "fincore", since that program literally does a
      mmmap without populating it, and then doing "mincore()" on that mapping
      that doesn't actually have any pages in it.
      
      I'm hoping that nobody actually has any workflow that cares, and the
      info leak is real.
      
      We may have to do something different if it turns out that people have
      valid reasons to want the old semantics, and if we can limit the
      information leak sanely.
      
      Cc: Kevin Easton <kevin@guarana.org>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
      Cc: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      574823bf