- 28 Jun, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Add the trace attributes to the default gendisk attributes, just like we already do for partitions. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628171850.1313069-2-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
blk_cleanup_disk is nothing but a trivial wrapper for put_disk now, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-7-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Set the queue dying flag and call blk_mq_exit_queue from del_gendisk for all disks that do not have separately allocated queues, and thus remove the need to call blk_cleanup_queue for them. Rename blk_cleanup_disk to blk_mq_destroy_queue to make it clear that this function is intended only for separately allocated blk-mq queues. This saves an extra queue freeze for devices without a separately allocated queue. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-6-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
These flags only apply to file system I/O, and all file system I/O is already drained by del_gendisk and thus can't be in progress when blk_cleanup_queue is called. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-5-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Disallow setting the blk-mq state on any queue that is already dying as setting the state even then is a bad idea, and remove the now unused QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD flag. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the proper helper to mark a surpise removal, remove the gendisk as soon as possible when removing the device and implement the ->free_disk callback to ensure the private data is alive as long as the gendisk has references. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-3-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This file is a huge mess that iterates over all devices and is in the way of fixing the device removal in this driver, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220619060552.1850436-2-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- 27 Jun, 2022 33 commits
-
-
Liu Song authored
Currently "blk_mq_tag_busy" return value has no effect, so adjust it. Some code implementations have also been adjusted to enhance readability. Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1656170121-1619-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
Currently, IO priority set in task's IO context is not reflected in the bio->bi_ioprio for most IO (only io_uring and direct IO set it). This results in odd results where process is submitting some bios with one priority and other bios with a different (unset) priority and due to differing priorities bios cannot be merged. Make sure bio->bi_ioprio is always set on bio submission. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-9-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
Bio's IO priority needs to be initialized before we try to merge the bio with other bios. Otherwise we could merge bios which would otherwise receive different IO priorities leading to possible QoS issues. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-8-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
Convert blk-ioprio handling from a rqos policy to a direct call from blk_mq_submit_bio(). Firstly, blk-ioprio is not much of a rqos policy anyway, it just needs a hook in bio submission path to set the bio's IO priority. Secondly, the rqos .track hook gets actually called too late for blk-ioprio purposes and introducing a special rqos hook just for blk-ioprio looks even weirder. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-7-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
blkcg->ioprio_set field is not really useful except for avoiding possibly more expensive checks inside blkcg_ioprio_track(). The check for blkcg->prio_policy being equal to POLICY_NO_CHANGE does the same service so just remove the ioprio_set field and replace the check. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-6-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
ioprio_get(2) can be asked to return the best IO priority from several tasks (IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP, IOPRIO_WHO_USER). Currently the call treats tasks without set IO priority as having priority IOPRIO_CLASS_BE/IOPRIO_BE_NORM however this does not really reflect the IO priority the task will get (which depends on task's nice value). Fix the code to use the real IO priority task's IO will use. We have to modify code for ioprio_get(IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS) to keep returning IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE priority for tasks without set IO priority as a special case to maintain userspace visible API. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-5-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
Nobody outside of block/ioprio.c uses it. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-4-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
get_current_ioprio() operates only on current task. We will need the same functionality for other tasks as well. Generalize get_current_ioprio() for that and also move the bulk out of the header file because it is large enough. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-3-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
get_current_ioprio() is used to initialize IO priority of various requests. As such it should be returning the effective IO priority of the task (i.e., reflecting the fact that unset IO priority should get set based on task's CPU priority) so that the conversion is concentrated in one place. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-2-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Jan Kara authored
Commit e70344c0 ("block: fix default IO priority handling") introduced an inconsistency in get_current_ioprio() that tasks without IO context return IOPRIO_DEFAULT priority while tasks with freshly allocated IO context will return 0 (IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE/0) IO priority. Tasks without IO context used to be rare before 5a9d041b ("block: move io_context creation into where it's needed") but after this commit they became common because now only BFQ IO scheduler setups task's IO context. Similar inconsistency is there for get_task_ioprio() so this inconsistency is now exposed to userspace and userspace will see different IO priority for tasks operating on devices with BFQ compared to devices without BFQ. Furthemore the changes done by commit e70344c0 change the behavior when no IO priority is set for BFQ IO scheduler which is also documented in ioprio_set(2) manpage: "If no I/O scheduler has been set for a thread, then by default the I/O priority will follow the CPU nice value (setpriority(2)). In Linux kernels before version 2.6.24, once an I/O priority had been set using ioprio_set(), there was no way to reset the I/O scheduling behavior to the default. Since Linux 2.6.24, specifying ioprio as 0 can be used to reset to the default I/O scheduling behavior." So make sure we default to IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE as used to be the case before commit e70344c0. Also cleanup alloc_io_context() to explicitely set this IO priority for the allocated IO context to avoid future surprises. Note that we tweak ioprio_best() to maintain ioprio_get(2) behavior and make this commit easily backportable. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e70344c0 ("block: fix default IO priority handling") Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-1-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() disables preemption to get a stable current CPU number and then invokes __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if the CPU number is part the mask. __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() acquires a spin_lock_t which is a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT and can't be acquired with disabled preemption. It is not required for correctness to invoke __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on a CPU matching hctx->cpumask. Both (async and direct requests) can run on a CPU not matching hctx->cpumask. The CPU mask without disabling preemption and invoking __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(). Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YrLSEiNvagKJaDs5@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Bart Van Assche authored
Fix the following warnings: block/bfq-cgroup.c:721: warning: Function parameter or member 'bfqg' not described in '__bfq_bic_change_cgroup' block/bfq-cgroup.c:721: warning: Excess function parameter 'blkcg' description in '__bfq_bic_change_cgroup' block/bfq-cgroup.c:870: warning: Function parameter or member 'ioprio_class' not described in 'bfq_reparent_leaf_entity' block/bfq-cgroup.c:900: warning: Function parameter or member 'ioprio_class' not described in 'bfq_reparent_active_queues' Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617210859.106623-1-bvanassche@acm.org
-
Bart Van Assche authored
This patch is the result of the analysis of a sparse report. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617204433.102022-1-bvanassche@acm.org
-
GuoYong Zheng authored
It is no need to judge entity is null or not here, directly return entity is ok, so remove it. Signed-off-by: GuoYong Zheng <zhenggy@chinatelecom.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1655461684-19075-1-git-send-email-zhenggy@chinatelecom.cnSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
blk_queue_get_max_sectors is private to the block layer, so move it out of blkdev.h. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-7-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Now that blk_max_size_offset has a single caller left, fold it into that and clean up the naming convention for the local variables there. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-6-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
get_max_io_size has a very odd choice of variables names and initialization patterns. Switch to more descriptive names and more clear initialization of them. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-5-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
blk_rq_get_max_sectors always uses q->limits.chunk_sectors as the chunk_sectors argument, and already checks for max_sectors through the call to blk_queue_get_max_sectors. That means much of blk_max_size_offset is not needed and open coding it simplifies the code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
max_io_len always passes an explicitly non-zero chunk_sectors into blk_max_size_offset. That means much of blk_max_size_offset is not needed and can be open coded to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-3-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Factor out a helper from blk_max_size_offset so that it can be reused independently. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-2-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Bart Van Assche authored
Since the introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() the operation type in the second argument of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() matters. The introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() caused blk_mq_get_sq_hctx() to select a hardware queue of type HCTX_TYPE_READ instead of HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT. Switch to hardware queue type HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT since HCTX_TYPE_READ should only be used for read requests. Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615225549.1054905-4-bvanassche@acm.orgSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Bart Van Assche authored
Before the introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type(), blk_mq_map_queue() only used the flags from its second argument. Since the introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type(), blk_mq_map_queue() uses both the operation and the flags encoded in that argument. Rename the second argument of blk_mq_map_queue() to make this clear. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615225549.1054905-3-bvanassche@acm.orgSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Bart Van Assche authored
Leave out the superfluous "& REQ_OP_MASK" code. The definition of req_op() shows that that code is superfluous: #define req_op(req) ((req)->cmd_flags & REQ_OP_MASK) Compile-tested only. Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615225549.1054905-2-bvanassche@acm.orgSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Bo Liu authored
Use ida_alloc()/ida_free() instead of ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove(). The latter is deprecated and more verbose. Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615081816.4342-1-liubo03@inspur.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Use the address alignment requirements from the block_device for direct io instead of requiring addresses be aligned to the block size. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-12-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Use the address alignment requirements from the block_device for direct io instead of requiring addresses be aligned to the block size. User space can discover the alignment requirements from the dma_alignment queue attribute. User space can specify any hardware compatible DMA offset for each segment, but every segment length is still required to be a multiple of the block size. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-11-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Provide a convenient function for this repeatable coding pattern. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-10-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
The existing iov_iter_alignment() function returns the logical OR of address and length. For cases where address and length need to be considered separately, introduce a helper function that a caller can specificy length and address masks that indicate if the iov is unaligned. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-9-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Individual bv_len's may not be a sector size. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-8-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Individual bv_len's may not be a sector size. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-7-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
This will make it easier to add more complex acceptable alignment criteria in the future. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-6-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
Preparing for upcoming dma_alignment users that have a block_device, but don't need the request_queue. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-5-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Keith Busch authored
User space may want to know how to align their buffers to avoid bouncing. Export the queue attribute. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-4-kbusch@fb.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-