1. 06 Mar, 2022 2 commits
  2. 04 Mar, 2022 2 commits
  3. 03 Mar, 2022 8 commits
  4. 02 Mar, 2022 14 commits
  5. 01 Mar, 2022 7 commits
  6. 28 Feb, 2022 7 commits
    • Thomas Hellström's avatar
      drm/i915: Clarify vma lifetime · c03d9826
      Thomas Hellström authored
      It's unclear what reference the initial vma kref reference refers to.
      A vma can have multiple weak references, the object vma list,
      the vm's bound list and the GT's closed_list, and the initial vma
      reference can be put from lookups of all these lists.
      
      With the current implementation this means
      that any holder of yet another vma refcount (currently only
      i915_gem_object_unbind()) needs to be holding two of either
      *) An object refcount,
      *) A vm open count
      *) A vma open count
      
      in order for us to not risk leaking a reference by having the
      initial vma reference being put twice.
      
      Address this by re-introducing i915_vma_destroy() which removes all
      weak references of the vma and *then* puts the initial vma refcount.
      This makes a strong vma reference hold on to the vma unconditionally.
      
      Perhaps a better name would be i915_vma_revoke() or i915_vma_zombify(),
      since other callers may still hold a refcount, but with the prospect of
      being able to replace the vma refcount with the object lock in the near
      future, let's stick with i915_vma_destroy().
      
      Finally this commit fixes a race in that previously i915_vma_release() and
      now i915_vma_destroy() could destroy a vma without taking the vm->mutex
      after an advisory check that the vma mm_node was not allocated.
      This would race with the ungrab_vma() function creating a trace similar
      to the below one. This was fixed in one of the __i915_vma_put() callsites
      in
      commit bc1922e5 ("drm/i915: Fix a race between vma / object destruction and unbinding")
      but although not seemingly triggered by CI, that
      is not sufficient. This patch is needed to fix that properly.
      
      [823.012188] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
      [823.012422] [IGT] gem_ppgtt: executing
      [823.016667] [IGT] gem_ppgtt: starting subtest blt-vs-render-ctx0
      [852.436465] stack segment: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
      [852.436480] CPU: 0 PID: 3200 Comm: gem_ppgtt Not tainted 5.16.0-CI-CI_DRM_11115+ #1
      [852.436489] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR5 RVP, BIOS ADLPFWI1.R00.2422.A00.2110131104 10/13/2021
      [852.436499] RIP: 0010:ungrab_vma+0x9/0x80 [i915]
      [852.436711] Code: ef e8 4b 85 cf e0 e8 36 a3 d6 e0 8b 83 f8 9c 00 00 85 c0 75 e1 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 e9 d6 fd 14 00 55 53 48 8b af c0 00 00 00 <8b> 45 00 85 c0 75 03 5b 5d c3 48 8b 85 a0 02 00 00 48 89 fb 48 8b
      [852.436727] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006db7880 EFLAGS: 00010246
      [852.436734] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc90006db7598 RCX: 0000000000000000
      [852.436742] RDX: ffff88815349e898 RSI: ffff88815349e858 RDI: ffff88810a284140
      [852.436748] RBP: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R08: ffff88815349e898 R09: ffff88815349e8e8
      [852.436754] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000051ef1141 R12: ffff88810a284140
      [852.436762] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88815349e868 R15: ffff88810a284458
      [852.436770] FS:  00007f5c04b04e40(0000) GS:ffff88849f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [852.436781] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [852.436788] CR2: 00007f5c04b38fe0 CR3: 000000010a6e8001 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
      [852.436797] PKRU: 55555554
      [852.436801] Call Trace:
      [852.436806]  <TASK>
      [852.436811]  i915_gem_evict_for_node+0x33c/0x3c0 [i915]
      [852.437014]  i915_gem_gtt_reserve+0x106/0x130 [i915]
      [852.437211]  i915_vma_pin_ww+0x8f4/0xb60 [i915]
      [852.437412]  eb_validate_vmas+0x688/0x860 [i915]
      [852.437596]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xc0e/0x25b0 [i915]
      [852.437770]  ? deactivate_slab+0x5f2/0x7d0
      [852.437778]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x60
      [852.437789]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0xc6/0x2c0 [i915]
      [852.437944]  ? init_object+0x49/0x80
      [852.437950]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e6/0x2580
      [852.437963]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x116/0x2c0 [i915]
      [852.438129]  ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x25b0/0x25b0 [i915]
      [852.438300]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xac/0x140
      [852.438310]  drm_ioctl+0x201/0x3d0
      [852.438316]  ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x25b0/0x25b0 [i915]
      [852.438490]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
      [852.438498]  do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
      [852.438507]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
      [852.438515] RIP: 0033:0x7f5c0415b317
      [852.438523] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
      [852.438542] RSP: 002b:00007ffd765039a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
      [852.438553] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e4d7829dd0 RCX: 00007f5c0415b317
      [852.438562] RDX: 00007ffd76503a00 RSI: 00000000c0406469 RDI: 0000000000000017
      [852.438571] RBP: 00007ffd76503a00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000081
      [852.438579] R10: 00000000ffffff7f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c0406469
      [852.438587] R13: 0000000000000017 R14: 00007ffd76503a00 R15: 0000000000000000
      [852.438598]  </TASK>
      [852.438602] Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_hdmi i915 mei_hdcp x86_pkg_temp_thermal snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg drm_buddy coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_codec ttm ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hwdep snd_hda_core e1000e drm_dp_helper ptp snd_pcm mei_me drm_kms_helper pps_core mei syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops prime_numbers intel_lpss_pci smsc75xx usbnet mii
      [852.440310] ---[ end trace e52cdd2fe4fd911c ]---
      
      v2: Fix typos in the commit message.
      
      Fixes: 7e00897b ("drm/i915: Add object locking to i915_gem_evict_for_node and i915_gem_evict_something, v2.")
      Fixes: bc1922e5 ("drm/i915: Fix a race between vma / object destruction and unbinding")
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222133209.587978-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
      c03d9826
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size · 2d45f668
      Matthew Auld authored
      Check that mappable vs non-mappable matches our expectations.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-7-matthew.auld@intel.com
      2d45f668
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/buddy: tweak 2big check · f199bf55
      Matthew Auld authored
      Otherwise we get -EINVAL, instead of the more useful -E2BIG if the
      allocation doesn't fit within the pfn range, like with mappable lmem.
      The hugepages selftest, for example, needs this to know if a smaller
      size is needed.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
      f199bf55
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/buddy: adjust res->start · f9eb7429
      Matthew Auld authored
      Differentiate between mappable vs non-mappable resources, also if this
      is an actual range allocation ensure we set res->start as the starting
      pfn. Later when we need to do non-mappable -> mappable moves then we
      want TTM to see that the current placement is not compatible, which
      should result in an actual move, instead of being turned into a noop.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
      f9eb7429
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/buddy: track available visible size · 26ffcbbe
      Matthew Auld authored
      Track the total amount of available visible memory, and also track
      per-resource the amount of used visible memory. For now this is useful
      for our debug output, and deciding if it is even worth calling into the
      buddy allocator. In the future tracking the per-resource visible usage
      will be useful for when deciding if we should attempt to evict certain
      buffers.
      
      v2:
       - s/place->lpfn/lpfn/, that way we can avoid scanning the list if the
         entire range is already mappable.
       - Move the end declaration inside the if block(Thomas).
       - Make sure to also account for reserved memory.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
      26ffcbbe
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915: add I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY · 30b9d1b3
      Matthew Auld authored
      If the user doesn't require CPU access for the buffer, then
      ALLOC_GPU_ONLY should be used, in order to prioritise allocating in the
      non-mappable portion of LMEM, on devices with small BAR.
      
      v2(Thomas):
        - The BO_ALLOC_TOPDOWN naming here is poor, since this is pure lies on
          systems that don't even have small BAR. A better name is GPU_ONLY,
          which is accurate regardless of the configuration.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
      30b9d1b3
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/ttm: require mappable by default · 3312a4ac
      Matthew Auld authored
      On devices with non-mappable LMEM ensure we always allocate the pages
      within the mappable portion. For now we assume that all LMEM buffers
      will require CPU access, which is also inline with pretty much all
      current kernel internal users. In the next patch we will introduce a new
      flag to override this behaviour.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
      3312a4ac