We don't need a message for every VLAN association, dbg
is fine. The message about adding the DSA or CPU
port to a VLAN is directly misleading, this is perfectly
fine.

Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We were checking that the MC (member config) was != 0
for some reason, all we need to check is that the config
has no ports, i.e. no members. Then it can be recycled.
This must be some misunderstanding.

Fixes: 4ddcaf1e ("net: dsa: rtl8366: Properly clear member config")
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The max VLAN number with non-4K VLAN activated is 15, and the
range is 0..15. Not 16.

The impact should be low since we by default have 4K VLAN and
thus have 4095 VLANs to play with in this switch. There will
not be a problem unless the code is rewritten to only use
16 VLANs.

Fixes: d8652956 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

While we were defining one VLAN per port for isolating the ports
the port_vlan_filtering() callback was implemented to enable a
VLAN on the port + 1. This function makes no sense, not only is
it incomplete as it only enables the VLAN, it doesn't do what
the callback is supposed to do, which is to selectively enable
and disable filtering on a certain port.

Implement the correct callback: we have two registers dealing
with filtering on the RTL9366RB, so we implement an ASIC-specific
callback and implement filering using the register bit that makes
the switch drop frames if the port is not in the VLAN member set.

The DSA documentation Documentation/networking/switchdev.rst states:

  When the bridge has VLAN filtering enabled and a PVID is not
  configured on the ingress port, untagged and 802.1p tagged
  packets must be dropped. When the bridge has VLAN filtering
  enabled and a PVID exists on the ingress port, untagged and
  priority-tagged packets must be accepted and forwarded according
  to the bridge's port membership of the PVID VLAN. When the
  bridge has VLAN filtering disabled, the presence/lack of a
  PVID should not influence the packet forwarding decision.

To comply with this, we add two arrays of bool in the RTL8366RB
state that keeps track of if filtering and PVID is enabled or
not for each port. We then add code such that whenever filtering
or PVID changes, we update the filter according to the
specification.

Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Cc: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This hacky default VLAN setup was done in order to direct
packets to the right ports and provide port isolation, both
which we now support properly using custom tags and proper
bridge port isolation.

We can drop the custom VLAN code and leave all VLAN handling
alone, as users expect things to be. We can also drop
ds->configure_vlan_while_not_filtering = false; and let
the core deal with any VLANs it wants.

Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use port isolation registers to configure bridge offloading.

Tested on the D-Link DIR-685, switching between ports and
sniffing ports to make sure no packets leak.

Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Leon Romanovsky says:

====================
Move devlink_register to be last devlink command

This is second version of patch series
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1628599239.git.leonro@nvidia.com/

The main change is addition of delayed notification logic that will
allowed us to delete devlink_params_publish API (future series will
remove it completely) and conversion of all drivers to have devlink_register
being last commend.

The series itself is pretty straightforward, except liquidio driver
which performs initializations in various workqueues without proper
locks. That driver doesn't hole device_lock and it is clearly broken
for any parallel driver core flows (modprobe + devlink + PCI reset will
100% crash it).

In order to annotate devlink_register() will lockdep of holding
device_lock, I added workaround in this driver.

Thanks

----------------------
From previous cover letter:
Hi Dave and Jakub,

This series prepares code to remove devlink_reload_enable/_disable API
and in order to do, we move all devlink_register() calls to be right
before devlink_reload_enable().

The best place for such a call should be right before exiting from
the probe().

This is done because devlink_register() opens devlink netlink to the
users and gives them a venue to issue commands before initialization
is finished.

1. Some drivers were aware of such "functionality" and tried to protect
themselves with extra locks, state machines and devlink_reload_enable().
Let's assume that it worked for them, but I'm personally skeptical about
it.

2. Some drivers copied that pattern, but without locks and state
machines. That protected them from reload flows, but not from any _set_
routines.

3. And all other drivers simply didn't understand the implications of early
devlink_register() and can be seen as "broken".
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink
is fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured. Indirectly this change fixes the commit mentioned
below where devlink_unregister() was prematurely removed.

Fixes: db4278c5 ("devlink: Make devlink_register to be void")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Open user space access to the devlink after driver is probed.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Open access to the devlink interface when the driver fully initialized.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Make sure that devlink is open to receive user input when all
parameters are initialized.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The change of devlink_alloc() to accept device makes sure that device
is fully initialized and device_register() does nothing except allowing
users to use that devlink instance.

Such change ensures that no user input will be usable till that point and
it eliminates the need to worry about internal locking as long as devlink_register
is called last since all accesses to the devlink are during initialization.

This change fixes the following lockdep warning.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.14.0-rc2+ #27 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 devlink/265 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff8880133c2bc0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
 but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffff8362b468 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x2b/0x8d0
 which lock already depends on the new lock.
 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310
        devlink_register+0xe7/0x280
        mlx5_devlink_register+0x118/0x480 [mlx5_core]
        mlx5_init_one+0x34b/0x440 [mlx5_core]
        probe_one+0x480/0x6e0 [mlx5_core]
        pci_device_probe+0x2a0/0x4a0
        really_probe+0x1cb/0xba0
        __driver_probe_device+0x18f/0x470
        driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
        __driver_attach+0x1ce/0x400
        bus_for_each_dev+0x11e/0x1a0
        bus_add_driver+0x309/0x570
        driver_register+0x20f/0x390
        0xffffffffa04a0062
        do_one_initcall+0xd5/0x400
        do_init_module+0x1c8/0x760
        load_module+0x7d9d/0xa4b0
        __do_sys_finit_module+0x118/0x1a0
        do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

 -> #0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2999/0x5a40
        lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0
        __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310
        mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
        mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x185/0x2b0 [mlx5_core]
        devlink_reload+0x1f2/0x640
        devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6c3/0x10d0
        genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0
        genl_rcv_msg+0x27f/0x4a0
        netlink_rcv_skb+0x11e/0x340
        genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
        netlink_unicast+0x433/0x700
        netlink_sendmsg+0x6fb/0xbe0
        sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0
        __sys_sendto+0x192/0x240
        __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0
        do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

 other info that might help us debug this:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(devlink_mutex);
                                lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
                                lock(devlink_mutex);
   lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 3 locks held by devlink/265:
  #0: ffffffff836371d0 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40
  #1: ffffffff83637288 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x31a/0x4a0
  #2: ffffffff8362b468 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x2b/0x8d0

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 265 Comm: devlink Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #27
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
  check_noncircular+0x268/0x310
  ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460
  ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
  ? alloc_chain_hlocks+0x1e6/0x5a0
  __lock_acquire+0x2999/0x5a40
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0
  ? add_lock_to_list.constprop.0+0x6c/0x530
  lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0
  ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
  ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0
  ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
  __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310
  ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
  ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
  ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110
  ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1160/0x1160
  ? mlx5_lag_is_active+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core]
  ? lock_downgrade+0x6d0/0x6d0
  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12e/0x270
  ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
  ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x185/0x2b0 [mlx5_core]
  ? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0x308/0xac0
  ? mlx5_devlink_info_get+0x1f0/0x1f0 [mlx5_core]
  ? __build_skb_around+0x110/0x2b0
  ? __alloc_skb+0x113/0x2b0
  devlink_reload+0x1f2/0x640
  ? devlink_unregister+0x1e0/0x1e0
  ? security_capable+0x51/0x90
  devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6c3/0x10d0
  ? devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit+0x1e0/0x1e0
  ? devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x72/0x8d0
  genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0
  ? __lock_acquire+0x15e2/0x5a40
  ? genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse.constprop.0+0x240/0x240
  ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1160/0x1160
  ? security_capable+0x51/0x90
  genl_rcv_msg+0x27f/0x4a0
  ? genl_get_cmd+0x3c0/0x3c0
  ? lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0
  ? devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit+0x1e0/0x1e0
  ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0
  netlink_rcv_skb+0x11e/0x340
  ? genl_get_cmd+0x3c0/0x3c0
  ? netlink_ack+0x930/0x930
  genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
  netlink_unicast+0x433/0x700
  ? netlink_attachskb+0x750/0x750
  ? __alloc_skb+0x113/0x2b0
  netlink_sendmsg+0x6fb/0xbe0
  ? netlink_unicast+0x700/0x700
  ? netlink_unicast+0x700/0x700
  sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0
  __sys_sendto+0x192/0x240
  ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0
  ? do_sys_openat2+0x10a/0x370
  ? down_write_nested+0x150/0x150
  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x215/0xd50
  ? __x64_sys_openat+0x11f/0x1d0
  ? __x64_sys_open+0x1a0/0x1a0
  __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0
  ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1d/0x50
  do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
 RIP: 0033:0x7f50b50b6b3a
 Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 83 ec 30 44 89 4c
 RSP: 002b:00007fff6c0d3f38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007f50b50b6b3a
 RDX: 0000000000000038 RSI: 000055763ac08440 RDI: 0000000000000003
 RBP: 000055763ac08410 R08: 00007f50b5192200 R09: 000000000000000c
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055763ac08410 R15: 000055763ac08440
 mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0: firmware version: 4.8.9999
 mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0: 0.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (8.0 GT/s PCIe x255 link)
 mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0 eth1: Link up

Fixes: a6f3b623 ("net/mlx5: Move devlink registration before interfaces load")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Refactor the code to make sure that devlink_register() is the last
command during initialization stage.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Separate devlink registrations and traps registrations so devlink will
be registered when driver is fully initialized.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is fully
configured. This change allows us to delete call to devlink_params_publish()
and impossible check during unregister flow.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Move devlink_registration routine to be the last command, when the
device is fully initialized.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Move devlink registration to be the last command in device activation,
so it opens the driver to accept such devlink commands from the user
when it is fully initialized.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Move devlink_register to be the last command in the initialization
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The liquidio driver is broken by design. It initialize PCI devices
in separate delayed works. It causes to the situation where device lock
is dropped during initialize and remove sequences.

That lock is part of driver/core and needed to protect from races during
init, destroy and bus invocations.

In addition to lack of locking protection, it has incorrect order of
destroy flows and very questionable synchronization scheme based on
atomic_t.

This change doesn't fix that driver but makes sure that rest of the
netdev subsystem doesn't suffer from such basic protection by adding
device_lock over devlink_*() APIs and by moving devlink_register()
to be last command in setup_nic_devices().
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Move devlink_register() to be last command in devlink configuration
sequence, so no user space access will be possible till devlink instance
is fully operable. As part of this change, the devlink_params_publish
call is removed as not needed.

This change fixes forgotten devlink_params_unpublish() too.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The devlink core code notified users about add/remove objects without
relation if this object can be accessible or not. In this patch we unify
such user visible notifications in one place.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

clang-14 does not like the custom offsetof() macro in vsc7326:

drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb/vsc7326.c:597:3: error: performing pointer subtraction with a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Werror,-Wnull-pointer-subtraction]
                HW_STAT(RxUnicast, RxUnicastFramesOK),
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb/vsc7326.c:594:56: note: expanded from macro 'HW_STAT'
        { reg, (&((struct cmac_statistics *)NULL)->stat_name) - (u64 *)NULL }

Rewrite this to use the version provided by the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

gcc-10 and later warn about a theoretical array overrun when
accessing priv->int_name_rx_irq[i] with an out of bounds value
of 'i':

drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c: In function 'stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi':
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:3528:17: error: 'snprintf' argument 4 may overlap destination object 'dev' [-Werror=restrict]
 3528 |                 snprintf(int_name, int_name_len, "%s:%s-%d", dev->name, "tx", i);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:3404:60: note: destination object referenced by 'restrict'-qualified argument 1 was declared here
 3404 | static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
      |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~

The warning is a bit strange since it's not actually about the array
bounds but rather about possible string operations with overlapping
arguments, but it's not technically wrong.

Avoid the warning by adding an extra bounds check.

Fixes: 8532f613 ("net: stmmac: introduce MSI Interrupt routines for mac, safety, RX & TX")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210421134743.3260921-1-arnd@kernel.org/Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

of_get_mac_address() reads the same "local-mac-address" property.
... But goes above and beyond by checking the MAC value properly.

printk+message seems outdated too,
so let's put dev_err in the queue.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use resource_size function on resource object
instead of explicit computation.

Clean up coccicheck warning:
./drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c:237:19-22: ERROR:
Missing resource_size with iores [ idx ]
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Replacing kmalloc/kfree/dma_map_single/dma_unmap_single()
with dma_alloc_coherent/dma_free_coherent() helps to reduce
code size, and simplify the code, and coherent DMA will not
clear the cache every time.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of pci_alloc_consistent(),
because only dma_alloc_coherent() is called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Reviewed-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

tcp_nv.c hasn't use any macro or function declared in mm.h. Thus, these files
can be removed from tcp_nv.c safely without affecting the compilation
of the net module.
Signed-off-by: Mianhan Liu <liumh1@shanghaitech.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_xxx_xxx() instead of pci_xxx_xxx(),
because the pci function wrappers are not called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of pci_alloc_consistent(),
because only dma_alloc_coherent() is called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of pci_alloc_consistent(),
because only dma_alloc_coherent() is called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_map_single() instead of pci_map_single(),
because the pci function wrappers are not called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use dma_map_single() instead of pci_map_single(),
because only dma_map_single() is called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>