- 02 Mar, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing a full fsync, if we have prealloc extents beyond (or at) eof, and the leaves that contain them were not modified in the current transaction, we end up not logging them. This results in losing those extents when we replay the log after a power failure, since the inode is truncated to the current value of the logged i_size. Just like for the fast fsync path, we need to always log all prealloc extents starting at or beyond i_size. The fast fsync case was fixed in commit 471d557a ("Btrfs: fix loss of prealloc extents past i_size after fsync log replay") but it missed the full fsync path. The problem exists since the very early days, when the log tree was added by commit e02119d5 ("Btrfs: Add a write ahead tree log to optimize synchronous operations"). Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt # Create our test file with many file extent items, so that they span # several leaves of metadata, even if the node/page size is 64K. Use # direct IO and not fsync/O_SYNC because it's both faster and it avoids # clearing the full sync flag from the inode - we want the fsync below # to trigger the slow full sync code path. $ xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 4K 0 16M" /mnt/foo # Now add two preallocated extents to our file without extending the # file's size. One right at i_size, and another further beyond, leaving # a gap between the two prealloc extents. $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 16M 1M" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 20M 1M" /mnt/foo # Make sure everything is durably persisted and the transaction is # committed. This makes all created extents to have a generation lower # than the generation of the transaction used by the next write and # fsync. sync # Now overwrite only the first extent, which will result in modifying # only the first leaf of metadata for our inode. Then fsync it. This # fsync will use the slow code path (inode full sync bit is set) because # it's the first fsync since the inode was created/loaded. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite 0 4K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo # Extent list before power failure. $ xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/foo /mnt/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 2178048..2178055 8 0x0 1: [8..16383]: 26632..43007 16376 0x0 2: [16384..32767]: 2156544..2172927 16384 0x0 3: [32768..34815]: 2172928..2174975 2048 0x800 4: [34816..40959]: hole 6144 5: [40960..43007]: 2174976..2177023 2048 0x801 <power fail> # Mount fs again, trigger log replay. $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt # Extent list after power failure and log replay. $ xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/foo /mnt/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 2178048..2178055 8 0x0 1: [8..16383]: 26632..43007 16376 0x0 2: [16384..32767]: 2156544..2172927 16384 0x1 # The prealloc extents at file offsets 16M and 20M are missing. So fix this by calling btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() when we are doing a full fsync, so that we always log all prealloc extents beyond eof. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When looping btrfs/074 with 64K page size and 4K sectorsize, there is a low chance (1/50~1/100) to crash with the following ASSERT() triggered in btrfs_subpage_start_writer(): ret = atomic_add_return(nbits, &subpage->writers); ASSERT(ret == nbits); <<< This one <<< [CAUSE] With more debugging output on the parameters of btrfs_subpage_start_writer(), it shows a very concerning error: ret=29 nbits=13 start=393216 len=53248 For @nbits it's correct, but @ret which is the returned value from atomic_add_return(), it's not only larger than nbits, but also larger than max sectors per page value (for 64K page size and 4K sector size, it's 16). This indicates that some call sites are not properly decreasing the value. And that's exactly the case, in btrfs_page_unlock_writer(), due to the fact that we can have page locked either by lock_page() or process_one_page(), we have to check if the subpage has any writer. If no writers, it's locked by lock_page() and we only need to unlock it. But unfortunately the check for the writers are completely opposite: if (atomic_read(&subpage->writers)) /* No writers, locked by plain lock_page() */ return unlock_page(page); We directly unlock the page if it has writers, which is the completely opposite what we want. Thankfully the affected call site is only limited to extent_write_locked_range(), so it's mostly affecting compressed write. [FIX] Just fix the wrong check condition to fix the bug. Fixes: e55a0de1 ("btrfs: rework page locking in __extent_writepage()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There is a big gap between inode_should_defrag() and autodefrag extent size threshold. For inode_should_defrag() it has a flexible @small_write value. For compressed extent is 16K, and for non-compressed extent it's 64K. However for autodefrag extent size threshold, it's always fixed to the default value (256K). This means, the following write sequence will trigger autodefrag to defrag ranges which didn't trigger autodefrag: pwrite 0 8k sync pwrite 8k 128K sync The latter 128K write will also be considered as a defrag target (if other conditions are met). While only that 8K write is really triggering autodefrag. Such behavior can cause extra IO for autodefrag. Close the gap, by copying the @small_write value into inode_defrag, so that later autodefrag can use the same @small_write value which triggered autodefrag. With the existing transid value, this allows autodefrag really to scan the ranges which triggered autodefrag. Although this behavior change is mostly reducing the extent_thresh value for autodefrag, I believe in the future we should allow users to specify the autodefrag extent threshold through mount options, but that's an other problem to consider in the future. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by:
-
- 23 Feb, 2022 6 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Although we have btrfs_requeue_inode_defrag(), for autodefrag we are still just exhausting all inode_defrag items in the tree. This means, it doesn't make much difference to requeue an inode_defrag, other than scan the inode from the beginning till its end. Change the behaviour to always scan from offset 0 of an inode, and till the end. By this we get the following benefit: - Straight-forward code - No more re-queue related check - Fewer members in inode_defrag We still keep the same btrfs_get_fs_root() and btrfs_iget() check for each loop, and added extra should_auto_defrag() check per-loop. Note: the patch needs to be backported and is intentionally written to minimize the diff size, code will be cleaned up later. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For extent maps, if they are not compressed extents and are adjacent by logical addresses and file offsets, they can be merged into one larger extent map. Such merged extent map will have the higher generation of all the original ones. But this brings a problem for autodefrag, as it relies on accurate extent_map::generation to determine if one extent should be defragged. For merged extent maps, their higher generation can mark some older extents to be defragged while the original extent map doesn't meet the minimal generation threshold. Thus this will cause extra IO. So solve the problem, here we introduce a new flag, EXTENT_FLAG_MERGED, to indicate if the extent map is merged from one or more ems. And for autodefrag, if we find a merged extent map, and its generation meets the generation requirement, we just don't use this one, and go back to defrag_get_extent() to read extent maps from subvolume trees. This could cause more read IO, but should result less defrag data write, so in the long run it should be a win for autodefrag. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For defrag, we don't really want to use btrfs_get_extent() to iterate all extent maps of an inode. The reasons are: - btrfs_get_extent() can merge extent maps And the result em has the higher generation of the two, causing defrag to mark unnecessary part of such merged large extent map. This in fact can result extra IO for autodefrag in v5.16+ kernels. However this patch is not going to completely solve the problem, as one can still using read() to trigger extent map reading, and got them merged. The completely solution for the extent map merging generation problem will come as an standalone fix. - btrfs_get_extent() caches the extent map result Normally it's fine, but for defrag the target range may not get another read/write for a long long time. Such cache would only increase the memory usage. - btrfs_get_extent() doesn't skip older extent map Unlike the old find_new_extent() which uses btrfs_search_forward() to skip the older subtree, thus it will pick up unnecessary extent maps. This patch will fix the regression by introducing defrag_get_extent() to replace the btrfs_get_extent() call. This helper will: - Not cache the file extent we found It will search the file extent and manually convert it to em. - Use btrfs_search_forward() to skip entire ranges which is modified in the past This should reduce the IO for autodefrag. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
From the very beginning of btrfs defrag, there is a check to reject extents which meet both conditions: - Physically adjacent We may want to defrag physically adjacent extents to reduce the number of extents or the size of subvolume tree. - Larger than 128K This may be there for compressed extents, but unfortunately 128K is exactly the max capacity for compressed extents. And the check is > 128K, thus it never rejects compressed extents. Furthermore, the compressed extent capacity bug is fixed by previous patch, there is no reason for that check anymore. The original check has a very small ranges to reject (the target extent size is > 128K, and default extent threshold is 256K), and for compressed extent it doesn't work at all. So it's better just to remove the rejection, and allow us to defrag physically adjacent extents. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] For compressed extents, defrag ioctl will always try to defrag any compressed extents, wasting not only IO but also CPU time to compress/decompress: mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount -o compress $DEV $MNT xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" $MNT/foobar sync xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 128K 128K" $MNT/foobar sync echo "=== before ===" xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/foobar btrfs filesystem defrag $MNT/foobar sync echo "=== after ===" xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/foobar Then it shows the 2 128K extents just get COW for no extra benefit, with extra IO/CPU spent: === before === /mnt/btrfs/file1: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x8 1: [256..511]: 26632..26887 256 0x9 === after === /mnt/btrfs/file1: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26640..26895 256 0x8 1: [256..511]: 26648..26903 256 0x9 This affects not only v5.16 (after the defrag rework), but also v5.15 (before the defrag rework). [CAUSE] From the very beginning, btrfs defrag never checks if one extent is already at its max capacity (128K for compressed extents, 128M otherwise). And the default extent size threshold is 256K, which is already beyond the compressed extent max size. This means, by default btrfs defrag ioctl will mark all compressed extent which is not adjacent to a hole/preallocated range for defrag. [FIX] Introduce a helper to grab the maximum extent size, and then in defrag_collect_targets() and defrag_check_next_extent(), reject extents which are already at their max capacity. Reported-by: -
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] With older kernels (before v5.16), btrfs will defrag preallocated extents. While with newer kernels (v5.16 and newer) btrfs will not defrag preallocated extents, but it will defrag the extent just before the preallocated extent, even it's just a single sector. This can be exposed by the following small script: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c sync -c "falloc 4k 16K" $mnt/file xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file btrfs fi defrag $mnt/file sync xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file The output looks like this on older kernels: /mnt/btrfs/file: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 26624..26631 8 0x0 1: [8..39]: 26632..26663 32 0x801 /mnt/btrfs/file: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..39]: 26664..26703 40 0x1 Which defrags the single sector along with the preallocated extent, and replace them with an regular extent into a new location (caused by data COW). This wastes most of the data IO just for the preallocated range. On the other hand, v5.16 is slightly better: /mnt/btrfs/file: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 26624..26631 8 0x0 1: [8..39]: 26632..26663 32 0x801 /mnt/btrfs/file: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 26664..26671 8 0x0 1: [8..39]: 26632..26663 32 0x801 The preallocated range is not defragged, but the sector before it still gets defragged, which has no need for it. [CAUSE] One of the function reused by the old and new behavior is defrag_check_next_extent(), it will determine if we should defrag current extent by checking the next one. It only checks if the next extent is a hole or inlined, but it doesn't check if it's preallocated. On the other hand, out of the function, both old and new kernel will reject preallocated extents. Such inconsistent behavior causes above behavior. [FIX] - Also check if next extent is preallocated If so, don't defrag current extent. - Add comments for each branch why we reject the extent This will reduce the IO caused by defrag ioctl and autodefrag. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
- 15 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In the rework of btrfs_defrag_file(), we always call defrag_one_cluster() and increase the offset by cluster size, which is only 256K. But there are cases where we have a large extent (e.g. 128M) which doesn't need to be defragged at all. Before the refactor, we can directly skip the range, but now we have to scan that extent map again and again until the cluster moves after the non-target extent. Fix the problem by allow defrag_one_cluster() to increase btrfs_defrag_ctrl::last_scanned to the end of an extent, if and only if the last extent of the cluster is not a target. The test script looks like this: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null mount $dev $mnt # As btrfs ioctl uses 32M as extent_threshold xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64M" $mnt/file1 sync # Some fragemented range to defrag xfs_io -s -c "pwrite 65548k 4k" \ -c "pwrite 65544k 4k" \ -c "pwrite 65540k 4k" \ -c "pwrite 65536k 4k" \ $mnt/file1 sync echo "=== before ===" xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1 echo "=== after ===" btrfs fi defrag $mnt/file1 sync xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1 umount $mnt With extra ftrace put into defrag_one_cluster(), before the patch it would result tons of loops: (As defrag_one_cluster() is inlined, the function name is its caller) btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816026: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144 btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816027: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=262144 len=262144 btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=524288 len=262144 btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=786432 len=262144 btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=1048576 len=262144 ... btrfs-126062 [005] ..... 4682.816043: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=262144 But with this patch there will be just one loop, then directly to the end of the extent: btrfs-130471 [014] ..... 5434.029558: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144 btrfs-130471 [014] ..... 5434.029559: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=16384 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Dāvis Mosāns authored
Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory we have allocated for buffer. This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside of allocated memory. This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using btrfs send can get #GP kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P OE 5.17.0-rc2-1 #12 kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0:* 48 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%rax <-- trapping instruction 3: 48 8d 79 08 lea 0x8(%rcx),%rdi 7: 48 83 e7 f8 and $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi b: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) e: 44 89 f0 mov %r14d,%eax 11: 48 8b 54 06 f8 mov -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212 kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000 kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312) kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455) kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397) kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377) kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332) kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301) kernel: </TASK> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by:Dāvis Mosāns <davispuh@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 09 Feb, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Dāvis Mosāns authored
Currently if we get IO error while doing send then we abort without logging information about which file caused issue. So log it to help with debugging. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(): $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c: (...) static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ... { (...) WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); (...) } (...) The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following: [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186 [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...) [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50 [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000 [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488 [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460 [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0 [947.571072] Call Trace: [947.572354] <TASK> [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998 [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156 [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407 [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139 [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32 [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [947.597561] </TASK> [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]--- This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made by commit ce8ea7cc ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning, and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability. We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem() is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report. To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it. This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered elsewhere. An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather recent commit e076ab2a ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example: [ 8948.247280] ====================================================== [ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted [ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock: [ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.250638] but task is already holding lock: [ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.252018] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 8948.252710] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 8948.253343] -> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 8948.253950] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900 [ 8948.254354] start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.254859] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.255408] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 8948.255942] btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs] [ 8948.256406] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 8948.256870] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8948.257413] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [ 8948.257961] btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs] [ 8948.258418] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 8948.258793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 8948.259146] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 8948.259709] -> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 8948.260330] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900 [ 8948.260692] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.261234] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 8948.261766] btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [ 8948.262379] btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs] [ 8948.262909] open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs] [ 8948.263359] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 8948.263863] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 8948.264242] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 8948.264594] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 8948.265017] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.265462] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 8948.265851] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 8948.266203] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 8948.266554] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 8948.266940] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 8948.267300] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 8948.267790] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 8948.268322] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260 [ 8948.268733] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 8948.269092] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.269591] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.270087] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 8948.270588] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs] [ 8948.271051] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.271586] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs] [ 8948.272071] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs] [ 8948.272579] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs] [ 8948.273113] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs] [ 8948.273573] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0 [ 8948.273942] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90 [ 8948.274371] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.274876] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.275417] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs] [ 8948.275863] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs] [ 8948.276438] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0 [ 8948.276829] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0 [ 8948.277189] kthread+0xf2/0x120 [ 8948.277506] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 8948.277868] other info that might help us debug this: [ 8948.278548] Chain exists of: sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex [ 8948.279601] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 8948.280102] CPU0 CPU1 [ 8948.280508] ---- ---- [ 8948.280915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex); [ 8948.281271] lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex); [ 8948.281915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex); [ 8948.282487] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 8948.282800] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570: [ 8948.283750] #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0 [ 8948.284609] #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0 [ 8948.285637] #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.286674] #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.287596] stack backtrace: [ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 [ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] [ 8948.290298] Call Trace: [ 8948.290517] <TASK> [ 8948.290700] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73 [ 8948.291026] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 8948.291375] ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.291826] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260 [ 8948.292241] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 8948.292714] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.293241] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140 [ 8948.293601] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 8948.294055] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.294518] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs] [ 8948.294957] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 8948.295312] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs] [ 8948.295813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 8948.296270] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs] [ 8948.296691] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.297175] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs] [ 8948.297678] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs] [ 8948.298123] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs] [ 8948.298570] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs] [ 8948.299061] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs] [ 8948.299495] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0 [ 8948.299817] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110 [ 8948.300160] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0 [ 8948.300494] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90 [ 8948.300874] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 8948.301243] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs] [ 8948.301706] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0 [ 8948.302055] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 8948.302564] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs] [ 8948.302970] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs] [ 8948.303510] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0 [ 8948.303860] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 8948.304221] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0 [ 8948.304543] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 8948.304904] kthread+0xf2/0x120 [ 8948.305184] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 8948.305598] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 8948.305921] </TASK> It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different code paths. So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/Reviewed-by:Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Once we start writeback (have called btrfs_run_delalloc_range()), we allocate an extent, create an extent map point to that extent, with a generation of (u64)-1, created the ordered extent and then clear the DELALLOC bit from the range in the inode's io tree. Such extent map can pass the first call of defrag_collect_targets(), as its generation is (u64)-1, meets any possible minimal generation check. And the range will not have DELALLOC bit, also passing the DELALLOC bit check. It will only be re-checked in the second call of defrag_collect_targets(), which will wait for writeback. But at that stage we have already spent our time waiting for some IO we may or may not want to defrag. Let's reject such extents early so we won't waste our time. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There is a user report about "btrfs filesystem defrag" causing 120s timeout problem. For btrfs_defrag_file() it will iterate all file extents if called from defrag ioctl, thus it can take a long time. There is no reason not to release the CPU during such a long operation. Add cond_resched() after defragged one cluster. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/10e51417-2203-f0a4-2021-86c8511cc367@gmx.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 31 Jan, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
After the recent changes made by commit c2e39305 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it") and its followup fix, commit 651740a5 ("btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an extent buffer"), we can now end up not cleaning up space reservations of log tree extent buffers after a transaction abort happens, as well as not cleaning up still dirty extent buffers. This happens because if writeback for a log tree extent buffer failed, then we have cleared the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE from the extent buffer and we have also set the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR on it. Later on, when trying to free the log tree with free_log_tree(), which iterates over the tree, we can end up getting an -EIO error when trying to read a node or a leaf, since read_extent_buffer_pages() returns -EIO if an extent buffer does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE set and has the EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR bit set. Getting that -EIO means that we return immediately as we can not iterate over the entire tree. In that case we never update the reserved space for an extent buffer in the respective block group and space_info object. When this happens we get the following traces when unmounting the fs: [174957.284509] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1913: errno=-5 IO failure [174957.286497] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in free_log_tree:3420: errno=-5 IO failure [174957.399379] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [174957.402497] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:127 btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs] [174957.407523] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...) [174957.424917] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1 [174957.426689] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [174957.428716] RIP: 0010:btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs] [174957.429717] Code: 21 48 8b bd (...) [174957.432867] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffdd0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [174957.433632] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: ffff8b0758edd1c8 [174957.434689] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0b467e7 RDI: ffff8b0758edd000 [174957.436068] RBP: ffff8b0758edd000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [174957.437114] R10: 0000000000000246 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b09c3848148 [174957.438140] R13: ffff8b09c3848198 R14: ffff8b0758edd188 R15: dead000000000100 [174957.439317] FS: 00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [174957.440402] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [174957.441164] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [174957.442117] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [174957.443076] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [174957.443948] Call Trace: [174957.444264] <TASK> [174957.444538] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x255/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.445238] close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs] [174957.445803] ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290 [174957.446250] generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120 [174957.446832] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [174957.447305] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [174957.447890] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0 [174957.448440] cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0 [174957.448888] task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 [174957.449336] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0 [174957.449934] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40 [174957.450512] do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 [174957.450980] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [174957.451605] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97 [174957.452059] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 (...) [174957.454320] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [174957.455262] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97 [174957.456131] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0 [174957.457118] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40 [174957.458005] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [174957.459113] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000 [174957.460193] </TASK> [174957.460534] irq event stamp: 0 [174957.461003] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.461947] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.463147] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.465116] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.466323] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3af ]--- [174957.467282] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [174957.468184] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3976 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.470066] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...) [174957.483137] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1 [174957.484691] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [174957.486853] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs] [174957.488050] Code: 00 00 00 ad de (...) [174957.491479] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffde0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [174957.492520] RAX: ffff8b08d79310b0 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [174957.493868] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: fffff443055ee600 RDI: ffffffffb1131846 [174957.495183] RBP: ffff8b08d79310b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [174957.496580] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b08d7931000 [174957.498027] R13: ffff8b09c38492b0 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [174957.499438] FS: 00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [174957.500990] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [174957.502117] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [174957.503513] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [174957.504864] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [174957.506167] Call Trace: [174957.506654] <TASK> [174957.507047] close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs] [174957.507867] ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290 [174957.508567] generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120 [174957.509447] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [174957.510194] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [174957.511123] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0 [174957.511976] cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0 [174957.512610] task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 [174957.513309] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0 [174957.514231] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40 [174957.515069] do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 [174957.515718] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [174957.516688] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97 [174957.517413] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 d8 (...) [174957.521052] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [174957.522514] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97 [174957.523950] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0 [174957.525375] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40 [174957.526763] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [174957.528058] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000 [174957.529404] </TASK> [174957.529843] irq event stamp: 0 [174957.530256] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.531061] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.532075] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [174957.533083] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [174957.533865] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3b0 ]--- [174957.534452] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info 4 has 1070841856 free, is not full [174957.535404] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info total=1073741824, used=2785280, pinned=0, reserved=49152, may_use=0, readonly=65536 zone_unusable=0 [174957.537029] BTRFS info (device dm-0): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.537859] BTRFS info (device dm-0): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.538697] BTRFS info (device dm-0): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.539552] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 [174957.540403] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 This also means that in case we have log tree extent buffers that are still dirty, we can end up not cleaning them up in case we find an extent buffer with EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR set on it, as in that case we have no way for iterating over the rest of the tree. This issue is very often triggered with test cases generic/475 and generic/648 from fstests. The issue could almost be fixed by iterating over the io tree attached to each log root which keeps tracks of the range of allocated extent buffers, log_root->dirty_log_pages, however that does not work and has some inconveniences: 1) After we sync the log, we clear the range of the extent buffers from the io tree, so we can't find them after writeback. We could keep the ranges in the io tree, with a separate bit to signal they represent extent buffers already written, but that means we need to hold into more memory until the transaction commits. How much more memory is used depends a lot on whether we are able to allocate contiguous extent buffers on disk (and how often) for a log tree - if we are able to, then a single extent state record can represent multiple extent buffers, otherwise we need multiple extent state record structures to track each extent buffer. In fact, my earlier approach did that: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/3aae7c6728257c7ce2279d6660ee2797e5e34bbd.1641300250.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ However that can cause a very significant negative impact on performance, not only due to the extra memory usage but also because we get a larger and deeper dirty_log_pages io tree. We got a report that, on beefy machines at least, we can get such performance drop with fsmark for example: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220117082426.GE32491@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ 2) We would be doing it only to deal with an unexpected and exceptional case, which is basically failure to read an extent buffer from disk due to IO failures. On a healthy system we don't expect transaction aborts to happen after all; 3) Instead of relying on iterating the log tree or tracking the ranges of extent buffers in the dirty_log_pages io tree, using the radix tree that tracks extent buffers (fs_info->buffer_radix) to find all log tree extent buffers is not reliable either, because after writeback of an extent buffer it can be evicted from memory by the release page callback of the btree inode (btree_releasepage()). Since there's no way to be able to properly cleanup a log tree without being able to read its extent buffers from disk and without using more memory to track the logical ranges of the allocated extent buffers do the following: 1) When we fail to cleanup a log tree, setup a flag that indicates that failure; 2) Trigger writeback of all log tree extent buffers that are still dirty, and wait for the writeback to complete. This is just to cleanup their state, page states, page leaks, etc; 3) When unmounting the fs, ignore if the number of bytes reserved in a block group and in a space_info is not 0 if, and only if, we failed to cleanup a log tree. Also ignore only for metadata block groups and the metadata space_info object. This is far from a perfect solution, but it serves to silence test failures such as those from generic/475 and generic/648. However having a non-zero value for the reserved bytes counters on unmount after a transaction abort, is not such a terrible thing and it's completely harmless, it does not affect the filesystem integrity in any way. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Rix authored
Clang static analysis reports this problem ioctl.c:3333:8: warning: 3rd function call argument is an uninitialized value ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info, cancel is only set in one branch of an if-check and is always used. So initialize to false. Fixes: 1a15eb72 ("btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls") Reviewed-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot: 1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots; 2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list; 3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free. This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by:
-
Su Yue authored
Check item size before accessing the device item to avoid out of bound access, similar to inode_item check. Signed-off-by:
Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Reviewed-by:
-
Su Yue authored
while mounting the crafted image, out-of-bounds access happens: [350.429619] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/btrfs/struct-funcs.c:161:1 [350.429636] index 1048096 is out of range for type 'page *[16]' [350.429650] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1 [350.429652] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [350.429653] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [350.429772] Call Trace: [350.429774] <TASK> [350.429776] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c [350.429780] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50 [350.429786] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x66/0x70 [350.429791] btrfs_get_16+0xfd/0x120 [btrfs] [350.429832] check_leaf+0x754/0x1a40 [btrfs] [350.429874] ? filemap_read+0x34a/0x390 [350.429878] ? load_balance+0x175/0xfc0 [350.429881] validate_extent_buffer+0x244/0x310 [btrfs] [350.429911] btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs] [350.429935] end_bio_extent_readpage+0x3af/0x850 [btrfs] [350.429969] ? newidle_balance+0x259/0x480 [350.429972] end_workqueue_fn+0x29/0x40 [btrfs] [350.429995] btrfs_work_helper+0x71/0x330 [btrfs] [350.430030] ? __schedule+0x2fb/0xa40 [350.430033] process_one_work+0x1f6/0x400 [350.430035] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430036] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 [350.430037] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430038] kthread+0x165/0x190 [350.430041] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [350.430043] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [350.430047] </TASK> [350.430077] BTRFS warning (device loop0): bad eb member start: ptr 0xffe20f4e start 20975616 member offset 4293005178 size 2 check_leaf() is checking the leaf: corrupt leaf: root=4 block=29396992 slot=1, bad key order, prev (16140901064495857664 1 0) current (1 204 12582912) leaf 29396992 items 6 free space 3565 generation 6 owner DEV_TREE leaf 29396992 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 fs uuid a62e00e8-e94e-4200-8217-12444de93c2e chunk uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 item 0 key (16140901064495857664 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3955 itemsize 40 generation 0 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 17592186044416 block group 0 mode 52667 links 33 uid 0 gid 2104132511 rdev 94223634821136 sequence 100305 flags 0x2409000a(none) atime 0.0 (1970-01-01 08:00:00) ctime 2973280098083405823.4294967295 (-269783007-01-01 21:37:03) mtime 18446744071572723616.4026825121 (1902-04-16 12:40:00) otime 9249929404488876031.4294967295 (622322949-04-16 04:25:58) item 1 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 12582912) itemoff 3907 itemsize 48 dev extent chunk_tree 3 chunk_objectid 256 chunk_offset 12582912 length 8388608 chunk_tree_uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 The corrupted leaf of device tree has an inode item. The leaf passed checksum and others checks in validate_extent_buffer until check_leaf_item(). Because of the key type BTRFS_INODE_ITEM, check_inode_item() is called even we are in the device tree. Since the item offset + sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item) > eb->len, out-of-bounds access is triggered. The item end vs leaf boundary check has been done before check_leaf_item(), so fix it by checking item size in check_inode_item() before access of the inode item in extent buffer. Other check functions except check_dev_item() in check_leaf_item() have their item size checks. The commit for check_dev_item() is followed. No regression observed during running fstests. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ CC: Wenqing Liu <wenqingliu0120@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki authored
Quota disable ioctl starts a transaction before waiting for the qgroup rescan worker completes. However, this wait can be infinite and results in deadlock because of circular dependency among the quota disable ioctl, the qgroup rescan worker and the other task with transaction such as block group relocation task. The deadlock happens with the steps following: 1) Task A calls ioctl to disable quota. It starts a transaction and waits for qgroup rescan worker completes. 2) Task B such as block group relocation task starts a transaction and joins to the transaction that task A started. Then task B commits to the transaction. In this commit, task B waits for a commit by task A. 3) Task C as the qgroup rescan worker starts its job and starts a transaction. In this transaction start, task C waits for completion of the transaction that task A started and task B committed. This deadlock was found with fstests test case btrfs/115 and a zoned null_blk device. The test case enables and disables quota, and the block group reclaim was triggered during the quota disable by chance. The deadlock was also observed by running quota enable and disable in parallel with 'btrfs balance' command on regular null_blk devices. An example report of the deadlock: [372.469894] INFO: task kworker/u16:6:103 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [372.479944] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.485067] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.493898] task:kworker/u16:6 state:D stack: 0 pid: 103 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.503285] Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [372.510782] Call Trace: [372.514092] <TASK> [372.521684] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.530104] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.538842] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.547092] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.555591] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.561894] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x18bb/0x2610 [btrfs] [372.570506] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [372.578875] ? free_unref_page+0x3f2/0x650 [372.585484] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.591594] ? release_extent_buffer+0x224/0x420 [btrfs] [372.599264] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xc13/0x10c0 [btrfs] [372.607157] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [372.613054] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extent+0xda0/0xda0 [btrfs] [372.620960] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [372.627137] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.633215] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [372.639404] btrfs_work_helper+0x1ae/0xa90 [btrfs] [372.646268] process_one_work+0x7e9/0x1320 [372.652321] ? lock_release+0x6d0/0x6d0 [372.658081] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 [372.664513] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.670529] worker_thread+0x59e/0xf90 [372.676172] ? process_one_work+0x1320/0x1320 [372.682440] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [372.687550] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [372.693811] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [372.700052] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [372.705517] </TASK> [372.709747] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2347 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [372.729827] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.745907] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.767106] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid: 2347 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.787776] Call Trace: [372.801652] <TASK> [372.812961] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.830011] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.852547] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.871761] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.886792] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.901685] wait_current_trans+0x22c/0x310 [btrfs] [372.919743] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x3d0/0x3d0 [btrfs] [372.938923] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.959085] ? join_transaction+0xc75/0xe30 [btrfs] [372.977706] start_transaction+0x938/0x10a0 [btrfs] [372.997168] transaction_kthread+0x19d/0x3c0 [btrfs] [373.013021] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0xfc0/0xfc0 [btrfs] [373.031678] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [373.047420] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.064645] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [373.078571] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [373.091197] </TASK> [373.105611] INFO: task btrfs:3145 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.114147] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.120401] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.130393] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3145 ppid: 3141 flags:0x00004000 [373.140998] Call Trace: [373.145501] <TASK> [373.149654] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.155306] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.161965] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.168469] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [373.175468] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.180814] wait_for_commit+0x104/0x150 [btrfs] [373.187643] ? test_and_set_bit+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.194772] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.201191] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x69/0x3d0 [btrfs] [373.208738] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [373.214704] ? __btrfs_end_transaction+0x347/0x7b0 [btrfs] [373.222342] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x44d/0x2610 [btrfs] [373.230233] ? join_transaction+0x255/0xe30 [btrfs] [373.237334] ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] [373.245251] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [373.253296] relocate_block_group+0x105/0xc20 [btrfs] [373.260533] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1270/0x1270 [373.267516] ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x85/0x180 [btrfs] [373.275155] ? merge_reloc_roots+0x710/0x710 [btrfs] [373.283602] ? btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0xd30/0xd30 [btrfs] [373.291934] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.298180] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x35c/0x930 [btrfs] [373.306047] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x85/0x210 [btrfs] [373.313229] btrfs_balance+0x12f4/0x2d20 [btrfs] [373.320227] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.326206] ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x210/0x210 [btrfs] [373.333591] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.340031] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 [373.346910] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x548/0x700 [btrfs] [373.354207] btrfs_ioctl+0x7f2/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.360774] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.367957] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.375327] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.383841] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.389993] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.395828] ? mntput_no_expire+0xf7/0xad0 [373.402083] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.408249] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.414486] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.420938] ? trace_raw_output_lock+0xb4/0xe0 [373.427442] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.434224] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.440660] ? force_qs_rnp+0x2a0/0x6b0 [373.446534] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x140 [373.452763] ? __blkcg_punt_bio_submit+0x1b0/0x1b0 [373.459732] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.466089] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.472022] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.477513] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.484823] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f4af7e2bb [373.490493] RSP: 002b:00007ffcbf936178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.500197] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f8f4af7e2bb [373.509451] RDX: 00007ffcbf936220 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.518659] RBP: 00007ffcbf93774a R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f8f4b02d4e0 [373.527872] R10: 00007f8f4ae87740 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [373.537222] R13: 00007ffcbf936220 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002 [373.546506] </TASK> [373.550878] INFO: task btrfs:3146 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.559383] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.565748] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.575748] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3146 ppid: 2168 flags:0x00000000 [373.586314] Call Trace: [373.590846] <TASK> [373.595121] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.600901] ? __lock_acquire+0x23db/0x5030 [373.607176] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.613954] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.619157] schedule_timeout+0x168/0x220 [373.625170] ? usleep_range_state+0x150/0x150 [373.631653] ? mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0 [373.637767] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [373.643993] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x17b/0x410 [373.651267] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.657677] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.664103] wait_for_completion+0x163/0x250 [373.670437] ? bit_wait_timeout+0x160/0x160 [373.676585] btrfs_quota_disable+0x176/0x9a0 [btrfs] [373.683979] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0x12f0/0x12f0 [btrfs] [373.691340] ? down_write+0xd0/0x130 [373.696880] ? down_write_killable+0x150/0x150 [373.703352] btrfs_ioctl+0x3945/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.710061] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.716192] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.722047] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x23cd/0x3050 [373.728486] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.737032] ? set_pte+0x6a/0x90 [373.742271] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x1f0 [373.748506] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.754792] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.761083] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.767521] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.774247] ? __up_read+0x182/0x6e0 [373.780026] ? count_memcg_events.constprop.0+0x46/0x60 [373.787281] ? up_write+0x460/0x460 [373.792932] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.799232] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.805237] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.810947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.818102] RIP: 0033:0x7f1383ea02bb [373.823847] RSP: 002b:00007fffeb4d71f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.833641] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1383ea02bb [373.842961] RDX: 00007fffeb4d7210 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.852179] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000078 [373.861408] R10: 00007f1383daec78 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fffeb4d874a [373.870647] R13: 0000000000493099 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [373.879838] </TASK> [373.884018] Showing all locks held in the system: [373.894250] 3 locks held by kworker/4:1/58: [373.900356] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/63: [373.906333] #0: ffffffff8945ff60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260 [373.917307] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/103: [373.923938] #0: ffff888127b4f138 ((wq_completion)btrfs-qgroup-rescan){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x712/0x1320 [373.936555] #1: ffff88810b817dd8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x73f/0x1320 [373.951109] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x1f6/0x10c0 [btrfs] [373.964027] 2 locks held by less/1803: [373.969982] #0: ffff88813ed56098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x80 [373.981295] #1: ffffc90000b3b2e8 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: n_tty_read+0x9e2/0x1060 [373.992969] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/2347: [373.999893] #0: ffff88813d4887a8 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0xe3/0x3c0 [btrfs] [374.015872] 3 locks held by btrfs/3145: [374.022298] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xc3/0x700 [btrfs] [374.034456] #1: ffff88813d48a0a0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0xfe5/0x2d20 [btrfs] [374.047646] #2: ffff88813d488838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x354/0x930 [btrfs] [374.063295] 4 locks held by btrfs/3146: [374.069647] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38b1/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.081601] #1: ffff88813d488bb8 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38fd/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.094283] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xc8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.106885] #3: ffff88813d489800 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xd5/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.126780] ============================================= To avoid the deadlock, wait for the qgroup rescan worker to complete before starting the transaction for the quota disable ioctl. Clear BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag before the wait and the transaction to request the worker to complete. On transaction start failure, set the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag again. These BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag changes can be done safely since the function btrfs_quota_disable is not called concurrently because of fs_info->subvol_sem. Also check the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag in qgroup_rescan_init to avoid another qgroup rescan worker to start after the previous qgroup worker completed. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Suggested-by:Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following super simple script would crash btrfs at unmount time, if CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT() is set. mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" $mnt/file umount $mnt mount -r ro $dev $mnt btrfs scrub start -Br $mnt umount $mnt This will trigger the following ASSERT() introduced by commit 0a31daa4 ("btrfs: add assertion for empty list of transactions at late stage of umount"). That patch is definitely not the cause, it just makes enough noise for developers. [CAUSE] We will start transaction for the following call chain during scrub: scrub_enumerate_chunks() |- btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() |- btrfs_join_transaction() However for RO mount, there is no running transaction at all, thus btrfs_join_transaction() will start a new transaction. Furthermore, since it's read-only mount, btrfs_sync_fs() will not call btrfs_commit_super() to commit the new but empty transaction. And leads to the ASSERT(). The bug has been there for a long time. Only the new ASSERT() makes it noisy enough to be noticed. [FIX] For read-only scrub on read-only mount, there is no need to start a transaction nor to allocate new chunks in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(). Just do extra read-only mount check in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), and if it's read-only, skip all chunk allocation and go inc_block_group_ro() directly. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When starting a defrag, we should update the writeback index of the inode's mapping in case it currently has a value beyond the start of the range we are defragging. This can help performance and often result in getting less extents after writeback - for e.g., if the current value of the writeback index sits somewhere in the middle of a range that gets dirty by the defrag, then after writeback we can get two smaller extents instead of a single, larger extent. We used to have this before the refactoring in 5.16, but it was removed without any reason to do so. Originally it was added in kernel 3.1, by commit 2a0f7f57 ("Btrfs: fix recursive auto-defrag"), in order to fix a loop with autodefrag resulting in dirtying and writing pages over and over, but some testing on current code did not show that happening, at least with the test described in that commit. So add back the behaviour, as at the very least it is a nice to have optimization. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
A defrag operation can dirty a lot of pages, specially if operating on the entire file or a large file range. Any task dirtying pages should periodically call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(), as stated in that function's comments, otherwise they can leave too many dirty pages in the system. This is what we did before the refactoring in 5.16, and it should have remained, just like in the buffered write path and relocation. So restore that behaviour. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When defragging we can end up collecting a range for defrag that has already pages under delalloc (dirty), as long as the respective extent map for their range is not mapped to a hole, a prealloc extent or the extent map is from an old generation. Most of the time that is harmless from a functional perspective at least, however it can result in a deadlock: 1) At defrag_collect_targets() we find an extent map that meets all requirements but there's delalloc for the range it covers, and we add its range to list of ranges to defrag; 2) The defrag_collect_targets() function is called at defrag_one_range(), after it locked a range that overlaps the range of the extent map; 3) At defrag_one_range(), while the range is still locked, we call defrag_one_locked_target() for the range associated to the extent map we collected at step 1); 4) Then finally at defrag_one_locked_target() we do a call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(), which will reserve data and metadata space. If the space reservations can not be satisfied right away, the flusher might be kicked in and start flushing delalloc and wait for the respective ordered extents to complete. If this happens we will deadlock, because both flushing delalloc and finishing an ordered extent, requires locking the range in the inode's io tree, which was already locked at defrag_collect_targets(). So fix this by skipping extent maps for which there's already delalloc. Fixes: eb793cf8 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to collect target file extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
- 19 Jan, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] After commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") autodefrag no longer properly re-defrag the file from previously finished location. [CAUSE] The recent refactoring of defrag only focuses on defrag ioctl subpage support, doesn't take autodefrag into consideration. There are two problems involved which prevents autodefrag to restart its scan: - No range.start update Previously when one defrag target is found, range->start will be updated to indicate where next search should start from. But now btrfs_defrag_file() doesn't update it anymore, making all autodefrag to rescan from file offset 0. This would also make autodefrag to mark the same range dirty again and again, causing extra IO. - No proper quick exit for defrag_one_cluster() Currently if we reached or exceed @max_sectors limit, we just exit defrag_one_cluster(), and let next defrag_one_cluster() call to do a quick exit. This makes @cur increase, thus no way to properly know which range is defragged and which range is skipped. [FIX] The fix involves two modifications: - Update range->start to next cluster start This is a little different from the old behavior. Previously range->start is updated to the next defrag target. But in the end, the behavior should still be pretty much the same, as now we skip to next defrag target inside btrfs_defrag_file(). Thus if auto-defrag determines to re-scan, then we still do the skip, just at a different timing. - Make defrag_one_cluster() to return >0 to indicate a quick exit So that btrfs_defrag_file() can also do a quick exit, without increasing @cur to the range end, and re-use @cur to update @range->start. - Add comment for btrfs_defrag_file() to mention the range->start update Currently only autodefrag utilize this behavior, as defrag ioctl won't set @max_to_defrag parameter, thus unless interrupted it will always try to defrag the whole range. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There are users using autodefrag mount option reporting obvious increase in IO: > If I compare the write average (in total, I don't have it per process) > when taking idle periods on the same machine: > Linux 5.16: > without autodefrag: ~ 10KiB/s > with autodefrag: between 1 and 2MiB/s. > > Linux 5.15: > with autodefrag:~ 10KiB/s (around the same as without > autodefrag on 5.16) [CAUSE] When autodefrag mount option is enabled, btrfs_defrag_file() will be called with @max_sectors = BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH (1024) to limit how many sectors we can defrag in one try. And then use the number of sectors defragged to determine if we need to re-defrag. But commit b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") uses wrong unit to increase @sectors_defragged, which should be in unit of sector, not byte. This means, if we have defragged any sector, then @sectors_defragged will be >= sectorsize (normally 4096), which is larger than BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH. This makes the @max_sectors check in defrag_one_cluster() to underflow, rendering the whole @max_sectors check useless. Thus causing way more IO for autodefrag mount options, as now there is no limit on how many sectors can really be defragged. [FIX] Fix the problems by: - Use sector as unit when increasing @sectors_defragged - Include @sectors_defragged > @max_sectors case to break the loop - Add extra comment on the return value of btrfs_defrag_file() Reported-by:
Anthony Ruhier <aruhier@mailbox.org> Fixes: b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
During defrag, at btrfs_defrag_file(), we have this loop that iterates over a file range in steps no larger than 256K subranges. If the range is too long, there's no way to interrupt it. So make the loop check in each iteration if there's signal pending, and if there is, break and return -AGAIN to userspace. Before kernel 5.16, we used to allow defrag to be cancelled through a signal, but that was lost with commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()"). This change adds back the possibility to cancel a defrag with a signal and keeps the same semantics, returning -EAGAIN to user space (and not the usually more expected -EINTR). This is also motivated by a recent bug on 5.16 where defragging a 1 byte file resulted in iterating from file range 0 to (u64)-1, as hitting the bug triggered a too long loop, basically requiring one to reboot the machine, as it was not possible to cancel defrag. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When attempting to defrag a file with a single byte, we can end up in a too long loop, which is nearly infinite because at btrfs_defrag_file() we end up with the variable last_byte assigned with a value of 18446744073709551615 (which is (u64)-1). The problem comes from the fact we end up doing: last_byte = round_up(last_byte, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1; So if last_byte was assigned 0, which is i_size - 1, we underflow and end up with the value 18446744073709551615. This is trivial to reproduce and the following script triggers it: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT echo -n "X" > $MNT/foobar btrfs filesystem defragment $MNT/foobar umount $MNT So fix this by not decrementing last_byte by 1 before doing the sector size round up. Also, to make it easier to follow, make the round up right after computing last_byte. Reported-by:
-
- 07 Jan, 2022 11 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Print extra information about how many dirty bytes an uncommitted has at the end of mount. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we extended the size of a swapfile after its header was created (by the mkswap utility) and then try to activate it, we will map the entire file when activating the swap file, instead of limiting to the max size defined in the swap file's header. Currently test case generic/643 from fstests fails because we do not respect that size limit defined in the swap file's header. So fix this by not mapping file ranges beyond the max size defined in the swap header. This is the same type of bug that iomap used to have, and was fixed in commit 36ca7943 ("mm/swap: consider max pages in iomap_swapfile_add_extent"). Fixes: ed46ff3d ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com Signed-off-by:
-
Yang Li authored
The warnings were found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is caused by using 'make W=1'. fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Function parameter or member 'bio_ctrl' not described in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'bio' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'prev_bio_flags' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Excess function parameter 'root' description in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' Note: this is fixing only the warnings regarding parameter list, the first line is not strictly conforming to the kdoc format as the btrfs codebase does not stick to that and keeps the first line more free form (because it's only for internal use). Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Su Yue authored
btrfs_decompress_bio, the only caller of compression_decompress_bio gets type from @cb and passes it to compression_decompress_bio. However, compression_decompress_bio can get compression type directly from @cb. So remove the parameter and access it through @cb. No functional change. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When code modifying extent-io-tree get modified and got that selftest failed, it can take some time to pin down the cause. To make it easier to expose the problem, dump the extent io tree if the selftest failed. This can save developers debug time, especially since the selftest we can not use the trace events, thus have to manually add debug trace points. Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of btrfs_stripe() has similar problems of scrub_chunk(): - Duplicated and ambiguous @base argument Can be fetched from btrfs_block_group::bg. - Ambiguous argument @length It's again device extent length - Ambiguous argument @num The instinctive guess would be mirror number, but in fact it's stripe index. Fix it by: - Remove @base parameter - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len - Rename @num to @stripe_index Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of scrub_chunk() has the following problems: - Duplicated @chunk_offset It is the same as btrfs_block_group::start. - Confusing @length The most instinctive guess is chunk length, and one may want to delete it, but the truth is, it's the device extent length. Fix this by: - Remove @chunk_offset Use btrfs_block_group::start instead. - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len Also rename the caller to remove the ambiguous naming. - Rename @cache to @bg The "_cache" suffix for btrfs_block_group has been removed for a while. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and that's scrub. But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such feature). Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata readahead: - Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada - Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached. - Poor layer separation Metadata readahead works kinda at device level. This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all. This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings unnecessary complexity. - Dead code In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all the debug related code useless and unable to test. Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism completely. [BENCHMARK] There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada. For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5% performance drop for scrub. For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance difference. The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s. The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a resolution of 1 second. Old New Diff SSD 455.3 466.332 +2.42% HDD 103.927 98.012 -5.69% Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For scrub, we trigger two readaheads for two trees, extent tree to get where to scrub, and csum tree to get the data checksum. For csum tree we already trigger readahead in btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), by setting path->reada. But for extent tree we don't have any path based readahead. Add the readahead for extent tree as well, so we can later remove the btrfs_reada_add() based readahead. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In function scrub_stripe() we allocated two btrfs_path's, one @path for extent tree search and another @ppath for full stripe extent tree search for RAID56. This is totally umncessary, as the @ppath usage is completely inside scrub_raid56_parity(), thus we can move the path allocation into scrub_raid56_parity() completely. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The purpose of this function is to unlock all nodes in a btrfs path which are above 'lowest_unlock' and whose slot used is different than 0. As such it used slightly awkward structure of 'if' as well as somewhat cryptic "no_skip" control variable which denotes whether we should check the current level of skipability or no. This patch does the following (cosmetic) refactorings: * Renames 'no_skip' to 'check_skip' and makes it a boolean. This variable controls whether we are below the lowest_unlock/skip_level levels. * Consolidates the 2 conditions which warrant checking whether the current level should be skipped under 1 common if (check_skip) branch, this increase indentation level but is not critical. * Consolidates the 'skip_level < i && i >= lowest_unlock' and 'i >= lowest_unlock && i > skip_level' condition into a common branch since those are identical. * Eliminates the local extent_buffer variable as in this case it doesn't bring anything to function readability. Reviewed-by:
-
