- 04 Mar, 2024 40 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
Change BUG_ON to a proper error handling in the unlikely case of seeing data when the command is started. This is supposed to be reset when the command is finished (send_cmd, send_encoded_extent). Signed-off-by:David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The may_destroy_subvol() looks up a root by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break the allowed range of a root id. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The find_first_extent_item() helper looks up an extent item by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break the allowed range of a extent item offset. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The extent_from_logical() helper looks up an extent item by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break the allowed range of a extent item offset. The same error is already handled in btrfs_backref_iter_start() so add a comment for consistency. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Same comment was added to this type of error, unify that and drop the assertion as we'd find out quickly that something is wrong after returning -EUCLEAN. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The memory allocation error in add_async_extent() is not handled properly, return an error and push the BUG_ON to the caller. Handling it there is not trivial so at least make it visible. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
The "do_list" variable has a rather confusing name, so remove it and directly use btrfs_is_free_space_inode() instead. Reviewed-by:
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The "do_list" variable is only used once, plus its name/meaning is a bit confusing, so remove it and directory use btrfs_is_free_space_inode(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When adding or removing and inode to/from the root's delalloc list, instead of using a BUG_ON() to validate list emptiness, use ASSERT() since this is to check logic errors rather than real errors. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The merge and split callbacks for an inode's io tree are supposed to be called while the io tree's spinlock is being held, so that the given extent_state records are stable, not modified or freed while the callbacks are using them. So add lockdep assertions in the callbacks. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When setting and clearing a delalloc range, at btrfs_set_delalloc_extent() and btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent(), we are adding/removing the inode to/from the root's list of delalloc inodes while under the protection of the inode's lock. This however is not needed, we can add and remove the inode to the root's list without holding the inode's lock because here we are under the protection of the io tree's lock, reducing the size of the critical section delimited by the inode's lock. The inode's lock is used in many other places such as when finishing an ordered extent (when calling btrfs_update_inode_bytes() or btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata(), or decreasing the number of outstanding extents) or when reserving space when doing a buffered or direct IO write (calls to functions from delalloc-space.c). So move the inode add/remove operations to the root's list of delalloc inodes to outside the critical section delimited by the inode's lock. This also allows us to get rid of the BTRFS_INODE_IN_DELALLOC_LIST flag since we can rely on the inode's delalloc bytes counter to determine if the inode is or is not in the list. The following fio based test, that exercises IO to multiple files in the same subvolume, was used to test: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nullb0 MNT=/mnt/nullb0 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT fio --direct=0 --ioengine=sync --thread --directory=$MNT \ --invalidate=1 --group_reporting=1 \ --new_group --rw=randwrite --size=50m --numjobs=200 \ --bs=4k --fsync_on_close=0 --fallocate=none --end_fsync=0 \ --name=foo --filename_format=FioWorkloads.\$jobnum umount $MNT The test was run on a non-debug kernel (Debian's default kernel config) against a 16G null block device. Result before this patch: WRITE: bw=81.9MiB/s (85.9MB/s), 81.9MiB/s-81.9MiB/s (85.9MB/s-85.9MB/s), io=9.77GiB (10.5GB), run=122136-122136msec Result after this patch: WRITE: bw=86.8MiB/s (91.0MB/s), 86.8MiB/s-86.8MiB/s (91.0MB/s-91.0MB/s), io=9.77GiB (10.5GB), run=115180-115180msec Reviewed-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
The function btrfs_add_delalloc_inodes() adds a single inode its root's list of delalloc inodes, so it doesn't make any sense at all for the function's name to be plural. Rename it to the singular form btrfs_add_delalloc_inode() to avoid any confusion. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
This function requires the delalloc lock of the inode's root to be held, so assert it's held. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
There's no need to pass a root argument to __btrfs_del_delalloc_inode() and btrfs_del_delalloc_inode(), we can just pass the inode since the root is always the root associated to that inode. Some remove the root argument from these functions. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
There's no need to pass a root argument to btrfs_add_delalloc_inodes(), we can just pass the inode since the root is always the root associated to the inode in the context it's called. So remove it and have the single caller pass only the inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Do a cleanup in the rest of the headers: - add forward declarations for types referenced by pointers - add includes when types need them This fixes potential compilation problems if the headers are reordered or the missing includes are not provided indirectly. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Do a cleanup in more headers: - add forward declarations for types referenced by pointers - add includes when types need them This fixes potential compilation problems if the headers are reordered or the missing includes are not provided indirectly. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Do a cleanup in the short headers: - add forward declarations for types referenced by pointers - add includes when types need them This fixes potential compilation problems if the headers are reordered or the missing includes are not provided indirectly. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The fs_info and sectorsize remain the same during the loops, no need to set them on each iteration. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Add a convenience helper to get a fs_info from a VFS inode pointer instead of open coding the chain or using btrfs_sb() that in some cases does one more pointer hop. This is implemented as a macro (still with type checking) so we don't need full definitions of struct btrfs_inode, btrfs_root or btrfs_fs_info. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Add convenience helpers to get a fs_info from a page or folio pointer instead of open coding the chain or using btrfs_sb() that in some cases does one more pointer hop. This is implemented as a macro (still with type checking) so we don't need full definitions of struct page, folio, btrfs_root and btrfs_fs_info. The latter can't be static inlines as this would create loop between ctree.h <-> fs.h, or the headers would have to be restructured. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Add convenience helpers to get a struct btrfs_inode from a page or folio pointer instead of open coding the chain or intermediate BTRFS_I. This is implemented as a macro (still with type checking) so we don't need full definitions of struct page or address_space. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Allocate fs_info and root to have a valid fs_info pointer in case it's dereferenced by a helper outside of tests, like find_lock_delalloc_range(). Signed-off-by: -
Lijuan Li authored
__btrfs_add_free_space is only used in free-space-cache.c, so mark it static. Reviewed-by:
Lijuan Li <lilijuan@iscas.ac.cn> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The recommended pattern for transaction abort after error is to place it right after the error is handled. That way it's easier to locate where it failed and help debugging. Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The recommended pattern for transaction abort after error is to place it right after the error is handled. That way it's easier to locate where it failed and help debugging. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The recommended pattern for transaction abort after error is to place it right after the error is handled. That way it's easier to locate where it failed and help debugging. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The error values returned by btrfs_insert_empty_items() are following the common patter of 0/-errno, but some callers check for a value > 0, which can't happen. Document that and update calls to not expect positive values. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The balance state machine is complex so it's good to verify the assumptions in helpers, however reset_balance_state() is used at the end of balance and fs_info::balance_ctl is properly set up before and protected by the exclusive op ownership in btrfs_balance(). Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The file extents are normally reserved in subvolume roots but could be also in the data reloc tree. Change the BUG_ON to assertions as this verifies the usage assumptions. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The BUG_ON in btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class() is a sanity check of the level which is verified in callers, e.g. when initializing an extent buffer or reading from an eb header. Change it to an assertion as this would not happen unless things are really bad and would fail elsewhere too. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
There's one caller of btrfs_read_roots() and that already uses the tree_root pointer, it's pointless to BUG_ON on it. As it's an assumption of the initialization helpers make it an assert instead. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The BUG_ON verifies a condition that should be guaranteed by the correct use of the path search (with keep_locks and lowest_level set), an assertion is the suitable check. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The pointer to root is initialized in btrfs_init_delayed_node(), no need to check for it again. Change the BUG_ON to assertion. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
There's a BUG_ON checking for a valid pointer of fs_info::delayed_root but it is valid since init_mount_fs_info() and has the same lifetime as fs_info. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The get_parent handler looks up a parent of a given dentry, this can be either a subvolume or a directory. The search is set up with offset -1 but it's never expected to find such item, as it would break allowed range of inode number or a root id. This means it's a corruption (ext4 also returns this error code). Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The check_committed_ref() helper looks up an extent item by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break the allowed range of a extent item offset. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption, as it could be caused only by two impossible conditions: - at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key->offset will contain the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item cannot have an offset -1 - after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it's impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size constraints Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The btrfs_init_root_free_objectid() looks up a root by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break the allowed range of a root id. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The btrfs_find_root() looks up a root by a key, allowing to do an inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such item, as it would break allowed the range of a root id. Reviewed-by:
-
