1. 04 Oct, 2023 2 commits
  2. 03 Oct, 2023 1 commit
  3. 02 Oct, 2023 11 commits
  4. 30 Sep, 2023 2 commits
  5. 28 Sep, 2023 4 commits
  6. 27 Sep, 2023 5 commits
  7. 25 Sep, 2023 6 commits
  8. 22 Sep, 2023 8 commits
  9. 21 Sep, 2023 1 commit
    • Ville Syrjälä's avatar
      drm/edid: Fixup h/vsync_end instead of h/vtotal · 2682768b
      Ville Syrjälä authored
      There are some weird EDIDs floating around that have the sync
      pulse extending beyond the end of the blanking period.
      
      On the currently problemtic machine (HP Omni 120) EDID reports
      the following mode:
      "1600x900": 60 108000 1600 1780 1860 1800 900 910 913 1000 0x40 0x5
      which is then "corrected" to have htotal=1861 by the current drm_edid.c
      code.
      
      The fixup code was originally added in commit 7064fef5 ("drm: work
      around EDIDs with bad htotal/vtotal values"). Googling around we end up in
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/297245
      where we find an EDID for a Dell Studio 15, which reports:
      (II) VESA(0): clock: 65.0 MHz   Image Size:  331 x 207 mm
      (II) VESA(0): h_active: 1280  h_sync: 1328  h_sync_end 1360 h_blank_end 1337 h_border: 0
      (II) VESA(0): v_active: 800  v_sync: 803  v_sync_end 809 v_blanking: 810 v_border: 0
      
      Note that if we use the hblank size (as opposed of the hsync_end)
      from the DTD to determine htotal we get exactly 60Hz refresh rate in
      both cases, whereas using hsync_end to determine htotal we get a
      slightly lower refresh rates. This makes me believe the using the
      hblank size is what was intended even in those cases.
      
      Also note that in case of the HP Onmi 120 the VBIOS boots with these:
        crtc timings: 108000 1600 1780 1860 1800 900 910 913 1000, type: 0x40 flags: 0x5
      ie. it just blindly stuffs the bogus hsync_end and htotal from the DTD
      into the transcoder timing registers, and the display works. I believe
      the (at least more modern) hardware will automagically terminate the hsync
      pulse when the timing generator reaches htotal, which again points that we
      should use the hblank size to determine htotal. Unfortunatley the old bug
      reports for the Dell machines are extremely lacking in useful details so
      we have no idea what kind of timings the VBIOS programmed into the
      hardware :(
      
      Let's just flip this quirk around and reduce the length of the sync
      pulse instead of extending the blanking period. This at least seems
      to be the correct thing to do on more modern hardware. And if any
      issues crop up on older hardware we need to debug them properly.
      
      v2: Add debug message breadcrumbs (Jani)
      Reviewed-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8895Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920211934.14920-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
      2682768b