1. 21 Jul, 2023 29 commits
    • Naveen Mamindlapalli's avatar
      octeontx2-pf: implement transmit schedular allocation algorithm · f78dca69
      Naveen Mamindlapalli authored
      unlike strict priority, where number of classes are limited to max
      8, there is no restriction on the number of dwrr child nodes unless
      the count increases the max number of child nodes supported.
      
      Hardware expects strict priority transmit schedular indexes mapped
      to their priority. This patch adds defines transmit schedular allocation
      algorithm such that the above requirement is honored.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNaveen Mamindlapalli <naveenm@marvell.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f78dca69
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'mlxsw-enslavement' · c6514f36
      David S. Miller authored
      Petr Machata says:
      
      ====================
      mlxsw: Permit enslavement to netdevices with uppers
      
      The mlxsw driver currently makes the assumption that the user applies
      configuration in a bottom-up manner. Thus netdevices need to be added to
      the bridge before IP addresses are configured on that bridge or SVI added
      on top of it. Enslaving a netdevice to another netdevice that already has
      uppers is in fact forbidden by mlxsw for this reason. Despite this safety,
      it is rather easy to get into situations where the offloaded configuration
      is just plain wrong.
      
      As an example, take a front panel port, configure an IP address: it gets a
      RIF. Now enslave the port to the bridge, and the RIF is gone. Remove the
      port from the bridge again, but the RIF never comes back. There is a number
      of similar situations, where changing the configuration there and back
      utterly breaks the offload.
      
      Similarly, detaching a front panel port from a configured topology means
      unoffloading of this whole topology -- VLAN uppers, next hops, etc.
      Attaching the port back is then not permitted at all. If it were, it would
      not result in a working configuration, because much of mlxsw is written to
      react to changes in immediate configuration. There is nothing that would go
      visit netdevices in the attached-to topology and offload existing routes
      and VLAN memberships, for example.
      
      In this patchset, introduce a number of replays to be invoked so that this
      sort of post-hoc offload is supported. Then remove the vetoes that
      disallowed enslavement of front panel ports to other netdevices with
      uppers.
      
      The patchset progresses as follows:
      
      - In patch #1, fix an issue in the bridge driver. To my knowledge, the
        issue could not have resulted in a buggy behavior previously, and thus is
        packaged with this patchset instead of being sent separately to net.
      
      - In patch #2, add a new helper to the switchdev code.
      
      - In patch #3, drop mlxsw selftests that will not be relevant after this
        patchset anymore.
      
      - Patches #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 prepare the codebase for smoother
        introduction of the rest of the code.
      
      - Patches #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 and #14 replay various aspects of upper
        configuration when a front panel port is introduced into a topology.
        Individual patches take care of bridge and LAG RIF memberships, switchdev
        replay, nexthop and neighbors replay, and MACVLAN offload.
      
      - Patches #15 and #16 introduce RIFs for newly-relevant netdevices when a
        front panel port is enslaved (in which case all uppers are newly
        relevant), or, respectively, deslaved (in which case the newly-relevant
        netdevice is the one being deslaved).
      
      - Up until this point, the introduced scaffolding was not really used,
        because mlxsw still forbids enslavement of mlxsw netdevices to uppers
        with uppers. In patch #17, this condition is finally relaxed.
      
      A sizable selftest suite is available to test all this new code. That will
      be sent in a separate patchset.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c6514f36
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: Permit enslavement to netdevices with uppers · 2c5ffe8d
      Petr Machata authored
      Enslaving of front panel ports (and their uppers) to netdevices that
      already have uppers is currently forbidden. In the previous patches, a
      number of replays have been added. Those ensure that various bits of state,
      such as next hops or switchdev objects, are offloaded when they become
      relevant due to a mlxsw lower being introduced into the topology.
      
      However the act of actually, for example, enslaving a front-panel port to
      a bridge with uppers, has been vetoed so far. In this patch, remove the
      vetoes and permit the operation.
      
      mlxsw currently validates creation of "interesting" uppers. Thus creating
      VLAN netdevices on top of 802.1ad bridges is forbidden if the bridge has an
      mlxsw lower, but permitted in general. This validation code never gets run
      when a port is introduced as a lower of an existing netdevice structure.
      
      Thus when enslaving an mlxsw netdevice to netdevices with uppers, invoke
      the PRECHANGEUPPER event handler for each netdevice above the one that the
      front panel port is being enslaved to. This way the tower of netdevices
      above the attachment point is validated.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2c5ffe8d
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Replay IP NETDEV_UP on device deslavement · 4560cf40
      Petr Machata authored
      When a netdevice is removed from a bridge or a LAG, and it has an IP
      address, it should join the router and gain a RIF. Do that by replaying
      address addition event on the netdevice.
      
      When handling deslavement of LAG or its upper from a bridge device, the
      replay should be done after all the lowers of the LAG have left the bridge.
      Thus these scenarios are handled by passing replay_deslavement of false,
      and by invoking, after the lowers have been processed, a new helper,
      mlxsw_sp_netdevice_post_lag_event(), which does the per-LAG / -upper
      handling, and in particular invokes the replay.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4560cf40
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Replay IP NETDEV_UP on device enslavement · 31618b22
      Petr Machata authored
      Enslaving of front panel ports (and their uppers) to netdevices that
      already have uppers is currently forbidden. When this is permitted, any
      uppers with IP addresses need to have the NETDEV_UP inetaddr event
      replayed, so that any RIFs are created.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      31618b22
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Replay neighbours when RIF is made · 8fdb09a7
      Petr Machata authored
      As neighbours are created, mlxsw is involved through the netevent
      notifications. When at the time there is no RIF for a given neighbour, the
      notification is not acted upon. When the RIF is later created, these
      outstanding neighbours are left unoffloaded and cause traffic to go through
      the SW datapath.
      
      In order to fix this issue, as a RIF is created, walk the ARP and ND tables
      and find neighbours for the netdevice that represents the RIF. Then
      schedule neighbour work for them, allowing them to be offloaded.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8fdb09a7
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Replay MACVLANs when RIF is made · 49c3a615
      Petr Machata authored
      If IP address is added to a MACVLAN netdevice, the effect is of configuring
      VRRP on the RIF for the netdevice linked to the MACVLAN. Because the
      MACVLAN offload is tied to existence of a RIF at the linked netdevice,
      adding a MACVLAN is currently not allowed until a RIF is present.
      
      If this requirement stays, it will never be possible to attach a first port
      into a topology that involves a MACVLAN. Thus topologies would need to be
      built in a certain order, which is impractical.
      
      Additionally, IP address removal, which leads to disappearance of the RIF
      that the MACVLAN depends on, cannot be vetoed. Thus even as things stand
      now it is possible to get to a state where a MACVLAN netdevice exists
      without a RIF, despite having mlxsw lowers. And once the MACVLAN is
      un-offloaded due to RIF getting destroyed, recreating the RIF does not
      bring it back.
      
      In this patch, accept that MACVLAN can be created out of order and support
      that use case.
      
      One option would seem to be to simply recognize MACVLAN netdevices as
      "interesting", and let the existing replay mechanisms take care of the
      offload. However, that does not address the necessity to reoffload MACVLAN
      once a RIF is created.
      
      Thus add a new replay hook, symmetrical to mlxsw_sp_rif_macvlan_flush(),
      called mlxsw_sp_rif_macvlan_replay(), which instead of unwinding the
      existing offloads, applies the configuration as if the netdevice were
      created just now.
      
      Additionally, remove all vetoes and warning messages that checked for
      presence of a RIF at the linked device.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      49c3a615
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Offload ethernet nexthops when RIF is made · cfc01a92
      Petr Machata authored
      As RIF is created, refresh each netxhop group tracked at the CRIF for which
      the RIF was created.
      
      Note that nothing needs to be done for IPIP nexthops. The RIF for these is
      either available from the get-go, or will never be available, so no after
      the fact offloading needs to be done.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cfc01a92
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Join RIFs of LAG upper VLANs · ef59713c
      Petr Machata authored
      In the following patches, the requirement that ports be only enslaved to
      masters without uppers, is going to be relaxed. It will therefore be
      necessary to join not only RIF for the immediate LAG, as is currently the
      case, but also RIFs for VLAN netdevices upper to the LAG.
      
      In this patch, extend mlxsw_sp_netdevice_router_join_lag() to walk the
      uppers of a LAG being joined, and also join any VLAN ones.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ef59713c
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Replay switchdev objects on port join · ec4643ca
      Petr Machata authored
      Currently it never happens that a netdevice that is already a bridge slave
      would suddenly become mlxsw upper. The only case where this might be
      possible as far as mlxsw is concerned, is with LAG netdevices. But if a LAG
      has any upper (e.g. is enslaved), enlaving mlxsw port to that LAG is
      forbidden. Thus the only way to install a LAG between a bridge and a mlxsw
      port is by first enslaving the port to the LAG, and then enslaving that LAG
      to a bridge. At that point there are no bridge objects (such as port VLANs)
      to replay. Those are added afterwards, and notified as they are created.
      This holds even for the PVID.
      
      However in the following patches, the requirement that ports be only
      enslaved to masters without uppers, is going to be relaxed. It will
      therefore be necessary to replay the existing bridge objects. Without this
      replay, e.g. the mlxsw bridge_port_vlan objects are not instantiated, which
      causes issues later, as a lot of code relies on their presence.
      
      To that end, add a new notifier block whose sole role is to filter out
      events related to the one relevant upper, and forward those to the existing
      switchdev notifier block. Pass the new notifier block to
      switchdev_bridge_port_offload() when the bridge port is created.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ec4643ca
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: On port enslavement to a LAG, join upper's bridges · 987c7782
      Petr Machata authored
      Currently it never happens that a netdevice that is already a bridge slave
      would suddenly become mlxsw upper. The only case where this might be
      possible as far as mlxsw is concerned, is with LAG netdevices. But if a LAG
      already has an upper, enslaving mlxsw port to that LAG is forbidden. Thus
      the only way to install a LAG between a bridge and a mlxsw port is by first
      enslaving the port to the LAG, and then enslaving that LAG to a bridge.
      
      However in the following patches, the requirement that ports be only
      enslaved to masters without uppers, is going to be relaxed. It will
      therefore be necessary to join bridges of LAG uppers. Without this replay,
      the mlxsw bridge_port objects are not instantiated, which causes issues
      later, as a lot of code relies on their presence.
      
      Therefore in this patch, when the first mlxsw physical netdevice is
      enslaved to a LAG, consider bridges upper to the LAG (both the direct
      master, if any, and any bridge masters of VLAN uppers), and have the
      relevant netdevices join their bridges.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      987c7782
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: Add a replay_deslavement argument to event handlers · 1c47e65b
      Petr Machata authored
      When handling deslavement of LAG or its upper from a bridge device, when
      the deslaved netdevice has an IP address, it should join the router. This
      should be done after all the lowers of the LAG have left the bridge. The
      replay intended to cause the device to join the router therefore cannot be
      invoked unconditionally in the event handlers themselves. It can be done
      right away if the handler is invoked for a sole device, but when it is
      invoked repeated for each LAG lower, the replay needs to be postponed
      until after this processing is done.
      
      To that end, add a boolean parameter, replay_deslavement, to
      mlxsw_sp_netdevice_port_upper_event(), mlxsw_sp_netdevice_port_vlan_event()
      and one helper on the call path. Have the invocations that are done for
      sole netdevices pass true, and those done for LAG lowers pass false.
      
      Nothing depends on this flag at this point, but it removes some noise from
      the patch that introduces the replay itself.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1c47e65b
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: Allow event handlers to check unowned bridges · 40b7b423
      Petr Machata authored
      Currently the bridge-related handlers bail out when the event is related to
      a netdevice that is not an upper of one of the front-panel ports. In order
      to allow enslavement of front-panel ports to bridges that already have
      uppers, it will be necessary to replay CHANGEUPPER events to validate that
      the configuration is offloadable. In order for the replay to be effective,
      it must be possible to ignore unsupported configuration in the context of
      an actual notifier event, but to still "veto" these configurations when the
      validation is performed.
      
      To that end, introduce two parameters to a number of handlers: mlxsw_sp,
      because it will not be possible to deduce that from the netdevice lowers;
      and process_foreign to indicate whether netdevices that are not front panel
      uppers should be validated.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      40b7b423
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum: Split a helper out of mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event() · 721717fa
      Petr Machata authored
      Move the meat of mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event() to a separate function that
      does just the validation. This separate helper will be possible to call
      later for recursive ascent when validating attachment of a front panel port
      to a bridge with uppers.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      721717fa
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Extract a helper to schedule neighbour work · 96c3e45c
      Petr Machata authored
      This will come in handy for neighbour replay.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      96c3e45c
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Allow address handlers to run on bridge ports · 6bbc9ca6
      Petr Machata authored
      Currently the IP address event handlers bail out when the event is related
      to a netdevice that is a bridge port or a member of a LAG. In order to
      create a RIF when a bridged or LAG'd port is unenslaved, these event
      handlers will be replayed. However, at the point in time when the
      NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is delivered, informing of the loss of
      enslavement, the port is still formally enslaved.
      
      In order for the operation to have any effect, these handlers need an extra
      parameter to indicate that the check for bridge or LAG membership should
      not be done. In this patch, add an argument "nomaster" to several event
      handlers.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6bbc9ca6
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      selftests: mlxsw: rtnetlink: Drop obsolete tests · d7eb1f17
      Petr Machata authored
      Support for enslaving ports to LAGs with uppers will be added in the
      following patches. Selftests to make sure it actually does the right thing
      are ready and will be sent as a follow-up.
      
      Similarly, ordering of MACVLAN creation and RIF creation will be relaxed
      and it will be permitted to create a MACVLAN first.
      
      Thus these two tests are obsolete. Drop them.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d7eb1f17
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      net: switchdev: Add a helper to replay objects on a bridge port · f2e2857b
      Petr Machata authored
      When a front panel joins a bridge via another netdevice (typically a LAG),
      the driver needs to learn about the objects configured on the bridge port.
      When the bridge port is offloaded by the driver for the first time, this
      can be achieved by passing a notifier to switchdev_bridge_port_offload().
      The notifier is then invoked for the individual objects (such as VLANs)
      configured on the bridge, and can look for the interesting ones.
      
      Calling switchdev_bridge_port_offload() when the second port joins the
      bridge lower is unnecessary, but the replay is still needed. To that end,
      add a new function, switchdev_bridge_port_replay(), which does only the
      replay part of the _offload() function in exactly the same way as that
      function.
      
      Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
      Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
      Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
      Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f2e2857b
    • Petr Machata's avatar
      net: bridge: br_switchdev: Tolerate -EOPNOTSUPP when replaying MDB · 989280d6
      Petr Machata authored
      There are two kinds of MDB entries to be replayed: port MDB entries, and
      host MDB entries. They are both replayed by br_switchdev_mdb_replay(). If
      the driver supports one kind, but lacks the other, the first -EOPNOTSUPP
      returned terminates the whole replay, including any further still-supported
      objects in the list.
      
      For this to cause issues, there must be MDB entries for both the host and
      the port being replayed. In that case, if the driver bails out from
      handling the host entry, the port entries are never replayed. However, the
      replay is currently only done when a switchdev port joins a bridge. There
      would be no port memberships at that point. Thus despite being erroneous,
      the code does not cause observable bugs.
      
      This is not an issue with other object kinds either, because there, each
      function replays one object kind. If a driver does not support that kind,
      it makes sense to bail out early. -EOPNOTSUPP is then ignored in
      nbp_switchdev_sync_objs().
      
      For MDB, suppress the -EOPNOTSUPP error code in br_switchdev_mdb_replay()
      already, so that the whole list gets replayed.
      
      The reason we need this patch is that a future patch will introduce a
      replay that should be used when a front-panel port netdevice is enslaved to
      a bridge lower, in particular a LAG. The LAG netdevice can already have
      both host and port MDB entries. The port entries need to be replayed so
      that they are offloaded on the port that joins the LAG.
      
      Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
      Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
      Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
      Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      989280d6
    • Lorenzo Bianconi's avatar
      net: ethernet: mtk_ppe: add MTK_FOE_ENTRY_V{1,2}_SIZE macros · a5dc694e
      Lorenzo Bianconi authored
      Introduce MTK_FOE_ENTRY_V{1,2}_SIZE macros in order to make more
      explicit foe_entry size for different chipset revisions.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarSimon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a5dc694e
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      Merge branch 'nexthop-refactor-and-fix-nexthop-selection-for-multipath-routes' · bf837e8f
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      Benjamin Poirier says:
      
      ====================
      nexthop: Refactor and fix nexthop selection for multipath routes
      
      In order to select a nexthop for multipath routes, fib_select_multipath()
      is used with legacy nexthops and nexthop_select_path_hthr() is used with
      nexthop objects. Those two functions perform a validity test on the
      neighbor related to each nexthop but their logic is structured differently.
      This causes a divergence in behavior and nexthop_select_path_hthr() may
      return a nexthop that failed the neighbor validity test even if there was
      one that passed.
      
      Refactor nexthop_select_path_hthr() to make it more similar to
      fib_select_multipath() and fix the problem mentioned above.
      
      v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230529201914.69828-1-bpoirier@nvidia.com/
      ====================
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719-nh_select-v2-0-04383e89f868@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      bf837e8f
    • Benjamin Poirier's avatar
      selftests: net: Add test cases for nexthop groups with invalid neighbors · c7e95bbd
      Benjamin Poirier authored
      Add test cases for hash threshold (multipath) nexthop groups with invalid
      neighbors. Check that a nexthop with invalid neighbor is not selected when
      there is another nexthop with a valid neighbor. Check that there is no
      crash when there is no nexthop with a valid neighbor.
      
      The first test fails before the previous commit in this series.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719-nh_select-v2-4-04383e89f868@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      c7e95bbd
    • Benjamin Poirier's avatar
      nexthop: Do not return invalid nexthop object during multipath selection · 75f5f04c
      Benjamin Poirier authored
      With legacy nexthops, when net.ipv4.fib_multipath_use_neigh is set,
      fib_select_multipath() will never set res->nhc to a nexthop that is not
      good (as per fib_good_nh()). OTOH, with nexthop objects,
      nexthop_select_path_hthr() may return a nexthop that failed the
      nexthop_is_good_nh() test even if there was one that passed. Refactor
      nexthop_select_path_hthr() to follow a selection logic more similar to
      fib_select_multipath().
      
      The issue can be demonstrated with the following sequence of commands. The
      first block shows that things work as expected with legacy nexthops. The
      last sequence of `ip rou get` in the second block shows the problem case -
      some routes still use the .2 nexthop.
      
      sysctl net.ipv4.fib_multipath_use_neigh=1
      ip link add dummy1 up type dummy
      ip rou add 198.51.100.0/24 nexthop via 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1 onlink nexthop via 192.0.2.2 dev dummy1 onlink
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip neigh add 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1 nud failed
      echo ".1 failed:"  # results should not use .1
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip neigh del 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1
      ip neigh add 192.0.2.2 dev dummy1 nud failed
      echo ".2 failed:"  # results should not use .2
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip link del dummy1
      
      ip link add dummy1 up type dummy
      ip nexthop add id 1 via 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1 onlink
      ip nexthop add id 2 via 192.0.2.2 dev dummy1 onlink
      ip nexthop add id 1001 group 1/2
      ip rou add 198.51.100.0/24 nhid 1001
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip neigh add 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1 nud failed
      echo ".1 failed:"  # results should not use .1
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip neigh del 192.0.2.1 dev dummy1
      ip neigh add 192.0.2.2 dev dummy1 nud failed
      echo ".2 failed:"  # results should not use .2
      for i in {10..19}; do ip -o rou get 198.51.100.$i; done
      ip link del dummy1
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719-nh_select-v2-3-04383e89f868@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      75f5f04c
    • Benjamin Poirier's avatar
      nexthop: Factor out neighbor validity check · 4bb5239b
      Benjamin Poirier authored
      For legacy nexthops, there is fib_good_nh() to check the neighbor validity.
      In order to make the nexthop object code more similar to the legacy nexthop
      code, factor out the nexthop object neighbor validity check into its own
      function.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719-nh_select-v2-2-04383e89f868@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      4bb5239b
    • Benjamin Poirier's avatar
      nexthop: Factor out hash threshold fdb nexthop selection · eedd47a6
      Benjamin Poirier authored
      The loop in nexthop_select_path_hthr() includes code to check for neighbor
      validity. Since this does not apply to fdb nexthops, simplify the loop by
      moving the fdb nexthop selection to its own function.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719-nh_select-v2-1-04383e89f868@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      eedd47a6
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      Merge branch 'eth-bnxt-handle-invalid-tx-completions-more-gracefully' · 022add1d
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      Jakub Kicinski says:
      
      ====================
      eth: bnxt: handle invalid Tx completions more gracefully
      
      bnxt trusts the events generated by the device which may lead to kernel
      crashes. These are extremely rare but they do happen. For a while
      I thought crashing may be intentional, because device reporting invalid
      completions should never happen, and having a core dump could be useful
      if it does. But in practice I haven't found any clues in the core dumps,
      and panic_on_warn exists.
      
      Series was tested by forcing the recovery path manually. Because of
      how rare the real crashes are I can't confirm it works for the actual
      device errors until it's been widely deployed.
      
      v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230710205611.1198878-1-kuba@kernel.org/
      ====================
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720010440.1967136-1-kuba@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      022add1d
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      eth: bnxt: handle invalid Tx completions more gracefully · 2b56b3d9
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      Invalid Tx completions should never happen (tm) but when they do
      they crash the host, because driver blindly trusts that there is
      a valid skb pointer on the ring.
      
      The completions I've seen appear to be some form of FW / HW
      miscalculation or staleness, they have typical (small) values
      (<100), but they are most often higher than number of queued
      descriptors. They usually happen after boot.
      
      Instead of crashing, print a warning and schedule a reset.
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720010440.1967136-4-kuba@kernel.orgReviewed-by: default avatarMichael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      2b56b3d9
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      eth: bnxt: take the bit to set as argument of bnxt_queue_sp_work() · 9b1a00fd
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      Most callers of bnxt_queue_sp_work() set a bit to indicate what work
      to perform right before calling it. Pass it to the function instead.
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720010440.1967136-3-kuba@kernel.orgReviewed-by: default avatarMichael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      9b1a00fd
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      eth: bnxt: move and rename reset helpers · fea2993a
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      Move the reset helpers, subsequent patches will need some
      of them on the Tx path.
      
      While at it rename bnxt_sched_reset(), on more recent chips
      it schedules a queue reset, instead of a fuller reset.
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720010440.1967136-2-kuba@kernel.orgReviewed-by: default avatarMichael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      fea2993a
  2. 20 Jul, 2023 11 commits