- 19 Jan, 2022 36 commits
-
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
KVM_CAP_XSAVE2 is out of sync due to a conflict. Copy the whole file while at it. Reported-by:
Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
amx_test's binary should be present in the .gitignore file for the git to ignore it. Fixes: bf70636d ("selftest: kvm: Add amx selftest") Signed-off-by:
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> Message-Id: <20220118122053.1941915-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Nullify svm_x86_ops.vcpu_(un)blocking if AVIC/APICv is disabled as the hooks are necessary only to clear the vCPU's IsRunning entry in the Physical APIC and to update IRTE entries if the VM has a pass-through device attached. Opportunistically rename the helpers to clarify their AVIC relationship. Signed-off-by:
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20211208015236.1616697-24-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Move svm_hardware_setup() below svm_x86_ops so that KVM can modify ops during setup, e.g. the vcpu_(un)blocking hooks can be nullified if AVIC is disabled or unsupported. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Drop avic_set_running() in favor of calling avic_vcpu_{load,put}() directly, and modify the block+put path to use preempt_disable/enable() instead of get/put_cpu(), as it doesn't actually care about the current pCPU associated with the vCPU. Opportunistically add lockdep assertions as being preempted in avic_vcpu_put() would lead to consuming stale data, even though doing so _in the current code base_ would not be fatal. Add a much needed comment explaining why svm_vcpu_blocking() needs to unload the AVIC and update the IRTE _before_ the vCPU starts blocking. Signed-off-by: -
Sean Christopherson authored
When waking vCPUs in the posted interrupt wakeup handling, do exactly that and no more. There is no need to kick the vCPU as the wakeup handler just needs to get the vCPU task running, and if it's in the guest then it's definitely running. Signed-off-by:
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20211208015236.1616697-21-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Move the fallback "wake_up" path into the helper to trigger posted interrupt helper now that the nested and non-nested paths are identical. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Refactor the posted interrupt helper to take the desired notification vector instead of a bool so that the callers are self-documenting. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Replace the full "kick" with just the "wake" in the fallback path when triggering a virtual interrupt via a posted interrupt fails because the guest is not IN_GUEST_MODE. If the guest transitions into guest mode between the check and the kick, then it's guaranteed to see the pending interrupt as KVM syncs the PIR to IRR (and onto GUEST_RVI) after setting IN_GUEST_MODE. Kicking the guest in this case is nothing more than an unnecessary VM-Exit (and host IRQ). Opportunistically update comments to explain the various ordering rules and barriers at play. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Don't bother updating the Physical APIC table or IRTE when loading a vCPU that is blocking, i.e. won't be marked IsRun{ning}=1, as the pCPU is queried if and only if IsRunning is '1'. If the vCPU was migrated, the new pCPU will be picked up when avic_vcpu_load() is called by svm_vcpu_unblocking(). Signed-off-by: -
Sean Christopherson authored
Use kvm_vcpu_is_blocking() to determine whether or not the vCPU should be marked running during avic_vcpu_load(). Drop avic_is_running, which really should have been named "vcpu_is_not_blocking", as it tracked if the vCPU was blocking, not if it was actually running, e.g. it was set during svm_create_vcpu() when the vCPU was obviously not running. This is technically a teeny tiny functional change, as the vCPU will be marked IsRunning=1 on being reloaded if the vCPU is preempted between svm_vcpu_blocking() and prepare_to_rcuwait(). But that's a benign change as the vCPU will be marked IsRunning=0 when KVM voluntarily schedules out the vCPU. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Remove handling of KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE from svm_vcpu_unblocking(), it's no longer needed as it was made obsolete by commit df7e4827 ("KVM: SVM: call avic_vcpu_load/avic_vcpu_put when enabling/disabling AVIC"). Prior to that commit, the manual check was necessary to ensure the AVIC stuff was updated by avic_set_running() when a request to enable APICv became pending while the vCPU was blocking, as the request handling itself would not do the update. But, as evidenced by the commit, that logic was flawed and subject to various races. Now that svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl() does avic_vcpu_load/put() in response to an APICv status change, drop the manual check in the unblocking path. Suggested-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Drop the avic_vcpu_is_running() check when waking vCPUs in response to a VM-Exit due to incomplete IPI delivery. The check isn't wrong per se, but it's not 100% accurate in the sense that it doesn't guarantee that the vCPU was one of the vCPUs that didn't receive the IPI. The check isn't required for correctness as blocking == !running in this context. From a performance perspective, waking a live task is not expensive as the only moderately costly operation is a locked operation to temporarily disable preemption. And if that is indeed a performance issue, kvm_vcpu_is_blocking() would be a better check than poking into the AVIC. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Signal the AVIC doorbell iff the vCPU is running in the guest. If the vCPU is not IN_GUEST_MODE, it's guaranteed to pick up any pending IRQs on the next VMRUN, which unconditionally processes the vIRR. Add comments to document the logic. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Drop kvm_x86_ops' pre/post_block() now that all implementations are nops. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Unexport switch_to_{hv,sw}_timer() now that common x86 handles the transitions. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: -
Sean Christopherson authored
Handle the switch to/from the hypervisor/software timer when a vCPU is blocking in common x86 instead of in VMX. Even though VMX is the only user of a hypervisor timer, the logic and all functions involved are generic x86 (unless future CPUs do something completely different and implement a hypervisor timer that runs regardless of mode). Handling the switch in common x86 will allow for the elimination of the pre/post_blocks hooks, and also lets KVM switch back to the hypervisor timer if and only if it was in use (without additional params). Add a comment explaining why the switch cannot be deferred to kvm_sched_out() or kvm_vcpu_block(). Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Move the seemingly generic block_vcpu_list from kvm_vcpu to vcpu_vmx, and rename the list and all associated variables to clarify that it tracks the set of vCPU that need to be poked on a posted interrupt to the wakeup vector. The list is not used to track _all_ vCPUs that are blocking, and the term "blocked" can be misleading as it may refer to a blocking condition in the host or the guest, where as the PI wakeup case is specifically for the vCPUs that are actively blocking from within the guest. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Remove kvm_vcpu.pre_pcpu as it no longer has any users. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Move the posted interrupt pre/post_block logic into vcpu_put/load respectively, using the kvm_vcpu_is_blocking() to determining whether or not the wakeup handler needs to be set (and unset). This avoids updating the PI descriptor if halt-polling is successful, reduces the number of touchpoints for updating the descriptor, and eliminates the confusing behavior of intentionally leaving a "stale" PI.NDST when a blocking vCPU is scheduled back in after preemption. The downside is that KVM will do the PID update twice if the vCPU is preempted after prepare_to_rcuwait() but before schedule(), but that's a rare case (and non-existent on !PREEMPT kernels). The notable wart is the need to send a self-IPI on the wakeup vector if an outstanding notification is pending after configuring the wakeup vector. Ideally, KVM would just do a kvm_vcpu_wake_up() in this case, but the scheduler doesn't support waking a task from its preemption notifier callback, i.e. while the task is right in the middle of being scheduled out. Note, setting the wakeup vector before halt-polling is not necessary: once the pending IRQ will be recorded in the PIR, kvm_vcpu_has_events() will detect this (via kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(), kvm_apic_get_interrupt(), apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr() and finally vmx_sync_pir_to_irr()) and terminate the polling. Signed-off-by:
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Bring in fix for VT-d posted interrupts before further changing the code in 5.17. Signed-off-by: -
Christian Borntraeger authored
Avoid warnings on s390 like [ 1801.980931] CPU: 12 PID: 117600 Comm: kworker/12:0 Tainted: G E 5.17.0-20220113.rc0.git0.32ce2abb03cf.300.fc35.s390x+next #1 [ 1801.980938] Workqueue: events irqfd_inject [kvm] [...] [ 1801.981057] Call Trace: [ 1801.981060] [<000003ff805f0f5c>] mark_page_dirty_in_slot+0xa4/0xb0 [kvm] [ 1801.981083] [<000003ff8060e9fe>] adapter_indicators_set+0xde/0x268 [kvm] [ 1801.981104] [<000003ff80613c24>] set_adapter_int+0x64/0xd8 [kvm] [ 1801.981124] [<000003ff805fb9aa>] kvm_set_irq+0xc2/0x130 [kvm] [ 1801.981144] [<000003ff805f8d86>] irqfd_inject+0x76/0xa0 [kvm] [ 1801.981164] [<0000000175e56906>] process_one_work+0x1fe/0x470 [ 1801.981173] [<0000000175e570a4>] worker_thread+0x64/0x498 [ 1801.981176] [<0000000175e5ef2c>] kthread+0x10c/0x110 [ 1801.981180] [<0000000175de73c8>] __ret_from_fork+0x40/0x58 [ 1801.981185] [<000000017698440a>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 when writing to a guest from an irqfd worker as long as we do not have the dirty ring. Signed-off-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> Reluctantly-acked-by:
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Message-Id: <20220113122924.740496-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 2efd61a6 ("KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU") Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Add a VMX specific test to verify that KVM doesn't explode if userspace attempts KVM_RUN when emulation is required with a pending exception. KVM VMX's emulation support for !unrestricted_guest punts exceptions to userspace instead of attempting to synthesize the exception with all the correct state (and stack switching, etc...). Punting is acceptable as there's never been a request to support injecting exceptions when emulating due to invalid state, but KVM has historically assumed that userspace will do the right thing and either clear the exception or kill the guest. Deliberately do the opposite and attempt to re-enter the guest with a pending exception and emulation required to verify KVM continues to punt the combination to userspace, e.g. doesn't explode, WARN, etc... Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Reject KVM_RUN if emulation is required (because VMX is running without unrestricted guest) and an exception is pending, as KVM doesn't support emulating exceptions except when emulating real mode via vm86. The vCPU is hosed either way, but letting KVM_RUN proceed triggers a WARN due to the impossible condition. Alternatively, the WARN could be removed, but then userspace and/or KVM bugs would result in the vCPU silently running in a bad state, which isn't very friendly to users. Originally, the bug was hit by syzkaller with a nested guest as that doesn't require kvm_intel.unrestricted_guest=0. That particular flavor is likely fixed by commit cd0e615c ("KVM: nVMX: Synthesize TRIPLE_FAULT for L2 if emulation is required"), but it's trivial to trigger the WARN with a non-nested guest, and userspace can likely force bad state via ioctls() for a nested guest as well. Checking for the impossible condition needs to be deferred until KVM_RUN because KVM can't force specific ordering between ioctls. E.g. clearing exception.pending in KVM_SET_SREGS doesn't prevent userspace from setting it in KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, and disallowing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS with emulation_required would prevent userspace from queuing an exception and then stuffing sregs. Note, if KVM were to try and detect/prevent the condition prior to KVM_RUN, handle_invalid_guest_state() and/or handle_emulation_failure() would need to be modified to clear the pending exception prior to exiting to userspace. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 137812 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:1623 vmx_queue_exception+0x14f/0x160 [kvm_intel] CPU: 6 PID: 137812 Comm: vmx_invalid_nes Not tainted 5.15.2-7cc36c3e14ae-pop #279 Hardware name: ASUS Q87M-E/Q87M-E, BIOS 1102 03/03/2014 RIP: 0010:vmx_queue_exception+0x14f/0x160 [kvm_intel] Code: <0f> 0b e9 fd fe ff ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa45c83577d38 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: 0000000080000006 RCX: 0000000000000006 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000010002 RDI: ffff9916af734000 RBP: ffff9916af734000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000006 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9916af734038 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f1e1a47c740(0000) GS:ffff99188fb80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1e1a6a8008 CR3: 000000026f83b005 CR4: 00000000001726e0 Call Trace: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x13a2/0x1f20 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x279/0x690 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reported-by: syzbot+82112403ace4cbd780d8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
Verify that the PMU event filter works as expected. Note that the virtual PMU doesn't work as expected on AMD Zen CPUs (an intercepted rdmsr is counted as a retired branch instruction), but the PMU event filter does work. Signed-off-by:
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
Extract the x86 model number from CPUID.01H:EAX. Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
Move this static inline function to processor.h, so that it can be used in individual tests, as needed. Opportunistically replace the bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int.' Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
Replace the one ad hoc "AuthenticAMD" CPUID vendor string comparison with a new function, is_amd_cpu(). Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
Refactor is_intel_cpu() to make it easier to reuse the bulk of the code for other vendors in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Mattson authored
The PMU event filter may contain up to 300 events. Replace the linear search in reprogram_gp_counter() with a binary search. Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Wang authored
vm_xsave_req_perm() is currently defined and used by x86_64 only. Make it compiled into vm_create_with_vcpus() only when on x86_64 machines. Otherwise, it would cause linkage errors, e.g. on s390x. Fixes: 415a3c33 ("kvm: selftests: Add support for KVM_CAP_XSAVE2") Reported-by:
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> Tested-by:
-
Like Xu authored
According to Intel extended feature disable (XFD) spec, the sub-function i (i > 1) of CPUID function 0DH enumerates "details for state component i. ECX[2] enumerates support for XFD support for this state component." If KVM does not report F(XFD) feature (e.g. due to CONFIG_X86_64), then the corresponding XFD support for any state component i should also be removed. Translate this dependency into KVM terms. Fixes: 690a757d ("kvm: x86: Add CPUID support for Intel AMX") Signed-off-by:
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Message-Id: <20220117074531.76925-1-likexu@tencent.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Matlack authored
Rewrite the comment in kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access() that explains why it is safe to flush TLBs outside of the MMU lock after write-protecting SPTEs for dirty logging. The current comment is a long run-on sentence that was difficult to understand. In addition it was specific to the shadow MMU (mentioning mmu_spte_update()) when the TDP MMU has to handle this as well. The new comment explains: - Why the TLB flush is necessary at all. - Why it is desirable to do the TLB flush outside of the MMU lock. - Why it is safe to do the TLB flush outside of the MMU lock. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Message-Id: <20220113233020.3986005-5-dmatlack@google.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Matlack authored
SPTEs are tagged with software-only bits to indicate if it is "MMU-writable" and "Host-writable". These bits are used to determine why KVM has marked an SPTE as read-only. Document these bits and their invariants, and enforce the invariants with new WARNs in spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() to ensure they are not accidentally violated in the future. Opportunistically move DEFAULT_SPTE_{MMU,HOST}_WRITABLE next to EPT_SPTE_{MMU,HOST}_WRITABLE since the new documentation applies to both. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: -
David Matlack authored
When handling the changed_pte notifier and the new PTE is read-only, clear both the Host-writable and MMU-writable bits in the SPTE. This preserves the invariant that MMU-writable is set if-and-only-if Host-writable is set. No functional change intended. Nothing currently relies on the aforementioned invariant and technically the changed_pte notifier is dead code. Signed-off-by:
-
David Matlack authored
When the TDP MMU is write-protection GFNs for page table protection (as opposed to for dirty logging, or due to the HVA not being writable), it checks if the SPTE is already write-protected and if so skips modifying the SPTE and the TLB flush. This behavior is incorrect because it fails to check if the SPTE is write-protected for page table protection, i.e. fails to check that MMU-writable is '0'. If the SPTE was write-protected for dirty logging but not page table protection, the SPTE could locklessly be made writable, and vCPUs could still be running with writable mappings cached in their TLB. Fix this by only skipping setting the SPTE if the SPTE is already write-protected *and* MMU-writable is already clear. Technically, checking only MMU-writable would suffice; a SPTE cannot be writable without MMU-writable being set. But check both to be paranoid and because it arguably yields more readable code. Fixes: 46044f72 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support write protection for nesting in tdp MMU") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 18 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Marcelo Tosatti authored
blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock is taken from hard interrupt context (pi_wakeup_handler), therefore it cannot sleep. Switch it to a raw spinlock. Fixes: [41297.066254] BUG: scheduling while atomic: CPU 0/KVM/635218/0x00010001 [41297.066323] Preemption disabled at: [41297.066324] [<ffffffff902ee47f>] irq_enter_rcu+0xf/0x60 [41297.066339] Call Trace: [41297.066342] <IRQ> [41297.066346] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 [41297.066353] ? irq_enter_rcu+0xf/0x60 [41297.066356] __schedule_bug.cold+0x7d/0x8b [41297.066361] __schedule+0x439/0x5b0 [41297.066365] ? task_blocks_on_rt_mutex.constprop.0.isra.0+0x1b0/0x440 [41297.066369] schedule_rtlock+0x1e/0x40 [41297.066371] rtlock_slowlock_locked+0xf1/0x260 [41297.066374] rt_spin_lock+0x3b/0x60 [41297.066378] pi_wakeup_handler+0x31/0x90 [kvm_intel] [41297.066388] sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi+0x9d/0xd0 [41297.066392] </IRQ> [41297.066392] asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi+0x12/0x20 ... Signed-off-by:
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 17 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Like Xu authored
The new module parameter to control PMU virtualization should apply to Intel as well as AMD, for situations where userspace is not trusted. If the module parameter allows PMU virtualization, there could be a new KVM_CAP or guest CPUID bits whereby userspace can enable/disable PMU virtualization on a per-VM basis. If the module parameter does not allow PMU virtualization, there should be no userspace override, since we have no precedent for authorizing that kind of override. If it's false, other counter-based profiling features (such as LBR including the associated CPUID bits if any) will not be exposed. Change its name from "pmu" to "enable_pmu" as we have temporary variables with the same name in our code like "struct kvm_pmu *pmu". Fixes: b1d66dad ("KVM: x86/svm: Add module param to control PMU virtualization") Suggested-by : Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
KVM forbids KVM_SET_CPUID2 after KVM_RUN was performed on a vCPU unless the supplied CPUID data is equal to what was previously set. Test this. Signed-off-by:
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220117150542.2176196-5-vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
In preparation to reusing the existing 'get_cpuid_test' for testing "KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN" rename it to 'cpuid_test' to avoid the confusion. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by:
-
